A prospective randomized comparative trial of pediatric C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope with McCoy direct laryngoscope for intubation in children posted for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric airway management requires careful clinical evaluation and experienced execution due to anatomical, physiological, and developmental considerations. Video laryngoscopy in pediatric airways is a developing area of research, with recent data suggesting that video laryngoscopes are better than standard Macintosh blades. Specifically, there is a paucity of literature on the advantages of the C-MAC D-blade compared to the McCoy direct laryngoscope. METHODS: After Ethics Committee approval, 70 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 children aged 4-12 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to intubation using a C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade (Group 1) and a McCoy laryngoscope size 2 blade (Group 2). The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) for ease of intubation was the primary outcome, while Cormack-Lehane grades, duration of laryngoscopy and intubation, hemodynamic responses, and incidence of any airway complications were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics. The median (IQR) Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score was better but was statistically nonsignificant with C-MAC (0 [0-0] vs. 0 [0-2], p = .055). The glottic views were superior (CL grade I in 32/35 vs. 23/35, p = .002), and the time to best glottic view (6 s [5-7] vs. 8.0 s [6-10], p = .006) was lesser in the C-MAC D-blade group while the total duration of intubation was comparable (20 s [16-22] vs. 18 s [15-22], p = .374). All the patients could be successfully intubated on the first attempt. None of the patients had any complications. CONCLUSION: The C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade provided faster and better glottic visualization but similar intubation difficulty compared to McCoy size 2 laryngoscope in children. The shorter time to achieve glottic view demonstrated with the C-MAC failed to translate into a shorter total duration of intubation when compared to the McCoy laryngoscope attributable to a pronounced curvature of the D-blade.

Evaluation of parental anxiety following three methods of pre-anesthesia counseling: Video, brochure and verbal communication.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to provide comprehensive and efficient pre-anesthesia counseling (PAC) utilizing audiovisual aids and to examine their effect on parental anxiety. METHODS: For this prospective, controlled study, 174 parents were recruited and randomized into three groups of 58 (Group A: video, Group B: brochure, and Group C: verbal). During pre-anesthesia counseling, the parent was provided with a detailed explanation of preoperative preparation, fasting instructions, transport to the operating room, induction, the emergence of anesthesia, and nursing in the post-anesthesia care unit based on their assigned group. We evaluated parental anxiety using Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory before and after the pre-anesthesia counseling. RESULTS: The results of our study show a statistically significant difference in the final mean STAI scores among the three groups (Group A: 34.69 ± 5.31, Group B: 36.34 ± 8.59, and Group C: 43.59 ± 3.39; p < .001). When compared to the brochure and verbal groups, the parents in the video group have the greatest difference in mean baseline and final Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores (12.207 ± 5.291, p .001). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that pre-anesthesia counseling by video or a brochure before the day of surgery is associated with a higher reduction in parental anxiety when compared to verbal communication.

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in paravertebral block in breast cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine in combination with bupivacaine for single-shot paravertebral block (PVB) in patients undergoing major breast cancer surgery. METHODS: This prospective, randomized double blind study was conducted in 45 ASA I/II/III females, aged ≥18 years, undergoing modified radical mastectomy or breast conservation surgery with axillary lymph node dissection. Patients in group PB (paravertebral-bupivacaine) received PVB with 0.5 % bupivacaine 0.3 ml/kg with 1 ml normal saline; group PBD (paravertebral-bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine) received PVB with 0.5 % bupivacaine 0.3 ml/kg and dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg in a volume of 1 ml; and group C (control) patients were given a sham block (a subcutaneous injection with 2 ml normal saline) before receiving general anesthesia (GA). All patients received analgesia by fentanyl intraoperatively and morphine patient-controlled analgesia postoperatively. RESULTS: The control group patients required more intraoperative fentanyl than the other two groups. Patients receiving dexmedetomidine had lower morphine consumption (p < 0.001), pain scores and incidence of postoperative nausea/vomiting (p = 0.011); longer time to first analgesic request; earlier time to mobilize; and better satisfaction scores. Heart rate and blood pressure values during the intraoperative period were also lower at many time points in this group. However, the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia were statistically similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: PVB using dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg added to 0.5 % bupivacaine in patients undergoing major breast cancer surgery under GA provides analgesia of longer duration with decreased postoperative opioid consumption and lower incidence of nausea/vomiting compared to PVB with bupivacaine alone or no PVB.

Clinical Evaluation of Two Different Doses of Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Pediatric Upper Limb Surgeries - A Randomized Trial.

Background: Clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetic for regional anesthesia in upper limb surgeries has been extensively studied in adults, but there is a paucity of data regarding the dose of clonidine which is effective and safe as an adjuvant in children. Aims: To find the dose of clonidine that prolongs the duration of analgesia without prolonging the side effects. Settings and Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Materials and Methods: After taking informed consent from the parents/guardian, 42 children aged 3-12 years who were scheduled to undergo unilateral upper limb surgeries below the elbow were randomized into two groups of 21 each. Group A was given 0.5 µg.kg-1 of clonidine in addition to 0.5 mL.kg-1 of 0.25% bupivacaine and Group B received 1 µg.kg-1 of clonidine added to the same volume and concentration of local anesthetic for supraclavicular brachial plexus block under general anesthesia using ultrasound guidance. The drug administration and the recording of the observations were done by an investigator blinded to the dose of clonidine. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical testing was conducted with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences system version SPSS 17.0. Results: The demographic parameters and baseline hemodynamic parameters were similar in the two groups. The block failed in one child in Group A. One patient in Group A required tramadol postoperatively while none of the patients in Group B required tramadol. The mean duration of analgesia (11.35 ± 1.54 h vs. 9.94 ± 1.04 h, P < 0.001) and the duration of motor block (8.86 ± 1.0 h vs. 7.77 ± 0.55 h, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in group B. Sedation scores were higher in the recovery room in Group B. Deep sedation, bradycardia, and respiratory depression were not observed in any of the cases. Conclusions: Clonidine 1 µg.kg-1 when added as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for pediatric supraclavicular brachial plexus block prolongs the duration of analgesia and motor block as compared to the dose of 0.5 µg.kg-1. However, this was at the cost of increased duration of motor block and sedation. Considering the clinical equivalence of the effect, a lower dose of clonidine would be preferable to avoid the undesirable effects.