Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of superficial depressed gastric lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) has been used for differential diagnosis of various focal lesions. The aim of our study was to evaluate ME-NBI criteria for cancer diagnosis in superficial depressed gastric lesions in comparison to conventional white light endoscopy (WLE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: ME-NBI and WLE images of 100 superficial gastric depressions (55 depressed cancers, 45 benign depressions) were independently evaluated by 11 endoscopists blinded to the diagnosis in each case. The presence or absence of predefined ME-NBI findings relating to microvasculature and fine mucosal structure (FMS) was recorded. A general diagnosis of benign or malignant also had to be given on the basis of a general assessment of features of color and shape as shown in the ME-NBI and WLE images, respectively, without regard to any prespecified criteria. RESULTS: Multivariate and ROC analysis demonstrated that the triad of FMS disappearance, microvascular dilation, and heterogeneity appeared to be the best combination for diagnosis of gastric cancer. ME-NBI diagnosis with the triad attained a good specificity (85 %, theoretically calculated if all of the triad were positive), which was significantly ( P < 0.001) superior to WLE general diagnosis (65 %), and comparable with ME-NBI general diagnosis (80 %). The sensitivities of the three diagnoses (ME-NBI with the triad 69 %, WLE general diagnosis 71 %, ME-NBI general diagnosis 72 %) were comparably moderate. The kappa values (interobserver concordance) for ME-NBI diagnosis with the triad (0.47) and ME-NBI general diagnosis (0.48) were superior to the kappa value for WLE diagnosis (0.34). CONCLUSION: The triad of FMS disappearance, microvascular dilation, and heterogeneity has good specificity for the diagnosis of superficial depressed gastric carcinoma, but the sensitivity needs to be improved.

Characteristics of epilepsy in severely mentally retarded individuals.

In order to clarify the characteristics of epilepsy in patients with severe mentally retarded (SMR) subjects, we analyzed 52 SMR subjects with epilepsy from the institute for SMR subjects at Kikuchi National Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan. A total of 61.5% patients had uncontrolled seizures which were resistant to treatment. The most common combinations of seizure types in those not responding to conventional anticonvulsants were generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) with tonic seizure and GTCS with atypical absence. Their clinical features were characterized by spastic paralysis associated with a slower background electroencephalogram and abnormal computed tomography scans of the head, suggesting the involvement of cortical damage. These findings suggest that a large proportion of epilepsy in SMR subjects does not respond to treatment and that the severity of organic brain damage may therefore affect the natural course of epilepsy in such patients.

Anticonvulsant effects of dipotassium clorazepate on hippocampal kindled seizures in rats.

We examined the anticonvulsant properties of dipotassium clorazepate (DC) against hippocampal kindled seizures in rats. Adult male Wistar rats were subjected to kindling 1 week after the implantation of electrodes. After five stage 5 seizures were induced, the generalized convulsion triggering threshold (GST) was determined. Dipotassium clorazepate was administered intraperitoneally in rats that showed two stable stage 5 seizures induced at the GST current intensity. Dipotassium clorazepate at doses of 1 mg/kg or more produced an anticonvulsant effect, but did not readily suppress limbic seizures. Dipotassium clorazepate did not completely suppress after-discharges (AD) even at the highest dose, which was 5 mg/kg. Moreover, raised stimulus intensity failed to affect its efficacy as an anticonvulsant. The results of the present study suggest that DC has a modest anticonvulsant potency. It is reasonable to assume that its anticonvulsant efficacy is primarily due to attenuation of AD propagation rather than the raising of the seizure triggering threshold at the kindling focus.