Textbook Outcome and Survival in Patients With Gastric Cancer: An Analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours in Ontario (PRESTO).

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between Textbook Outcome (TO)-a new composite quality measurement-and long-term survival in gastric cancer surgery. BACKGROUND: Single-quality indicators do not sufficiently reflect the complex and multifaceted nature of perioperative care in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: All patients undergoing gastrectomy for nonmetastatic gastric adenocarcinoma registered in the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario (PRESTO) between 2004 and 2015 were included. TO was defined according to negative margins; >15 lymph nodes sampled; no severe complications; no re-interventions; no unplanned ICU admission; length of stay ≤21 days; no 30-day readmission; and no 30-day mortality. Three-year survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A marginal multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model was used to estimate the association between achieving TO metrics and long-term survival. E-value methodology was used to assess for risk of residual confounding. RESULTS: Of the 1836 patients included in this study, 402 (22%) achieved all TO metrics. TO patients had a higher 3-year survival rate compared to non-TO patients (75% vs 55%, log-rank P < 0.001). After adjustments for covariates and clustering within hospitals, TO was associated with a 41% reduction in mortality (adjusted hazards ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.48, 0.72, P < 0.001). These results were robust to potential residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving TO is strongly associated with improved long-term survival in gastric cancer patients and merits further focus in surgical quality improvement efforts.

Association Between Preoperative Patient-Reported Symptoms and Postoperative Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy experience a significant symptom burden. However, it is unknown whether symptoms during radiotherapy may portend adverse postoperative outcomes and healthcare utilization. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and proctectomy in Ontario from 2007 to 2014. The primary outcome was a complicated postoperative course-a dichotomous variable created as a composite of postoperative mortality, major morbidity, or hospital readmission. Patient-reported Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores, collected routinely at outpatient provincial cancer center visits, were linked to administrative healthcare databases. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to compare ESAS scoring approaches and to stratify patients into low versus high symptom score groups. Multivariable regression models were constructed to evaluate associations between preoperative symptom scores and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: 1455 rectal cancer patients underwent sequential radiotherapy and proctectomy during the study period and recorded symptom assessments. Patients with high preoperative symptom scores were significantly more likely to experience a complicated postoperative course (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.95). High preoperative ESAS scores were also associated with the secondary outcomes of emergency department visits (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08-1.66) and longer length of stay (IRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.45). CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer patients reporting elevated symptom scores during neoadjuvant radiotherapy have increased odds of experiencing a complicated postoperative course. Preoperative patient-reported outcome screening may be a useful tool to identify at-risk patients and to efficiently direct perioperative supportive care.

Patient-reported symptoms in metastatic gastric cancer patients in the last 6 months of life.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic gastric cancer have poor survival outcomes and may experience high symptom burden. We evaluated symptom trajectory and risk factors for increased symptom severity among metastatic gastric cancer patients during the last 6 months of life. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer from January 2007 to December 2014 in the province of Ontario, Canada. We included patients who died during the study period and who reported at least one Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) score during the last 6 months of life. We described the proportion of patients who reported moderate-to-severe symptom scores (≥ 4) by month. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to identify risk factors for moderate-to-severe symptom scores. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-eight eligible patients with 3286 unique symptom scores completed during their last 6 months of life were identified. The highest prevalence of moderate-to-severe scores was observed for tiredness and lack of appetite, while nausea and depression had the lowest prevalence of elevated scores. The prevalence of moderate-to-severe was consistently high for all symptoms, particularly approaching end-of-life. Timing of ESAS scores, receipt of cancer-directed therapy, urban residence, and female sex were associated with increased odds of reporting moderate-to-severe symptom scores. CONCLUSION: Patients with metastatic gastric cancer experience significant symptom burden at the end-of-life. Routine screening with patient-reported outcome tools may assist in shared decision-making and effective palliative care by ensuring patients' health status and supportive care needs are identified promptly at the time of clinical encounters.

Gastrectomy case volume and textbook outcome: an analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario (PRESTO).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between gastric cancer surgery case-volume and Textbook Outcome, a new composite quality measurement. BACKGROUND: Textbook Outcome included (a) negative resection margin, (b) greater than 15 lymph nodes sampled, (c) no severe complication, (d) no re-intervention, (e) no unplanned ICU admission, (f) length of stay of 21 days or less, (g) no 30-day readmission and (h) no 30-day mortality following surgery. METHODS: All patients undergoing gastrectomy for non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma registered in the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario between 2004 and 2015 were included. We used multivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression modelling to estimate the association between gastrectomy volume (surgeon and hospital annual volumes) and Textbook Outcome. Volumes were considered as continuous variables and quintiles. RESULTS: Textbook Outcome was achieved in 378 of 1660 patients (22.8%). The quality metrics least often achieved were inadequate lymph node sampling and presence of severe complications, which occurred in 46.1% and 31.7% of patients, respectively. Accounting for covariates and clustering, neither surgeon volume nor hospital volume were significantly associated with Textbook Outcome. However, hospital volume was associated with adequate lymphadenectomy and fewer unplanned ICU admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Higher case volume can impact certain measures of quality of care but may not address all care structures necessary for ideal Textbook recovery. Future quality improvement strategies should consider using case-mix adjusted Textbook Outcome rates as a surgical quality metric.

Outcomes of Non-curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

BACKGROUND: The surgical care of patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC) remains debated. Despite level 1 evidence showing lack of survival benefit, surgery may be used for symptoms prevention or palliation. This study examined short-term postoperative outcomes of non-curative gastrectomy performed for metastatic GC. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) registry, including gastrectomies for GC (2007-2015). The primary outcome was 30-day major morbidity. Multivariable analysis examined the association between metastatic status and outcomes adjusted for relevant demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: Of 5341 patients, 377 (7.1%) had metastases. Major morbidity was more common with metastases (29.4 vs. 19.6%; p < 0.001), driven by a higher rate of respiratory events. Prolonged hospital length of stay (beyond the 75th percentile: 11 days) was more likely with metastases than with no metastases (41.9 vs. 28.3%; p < 0.001). After adjustment, metastatic status was associated with major morbidity (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.90). This association remained for respiratory events (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07-2.33), 30-day mortality (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.38-3.48), and prolonged hospital stay (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.31-2.07). CONCLUSION: Non-curative gastrectomy for metastatic GC was associated with significant major morbidity and mortality as well as a prolonged hospital stay, longer than expected for gastrectomy for non-metastatic GC. These data can inform decision making regarding non-curative gastrectomy, helping surgeons to weigh the risks of morbidity against the potential benefits and alternative therapeutic options.

Validating an algorithm to identify metastatic gastric cancer in the absence of routinely collected TNM staging data.

BACKGROUND: Accurate TNM stage information is essential for cancer health services research, but is often impractical and expensive to collect at the population-level. We evaluated algorithms using administrative healthcare data to identify patients with metastatic gastric cancer. METHODS: A population-based cohort of gastric cancer patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2007 identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry were linked to routinely collected healthcare data. Reference standard data identifying metastatic disease were obtained from a province-wide chart review, according to the Collaborative Staging method. Algorithms to identify metastatic gastric cancer were created using administrative healthcare data from hospitalization, emergency department, and physician billing records. Time frames of data collection in the peri-diagnosis period, and the diagnosis codes used to identify metastatic disease were varied. Algorithm sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 2366 gastric cancer patients, included within the chart review, 54.3% had metastatic disease. Algorithm sensitivity ranged from 50.0- 90%, specificity ranged from 27.6 - 92.5%, and accuracy from 61.5 - 73.4%. Sensitivity and specificity were maximized when the most conservative list of diagnosis codes from hospitalization and outpatient records in the six months prior to and the six months following diagnosis were included. CONCLUSION: Algorithms identifying metastatic gastric cancer can be used for research purposes using administrative healthcare data, although they are imperfect measures. The properties of these algorithms may be generalizable to other high fatality cancers and other healthcare systems. This study provides further support for the collection of population-based, TNM stage data.

Patient-Reported Symptom Severity Among 22,650 Cancer Outpatients in the Last Six Months of Life.

CONTEXT: Understanding the magnitude and risk factors for symptom burden of patients with cancer at the end of life is critical to guiding effective patient- and system-level interventions. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to estimate the prevalence of severe patient-reported symptoms among cancer outpatients during the six months before death and to identify patient groups at a higher risk for reporting severe symptoms. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of cancer decedents at regional cancer centers from 2010 to 2016. Patient-reported Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores from the last six months of life were linked to administrative databases. The proportion of patients reporting severe symptom scores (≥7) for anxiety, depression, drowsiness, lack of appetite, nausea, pain, shortness of breath, tiredness, and overall well-being during the six months before death was described. Multivariable modified Poisson regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for reporting severe symptom scores. RESULTS: Of 39,084 cancer decedents, 22,650 had one or more symptom assessments recorded in the last six months of life, resulting in 92,757 ESAS assessments. Severe scores were highest for tiredness (56%), lack of appetite (46%), and impaired well-being (45%). The proportion of patients reporting severe symptom scores was stable before progressively increasing at three months before death. Elderly, women, patients with high comorbidity, immigrants, and living in urban areas or with high material deprivation were at increased risk of reporting severe scores. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an integrated symptom screening program, rates of severe patient-reported symptom scores before death were high for outpatients with cancer. Patient subgroups at increased risk of severe symptom burden may benefit from targeted interventions. Ongoing review of routinely collected symptom data may be used to assess the supportive care needs and guide targeted interventions at the health-system level.