Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Endocr Pract ; 30(9): 810-816, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38876181

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of Gan & Lee insulin glargine (GL Glargine) with that of the originator insulin glargine (Lantus) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label, equivalence study. Five hundred seventy-six subjects with T1DM were randomized 1:1 to receive either GL Glargine or Lantus treatment for 26 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects in each treatment group who developed treatment-induced anti-insulin antibody after baseline and up to visit week 26, which was evaluated using a country-adjusted logistic regression model. The study also compared the changes in glycated hemoglobin, and adverse events including hypoglycemia. RESULTS: The percentage of subjects positive for treatment-induced anti-insulin antibody by Week 26 was 25.8% in the GL Glargine treatment group and 25.3% in the Lantus treatment group, with a 90% confidence interval (-5.4, 6.5) of the difference in proportions that fell completely between the similarity margins (-11.3, 11.3). The least squares mean difference between treatment groups for changes in glycated hemoglobin was -0.08 (90% confidence interval: -0.23, 0.06), and the other immunogenicity and safety profiles were comparable. CONCLUSION: GL Glargine demonstrated similar immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety compared to Lantus over 26 weeks in patients with T1DM.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Hipoglucemiantes , Insulina Glargina , Humanos , Insulina Glargina/uso terapéutico , Insulina Glargina/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/inmunología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Anticuerpos Insulínicos/sangre , Anticuerpos Insulínicos/inmunología , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adolescente , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/inmunología
2.
Elife ; 122023 Dec 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38063373

RESUMEN

Evolution can tinker with multi-protein machines and replace them with simpler single-protein systems performing equivalent functions in an equally efficient manner. It is unclear how, on a molecular level, such simplification can arise. With ancestral reconstruction and biochemical analysis, we have traced the evolution of bacterial small heat shock proteins (sHsp), which help to refold proteins from aggregates using either two proteins with different functions (IbpA and IbpB) or a secondarily single sHsp that performs both functions in an equally efficient way. Secondarily single sHsp evolved from IbpA, an ancestor specialized in strong substrate binding. Evolution of an intermolecular binding site drove the alteration of substrate binding properties, as well as the formation of higher-order oligomers. Upon two mutations in the α-crystallin domain, secondarily single sHsp interacts with aggregated substrates less tightly. Paradoxically, less efficient binding positively influences the ability of sHsp to stimulate substrate refolding, since the dissociation of sHps from aggregates is required to initiate Hsp70-Hsp100-dependent substrate refolding. After the loss of a partner, IbpA took over its role in facilitating the sHsp dissociation from an aggregate by weakening the interaction with the substrate, which became beneficial for the refolding process. We show that the same two amino acids introduced in modern-day systems define whether the IbpA acts as a single sHsp or obligatorily cooperates with an IbpB partner. Our discoveries illuminate how one sequence has evolved to encode functions previously performed by two distinct proteins.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Escherichia coli , Proteínas de Choque Térmico Pequeñas , Proteínas de Choque Térmico Pequeñas/genética , Proteínas de Choque Térmico/metabolismo , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Proteínas HSP70 de Choque Térmico/metabolismo
3.
Front Mol Biosci ; 8: 666893, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34055885

RESUMEN

Small heat shock proteins (sHsps) are an evolutionarily conserved class of ATP-independent chaperones that form the first line of defence during proteotoxic stress. sHsps are defined not only by their relatively low molecular weight, but also by the presence of a conserved α-crystallin domain, which is flanked by less conserved, mostly unstructured, N- and C-terminal domains. sHsps form oligomers of different sizes which deoligomerize upon stress conditions into smaller active forms. Activated sHsps bind to aggregation-prone protein substrates to form assemblies that keep substrates from irreversible aggregation. Formation of these assemblies facilitates subsequent Hsp70 and Hsp100 chaperone-dependent disaggregation and substrate refolding into native species. This mini review discusses what is known about the role and place of bacterial sHsps in the chaperone network.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA