Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Trauma ; 64(6): 1638-50, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18545134

RESUMEN

The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma's Advanced Trauma Life Support Course is currently taught in 50 countries. The 8th edition has been revised following broad input by the International ATLS subcommittee. Graded levels of evidence were used to evaluate and approve changes to the course content. New materials related to principles of disaster management have been added. ATLS is a common language teaching one safe way of initial trauma assessment and management.


Asunto(s)
Curriculum/normas , Educación Médica Continua , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/normas , Traumatología/educación , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum/tendencias , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Tratamiento de Urgencia/normas , Tratamiento de Urgencia/tendencias , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/tendencias , Masculino , Resucitación/educación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Traumatología/tendencias , Estados Unidos
2.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 78(6): 1102-10, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26151508

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that trauma systems decrease morbidity and mortality after injury, but progress in system development has been slow and inconsistent. This study evaluated the progress in 20 state or regional systems following a consultative visit conducted by the Trauma Systems Evaluation and Planning Committee (TSEPC) of the Committee on Trauma, expanding on a previous study published in 2008, which demonstrated significant progress in six systems following consultation. METHODS: Twenty trauma systems that underwent TSEPC consultation between 2004 and 2010 were studied. Status was assessed using a set of 16 objective indicators. Baseline scores for 14 regions were calculated during the consultation visit and taken from the 2008 study for the remaining six. Postconsultation status was assessed during facilitated teleconferences. Progress was assessed by comparing changes in indicator scores. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in approximately 80% of systems evaluated within 60 months following the consultation. There was no progress in five of six systems reevaluated over 80 months after consultation, and all four systems evaluated over 100 months after consultation showed erosion of progress. Significant improvements were seen in 10 of the 16 individual indicators, with the greatest gains related to system standards, data systems, performance improvement, prehospital triage criteria, and linkages with public health. Consistent with the 2008 study, the two indicators related to financing for the trauma system showed no improvement. CONCLUSION: The TSEPC consultation process continues to be associated with improvements in trauma system development in approximately 80% of cases, consistent with the 2008 study, but gains are not self-sustaining. There was a stagnation in progress and a deterioration in total score over time, suggesting that a repeat consultation may be beneficial. System funding remains a challenge and was the area most likely to suffer setbacks over during study period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management study, level V.


Asunto(s)
Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Regionalización/organización & administración , Centros Traumatológicos , Comités Consultivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 31(2): 264-273, 1998 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28139995

RESUMEN

See editorial, p 274. Variations in the way that data are entered in emergency department record systems impede the use of ED records for direct patient care and deter their reuse for many other legitimate purposes. To foster more uniform ED data, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control is coordinating a public-private partnership that has developed recommended specifications for many observations, actions, instructions, conclusions, and identifiers that are entered in ED records. The partnership's initial product, Data Elements for Emergency Department Systems, Release 1.0 (DEEDS), is intended for use by individuals and organizations responsible for ED record systems. If the recommended specifications are widely adopted, then problems-such as data incompatibility and high costs of collecting, linking, and using data-can be substantially reduced. The collaborative effort that led to DEEDS, Release 1.0 sets a precedent for future review and revision of the initial recommendations. [DEEDS Writing Committee: Data Elements for Emergency Department Systems, Release 1.0 (DEEDS): A summary report. Ann Emerg Med February 1998;31:264-273.].

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA