RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition affecting up to one-quarter of children. Uncontrolled pruritus associated with childhood AD, and the accompanying scratching, negatively impacts quality of life (QoL), sleep and development. The humanized monoclonal antibody nemolizumab, used concomitantly with topical agents, was shown to reduce pruritus and improve QoL in patients with AD aged ≥ 13â years. However, data relating to its efficacy and safety in younger children (aged < 13â years) have been lacking. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab, administered concomitantly with topical agents, in Japanese paediatric patients (aged 6-12â years) with AD and inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe pruritus. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, 16-week, phase III study. Patients aged ≥ 6 and < 13â years, with confirmed AD, and an inadequate pruritic response despite treatment with topical agents and oral antihistamines were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive nemolizumab 30â mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the weekly mean 5-level itch score from baseline to week 16; secondary efficacy endpoints were related to pruritus, indicators for AD and QoL. Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory test results. RESULTS: In total, 89 patients were enrolled, received either nemolizumab 30â mg (n = 45) or placebo (n = 44) Q4W, and completed the study. The mean patient age was 9.1 (SD 1.9) years, and mean duration of AD was 8.5 (2.7) years. The change in 5-level itch score from baseline to week 16 showed a statistically significant difference in the nemolizumab treatment group (-1.3) compared with placebo (-0.5; least-squares mean difference -0.8, 95% confidence interval -1.1 to -0.5; P < 0.0001). Improvements with nemolizumab were observed from the second day of administration. Secondary endpoints were in favour of nemolizumab. No AEs resulted in discontinuation, and the overall safety profile in patients aged 6-12â years was comparable with that in older patients (aged ≥ 13â years) with AD. CONCLUSIONS: Nemolizumab is a potential new treatment option for paediatric patients with AD whose pruritus has not been sufficiently improved with topical treatments and antihistamines.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Humanos , Niño , Anciano , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Prurito/etiología , Prurito/complicaciones , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cow's milk (CM) is an increasingly common cause of severe allergic reactions, but there is uncertainty with respect to severity of reactions at low-level CM exposure, as well as the reproducibility of reaction thresholds. OBJECTIVE: We undertook an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of studies reporting double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in CM to determine the rate of anaphylaxis to low-level exposures and the reproducibility of reaction thresholds. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and IPD meta-analysis of studies reporting relevant data. Authors were contacted to provide additional data and/or clarification as needed. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Institute for Clinical Excellence methodologic checklists. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included, representing data from over 1000 participants. The cumulative ED01 and ED05 (cumulative doses causing objective symptoms in 1% and 5% of the at-risk allergic population) were 0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.5) and 2.9 (95% CI, 1.6-5.4) mg, respectively. At meta-analysis, 4.8% (95% CI, 2.0-10.9) and 4.8% (95% CI, 0.7-27.1) of individuals reacting to ≤5 mg and ≤0.5 mg of CM protein had anaphylaxis (minimal heterogeneity, I2 = 0%). Then 110 individuals underwent repeat double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges; the intraindividual variation in reaction threshold was limited to a ½-log change in 80% (95% CI, 65-89) of participants. Two individuals initially tolerated 5 mg CM protein but then reacted to this dose at a subsequent challenge, although neither had anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: About 5% of CM-allergic individuals reacting to ED01 or ED05 exposure might have anaphylaxis to that dose. This equates to 5 and 24 anaphylaxis events per 10,000 patients exposed to an ED01 or ED05 dose, respectively, in the broader CM-allergic population. Most of these anaphylactic reactions would be mild and respond to a single dose of epinephrine.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche , Bovinos , Femenino , Animales , Humanos , Leche/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/complicaciones , Anafilaxia/etiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Proteínas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
This is an abridged edition of English version of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis 2021. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a disease characterized by relapsing eczema with pruritus as a primary lesion. In Japan, from the perspective of evidence-based medicine, the current strategies for the treatment of AD consist of three primary measures: (i) use of topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment, and delgocitinib ointment as the main treatment of the inflammation; (ii) topical application of emollients to treat the cutaneous barrier dysfunction; and (iii) avoidance of apparent exacerbating factors, psychological counseling, and advice about daily life. In the present revised guidelines, the description about three new drugs, namely, dupilumab, delgocitinib, and baricitinib, has been added. The guidelines present recommendations to review clinical research articles, evaluate the balance between the advantages and disadvantages of medical activities, and optimize medical activity-related patient outcomes with respect to several important points requiring decision-making in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatitis Atópica/patología , Emolientes/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Japón , Pomadas/uso terapéutico , Tacrolimus/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) in children with severe cow's milk allergy. METHODS: The subjects comprised 28 children (aged 3-12 years) with allergic symptoms that were induced by ≤ 10 mL of cow's milk in an oral food challenge test (OFC). The subjects were randomly allocated to the treatment group (n = 14) and control group (n = 14); the former received rush immunotherapy for 2 weeks, followed by a gradual increase of cow's milk volume to 100 mL for 1 year, and the latter completely eliminated cow's milk for 1 year. Both groups underwent an OFC with 100 mL of cow's milk after 1 year. RESULTS: The treatment group had significantly higher rates of a negative OFC [7/14 (50%) vs. 0/14 (0%), p < 0.01] compared with the control group. The cow's milk-specific IgE level significantly decreased in the treatment group (p < 0.01) but not in the control group (p = 0.63). During the study period, adrenaline was required in 6/14 patients (43%) of the treatment group and in 0/14 patients (0%) of the control group. Long follow-up data were available at the 2-year point after the study for 8 in the treatment group and 7 (87.5%) of these continued to ingest milk (>100 mL). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of immunotherapy was 50%, but the incidence of adverse events was not low. Further studies focusing on safety is necessary to standardize OIT for cow's milk allergy.
Asunto(s)
Desensibilización Inmunológica , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/terapia , Leche/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Desensibilización Inmunológica/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Japón , Leucocitos Mononucleares/inmunología , Masculino , Leche/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/sangre , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/genética , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The combination drug of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting ß2 agonist is being used as a long-term control medication for pediatric asthma patients for those who are poorly controlled by ICS alone. Long-term efficacy and safety of Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate hydrate (FP/FM) was evaluated in pediatric patients with bronchial asthma. METHODS: Two inhales of FP/FM (50/5µg) at one time, twice daily were administered for 24 weeks to Japanese asthma patients aged 5 to ï¼16 years who had asthma symptoms during the observation period while using the same dosage of ICS during a certain period of time. Adverse drug reactions, morning peak flow (mPEF) and asthma symptoms were evaluated 24 weeks after administration. RESULTS: FP/FM was administered to 53 subjects. 52 subjects completed the 24 week administration. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 9.4% (5 of 53), and all of the adverse drug reactions were mild. The mPEF increased from the starting value and was maintained through the treatment period. The average change from baseline in the mPEF after 24 weeks of treatment was 21.39±2.93L/min (Least squares mean±standard error). Changes in asthma symptoms were similar to that of morning peak flow. CONCLUSION: It was considered that FP/FM could be useful for long-term control of pediatric asthma.
Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Fumarato de Formoterol/uso terapéutico , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Aerosoles/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Combinación de Medicamentos , Fluticasona/efectos adversos , Fumarato de Formoterol/efectos adversos , Humanos , Japón , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although the guidelines in most countries do not recommend continuous inhalation of l-isoproterenol to treat pediatric patients with acute severe exacerbation of asthma, lower dose of l-isoproterenol has been widely used in Japan. To determine whether the efficacy of low-dose l-isoproterenol was superior to that of salbutamol, we conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Hospitalized patients aged 1-17 years were eligible if they had severe asthma exacerbation defined by the modified pulmonary index score (MPIS). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive inhalation of l-isoproterenol (10 µg/kg/h) or salbutamol (500 µg/kg/h) for 12 hours via a large-volume nebulizer with oxygen. The primary outcome was the change in MPIS from baseline to 3 hours after starting inhalation. Trial registration number UMIN000001991. RESULTS: From December 2009 to October 2013, 83 patients (42 in the l-isoproterenol group and 41 in the salbutamol group) were enrolled into the study. Of these, one patient in the l-isoproterenol group did not receive the study drug and was excluded from the analysis. Compared with salbutamol, l-isoproterenol reduced MPIS more rapidly. Mean (SD) changes in MPIS at 3 hours were -2.9 (2.5) in the l-isoproterenol group and -0.9 (2.3) in the salbutamol group (difference -2.0, 95% confidence interval -3.1 to -0.9; P < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 1 (2%) and 11 (27%) patients in the l-isoproterenol and salbutamol groups, respectively (P = 0.003). Hypokalemia and tachycardia occurred only in the salbutamol group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose l-isoproterenol has a more rapid effect with fewer adverse events than salbutamol.
Asunto(s)
Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/fisiopatología , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Isoproterenol/uso terapéutico , Administración por Inhalación , Albuterol/administración & dosificación , Albuterol/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Isoproterenol/administración & dosificación , Isoproterenol/efectos adversos , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While Japanese guideline recommends initial control treatment for preschool children with asthma symptoms more than once a month, Western guidelines do not. To determine whether control treatment with montelukast was more effective than as-needed ß2-agonists in this population, we conducted a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Eligible patients were children aged 1-5 years who had asthma symptoms more than once a month but less than once a week. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive montelukast 4 mg daily for 48 weeks or as-needed ß2-agonists. The primary endpoint was the number of acute asthma exacerbations before starting step-up treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. This study is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network clinical trials registry, number UMIN000002219. RESULTS: From September 2009 to November 2012, 93 patients (47 in the montelukast group and 46 in the no-controller group) were enrolled into the study. All patients were included in the analysis. During the study, 13 patients (28%) in the montelukast group and 23 patients (50%) in the no-controller group had acute exacerbations with the mean numbers of 0.9 and 1.9/year, respectively (P = 0.027). In addition, 10 (21%) and 19 (41%) patients received step-up treatment, respectively. Cumulative incidence of step-up treatment was significantly lower in the montelukast group (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.92; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast is an effective control treatment for preschool children who had asthma symptoms more than once a month but less than once a week.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Sistema de Registros , Acetatos/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/efectos adversos , Asma/epidemiología , Preescolar , Ciclopropanos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , SulfurosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Periostin and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) are involved in the pathogenesis of asthma. Acute bronchitis due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection during infancy exhibits an asthma-like pathogenesis, suggesting that it may be associated with the subsequent development of asthma. However, the mechanism by which RSV infection leads to development of asthma has not yet been fully elucidated. METHODS: Infants younger than 36 months were enrolled and classified into three groups. Group I included patients hospitalized with RSV-induced bronchitis. These patients were further stratified into two sub-groups according to whether the criteria for the modified Asthma Predictive Index (mAPI) had been met: Group I consisted of mAPI (+) and mAPI (-) patients; Group II included patients with food allergy as a positive control group; and Group III included children with no allergy as a negative control group. Serum periostin and SCCA levels were measured in the groups. This study was registered as a clinical trial (UMIN000012339). RESULTS: We enrolled 14 subjects in Group I mAPI (+), 22 in Group I mAPI (-), 18 in Group II, and 18 in Group III. In Group I, the serum periostin and SCCA levels were significantly higher during the acute phase compared with the recovery phase. However, no significant differences were found between Group I mAPI (+) and mAPI (-). CONCLUSIONS: The serum periostin and SCCA levels increased during acute RSV bronchitis. Both periostin and SCCA may play a role in the pathogenesis of acute bronchitis due to RSV.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Neoplasias/sangre , Bronquitis/sangre , Bronquitis/virología , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/sangre , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/sangre , Serpinas/sangre , Asma/sangre , Asma/virología , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/complicaciones , Regulación hacia ArribaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the long-term safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy with TO-204, a standardized house dust mite (HDM) allergen extracts, we conducted a multicenter, open label clinical trial. METHODS: Japanese patients aged 5-65 years were eligible for the study, if they had HDM-induced allergic rhinitis (AR), allergic bronchial asthma (BA), or both. TO-204 was administered in a dose titration scheme, and the maintenance dose was determined according to the predefined criteria. The treatment period was 52 weeks, and patients who were willing to continue the treatment received TO-204 beyond 52 weeks. This clinical trial is registered at the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (Japic CTI-121900). RESULTS: Between July 2012 and May 2015, 44 patients (28 with AR and 16 with allergic BA) were enrolled into the study. All patients were included in the analysis. The duration of treatment ranged from 23 to 142 weeks and the median maintenance dose was 200 Japanese allergy units (JAU). Adverse events occurred in 22 patients (50%). The most common adverse event was local reactions related to the injection sites. Four patients experienced anaphylactic reactions when they were treated with the dose of 500 JAU. Two patients experienced anaphylactic shock with the doses of 1000 JAU at onset. These 6 patients could continue the study with dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Safety profile of TO-204 was acceptable in Japanese patients with HDM-induced AR or allergic BA. Higher doses should be administered carefully, because the risk of anaphylaxis increased at doses of 500 or 1000 JAU.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos Dermatofagoides/administración & dosificación , Asma/terapia , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Antígenos Dermatofagoides/efectos adversos , Pueblo Asiatico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pyroglyphidae/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are no reports on the prevalence and social acceptance of food allergies (FAs) and FAinduced symptoms in nursery schools in Japan. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to clarify the current status of FA among children in nurseries. METHODS: Investigations were conducted in childcare facilities nationwide through survey request forms found on the Web page or sent via post. RESULT: We received responses from 15722 out of the 32210 institutions (48.8%) to whom survey request forms were sent.The overall prevalence of FA was 4.0%, with 6.4% at age less than 1 year, 7.1% at age 1, 5.1% at age 2, 3.6% at age 3, 2.8% at age 4, 2.3% at age 5, and 0.8% at age 6. Ninety-three point four percent of the institutions responded that they catered to children with FA, whereas 3.3% of the institutions responded that they did not. The details of the meal service were as follows: 52.4% were meals without causative foods, 39.5% were alternative meals without causative foods, and 3.3% were packed lunches from home. Seven point six percent of infants had at least one FA symptom in the institutions. CONCLUSION: Several nursery schools were accepting children with FA, and school lunches were also modified by removing causative food and providing alternative meals. On the other hand, several infants experience FA-induced symptoms, and it is necessary for each department to establish a system to reduce accidental ingestion and to ensure proper emergency response.
Asunto(s)
Guarderías Infantiles , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Responsabilidad Parental , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Japón , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Omalizumab is effective and well-tolerated in children with moderate to severe allergic asthma. However, the effects of long-term treatment with omalizumab in this population haven't been well investigated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of omalizumab in children with uncontrolled severe asthma. METHODS: Thirty-eight Japanese children (aged 7-16 years) who completed the 24-week treatment core study were included in an uncontrolled extension study, in which treatment with omalizumab continued until the pediatric indication was approved in Japan (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01328886). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (92.1%) completed the extension study. The median exposure throughout the core and extension studies was 116.6 weeks (range, 46.9-151.1 weeks). The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis, influenza, upper respiratory tract infection, and asthma. Serious adverse events developed in 10 patients (26.3%), but resolved completely with additional treatments. Incidence of adverse events didn't increase with extended exposure with omalizumab. Twenty-nine patients (76.3%) achieved completely- or well-controlled asthma compared with 9 patients (23.7%) at the start of the extension study. QOL scores, the rates (per year) of hospitalizations and ER visits were significantly improved compared with the baseline of the core study [39.0 vs 48.0 (median), p < 0.001 for QOL, 1.33 vs 0.16, p < 0.001 for hospitalization, 0.68 vs 0.15, p = 0.002 for ER visits]. Remarkably, the mean total IgE level showed a decreasing trend while exposure to omalizumab remained at steady-state. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with omalizumab is well-tolerated and effective in children with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma. No new safety findings were identified.
Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Omalizumab/administración & dosificación , Omalizumab/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Omalizumab/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are some biomarkers for asthma diagnosis but they are often difficult in clinical use, particularly in pediatric cases. Periostin is an extracellular matrix protein, upregulated in response to IL-4 or IL-13. Serum periostin is expected to be used as a non-invasive biomarker for asthma diagnosis and management. METHODS: Twenty-eight children with asthma (BA) and 27 children without asthma (patients with pectus excavatum, etc. as control group) aged 6-16 years were included. Bronchial asthma was diagnosed according to International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), lung function, blood eosinophil counts, total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, and serum periostin levels were assessed. Results were compared between BA and controls. Asthma diagnostic accuracies were calculated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: Serum periostin levels in the BA group were significantly higher than those in the control group [medians (with interquartile ranges), 134.0 (116.3-166.3) vs. 112.0 (97.0-132.0) ng/ml; p = 0.012]. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for periostin, FeNO, and eosinophil counts were 0.70, 0.72, and 0.84, respectively. After the exclusion of controls with pectus excavatum, AUC for periostin, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ), and maximum mid-expiratory flow rate (MMF) were 0.75, 0.74, and 0.80, respectively. CONCLUSION: Serum periostin levels were significantly higher in children with asthma. ROC AUC values for periostin were equivalent to conventional biomarkers, including FeNO levels and lung function testing, indicating the utility of serum periostin levels in diagnosing asthma in children.
Asunto(s)
Asma/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/sangre , Adolescente , Antígenos de Neoplasias/sangre , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Niño , Eosinófilos/citología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Interleucina-13/sangre , Interleucina-4/sangre , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Serpinas/sangre , EspirometríaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several guidelines, including the Japanese Pediatric Guideline for the Treatment and Management of Asthma (JPGL), recommend salmeterol/fluticasone combination therapy (SFC) as step 3 to 4 treatment for moderate to severe asthma. However, the optimal step-down approach to SFC remains unclear. In the current study, we examined step-down approaches in asthmatic children whose symptoms had been stabilized by SFC 100/200 µg/day. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted over 12 weeks. For step-down therapy, subjects aged 5-15 years were randomly assigned to an SFC group (25/50 µg b.i.d.) or an FP group (100 µg b.i.d.), and treated for 12 weeks. Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) scores, lung function, and exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels were monitored. RESULTS: Of 131 enrolled subjects, 128 completed the study and were included in the analysis. Decreases in % peak expiratory flow rate and % forced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity (V50) were observed in the FP group at each time point. There was a significant difference between the two groups for the change in %V50 from its previous value at each time point. There were no significant changes in FeNO levels (range 15-20 ppb) or C-ACT scores (â¼26 points) within or between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A high level of asthma control was maintained with both approaches. The use of SFC step-down resulted in somewhat better respiratory function, with no worsening of airway inflammation. However, halving the dose of SFC and switching to FP alone are both optimal step-down approaches.
Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Xinafoato de Salmeterol/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Asma/diagnóstico , Niño , Preescolar , Esquema de Medicación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Espiración , Femenino , Fluticasona/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Óxido Nítrico , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Xinafoato de Salmeterol/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In Japan, pediatric asthma is managed based on the Japanese Pediatric Guideline for the Treatment and Management of Asthma 2012 (JPGL 2012). JPGL 2012 also recommends treat- ment and management aimed at complete control through avoiding exacerbation factors and appropriate use of anti-inflammatory drugs. In this review, we describe an overview of the newer treatment options available for treatment and management of pediatric asthma and some topics.
Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Niño , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the health effects of volcanic gas, mainly sulfur dioxide (SO2), exposure on the children of Miyakejima Island. METHODS: Health checkups were conducted in November from 2006 to 2011. Health effects were evaluated through a self-administered questionnaire on respiratory and irritative symptoms, and spirometry. SO2 was measured continuously from February 2005 onward at six fixed monitoring stations in inhabitable areas. Based on mean SO2 concentration during 3 months before each health checkup, inhabitable areas were classified into three categories: (1) lower (area L); (2) higher (area H-1); and (3) highest (area H-2). RESULTS: Average concentrations (ppb) of SO2 decreased year-by-year and ranged from 11.3 to 2.47 in area L, from 32.2 to 12.2 in area H-1, and from 75.1 to 12.1 in area H-2, respectively. In general, prevalence of respiratory and irritative symptoms was higher in area H-2, and the prevalence decreased year-by-year in all three areas by Cochran-Armitage test for trend. We defined a study population in area L in 2008 as a reference population because we had no unexposed population. Applying a logistic regression model, age-, sex-, and hypersusceptibility-adjusted prevalence odds ratios to the reference population showed clear exposure-dependent increases in some irritative symptoms such as "Irritation and/or pain in throat" and "in eyes," and approximately 30 ppb seemed to be the threshold concentration. Spirometry did not show any significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Though no pulmonary functions were affected, some subjective symptoms were detected dose-dependently by SO2 exposure concentration in child residents during the 6 years after the eruption.
Asunto(s)
Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Dióxido de Azufre/toxicidad , Erupciones Volcánicas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Niño , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Femenino , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación/análisis , Japón/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Enfermedades Respiratorias/inducido químicamente , Espirometría , Dióxido de Azufre/análisis , Erupciones Volcánicas/análisisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbation of asthma is divided qualitatively into mild, moderate, and severe attacks and respiratory failure. This system is, however, not suitable for estimating small changes in respiratory condition with time and for determining the efficacy of treatments, because it has a qualitative, but not quantitative nature. METHODS: To evaluate the usefulness of quantitative estimation of asthma exacerbation, modified Pulmonary Index Score (mPIS) values were measured in 87 asthmatic children (mean age, 5.0 ± 0.4 years) during hospitalization. mPIS was calculated by adding the sum of scores for 6 items (scores of 0-3 were given for each item). These consisted of heart rate, respiratory rate, accessory muscle use, inspiratory-to-expiratory flow ratio, degree of wheezing, and oxygen saturation in room air. Measurements were made at visits and at hospitalization and were then made twice a day until discharge. RESULTS: mPIS values were highly correlated among raters. mPIS values at visits were 9.1 ± 0.1 and 12.6 ± 0.4 in subjects with moderate and severe attacks, respectively (p < 0.001). mPIS values of subjects requiring continuous inhalation therapy (CIT) with isoproterenol in addition to systemic steroids were significantly higher than the values of those without CIT (12.0 ± 0.5 and 9.3 ± 0.2, respectively, p < 0.001). A score of 10 was suggested to be the optimal cutoff for distinguishing between subjects requiring and not requiring CIT, from the perspectives of both sensitivity and specificity. mPIS at hospitalization correlated well with the period until discharge, suggesting that this score was a useful predictor for the clinical course after hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: mPIS could be a useful tool for several aspects during acute asthma attacks, including the determination of a treatment plan, and prediction of the period of hospitalization in admitted patients, although prospective studies would be required to establish our hypothesis.
Asunto(s)
Asma/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/fisiopatología , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Isoproterenol/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Ventilación Pulmonar , Frecuencia Respiratoria , Ruidos Respiratorios/fisiopatologíaAsunto(s)
Bronquiolitis/diagnóstico , Bronquiolitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Haemophilus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Haemophilus/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/patología , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Omalizumab has demonstrated clinical benefits in children with moderate to severe allergic asthma. However, no studies have been performed in Japanese asthmatic children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy including free IgE suppression and safety of omalizumab in Japanese children with severe allergic asthma. The primary objective was to examine whether omalizumab decreases serum free IgE levels to less than 25 ng/ml (target level of suppression). METHODS: Thirty-eight Japanese children (6-15 years) with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (>200 µg/day fluticasone propionate or equivalent) and two or more controller therapies received add-on treatment with omalizumab in a 24-week, multicenter, uncontrolled, open-label study. RESULTS: The geometric mean serum free IgE level at 24 weeks was 15.6 ng/mL. Compared with baseline, total asthma symptom scores, daily activity scores and nocturnal sleep scores at 24 weeks were significantly improved. The rates of asthma exacerbation and hospitalization due to asthma were reduced by 69.2% and 78.2%, respectively (p < 0.001), versus baseline. Quality-of-life scores were also significantly improved (p < 0.001). In addition, 11 (28.9%) patients reduced the dose of any asthma controller medications. Thirty-six (94.7%) patients experienced at least one adverse event during the treatment period. All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and no new safety concerns were detected. No patients discontinued the study. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese children with severe allergic asthma, omalizumab decreased free IgE levels to less than 25 ng/mL. Omalizumab improved asthma control and was well-tolerated, as well.