An open-label prospective study to assess short incubation time white LED light photodynamic therapy in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma.

Artificial white LED light photodynamic therapy (awl-PDT) is an effective, pain-free treatment for actinic keratosis. The efficacy of awl-PDT in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) has not been assessed. Patients with histologically confirmed sBCC underwent two treatments of awl-PDT 1 week apart. Lesions were incubated with methyl 5-aminolaevulinic acid for 30 min and then illuminated using the Maquet Power LED 500 theatre light (405-800nm, 140 000 lux) to deliver an equivalent red light dose of 75 J/cm2 at a rate of 55 mW/cm2 . Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale during treatment. Clinical response was assessed at day 28. Follow-up continued 3 months for 1 year. Cosmetic outcome was assessed at 3 months and 1 year. Twenty-eight patients with 36 lesions and a mean age of 63.64 (SD 2.62) were recruited. The median lesion size was 15 mm (IQR 8.75). The response rate at day 28 was 100%. Recurrence rates were 3/36 (8.3%) at 3 months, 6/36 (16.7%) at 6 months, 10/36 (27.8%) at 9 months and 11/36 (30.6%) at 1 year. Median pain scores were 0/100 (IQR 0) and 0/100 (IQR 5) during treatments one and two, respectively. Cosmetic outcome was excellent or good in the majority of cases. Although initially effective for sBCC at 28 days, 30.6% of lesions recurred 1 year after awl-PDT. Pain scores were negligible, and the cosmetic outcome was favourable. Further head-to-head studies with optimised protocols are required to determine if awl-PDT has a role in the treatment of sBCC.

Artificial White Light vs Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Daylight photodynamic therapy using topical methyl 5-aminolevulinic acid (MAL) for actinic keratoses (AKs) is as effective as conventional photodynamic therapy but has the advantage of being almost pain free. Daylight photodynamic therapy, however, requires dry and warm weather conditions. OBJECTIVE: To establish if topical MAL photodynamic therapy using a white light light-emitting diode (LED) lamp is as effective and well-tolerated as daylight photodynamic therapy for the treatment of AKs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 22 men with significant photodamage and a high number of AKs were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, single-blind study, employing a split-scalp design, comparing the effectiveness and adverse effects of daylight photodynamic therapy and artificial white light (AWL) LED photodynamic therapy for the treatment of AKs on the forehead and scalp. Organ transplant recipients were excluded. Patients were treated and evaluated at an academic tertiary referral dermatology center. Treatment lasted from April 2014 to July 2014 and follow-up visits occurred for 9 months posttreatment. INTERVENTIONS: Two symmetrical treatment fields were defined and AKs counted, mapped, and photographed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. Patients had half of their scalp treated with daylight photodynamic therapy and the other half treated with AWL photodynamic therapy 1 week apart and randomly allocated. MAL was applied, and treatment commenced 30 minutes later and lasted 2 hours. Irradiance, illuminance, and light spectra measurements were performed. The integrated dose in J/cm2 was measured. The effective light dose, weighted to the absorption spectrum for protoporphyrin IX, was calculated. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the reduction in total AK count per treatment field. Secondary end points included adverse effects and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: We enrolled 22 men with a median age of 72 years (range, 47-85 years) at baseline, the total (median of AKs per field) were 469 (20.5) for the DPDT group and 496 (20.5) for the AWLPDT group (P = .34). The median number and percentage of reduction in AKs per field were 12 and 62.3% for DPDT and 14 and 67.7% for AWLPDT at 1 month (P = .21 and P = .13, respectively). There was no significant difference in the reduction percentage of AKs for either treatment at 1, 3, and 6 months. At 9 months, the median number and percentage of reduction in AKs per field was 9.0 and 48.4% for DPDT and 12.0 and 64.4% for AWLPDT (P = .13 and P = .05, respectively). Pain was reported by 14 patients with DPDT and 16 patients with AWLPDT (median maximum score [out of 100], 4 vs 6; P = .51). Moderate erythema was reported by 9 patients after DPDT and 14 patients after AWLPDT. On a scale of 0 (intolerable) to 10 (very tolerable) patients rated DPDT as 9.5 and AWLPDT as 9 (P = .37). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Photodynamic therapy using an AWL source was as effective and well-tolerated as daylight photodynamic therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02520700.

Community violence, social support networks, ethnic group differences, and male perpetration of intimate partner violence.

The authors examined how witnessing community violence influenced social support networks and how these networks were associated with male-to-female intimate partner violence (IPV) in ethnically diverse male college students. The authors assessed whether male social support members themselves had perpetrated IPV (male network violence) and whether female social support members had been victimized by intimates (female network victimization). The results indicated an association between community violence and male network violence; both factors were significantly associated with higher levels of IPV. Furthermore, the relationship between community violence and IPV was partially mediated by male network violence. Additionally, the results indicated a moderated relationship such that male participants who reported the highest levels of exposure to community violence and male network violence were at highest risk for IPV. However, this relationship did not hold across all ethnicities and races. The findings suggest that the mechanisms associating community violence, networks, and IPV are multifaceted and differ across ethnicity and race.