Exploration of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Silicone Breast Implant Rupture Detection and Classification.

Background and Objectives: The surge in breast-related surgeries in Korea underscores the critical need for an accurate early diagnosis of silicone breast implant-related issues. Complications such as BIA-ALCL and BIA-SCC add complexity to breast health concerns, necessitating vigilant monitoring. Despite advancements, discrepancies persist between ultrasonographic and pathologic classifications of silicone implant ruptures, highlighting a need for enhanced diagnostic tools. This study explores the reliability of ultrasonography in diagnosing silicone breast implant ruptures and determining the extent of silicone migration, specifically with a focus on guiding potential capsulectomy based on pathology. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive review of medical records encompassing 5557 breast implants across 2790 patients who underwent ultrasound-assisted examinations was conducted. Among the screened implants, 8.9% (249 cases) were diagnosed with silicone breast implant rupture through ultrasonography. Subsequently, 89 women underwent revisional surgery, involving capsulectomy. The pathological analysis of 111 periprosthetic capsules from these cases aimed to assess the extent of silicone migration, and the findings were juxtaposed with the existing ultrasonographic rupture classification. Results: The diagnostic agreement between preoperative sonography and postoperative findings reached 100% for silicone breast implant ruptures. All eighty prosthetic capsules exhibiting a snowstorm sign in ultrasonography demonstrated silicone migration to capsules upon pathologic findings. Conclusions: High-resolution ultrasonography emerged as a valuable and reliable imaging modality for diagnosing silicone breast implant ruptures, with a notable ability to ascertain the extent of free silicone migration to capsules. This diagnostic precision is pivotal in informing decisions about potential capsulectomy during revisional surgery. The study advocates for an update to the current binary ultrasonographic classification, suggesting a more nuanced categorization into three types (subcapsular, intracapsular, and extracapsular) based on pathology.

Use of High-Resolution Ultrasound in Characterizing the Surface Topography of a Breast Implant.

Background and Objectives: With the emergence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), it has become necessary to identify the implant shell type patients have received. Therefore, an immediate, reliable method for identifying a breast implant shell type is essential. Evidence-based research and applying a real-world technique that identifies the surface topographic information of the inserted breast implants, without surgery, has become of paramount importance for breast implant physicians. Methods and Materials: A review of the medical records of 1901 patients who received 3802 breast implants and subsequently received an ultrasound-assisted examination was performed. All patients received not only a breast cancer examination but also a high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) assisted examination of the device at a single center between 31 August 2017 and 31 December 2022. Results: Most patients had breast implants within 10 years (77.7%) of the examination. Of the 3802 implants screened, 2034 (53.5%) were identified with macro-textured shell topography in ultrasonography. A macrotextured shell type implant was used in 53.5% of cases and a smooth type in 42.7% of cases. Seventy-three (1.9%) breast implant shell types could not be identified due to ruptures. However, 250 breast implant shell types could be identified despite rupture cases (6.5%). Conclusions: HRUS was found to be a useful and reliable image modality for identifying various surface shell types of breast implants. The shell type information would be helpful to patients who lack information about their breast implants and are concerned about BIA-ALCL.

High-Resolution Ultrasound-Assisted Assessment of Preliminary Short-term Safety Outcomes of an Implant-Based Augmentation Mammaplasty Using a Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth-Surface Device in Korean Females.

BACKGROUND: The Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface (Establishment Labs Holdings Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica) is one of the representative brands of the fifth generation of a silicone gel-filled breast implant with a microtextured surface. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors describe preliminary short-term safety outcomes of an implant-based augmentation mammaplasty using the Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface in Korean females. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of medical records in a total of 69 females (n = 69) receiving an implant-based augmentation mammaplasty using the Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface between September 26, 2017, and December 31, 2020. The authors analyzed incidences of postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 6 cases (8.7%) of postoperative complications occurred; these include 2 cases (2.9%) of early seroma, 1 case (1.4%) of capsular contracture, 2 cases (2.9%) of alterations in the shape, and 1 case (1.4%) of foreign body sensation. Time-to-events were estimated at 266.81 ± 273.17 days. CONCLUSIONS: The authors describe our preliminary short-term safety outcomes of an implant-based augmentation mammaplasty using the Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface in Korean females. But this deserves further large-scale studies with long periods of follow-up.

Short-term treatment outcomes and safety of two representative brands of the fifth-generation silicone gel-filled breast implants in Korea.

It is allegedly reported that the BellaGel® SmoothFine (HansBiomed Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea) and Motiva ErgonomixTM (Establishment Labs Holdings Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica) are representative brands of a microtextured breast implant in Korea. We compared short-term safety outcomes between them. We evaluated the patients who received breast augmentation using the BellaGel® SmoothFine (n = 264) or the Motiva Ergonomix™ (n = 76) for aesthetic purposes and those with available medical records. They were followed up during a mean period of 122.11 ± 95.37 (4-477) and 126.80 ± 116.29 (13-534) days in the corresponding order. Early seroma occurred at an incidence of 1.89 and 5.26% following breast augmentation using the BellaGel® SmoothFine and the Motiva ErgonomixTM, respectively. This difference reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). Of note, CC occurred at an incidence of 2.27 and 0.00% in the corresponding order. Cumulative incidences of postoperative complications depending on the type of breast implants showed no significant difference; statistical significance was analyzed using the log-rank test (χ2 = 1.71, df = 1, p = 0.19). Cumulative survival of the breast implant is shown in Table 3; the Motiva Ergonomix™ showed a longer survival as compared with the BellaGel® SmoothFine (130.13 ± 13.70 vs. 120.45 ± 5.76 days). In conclusion, we describe short-term treatment outcomes and safety of an implant-based breast augmentation using two representative brands of the fifth-generation silicone gel-filled breast implants in Korean women.

Short-term Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the BellaGel Implants in Korean Women.

Asian women are stereotypically characterized by a slim body, smaller breasts and areolae, and larger nipples when compared with White women. They would therefore be vulnerable to displacement of a breast implant if they receive larger implants. They are also prone to hypertrophic and prolonged hyperemic scars. Surgeons should therefore be aware of Asian women's breast anatomy, healing tendency, and preferences. We conducted this multicenter, retrospective study to assess the short-term safety of the BellaGel implants in Korean women. METHODS: We evaluated a total of 637 women (n = 637; 1,274 breasts) for incidences of postoperative complications and the cumulative Kaplan-Meier complication-free survival. RESULTS: Overall, there were 12 cases (1.9%) of postoperative complications; these include 6 cases (0.9%) of hematoma, 2 cases (0.3%) of infection, and 4 cases (0.6%) of seroma. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the cumulative complication-free survival at 120 weeks between the 4 types of the BellaGel implants (χ2 = 2.289, P = 0.513). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we describe the short-term safety of augmentation mammaplasty using the BellaGel implants in Korean women. But further prospective, large-scale, multicenter studies with a long period of follow-up are warranted to establish our results.