RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa provides high sustained factor VIII activity with superior bleeding prevention as compared with prestudy factor VIII prophylaxis in previously treated patients 12 years of age or older with severe hemophilia A. Data on outcomes of efanesoctocog alfa treatment in children younger than 12 years of age with severe hemophilia A are limited. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, open-label study involving previously treated patients younger than 12 years of age with severe hemophilia A. Patients received prophylaxis with once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa (50 IU per kilogram of body weight) for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the occurrence of factor VIII inhibitors (neutralizing antibodies against factor VIII). Secondary end points included annualized rates of treated bleeding episodes, bleeding treatment, safety, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: A total of 74 male patients were enrolled (38 with an age of <6 years and 36 with an age of 6 to <12 years). No factor VIII inhibitors developed. Most adverse events were nonserious. No serious adverse events that were assessed by the investigator as being related to efanesoctocog alfa were reported. In the 73 patients treated according to the protocol, the median and model-based mean annualized bleeding rates were 0.00 (interquartile range, 0.00 to 1.02) and 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.90), respectively. A total of 47 patients (64%) had no treated bleeding episodes, 65 (88%) had no spontaneous bleeding episodes, and 61 (82%) had no episodes of bleeding into joints. A total of 41 of 43 bleeding episodes (95%) resolved with one injection of efanesoctocog alfa. Mean factor VIII activity at steady state was more than 40 IU per deciliter for 3 days and more than 10 IU per deciliter for almost 7 days after dose administration. The geometric mean terminal half-life was 40.0 hours. CONCLUSIONS: In children with severe hemophilia A, once-weekly prophylaxis with efanesoctocog alfa provided high sustained factor VIII activity in the normal to near-normal range (>40 IU per deciliter) for 3 days and more than 10 IU per deciliter for almost 7 days after administration, leading to effective bleeding prevention. Efanesoctocog alfa was associated with mainly nonserious adverse events. (Funded by Sanofi and Sobi; XTEND-Kids ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04759131.).
Asunto(s)
Factor VIII , Hemofilia A , Hemorragia , Humanos , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Factor VIII/inmunología , Factor VIII/efectos adversos , Factor VIII/administración & dosificación , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Niño , Preescolar , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Lactante , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Esquema de MedicaciónRESUMEN
PUPs A-LONG evaluated the safety and efficacy of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with hemophilia A. This open-label, phase 3 study enrolled male PUPs (<6 years) with severe hemophilia A to receive rFVIIIFc. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of inhibitor development. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleed rate (ABR). Of 103 subjects receiving ≥1 dose of rFVIIIFc, 80 (78%) were aged <1 year at the study start, 20 (19%) had a family history of inhibitors, and 82 (80%) had high-risk F8 mutations. Twenty subjects began on prophylaxis, while 81 began an on-demand regimen (69 later switched to prophylaxis). Eighty-seven (81%) subjects completed the study. Inhibitor incidence was 31.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8% to 41.7%) in subjects with ≥10 exposure days (or inhibitor); high-titer inhibitor incidence was 15.6% (95% CI, 8.8% to 24.7%). The median (range) time to high-titer inhibitor development was 9 (4-14) exposure days. Twenty-eight (27%) subjects experienced 32 rFVIIIFc treatment-related adverse events; most were inhibitor development. There was 1 nontreatment-related death due to intracranial hemorrhage (onset before the first rFVIIIFc dose). The overall median (interquartile range [IQR]) ABR was 1.49 (0.00-4.40) for subjects on variable prophylaxis dosing regimens. In this study of rFVIIIFc in pediatric PUPs with severe hemophilia A, overall inhibitor development was within the expected range, although high-titer inhibitor development was on the low end of the range reported in the literature. rFVIIIFc was well-tolerated and effective for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02234323).
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión , Niño , Factor VIII , Semivida , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with hemophilia A treated with coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) products are at risk for developing anti-FVIII antibodies. The ABIRISK Consortium aimed to provide knowledge on the formation and detection of anti-drug antibodies against biopharmaceutical products, including FVIII. Accordingly, standardized and validated assays for the detection of binding (total) and neutralizing antibodies are needed. AIM: Two-center validation of an ELISA for the detection of total FVIII-binding IgG-antibodies and Nijmegen-Bethesda assays for the quantification of FVIII-neutralizing antibodies according to consensus validation guidelines. METHODS: Validation of assays at both sites was done according to published recommendations and included preanalytics, the determination of key assay parameters, including cut-points, assay sensitivity, precision, and FVIII interference. RESULTS: The validated assays reproducibly detected FVIII-binding and -neutralizing antibodies with comparable performance in both laboratories. Floating screening cut-points were established for both assays. Determined mass-based sensitivity of both assays (all values ≤66 ng/mL) complied with the minimum sensitivity for the detection of anti-drug antibodies as recommended by the FDA (<100 ng/mL). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation did not exceed 25%. Assay validation further revealed that pre-analytical heat treatment led to potentially false-positive ELISA results, while up to 0.15 IU/mL, residual FVIII showed no significant impact. Overall, good agreement of results was found for patient samples analyzed at both study sites. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive validation of different anti-FVIII-antibody assays in two laboratories gave novel insights into the impact of pre-analytical sample treatment as well as the comparability of test results generated by the use of methodically different assays.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Hemofilia A , Humanos , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea , Inmunoglobulina G , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción EnzimáticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite the rapid uptake of emicizumab in the paediatric haemophilia A (HA) population, real-world data on the safety and efficacy is limited. AIM: To report on bleeding and safety in paediatric patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. METHODS: Data were extracted from the multicentre prospective observational PedNet Registry (NCT02979119). Children with haemophilia A, and ≥50 FVIII exposures or inhibitors present receiving emicizumab maintenance therapy were analysed. Data were summarized as medians with interquartile range (IQR, P25-P75). Mean (95% confidence interval (CI)), annualized (joint) bleeding rate (A(J)BR) during emicizumab and ≤2 years before emicizumab prophylaxis were modelled and compared using negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Total of 177 patients started emicizumab at median 8.6 years (IQR 4.8-13.1), most had no FVIII inhibitors (64%). Follow up before emicizumab was median: 1.68 years (IQR: 1.24-1.90) and during emicizumab: 1.32 years (IQR: .94-2.11). In patients without inhibitors, mean ABR reduced after starting emicizumab from 2.41 (CI 1.98-2.95) to 1.11 (CI .90-1.36, p < .001), while AJBR reduced from.74 (CI .56-.98) to.31 (CI .21-.46, p < .001). Concordantly, in patients with inhibitors, mean ABR reduced from 5.08 (CI 4.08-6.38) to .75 (CI .56-1.01, p < .001), while AJBR reduced from 1.90 (CI 1.42-2.58) to .34 (CI .21-.56, p < .001). Five emicizumab-related adverse events were reported (3% of the cohort), including one patient with antidrug antibodies. CONCLUSION: This study showed improved bleeding control compared to previous treatment and a favourable safety profile during emicizumab therapy in paediatric haemophilia A patients.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Hemofilia A , Hemorragia , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Niño , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/farmacología , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Preescolar , Estudios Prospectivos , Factor VIII/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: People with non-severe haemophilia appear to be under-treated in many countries, and this may lead to joint damage and worsen quality of life. AIM: To review literature for clotting factor replacement prophylaxis in people with non-severe haemophilia A and B (HA/HB) in relation to long-term outcomes to support clinical decision-making. METHODS: A targeted literature search was performed to identify studies published between 2000 and 2021 that included prophylaxis in people with non-severe HA/HB and long-term outcomes, including annualized bleeding rates, joint health and quality of life. RESULTS: Although eligible articles included 2737 and 2272 people with mild or moderate HA, respectively, only 22% (n = 609) and 29% (n = 668) reported treatment regimens. A total of 549 people with moderate HA were treated with factor replacement prophylaxis and were from high-income countries. On the contrary, nearly all people with mild HA received desmopressin (n = 599). Details of treatment regimens for women with haemophilia and people with HB were sparse. Three studies provided long-term outcomes for people with moderate haemophilia who received prophylaxis with factor concentrate, supporting early prophylaxis in people with a frequent bleeding phenotype regardless of their endogenous clotting factor level to preserve joint health. CONCLUSION: There remain large knowledge gaps when considering how to provide optimal treatment for people with non-severe haemophilia. Nonetheless, there is a strong rationale that prophylaxis should be considered early in life according to similar strategies as for severe haemophilia for those with a frequent severe bleeding phenotype.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Femenino , Humanos , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia A/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia B/complicaciones , Hemofilia B/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor VIII/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia A care has changed with the introduction of emicizumab. Experience on the youngest children is still scarce and clinical practice varies between haemophilia treatment centres. AIM: We aimed to assess the current clinical practice on emicizumab prophylaxis within PedNet, a collaborative research platform for paediatricians treating children with haemophilia. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to all PedNet members (n = 32) between October 2022 and February 2023. The survey included questions on the availability of emicizumab, on the practice of initiating prophylaxis in previously untreated or minimally treated patients (PUPs or MTPs) and emicizumab use in patients with or without inhibitors. RESULTS: All but four centres (28/32; 88%) responded. Emicizumab was available in clinical practice in 25/28 centres (89%), and in 3/28 for selected patients only (e.g. with inhibitors). Emicizumab was the preferred choice for prophylaxis in PUPs or MTPs in 20/25 centres; most (85%) started emicizumab prophylaxis before 1 year of age (30% before 6 months of age) and without concomitant FVIII (16/20; 80%). After the loading dose, 13/28 centres administered the recommended dosing, while the others adjusted the interval of injections to give whole vials. In inhibitor patients, the use of emicizumab during ITI was common, with low-dose ITI being the preferred protocol. CONCLUSION: Most centres choose to initiate prophylaxis with emicizumab before 12 months of age and without concomitant FVIII. In inhibitor patients, ITI is mostly given in addition to emicizumab, but there was no common practice on how to proceed after successful ITI.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Hemofilia A , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , ElectrónicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune dysregulation as a result of an inborn error of immunity (IEI) leads to the complicated symptoms of refractory multi-organ immune dysregulation. B lymphocytes with immune regulatory capacity (Breg) are activated by environmental triggers and act as regulators of the immune response as observed in several autoimmune diseases. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the Breg profile and the CD21low expressing B cells of patients with LRBA deficiency (N = 6) and non-LRBA deficiency IEI (N = 13) with overlapping clinical symptoms of immune dysregulation. Normal values for Breg subpopulations were obtained from patients age-matched healthy cohorts (N = 48). Furthermore, we investigated the impact of abatacept treatment in LRBA deficient patients receiving biweekly abatacept (N = 5). METHODS: Using a flow cytometric approach with a pre-formulated antibody panel in peripheral blood samples, Breg subsets including plasmablasts (CD27+CD38hi), transitional B cells (CD24hiCD38hi), and B10 cells (CD24hiCD27+), and additionally the CD21low B cells (CD21lowCD38low) were analyzed. Breg function was assessed by the interleukin-10 expression within the CD19+ population. Additionally, B cell cytokines were measured in cell culture supernatants. RESULTS: We observe significant alterations of B cell/Breg subpopulations in the LRBA deficient cohort including a severe lack of memory B cells (P = 0.031) and B10 cells (P = 0.031) as well as a tendency towards higher CD21low B cells (P = 0.063). Within the non-LRBA deficient cohort, we observe a significant expansion of the plasmablasts (P = 0.012), and a tendency towards elevated levels of CD21low expressing B cells (P = 0.063). The treatment with abatacept ameliorated disease symptoms in the LRBA deficient cohort and led to an effective decrease in CD21low B cells over time (P = 0.021). Furthermore, there was a significantly increased level of B cell-activating factor (BAFF; P = 0.02) and lower IL-12p70 secretion upon stimulation (P = 0.020) in the LRBA cohort. CONCLUSION: Aberrant maturation of Breg subsets and the pathological expansion of CD21low B cells in patients with IEI may have therapeutic implications. Patients suffering from LRBA deficiency show a lack of memory B cells, insufficient expansion of B10 cells, increased BAFF levels as well as an increase in circulating CD21low B cells. Abatacept treatment results in a steady decrease in CD21low B cells.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Linfocitos B Reguladores , Humanos , Abatacept , Células Plasmáticas , Citometría de Flujo , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de SeñalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that patients with haemophilia should preferably receive vaccination subcutaneously. COVID-19 and other vaccines, however, are only licenced for intramuscular application. AIMS: To assess the safety of intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination in patients living with haemophilia. METHODS: Part A of this prospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients with haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) of all ages and severities and assessed injection site bleeding and other complications within 30 days of vaccination. Part B enrolled patients providing informed consent for detailed data collection including medication and prophylaxis around the time of vaccination. Logistic regression was performed to assess potential risk factors for bleeding. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-one patients were enrolled into part A. The primary endpoint injection site bleeding occurred in seven patients (1.5%, 95% confidence interval .7-3.1%). Comprehensive analysis of 214 patients (404 vaccinations, part B) revealed that 97% of patients with severe haemophilia had prophylaxis before vaccination, either as part of their routine prophylaxis or using additional doses. 56% and 30% of patients with moderate and mild haemophilia, respectively, received prophylaxis before vaccination. Among the seven bleeds recorded, three occurred when intramuscular vaccination was done without prophylaxis (odds ratio 12). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study reporting on the safety of intramuscular vaccination in haemophilia. The rate of injection site bleeding was low in mild haemophilia, and in moderate and severe haemophilia if patients received factor prophylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hemofilia A , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Vacunación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The incidence of FIX inhibitors in severe hemophilia B (SHB) is not well defined. Frequencies of 3-5% have been reported but most studies to date were small, including patients with different severities, and without prospective follow-up for inhibitor incidence. Study objective was to investigate inhibitor incidence in patients with SHB followed up to 500 exposure days (ED), the frequency of allergic reactions, and the relationship with genotypes. Consecutive previously untreated patients (PUPs) with SHB enrolled into the PedNet cohort were included. Detailed data was collected for the first 50 ED, followed by annual collection of inhibitor status and allergic reactions. Presence of inhibitors was defined by at least two consecutive positive samples. Additionally, data on factor IX gene mutation was collected. 154 PUPs with SHB were included; 75% were followed until 75 ED, and 43% until 500 ED. Inhibitors developed in 14 patients (7 high-titre). Median number of ED at inhibitor manifestation was 11 (IQR 6.5-36.5). Cumulative inhibitor incidence was 9.3% (95%CI 4.4-14.1) at 75 ED, and 10.2% (5.1-15.3) at 500 ED. Allergic reactions occurred in 4 (28.6%) inhibitor patients. Missense mutations were most frequent (46.8%) overall but not associated with inhibitors. Nonsense mutations and deletions with large structural changes comprised all mutations among inhibitor patients and were associated with an inhibitor risk of 26.9% and 33.3%, respectively. In an unselected, well-defined cohort of PUPs with SHB, cumulative inhibitor incidence was 10.2% at 500 ED. Nonsense mutations and large deletions were strongly associated with the risk of inhibitor development. The PedNet Registry is registered at clinicaltrials.gov; identifier: NCT02979119.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Factor VIII , Hemofilia B/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/epidemiología , Hemofilia B/genética , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: For children with haemophilia, early initiation of prophylaxis is crucial to prevent life-threatening bleeds and maintain joint health throughout life. Options for prophylaxis have recently increased from replacement therapy with standard or extended half-life coagulation factor products to include other haemostasis products, such as the non-replacement therapy emicizumab. AIM: To review key factors that determine the choice of prophylaxis in young children. METHODS: Key clinical questions on the implementation of prophylaxis for haemophilia in children were identified and PubMed was searched for evidence supporting guidance on the implementation of prophylaxis. RESULTS: The results of the literature search and the practical experience of the authors were used to build consensus on when to start prophylaxis, the pros and cons of the products available to guide the choice of product, and practical aspects of starting prophylaxis to guide the choice of regimen. CONCLUSIONS: In this era of increasing therapeutic choices, available information about the range of treatment options must be considered when initiating prophylaxis in young children. Parents or care givers must be sufficiently informed to allow informed shared decision making. Although plentiful data and clinical experience have been gathered on prophylaxis with clotting factor replacement therapy, its use in young children brings practical challenges, such as the need for intravenous administration. In contrast, our relatively brief experience and limited data with subcutaneously administered non-replacement therapy (i.e., emicizumab) in this patient group imply that starting emicizumab prophylaxis in young children requires careful consideration, despite the more convenient route of administration.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Semivida , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas , HumanosRESUMEN
Standard treatment of haemophilia A is based on replacing the missing coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to treat and prevent bleeding episodes. The most challenging complication of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) that can render treatment ineffective. Eradication of the inhibitor through immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the most effective strategy for managing these patients. Bypassing agents can be used to help restore haemostasis in inhibitor patients. Several novel agents have recently been developed, such as the FVIII mimetic agent emicizumab, which has been effective in reducing the annualized bleeding rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. When coadministered with repetitive high doses of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (ie >100 U/kg/d for ≥24 hours), emicizumab was associated with thrombotic microangiopathy and thrombosis events. As a consequence the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centres Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO) issued the first guidance on the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients receiving emicizumab. To build on and extend this work, a panel of German haemophilia specialists met to discuss the UK guidance, review current evidence and provide additional guidance for German healthcare professionals on how to optimize the management of patients with haemophilia A receiving emicizumab. Recommendations are provided on the use of bypassing and other agents to manage breakthrough bleeding, ITI in the emicizumab era, haemostatic support during surgery and issues relating to laboratory monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Hemofilia A , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/prevención & control , HumanosRESUMEN
In patients with severe haemophilia receiving clotting factor concentrates, the risk of immunisation against their usual treatment is still patent and feared. New haemophilia drug treatments with an extended half-life have become available over the past few years. The risk of inhibitor development to these new treatments is unclear. We report the case of a 51-year-old man with severe haemophilia A, who was previously treated with no history of inhibitor development. Soon after a switch in his treatment to efmoroctocog alfa he developed an inhibitor against this recombinant Fc fusion extended half-life FVIII (rFc-FVIII) product. The patient was on an on-demand treatment regimen and was treated for mucosal bleeding. The inhibitor was characterised as type I, with classical epitope mapping. The spontaneous evolution of this inhibitor was favourable, but an anamnestic response led to a switch in his treatment to emicizumab.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Factor de Coagulación Sanguínea/sangre , Factor VIII/administración & dosificación , Hemofilia A , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Factor VIII/efectos adversos , Francia , Hemofilia A/sangre , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The expansion of polyclonal T regulatory cells (Tregs) offers great promise for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). However, polyclonal Tregs can be non-specifically immunosuppressive. Based on the advancements with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy in leukemia, we previously engineered Tregs to express a T-cell receptor (TCR) specific for a myelin basic protein (MBP) peptide. These TCR-engineered specific Tregs suppressed the proliferation of MBP-reactive T effector cells and ameliorated myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Herein, we extend this approach by creating human regulatory T cells expressing functional single-chain chimeric antigen receptors (scFv CAR), targeting either MBP or MOG. These scFv CAR-transduced Tregs retained FoxP3 and Helios, characteristic of Treg cells, after long-term expansion in vitro. Importantly, these engineered CNS targeting CAR-Tregs were able to suppress autoimmune pathology in EAE, demonstrating that these Tregs have the potential to be used as a cellular therapy for MS patients.
Asunto(s)
Encefalomielitis Autoinmune Experimental/inmunología , Proteína Básica de Mielina/metabolismo , Linfocitos T Reguladores/inmunología , Animales , Encefalomielitis Autoinmune Experimental/terapia , Femenino , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/metabolismo , Humanos , Tolerancia Inmunológica/inmunología , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Transgénicos , Esclerosis Múltiple/inmunología , Proteína Básica de Mielina/inmunología , Vaina de Mielina/metabolismo , Vaina de Mielina/patología , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito/inmunología , Ingeniería de Proteínas/métodos , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/metabolismoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in children with haemophilia A (HA) is current standard of care. The benefit of prophylactic treatment for adult HA patients is not commonly accepted. AIM: To investigate the benefit of prophylaxis over on-demand treatment in adult and elderly patients with severe or non-severe HA in a real-life setting. METHODS: Data from 163 patients comprising 1202 patient-years were evaluated for 7.5 (±5.3) years. The effects on the annual bleeding rate (ABR, including spontaneous and traumatic bleeds) of treatment with a plasma-derived FVIII concentrate, the patient's age and disease severity were investigated. The effect of changing the treatment from on demand to continuous prophylaxis on the patients' ABRs was further analysed. RESULTS: Prophylaxis had the greatest effect on the ABRs of patients of any age with severe or non-severe HA. The difference in ABR of all patients treated on demand (median 31.4; interquartile range (IQR) 27.6; N = 83) compared with those treated prophylactically (median 1.3; IQR 3.6; N = 122) was statistically significant (P < .05), even for patients with non-severe HA (median 8.4; IQR 15.5; N = 11) vs median 1.5; IQR 4.2 (N = 17), P < .05). Patients, aged up to 88 years, switching from on demand to continuous prophylaxis showed the lowest median ABR (1.1; N = 51) after their regimen change. CONCLUSION: Any (even low-frequency) prophylaxis results in lower ABR than on-demand treatment. Patients switching to prophylaxis benefitted the most, irrespective of age or HA severity. Prophylactic treatment-even tertiary-is the regimen of choice for patients of any age, including elderly patients, with severe or non-severe HA.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Tenofovir disoxoproxil fumarate (TDF) is recommended for antiretroviral treatment for pregnant women living with HIV. As a comparative method to study bone density, we investigated the influence of in utero tenofovir exposure on the prevalence and distribution of developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in the primary dentition, as the mineralization process in teeth is higher and more complex and thus more vulnerable. HIV-exposed children with in utero exposition to tenofovir were included in this prospective observational single-center study. Dental status and enamel defects were assessed by an experienced dentist following a standardized protocol. Further information was collected using a standardized questionnaire, available in German and English. The prevalence of developmental defects in children with intrauterine tenofovir exposure was compared with literature data from a recent study of 377 healthy children in Germany and literature data from a study of 1221 healthy African children. Thirty-one children (mean age 2.1 ± 0.3 years; 41.9% female) were included. Median tenofovir exposure in utero was 28 weeks (mean ± 10.52 SD). Prevalence of developmental defects in the primary dentition in tenofovir-exposed children was similar compared to data of unexposed children (16.1% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.051 (compared to German cohort); 16.1% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.068 (compared to African cohort)).Conclusion: HIV-uninfected infants with in utero exposure to TDF showed no significant differences in the prevalence of DDE in comparison to cross-sectional data of HIV- and TDF-unexposed children; thus, the in utero exposure to TDF did not negatively influence the prevalence or distribution of DDE. What is Known: ⢠There are no data available on the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in the primary dentition in intrauterine HIV- and tenofovir-exposed children. ⢠Conclusions can be drawn from intrauterine milk tooth development to bone development and mineralization. What is New: ⢠Prevalence of developmental defects in the primary dentition in tenofovir-exposed children was similar compared to data of unexposed children. ⢠Preterm birth and hospitalization did not show a significant association on the prevalence of developmental defects in the primary dentition.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Nacimiento Prematuro , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Embarazo , Tenofovir/efectos adversos , Diente PrimarioRESUMEN
Replacement therapy with factor VIII (FVIII) is used in patients with hemophilia A for treatment of bleeding episodes or for prophylaxis. A common and serious problem with this therapy is the patient's immune response to FVIII, because of a lack of tolerance, leading to the formation of inhibitory antibodies. Development of tolerogenic therapies, other than standard immune tolerance induction (ITI), is an unmet goal. We previously generated engineered antigen-specific regulatory T cells (Tregs), created by transduction of a recombinant T-cell receptor (TCR) isolated from a hemophilia A subject's T-cell clone. The resulting engineered T cells suppressed both T- and B-cell effector responses to FVIII. In this study, we have engineered an FVIII-specific chimeric antigen receptor (ANS8 CAR) using a FVIII-specific scFv derived from a synthetic phage display library. Transduced ANS8 CAR T cells specific for the A2 domain proliferated in response to FVIII and ANS8 CAR Tregs were able to suppress the proliferation of FVIII-specific T-effector cells with specificity for a different FVIII domain in vitro. These data suggest that engineered cells are able to promote bystander suppression. Importantly, ANS8 CAR-transduced Tregs also were able to suppress the recall antibody response of murine splenocytes from FVIII knockout mice to FVIII in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, CAR-transduced Tregs are a promising approach for future tolerogenic treatment of hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Ingeniería Celular/métodos , Factor VIII/inmunología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T Reguladores/inmunología , Animales , Linfocitos B , Citometría de Flujo , Humanos , Activación de Linfocitos/inmunología , Ratones , Ratones Noqueados , Transducción GenéticaRESUMEN
Several studies showed that neutralizing anti-factor VIII (anti-fVIII) antibodies (inhibitors) in patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA) and congenital hemophilia A (HA) are primarily directed to the A2 and C2 domains. In this study, the frequency and epitope specificity of anti-C1 antibodies were analyzed in acquired and congenital hemophilia inhibitor patients (n = 178). The domain specificity of antibodies was studied by homolog-scanning mutagenesis (HSM) with single human domain human/porcine fVIII proteins and antibody binding to human A2, C1, and C2 domains presented as human serum albumin (HSA) fusion proteins. The analysis with HSA-fVIII domain proteins confirmed the results of the HSM approach but resulted in higher detection levels. The higher detection levels with HSA-fVIII domain proteins are a result of antibody cross-reactivity with human and porcine fVIII leading to false-negative HSM results. Overall, A2-, C1-, and C2-specific antibodies were detected in 23%, 78%, and 68% of patients with AHA (n = 115) and in 52%, 57%, and 81% of HA inhibitor patients (n = 63). Competitive binding of the human monoclonal antibody (mAb) LE2E9 revealed overlapping epitopes with murine C1-specific group A mAbs including 2A9. Mutational analyses identified distinct crucial binding residues for LE2E9 (E2066) and 2A9 (F2068) that are also recognized by anti-C1 antibodies present in patients with hemophilia. A strong contribution of LE2E9- and 2A9-like antibodies was particularly observed in patients with AHA. Overall, our study demonstrates that the C1 domain, in addition to the A2 and C2 domains, contributes significantly to the humoral anti-fVIII immune response in acquired and congenital hemophilia inhibitor patients.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Factor VIII/inmunología , Hemofilia A/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Animales , Mapeo Epitopo , Factor VIII/química , Humanos , Ratones , Dominios Proteicos , PorcinosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Published estimates of mortality and progression to AIDS as children with HIV approach adulthood are limited. We describe rates and risk factors for death and AIDS-defining events in children and adolescents after initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in 17 middle- and high-income countries, including some in Western and Central Europe (W&CE), Eastern Europe (Russia and Ukraine), and Thailand. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Children with perinatal HIV aged <18 years initiating cART were followed until their 21st birthday, transfer to adult care, death, loss to follow-up, or last visit up until 31 December 2013. Rates of death and first AIDS-defining events were calculated. Baseline and time-updated risk factors for early/late (≤/>6 months of cART) death and progression to AIDS were assessed. Of 3,526 children included, 32% were from the United Kingdom or Ireland, 30% from elsewhere in W&CE, 18% from Russia or Ukraine, and 20% from Thailand. At cART initiation, median age was 5.2 (IQR 1.4-9.3) years; 35% of children aged <5 years had a CD4 lymphocyte percentage <15% in 1997-2003, which fell to 15% of children in 2011 onwards (p < 0.001). Similarly, 53% and 18% of children ≥5 years had a CD4 count <200 cells/mm3 in 1997-2003 and in 2011 onwards, respectively (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 5.6 (2.9-8.7) years. Of 94 deaths and 237 first AIDS-defining events, 43 (46%) and 100 (42%) were within 6 months of initiating cART, respectively. Multivariable predictors of early death were: being in the first year of life; residence in Russia, Ukraine, or Thailand; AIDS at cART start; initiating cART on a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen; severe immune suppression; and low BMI-for-age z-score. Current severe immune suppression, low current BMI-for-age z-score, and current viral load >400 c/mL predicted late death. Predictors of early and late progression to AIDS were similar. Study limitations include incomplete recording of US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) disease stage B events and serious adverse events in some countries; events that were distributed over a long time period, and that we lacked power to analyse trends in patterns and causes of death over time. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 3,526 children and adolescents with perinatal HIV infection initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) in countries in Europe and Thailand. We observed that over 40% of deaths occurred ≤6 months after cART initiation. Greater early mortality risk in infants, as compared to older children, and in Russia, Ukraine, or Thailand as compared to W&CE, raises concern. Current severe immune suppression, being underweight, and unsuppressed viral load were associated with a higher risk of death at >6 months after initiation of cART.
Asunto(s)
Antirretrovirales/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/mortalidad , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/mortalidad , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/virología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada/mortalidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Factores de Riesgo , Tailandia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Inhibitor formation in hemophilia A is the most feared treatment-related complication of factor VIII (fVIII) therapy. Most inhibitor patients with hemophilia A develop antibodies against the fVIII A2 and C2 domains. Recent evidence demonstrates that the C1 domain contributes to the inhibitor response. Inhibitory anti-C1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been identified that bind to putative phospholipid and von Willebrand factor (VWF) binding epitopes and block endocytosis of fVIII by antigen presenting cells. We now demonstrate by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry that 7 of 9 anti-human C1 mAbs tested recognize an epitope distinct from the C1 phospholipid binding site. These mAbs, designated group A, display high binding affinities for fVIII, weakly inhibit fVIII procoagulant activity, poorly inhibit fVIII binding to phospholipid, and exhibit heterogeneity with respect to blocking fVIII binding to VWF. Another mAb, designated group B, inhibits fVIII procoagulant activity, fVIII binding to VWF and phospholipid, fVIIIa incorporation into the intrinsic Xase complex, thrombin generation in plasma, and fVIII uptake by dendritic cells. Group A and B epitopes are distinct from the epitope recognized by the canonical, human-derived inhibitory anti-C1 mAb, KM33, whose epitope overlaps both groups A and B. Antibodies recognizing group A and B epitopes are present in inhibitor plasmas from patients with hemophilia A. Additionally, group A and B mAbs increase fVIII clearance and are pathogenic in a hemophilia A mouse tail snip bleeding model. Group A anti-C1 mAbs represent the first identification of pathogenic, weakly inhibitory antibodies that increase fVIII clearance.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/inmunología , Inhibidores de Factor de Coagulación Sanguínea/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Epítopos/inmunología , Factor VIII , Hemofilia A/inmunología , Animales , Afinidad de Anticuerpos , Sitios de Unión de Anticuerpos , Células Dendríticas/patología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Factor VIII/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor VIII/inmunología , Hemofilia A/patología , Humanos , Ratones , Dominios Proteicos , Factor de von Willebrand/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8) is the etiological agent of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), which primarily affects human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults with advanced immunodeficiency. Currently, only limited prevalence data for HHV-8 infection in HIV-infected children living in non-endemic areas are available. This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in four university hospitals in Germany specializing in pediatric HIV care. Stored serum specimens obtained from 207 vertically HIV-1-infected children and adolescents were tested for antibodies against lytic and latent HHV-8 antigens. Logistic regression was used to assess independent risk factors associated with HHV-8 seropositivity. The overall HHV-8 seroprevalence was 24.6 % (n = 51/207) without significant differences related to sex, age, or ethnicity. In univariate analysis, HHV-8 seropositivity was significantly associated with a child having being born outside Germany, maternal origin from sub-Saharan Africa, a history of breastfeeding, CDC immunologic category 3, and deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy (>24 months of age). In multivariate analysis, a child's birth outside Germany was the only significant risk factor for HHV-8 seropositivity (odds ratio 3.98; 95 % confidence interval 1.27-12.42). HHV-8-associated malignancies were uncommon; only one patient had a history of KS. Serum specimen of vertically HIV-infected children and adolescents living in Germany showed a high HHV-8 seroprevalence. These findings suggest that primary HHV-8 infection-a risk factor for KS and other HHV-8-associated malignancies-occurs early in life. Thus, management of perinatally HIV-infected children should include testing for HHV-8 coinfection and should consider future risks of HHV-8-associated malignancies.