Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483248

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D (VD) deficiency is common among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and often associated with severity. However, randomized trials of VD supplementation in AD have had equivocal results, and there is little information regarding the effect of VD supplementation on type 2 immunity in AD patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of VD supplementation to decrease severity of AD and to alter type 2 immunity biomarkers. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We randomly assigned 101 children with AD to weekly oral vitamin D3 (VD3) or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the Severity Scoring of AD (SCORAD). RESULTS: Mean age of subjects was 6.3 ± 4.0 years, and baseline SCORAD was 32 ± 29. At baseline, 57% of children were VD deficient, with no difference between groups. Change in 25(OH)D was significantly greater with VD3 than placebo (+43.4 ± 34.5 nmol/L vs. +2.3 ± 21.2 nmol/L, p < 0.001). SCORAD change at 6 weeks was not different between VD and placebo (-5.3 ± 11.6 vs. -5.5 ± 9.9, p = 0.91). There were no significant between-group differences in change of eosinophil counts, total IgE, Staphylococcal enterotoxin specific IgE, CCL17, CCL22, CCL27, LL-37 or Staphylococcus aureus lesional skin colonization. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene single nucleotide polymorphisms FokI, ApaI and TaqI did not modify subjects' response to VD supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Among children with AD, weekly VD supplementation improved VD status but did not modify AD severity or type 2 immunity biomarkers compared to placebo (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01996423).

2.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 130(2): 225-232, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36191849

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lupin is a protein-rich legume with a growing presence in the food market worldwide. With increased consumption, lupin allergy (LA) reports are also rising. Uncertainties exist on the cross-reactivity between peanut and lupin, the allergenic potential of different lupin species, and sensitization patterns among different populations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the molecular basis of LA and to determine lupin allergens from 3 different species that may be involved in peanut allergy (PA) cross-reactivity. METHODS: A total of 43 subjects with PA, those with LA, or controls without food allergy were evaluated with skin prick tests (SPTs) and specific IgEs (sIgEs). Lupin-sensitized subjects were offered a lupin oral food challenge (OFC). Immunoblots and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed on sera from lupin-sensitized subjects. RESULTS: In this study, 44% of the PA subjects were confirmed to have LA by OFC. Anaphylaxis was the most frequent manifestation after lupin consumption, with a minimal eliciting dosage of 1 g lupin flour. There was no difference in lupin sIgE or SPT wheal size between lupin-sensitized and confirmed LA subjects or in the severity of symptoms among confirmed LA subjects. Sera from lupin-sensitized subjects uniformly reacted to all 3 different lupin species. Immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays revealed immunoglobulin E binding to α- and γ-conglutin in all analyzed sera, whereas α- and ß-conglutin recognition was variable. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal a high prevalence of LA among PA subjects, emphasizing lupin must be labeled as an allergen in foods. Owing to high variability in lupin-sIgE and lupin-SPT results, LA diagnosis may require OFC. In our population, γ-conglutin is the major allergen of lupin.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Lupinus , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/epidemiología , Alérgenos , Prevalencia , Inmunoglobulina E , Lupinus/efectos adversos , Arachis , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos
3.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 40(1): 64-68, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36047809

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Research suggests an association between obesity and AD, although evidence is lacking from Latin American populations. This study evaluated the association of obesity with AD in children from Chile, a country with high obesity prevalence. METHODS: A case-control study was performed in children with active AD (cases) and healthy controls (HCs) from Santiago, Chile. Body mass index was evaluated by z-score (z-BMI), with overweight defined as z-BMI ≥+1 and <+2, and obesity as z-BMI ≥+2. Abdominal obesity was defined by a waist circumference-to-height ratio (WHR) ≥0.5. AD severity was evaluated by Scoring AD (SCORAD) index. RESULTS: A total of 174 children with AD and 101 controls were included. AD patients had similar overweight (27% vs. 28%) and obesity (21% vs. 26%) rates as HCs (p = .65). Abdominal obesity rates were also comparable (64% vs. 62%, p = .81). In sex-specific analyses, girls with AD had higher abdominal obesity rates than HCs (71% vs. 53%, p < .05) while boys with AD had lower abdominal obesity rates than HCs (53% vs. 75%, p = .03). Among children with AD, higher z-BMI or WHR did not correlate with higher SCORAD, eosinophil counts or total IgE. CONCLUSION: In our study, Chilean children with AD had high but similar rates of obesity as HCs, but showed sex-specific associations of abdominal obesity and AD. Further research is needed to evaluate these associations and the roles that weight excess and weight loss could play in the pathogenesis and treatment of AD.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Obesidad Abdominal/complicaciones , Obesidad Abdominal/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e792-e804, 2022 08 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34537835

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The development of effective vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 is a global priority. CoronaVac is an inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine with promising safety and immunogenicity profiles. This article reports safety and immunogenicity results obtained for healthy Chilean adults aged ≥18 years in a phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS: Volunteers randomly received 2 doses of CoronaVac or placebo, separated by 2 weeks. A total of 434 volunteers were enrolled, 397 aged 18-59 years and 37 aged ≥60 years. Solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions were registered from all volunteers. Blood samples were obtained from a subset of volunteers and analyzed for humoral and cellular measures of immunogenicity. RESULTS: The primary adverse reaction in the 434 volunteers was pain at the injection site, with a higher incidence in the vaccine than in the placebo arm. Adverse reactions observed were mostly mild and local. No severe adverse events were reported. The humoral evaluation was performed on 81 volunteers. Seroconversion rates for specific anti-S1-receptor binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) were 82.22% and 84.44% in the 18-59 year age group and 62.69% and 70.37% in the ≥60 year age group, 2 and 4 weeks after the second dose, respectively. A significant increase in circulating neutralizing antibodies was detected 2 and 4 weeks after the second dose. The cellular evaluation was performed on 47 volunteers. We detected a significant induction of T-cell responses characterized by the secretion of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) upon stimulation with Mega Pools of peptides from SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization with CoronaVac in a 0-14 schedule in Chilean adults aged ≥18 years is safe, induces anti-S1-RBD IgG with neutralizing capacity, activates T cells, and promotes the secretion of IFN-γ upon stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 antigens.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas Virales , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Chile , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Inmunoglobulina G , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 814, 2021 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34388972

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection rapidly spreads in populations due to the high rates of community transmission. Interrupting the shedding of SARS-CoV-2 may reduce the incidence of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). Herein we provide a protocol for a cluster randomized trial that will examine the effectiveness of treatment with interferon (IFN) ß-1a compared to standard of care in limiting the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Co-primary objectives are to determine whether IFN therapy reduces (a) the proportion of infected cases shedding SARS-CoV-2 at day 11 post randomization and (b) the incidence of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection from index cases to treatment-eligible household post-exposure contacts at day 11 after randomization. Secondary objectives include assessing the impact of IFN treatment on duration of viral clearance, hospitalizations and fatalities, and evaluating the safety of IFN treatment. METHODS: Three hundred and ten households, each including an index case with a recent COVID-19 diagnosis and at least one asymptomatic treatment-eligible household contact, will be randomized to receive 3 doses of 125 µg IFN ß-1a by subcutaneous administration (days 1, 6, and 11), or standard of care. All participants will be followed until day 29. DISCUSSION: The results from this trial will identify whether IFN ß treatment of mild or moderate COVID-19 cases accelerates viral clearance and prevents disease progression and whether IFN ß treatment of post-exposure contacts of COVID-19 cases reduces transmission of infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04552379; date of registration September 17, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Interferón beta/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/transmisión , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
BMC Pediatr ; 20(1): 164, 2020 04 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32293348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence shows that atopic dermatitis (AD), food allergy (FA), allergic rhinitis, and asthma are largely determined during the first 1000 days (time elapsed from conception to the 2nd birthday). The ARIES birth cohort aims to determine prenatal and perinatal conditions, as well as genetic and epigenetic factors, that participate in the early setting of immune responses, and the role of these in the later determination of the risk of allergic diseases and asthma in the offspring. METHODS: We have designed a birth cohort of 250 families with prenatal recruitment (~ 14 weeks). We will genotype relevant allergy/asthma-associated variants in trios and will perform immunophenotyping and evaluation of allergy biomarkers in cord blood. At 1 and 2 years of age we will assess if infants have developed allergic sensitization, AD, FA, as well as biomarkers of asthma including the asthma predictive index. We will also evaluate how maternal conditions modify immune programming through epigenetic modifications and will then depict newborn epigenetic cues of allergy/asthma risk. Next, we will assess composition/diversity of maternal gut, placenta, breastmilk and infant gut microbiome and their association with immunophenotype and biomarkers at birth, and clinical outcomes at age 1 and 2. Finally, we plan to assess how environmental exposures (perinatal outdoor and indoor pollution, allergens and endotoxin) affect the incidence of allergic sensitization, AD, FA, and risk of asthma. DISCUSSION: The in-depth study of the ARIES birth cohort shall provide crucial information to understand the rising incidence of allergies and asthma in developing countries, and hopefully provide cues on how to prevent and treat these diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04186949, retrospectively registered on December 5, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Asma/etiología , Chile/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/etiología , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/etiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Rinitis Alérgica/etiología
7.
Exp Dermatol ; 28(3): 308-311, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30624829

RESUMEN

Vitamin D (VD) deficiency has been associated with increased incidence and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD), but the mechanisms through which VD may ameliorate AD are unclear. We compared the phenotypic characteristics of circulating myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (mDCs and pDCs, respectively) of children with AD vs healthy controls (HC) and evaluated if VD can modulate the allergic phenotype of circulating DCs in AD patients. Although there was no difference in frequency of circulating DCs between groups, among children with AD there was an inverse correlation between SCORAD and circulating total DCs and mDCs. In AD, serum IgE concentration correlated with FcεRI and surface-bound IgE expression on mDCs and pDCs; pDCs expressing FcεRI and IgE were significantly increased compared to HC. Ex vivo, 1,25(OH)2 D3 significantly decreased FcεRI expression on mDCs and surface-bound IgE on mDCs and pDCs. Oral VD supplementation reduced expression of surface-bound IgE on pDCs in children with AD. In summary, VD decreases the allergic phenotype of circulating DCs in children with AD, a potential mechanism for how VD supplementation may improve AD severity. Future studies are needed to further assess the role of VD supplementation as an immunomodulatory therapy for AD.


Asunto(s)
Células Dendríticas/citología , Dermatitis Atópica/sangre , Dermatitis Atópica/terapia , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/sangre , Vitamina D/farmacología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Masculino , Células Mieloides/citología , Fenotipo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/terapia
8.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 118(9): 2021-2027, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29987354

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of performing a self-regulated cognitive dual task on time to failure and neuromuscular force control during submaximal isometric contractions. METHODS: Fifteen young sedentary males performed isometric contractions at 50% of each individual's maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) under single-task (without cognitive load) and dual-task (with self-regulated mathematical task) conditions. Force signal complexity and biceps brachialis muscle activity were determined at the start, middle, and end of each trial. The slope of the linear regression of median frequency determined the rate of muscle fatigue. Force-task error was established as any amplitude percentage greater or less than 50% MVC. RESULTS: The dual-task condition resulted in a 42 s longer time to failure than the single-task condition. EMG amplitude did not differ between conditions. The rate of muscle fatigue was higher in the single-task (- 0.35%/s) than the dual-task (- 0.2%/s) condition. Force signal complexity was, on average, 22% lower in the dual-task condition. The dual-task condition, as compared to the single-task condition, elicited a higher rate of force-task error below (6.37 versus 4.76%) and over (2.11 versus 1.68%) the force threshold. CONCLUSION: The dual-task condition resulted in a longer time to failure and decreased motor output complexity and fatigue rate when performing a submaximal force task. As the dual task also increased the force-task error, we suggest cognitive dual tasks as a possible strategy for delaying fatigue in sedentary young males when exerting submaximal isometric force, contributing to neuromuscular training when error in force control can be ignored.


Asunto(s)
Cognición/fisiología , Contracción Isométrica/fisiología , Contracción Muscular/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Adulto , Codo/fisiología , Electromiografía/métodos , Fatiga/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Fatiga Muscular/fisiología , Resistencia Física/fisiología , Esfuerzo Físico/fisiología , Torque , Adulto Joven
9.
Rev Chil Pediatr ; 89(5): 630-637, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30571806

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP) is the most frequent presenta tion of non-IgE mediated food allergy (FA). The diagnosis is made by oral food challenge, however, non-invasive diagnostic tests are not available. In Chile, the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is fre quently used to confirm FPIAP, however, there are no studies that support this practice. OBJECTIVE: To establish the diagnostic validity of FOBT in the evaluation of infants with FPIAP. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Case-control study with prospective recruitment of infants with rectal bleeding and suspicion of FPIAP, and controls were healthy infants, in whom the FOBT was conducted. All cases underwent an elimination diet, after which the diagnosis of FPIAP was confirmed by oral food cha llenge. RESULTS: 25 cases and 29 controls were included without significant differences in age, gen der, type of delivery, feeding, and maternal age. The cases had higher rates of allergic comorbidities, medication use, and family history of allergy. The FOBT was positive in 84% of cases and in 34% of controls (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of the FOBT for the diagnosis of FPIAP was 84%, specificity was 66%, positive predictive value 68%, and the negative predictive value 83%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.75 (CI 95% 0.61-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Although the FOBT has an adequate sensitivity to diagnose FPIAP in infants with rectal bleeding, this test had abnormal results in more than a third of healthy infants. Therefore, the routine use of FOBT is not recommended for the diagnosis of FPIAP.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Sangre Oculta , Proctocolitis/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/complicaciones , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
11.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 31(6): e118-9, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25424219

RESUMEN

The Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index is a widely applied instrument for measuring the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD), but few studies have evaluated the interobserver agreement between different disciplines. A cross-sectional study of 21 children with AD evaluated by dermatology and pediatric researchers found excellent agreement between the SCORAD, the objective SCORAD, and the Three Item Severity score, confirming the applicability of these scores by nondermatologists.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/clasificación , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Investigación Biomédica , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Dermatología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pediatría , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
12.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 315(4): 761-770, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36273083

RESUMEN

Although vitamin D (VD) is known to have multiple effects on the skin and immunity, its effects on atopic dermatitis (AD) severity remain unclear. We investigated whether oral cholecalciferol (VD3) supplementation changes stratum corneum expression of the vitamin D receptor (vdr), and the epidermal alarmins Cathelicidin Antimicrobial Peptide (camp/LL-37) and Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (tslp) in children with AD. We conducted an open-label supplementation study with weekly oral VD3 for six weeks in children with AD. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), lesional Staphylococcus aureus colonization, and AD severity evaluated by SCORAD index were evaluated before and after supplementation. Tape stripping (TS) was performed on non-lesional and lesional skin to measure mRNA expression of vdr, camp, and tslp through RT-qPCR and LL-37 peptide by ELISA. Twenty-two children with moderate-severe AD received weekly oral VD3 for six weeks. Total serum 25OHD increased from 45.1 ± 23 to 93.5 ± 24.3 nmoL/L (p < 0.0001), while SCORAD decreased from 41.4 ± 13.5 to 31.5 ± 15.8 (p < 0.0001). After treatment, epidermal gene expression of camp increased significantly in non-lesional (p = 0.014) and lesional (p = 0.0007) tape stripping samples, while vdr only increased in lesional skin samples (p < 0.0001). LL-37 peptide increased significantly only in lesional skin samples (p = 0.008). Gene expression of tslp did not change after oral VD3 treatment. In children with AD, oral VD3 supplementation was associated with improved VD status and AD severity, as well as increased VDR and Cathelicidin expression in lesional skin, which provide mechanistic clues on its effects.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Humanos , Niño , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Catelicidinas/genética , Catelicidinas/metabolismo , Receptores de Calcitriol/genética , Vitamina D , Epidermis/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Linfopoyetina del Estroma Tímico
13.
Clin Drug Investig ; 43(6): 447-461, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37347370

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interferons have been identified as a potential treatment alternative for coronavirus disease 2019. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, bioavailability, and biological activity of inhaled interferon-α2b (IFN)-α2b in healthy adults. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, phase I clinical trial was conducted with two cohorts of healthy subjects aged 18-50 years. The first cohort received 2.5 MIU of inhaled IFN-α2b twice daily for 10 days (n = 6) or placebo (n = 3); the second cohort received 5.0 MIU of inhaled IFN-α2b in a similar scheme (n = 6) or placebo (n = 3). The first two doses were administered in an emergency department, then participants completed their treatment at home. Safety was measured through vital signs, new symptoms, and laboratory tests. Tolerability was measured as participants' treatment acceptability. Bioavailability and biological activity were measured from serum IFNα concentrations and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction of interferon-induced genes in blood before and after treatments. RESULTS: Exposure to inhaled IFN-α2b at 2.5-MIU or 5-MIU doses did not produce statistically significant changes in participant vital signs, or elicit new symptoms, and standard hematological and biochemical blood measurements were comparable to those recorded in individuals who received placebo. A total of 58 adverse events were observed. All were mild or moderate and did not require medical care. All participants reported very high tolerability towards a twice-daily nebulized treatment for 10 days (98.0, 97.0, and 97.0 in the placebo, 2.5-MIU, and 5-MIU groups, respectively, on a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale). A dose-dependent mild increase in serum IFN-α concentrations and an increase in serum RNA expression of IFN-induced genes were observed 11 days after treatment (p < 0.05 for all between-group comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled IFN-α2b was preliminarily safe and well tolerated, and induced systemic biological activity in healthy subjects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04988217), 3 August, 2021.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Disponibilidad Biológica , Interferón-alfa/efectos adversos , Interferón alfa-2 , Método Doble Ciego
14.
EClinicalMedicine ; 62: 102082, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37538539

RESUMEN

Background: Accumulating evidence indicates that an early, robust type 1 interferon (IFN) response to SARS-CoV-2 is important in determining COVID-19 outcomes, with an inadequate IFN response associated with disease severity. Our objective was to examine the prophylactic potential of IFN administration to limit viral transmission. Methods: A cluster randomised open label clinical trial was undertaken to determine the effects of pegylated IFNß-1a administration on SARS-CoV-2 household transmission between December 3rd, 2020 and June 29th, 2021. Index cases were identified from databases of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 individuals in Santiago, Chile. Households were cluster randomised (stratified by household size and age of index cases) to receive 3 doses of 125 µg subcutaneous pegylated IFNß-1a (172 households, 607 participants), or standard care (169 households, 565 participants). The statistical team was blinded to treatment assignment until the analysis plan was finalised. Analyses were undertaken to determine effects of treatment on viral shedding and viral transmission. Safety analyses included incidence and severity of adverse events in all treatment eligible participants in the standard care arm, or in the treatment arm with at least one dose administered. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04552379. Findings: 5154 index cases were assessed for eligibility, 1372 index cases invited to participate, and 341 index cases and their household contacts (n = 831) enrolled. 1172 participants in 341 households underwent randomisation, with 607 assigned to receive IFNß-1a and 565 to standard care. Based on intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses for the primary endpoints, IFNß-1a treatment did not affect duration of viral shedding in index cases (absolute risk reduction = -0.2%, 95% CI = -8.46% to 8.06%) and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to household contacts (absolute risk reduction = 3.87%, 95% CI = -3.6% to 11.3%). Treatment with IFNß-1a resulted in significantly more treatment-related adverse events, but no increase in overall adverse events or serious adverse events. Interpretation: Based upon the primary analyses, IFNß-1a treatment did not affect duration of viral shedding or the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to uninfected contacts within a household. Funding: Biogen PTY Ltd. Supply of interferon as 'Plegridy (peginterferon beta-1a).' The study was substantially funded by BHP Holdings Pty Ltd.

15.
EBioMedicine ; 91: 104563, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37099842

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Omicron variant has challenged the control of the COVID-19 pandemic due to its immuno-evasive properties. The administration of a booster dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine showed positive effects in the immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2, effect that is even enhanced after the administration of a second booster. METHODS: During a phase-3 clinical trial, we evaluated the effect of a second booster of CoronaVac®, an inactivated vaccine administered 6 months after the first booster, in the neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 (n = 87). In parallel, cellular immunity (n = 45) was analyzed in stimulated peripheral mononuclear cells by flow cytometry and ELISPOT. FINDINGS: Although a 2.5-fold increase in neutralization of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 was observed after the second booster when compared with prior its administration (Geometric mean units p < 0.0001; Geometric mean titer p = 0.0002), a poor neutralization against the Omicron variant was detected. Additionally, the activation of specific CD4+ T lymphocytes remained stable after the second booster and, importantly, equivalent activation of CD4+ T lymphocytes against the Omicron variant and the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 were found. INTERPRETATION: Although the neutralizing response against the Omicron variant after the second booster of CoronaVac® was slightly increased, these levels are far from those observed against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and could most likely fail to neutralize the virus. In contrast, a robust CD4+T cell response may confer protection against the Omicron variant. FUNDING: The Ministry of Health, Government of Chile, the Confederation of Production and Commerce, Chile and SINOVAC Biotech.NIHNIAID. The Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes
16.
Int J Dermatol ; 61(3): 310-315, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34480753

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Filaggrin (FLG) loss-of-function variants are major genetic risk factors for atopic dermatitis (AD), but these have not been studied in Latin American populations with and without AD. METHODS: FLG variants R501X and 2282del4 were genotyped in 275 Chilean adults with and without AD from the "Early origins of allergy and asthma" (ARIES) cohort and in 227 patients from an AD cohort based in Santiago, Chile. RESULTS: Among adults in the ARIES cohort, 3.3% were carriers of R501X and 2.9% of 2282del4 variants, all heterozygotes. In this cohort, 6.2% were FLG variant carriers: 11.1% of subjects reporting AD were carriers of FLG variants vs. 5.2% in those without AD (P = 0.13). In this first cohort, FLG variants were not significantly associated with asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy. In the AD cohort, the prevalence of FLG variants was 7% for R501X, 2.2% for the 2282del4 variant, and 9.3% for the combined genotype. In this cohort, FLG variants were present in 15.5% of severe AD vs. 7.1% of mild-to-moderate AD subjects (P = 0.056). Evaluation of Chilean population from both cohorts combined (n = 502) revealed that FLG variants were not significantly associated with AD (OR = 1.92 [95% CI 0.95-3.9], P = 0.067) but were associated with asthma (OR = 2.16 [95% CI 1.02-4.56], P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate FLG loss-of-function variants R501X and 2282del4 in Latin American population, revealing a similar prevalence of these FLG variant carriers to that of European populations. Among Chileans, FLG variants were significantly associated with asthma but not AD.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Proteínas Filagrina/genética , Adulto , Chile/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Mutación , Prevalencia
17.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(7)2022 Jul 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35891246

RESUMEN

Several vaccines have been developed to control the COVID-19 pandemic. CoronaVac®, an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, has demonstrated safety and immunogenicity, preventing severe COVID-19 cases. We investigate the safety and non-inferiority of two immunization schedules of CoronaVac® in a non-inferiority trial in healthy adults. A total of 2302 healthy adults were enrolled at 8 centers in Chile and randomly assigned to two vaccination schedules, receiving two doses with either 14 or 28 days between each. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were solicited adverse events (AEs) within 7 days of each dose, and comparing the number of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection 14 days after the second dose between the schedules, respectively. The most frequent local AE was pain at the injection site, which was less frequent in participants aged ≥60 years. Other local AEs were reported in less than 5% of participants. The most frequent systemic AEs were headache, fatigue, and myalgia. Most AEs were mild and transient. There were no significant differences for local and systemic AEs between schedules. A total of 58 COVID-19 cases were confirmed, and all but 2 of them were mild. No differences were observed in the proportion of COVID-19 cases between schedules. CoronaVac® is safe, especially in ≥60-year-old participants. Both schedules protected against COVID-19 hospitalization.

18.
medRxiv ; 2022 Feb 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35441179

RESUMEN

Background: CoronaVac ® is an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine approved by the World Health Organization. Previous studies reported increased levels of neutralizing antibodies and specific T cells two- and four-weeks after two doses of CoronaVac ® , but the levels of neutralizing antibodies are reduced at six to eight months after two doses. Here we report the effect of a booster dose of CoronaVac ® on the anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune response generated against variants of concern (VOC) Delta and Omicron in adults participating in a phase 3 clinical trial in Chile. Methods: Volunteers immunized with two doses of CoronaVac ® in a four-week interval received a booster dose of the same vaccine between twenty-four and thirty weeks after the 2nd dose. Four weeks after the booster dose, neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses were measured. Neutralization capacities and T cell activation against VOC Delta and Omicron were detected at four weeks after the booster dose. Findings: We observed a significant increase in neutralizing antibodies at four weeks after the booster dose. We also observed an increase in CD4 + T cells numbers over time, reaching a peak at four weeks after the booster dose. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells induced by the booster showed activity against VOC Delta and Omicron. Interpretation: Our results show that a booster dose of CoronaVac ® increases the anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral and cellular immune responses in adults. Immunity induced by a booster dose of CoronaVac ® is active against VOC, suggesting an effective protection.

19.
Elife ; 112022 10 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36226829

RESUMEN

Background: The development of vaccines to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic progression is a worldwide priority. CoronaVac is an inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine approved for emergency use with robust efficacy and immunogenicity data reported in trials in China, Brazil, Indonesia, Turkey, and Chile. Methods: This study is a randomized, multicenter, and controlled phase 3 trial in healthy Chilean adults aged ≥18 years. Volunteers received two doses of CoronaVac separated by 2 (0-14 schedule) or 4 weeks (0-28 schedule); 2302 volunteers were enrolled, 440 were part of the immunogenicity arm, and blood samples were obtained at different times. Samples from a single center are reported. Humoral immune responses were evaluated by measuring the neutralizing capacities of circulating antibodies. Cellular immune responses were assessed by ELISPOT and flow cytometry. Correlation matrixes were performed to evaluate correlations in the data measured. Results: Both schedules exhibited robust neutralizing capacities with the response induced by the 0-28 schedule being better. No differences were found in the concentration of antibodies against the virus and different variants of concern (VOCs) between schedules. Stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with Mega pools of Peptides (MPs) induced the secretion of interferon (IFN)-γ and the expression of activation induced markers in CD4+ T cells for both schedules. Correlation matrixes showed strong correlations between neutralizing antibodies and IFN-γ secretion. Conclusions: Immunization with CoronaVac in Chilean adults promotes robust cellular and humoral immune responses. The 0-28 schedule induced a stronger humoral immune response than the 0-14 schedule. Funding: Ministry of Health, Government of Chile, Confederation of Production and Commerce & Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Chile. Clinical trial number: NCT04651790.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Esquemas de Inmunización , Adulto , Humanos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Inmunidad Humoral , Interferones , Leucocitos Mononucleares , SARS-CoV-2
20.
mBio ; 13(4): e0142322, 2022 08 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35946814

RESUMEN

CoronaVac is an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine approved by the World Health Organization (WHO). Previous studies reported increased levels of neutralizing antibodies and specific T cells 2 and 4 weeks after two doses of CoronaVac; these levels were significantly reduced at 6 to 8 months after the two doses. Here, we report the effect of a booster dose of CoronaVac on the anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune response generated against the variants of concern (VOCs), Delta and Omicron, in adults participating in a phase III clinical trial in Chile. Volunteers immunized with two doses of CoronaVac in a 4-week interval received a booster dose of the same vaccine between 24 and 30 weeks after the second dose. Neutralization capacities and T cell activation against VOCs Delta and Omicron were assessed 4 weeks after the booster dose. We observed a significant increase in neutralizing antibodies 4 weeks after the booster dose. We also observed a rise in anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells over time, and these cells reached a peak 4 weeks after the booster dose. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies and SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells induced by the booster showed activity against VOCs Delta and Omicron. Our results show that a booster dose of CoronaVac increases adults' humoral and cellular anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses. In addition, immunity induced by a booster dose of CoronaVac is active against VOCs, suggesting adequate protection. IMPORTANCE CoronaVac is an inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 that has been approved by WHO for emergency use. Phase III clinical trials are in progress in several countries, including China, Brazil, Turkey, and Chile, and have shown safety and immunogenicity after two doses of the vaccine. This report characterizes immune responses induced by two doses of CoronaVac followed by a booster dose 5 months after the second dose in healthy Chilean adults. The data reported here show that a booster dose increased the immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, enhancing levels of neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral strain and VOCs. Similarly, anti-SARS-CoV-2 CD4+ T cell responses were increased following the booster dose. In contrast, levels of gamma interferon secretion and T cell activation against the VOCs Delta and Omicron were not significantly different from those for the ancestral strain. Therefore, a third dose of CoronaVac in a homologous vaccination schedule improves its immunogenicity in healthy volunteers.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas Virales , Adulto , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Linfocitos T
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA