Race and Sex Differences in the Association of Bystander CPR for Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with higher survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but whether its association with survival differs by patients' sex and race and ethnicity is less clear. METHODS: Within a large US registry, we identified 623 342 nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during 2013 to 2022 for this observational cohort study. Using hierarchical logistic regression, we examined whether there was a differential association between bystander CPR and survival outcomes by patients' sex and race and ethnicity, overall and by neighborhood strata. RESULTS: Mean age was 62.1±17.1 years, and 35.9% were women. Nearly half of patients (49.8%) were non-Hispanic White; 20.6% were non-Hispanic Black; 7.3% were Hispanic; 2.9% were Asian; and 0.4% were Native American. Overall, 58 098 (9.3%) survived to hospital discharge. Although bystander CPR was associated with higher survival in each race and ethnicity group, the association of bystander CPR compared with patients without bystander CPR in each racial and ethnic group was highest in individuals who were White (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.30-1.37]) and Native American (adjusted OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.02-1.90]) and lowest in individuals who were Black (adjusted OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.04-1.14]; Pinteraction<0.001). The adjusted OR for bystander CPR compared with those without bystander CPR for Hispanic patients was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.20-1.139), for Asian patients, it was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.12-1.42), and for those of unknown race, it was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.25-1.36). Similarly, bystander CPR was associated with higher survival in both sexes, but its association with survival was higher in men (adjusted OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.31-1.38]) than women (adjusted OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.12-1.19]; Pinteraction<0.001). The weaker association of bystander CPR in Black individuals and women was consistent across neighborhood race and ethnicity and income strata. Similar results were observed for the outcome of survival without severe neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Although bystander CPR was associated with higher survival in all patients, its association with survival was weakest for Black individuals and women with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Have Higher Performing Hospitals Stayed High-Performing?

BACKGROUND: Survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) has declined since the COVID-19 pandemic. Because the burden of COVID-19 was uneven throughout the U.S., it remains unknown if top-performer hospitals in IHCA survival have remained top-performers since the pandemic. METHODS: Within Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation, we identified hospitals with at least 2 years of registry participation pre-pandemic (2017-2019) and post-pandemic (July 2020-2022) and with at least 20 IHCA cases in both periods. Using multivariable hierarchical models with hospital as a random effect and adjusting for patient and arrest characteristics, we calculated risk-standardized survival rates to discharge (RSSR) for IHCA at each hospital during the pre- and post-pandemic periods. We then assessed the correlation between a hospital's pre-pandemic and post-pandemic RSSR for IHCA, and whether the correlation differed by the proportion of Black or Hispanic IHCA patients at each hospital. RESULTS: A total of 243 hospitals were included, comprising 122,561 IHCAs (pre-pandemic: 57,601; post-pandemic: 64,960). Pre-pandemic, the mean RSSR was 26.8% (SD, 5.2%) whereas the mean RSSR post-pandemic was 21.7% (SD, 5.5%). There was good correlation between a hospital's pre- and post-pandemic RSSR: correlation of 0.55. When hospitals were categorized into tertiles based on the proportion of their IHCA patients who were Black or Hispanic, this correlation remained similar: 0.48, 0.68, and 0.45 (interaction P-value: 0.69) for hospitals in the upper, middle and lower tertiles, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the COVID-19 pandemic affected the U.S. unevenly, there was good correlation in a hospital's performance for IHCA survival before and after the pandemic, even at hospitals caring for a larger proportion of Black and Hispanic patients. Future studies are needed to understand what characteristics of high-performing hospitals pre-pandemic allowed many to continue to excel in the post-pandemic period.

Time to bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation by patient sex for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Delays in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are associated with worse out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes. Whether disparities exist in time to CPR between women and men is unknown. METHODS: We included witnessed OHCAs treated with bystander CPR from the Cardiac Arrest Registry Enhancing Survival between 2013-2021. The primary outcome was time to first bystander CPR, and secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological survival. Hierarchical ordinal regression was used to model time to first CPR, which estimates the odds of having a 2-minute longer delay (from 0 to ≥10 minutes) in receiving bystander CPR. The model included sex, age, race, location of arrest, cardiac arrest etiology, day of week, and season as fixed effects and EMS agency as a random effect to account for clustering of patients within an agency. RESULTS: Of 78,043 patients with a witnessed OHCA that received bystander CPR, 25,197 (32.3%) were women. The median [IQR] time to first bystander CPR was 2 [1,5] minutes for both women and men. In adjusted analysis, time to bystander CPR was similar in men and women (p = 0.26). Moreover, there was a statistically significantly graded inverse association between time to bystander CPR and survival. CONCLUSION: For patients with witnessed OHCA that received bystander CPR, women and men had similar times to CPR, although 5-minute or greater delays in initiating CPR was not uncommon. Delays in bystander CPR in OHCA were associated with worse survival outcomes.

Correlation between hospital rates of survival to discharge and long-term survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest: Insights from Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation registry.

AIM: Given challenges in collecting long-term outcomes for survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), most studies have focused on in-hospital survival. We evaluated the correlation between a hospital's risk-standardized survival rate (RSSR) at hospital discharge for IHCA with its RSSR for long-term survival. METHODS: We identified patients ≥65 years of age with IHCA at 472 hospitals in Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation registry during 2000-2012, who could be linked to Medicare files to obtain post-discharge survival data. We constructed hierarchical logistic regression models to compute RSSR at discharge, and 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year RSSRs for each hospital. The association between in-hospital and long-term RSSR was evaluated with weighted Kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Among 56,231 Medicare beneficiaries (age 77.2 ± 7.5 years and 25,206 [44.8%] women), 10,536 (18.7%) survived to discharge and 8,485 (15.1%) survived to 30 days after discharge. Median in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year RSSRs were 18.6% (IQR, 16.7-20.4%), 14.9% (13.2-16.7%), 10.3% (9.1-12.1%), and 7.6% (6.8-8.8%), respectively. The weighted Kappa coefficient for the association between a hospital's RSSR at discharge with its 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year RSSRs were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68-0.76), 0.56 (0.50-0.61), and 0.47 (0.41-0.53), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong correlation between a hospital's RSSR at discharge and its 30-day RSSR for IHCA, although this correlation weakens over time. Our findings suggest that a hospital's RSSR at discharge for IHCA may be a reasonable surrogate of its 30-day post-discharge survival and could be used by Medicare to benchmark hospital performance for this condition without collecting 30-day survival data.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic On Patient Social Media Use and Acceptance of Cosmetic Procedures.

Objective: We sought to explore facets of social media usage and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the acceptance of cosmetic procedures. Methods: At an outpatient dermatology clinic from October 2019 to June 2022, 175 subjects who were English and Spanish speaking and aged 18 years or older were recruited. Participants completed a questionnaire including demographic information, social media usage, perceptions of cosmetic procedures, and desire to have a cosmetic procedure. Results were grouped into a pre-COVID-19 pandemic group and post-COVID-19 pandemic group due to a natural experiment that arose. Data were analyzed to ascertain the effect of social media usage and other factors that impact desire to undergo a cosmetic procedure between patients before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Factors resulting in differences in desire to have a cosmetic procedure included using photo editing applications (p=0.002), following celebrities and influencers on social media (p<0.001), and following social media accounts showing cosmetic results (p=0.013). There was a statistically significant change in number of participants that: followed social media accounts showing results of cosmetic procedures (pre-COVID: 31.9%, post-COVID: 50.6%, p=0.036); had thought about having a cosmetic procedure done (pre-COVID: 63.8%, post-COVID: 86.4%, p<0.001); had discussed cosmetic procedures with a physician, dermatologist, or other professional (pre-COVID: 43.6%, post-COVID: 67.9%, p=0.001); and believed that a cosmetic procedure would help their self-esteem (pre-COVID: 47.9%, post-COVID: 77.8%, p<0.001). Limitations: Limitations of this study include response bias, recall bias, and single institution study design, limiting generalizability. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that time spent on social media and use of photo-editing applications significantly contributes to desire to undergo a cosmetic procedure and contributed to the rise of cosmetic consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Limited English proficiency, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and in-hospital COVID-19 outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular risk factors and history of cardiovascular disease are associated with greater morbidity and mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Limited English proficiency (LEP) has also been associated with worse outcomes in this setting, including requiring intensive care unit (ICU) level of care and in-hospital death. Whether non-English-language preference (NELP) modifies the association between cardiovascular risk factors or disease and outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to a large New England health system between March 1 and December 31, 2020, who tested positive for COVID-19. NELP was defined as having a preferred language that was not English noted in the electronic health record. METHODS: Cardiovascular risk factors, history of cardiovascular disease, and NELP were related to the primary composite clinical outcome-death or ICU admission-using multivariable binary logistic regression adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Interaction terms for NELP and model covariates were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 3582 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 1024 (28.6%) had NELP; 812 (79.3%) of the patients with NELP received interpreter services. Death or ICU admission occurred in 794 (22.2%) of the hospitalized patients. NELP was not significantly associated with the primary composite outcome in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. In the adjusted analyses, only male gender, coronary artery disease, pulmonary circulatory disease, and liver disease significantly predicted the primary outcome. NELP did not modify the effect of these associations. CONCLUSIONS: NELP was not significantly associated with odds of death or ICU admission, nor did it modify the association between cardiovascular risk factors or history of cardiovascular disease and this composite outcome. Because most patients with NELP received interpreter services, these findings may support the role of such services in ensuring equitable outcomes.

Association Between Delays in Time to Bystander CPR and Survival for Witnessed Cardiac Arrest in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Prompt initiation of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is critical to survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the association between delays in bystander CPR and OHCA survival is poorly understood. METHODS: In this observational study using a nationally representative US registry, we identified patients who received bystander CPR from a layperson for a witnessed OHCA from 2013 to 2021. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the association between time to CPR (<1 minute versus 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and ≥10-minute intervals) and survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological survival (survival to discharge with cerebral performance category of 1 or 2 [ie, without severe neurological disability]). RESULTS: Of 78 048 patients with a witnessed OHCA treated with bystander CPR, the mean age was 63.5±15.7 years and 25, 197 (32.3%) were women. The median time to bystander CPR was 2 (1-5) minutes, with 10% of patients having a≥10-minute delay before initiation of CPR. Overall, 15 000 (19.2%) patients survived to hospital discharge and 13 159 (16.9%) had favorable neurological survival. There was a graded inverse relationship between time to bystander CPR and survival to hospital discharge (P for trend <0.001). Compared with patients who received CPR within 1 minute, those with a time to CPR of 2 to 3 minutes were 9% less likely to survive to discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.95]) and those with a time to CPR 4 to 5 minutes were 27% less likely to survive (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68-0.77]). A similar graded inverse relationship was found between time to bystander CPR and favorable neurological survival (P for trend <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with witnessed OHCA, there was a dose-response relationship between delays in bystander initiation of CPR and lower survival rates.

Effect of Ablation Energy Source on Outcomes of Slow Pathway Modification for AVNRT in Children.

BACKGROUND: Selection of radiofrequency ablation (RF) or cryoablation (Cryo) for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in children remains controversial due to a lack of contemporary comparison studies in this population. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare outcomes of RF and Cryo for AVNRT in the pediatric population. METHODS: AVNRT ablation outcomes were retrospectively analyzed utilizing the National Cardiovascular Data Registry IMPACT (Improving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatment) Registry from April 2016 to March 2019. Data from subjects 1 to 21 years of age undergoing elective first-time slow pathway (SP) modification for AVNRT were included. Exclusion criteria included <1 year of age, congenital heart disease, and >1 ablation target. Cases were analyzed by ablation energy: 1) RF only; 2) Cryo only; 3) radiofrequency ablation switching to cryoablation (RF→Cryo); and 4) cryoablation switching to radiofrequency ablation (Cryo→RF). The primary outcome was acute ablation failure. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital adverse events. RESULTS: Among 2,448 patients (mean age 13.6 ± 3.4 years, 60% female), RF only was employed in 43% (n = 1,046), Cryo only in 49% (n = 1,201), RF→Cryo in 6% (n = 135), and Cryo→RF in 66 (3%). Acute ablation failure occurred in 1.3% (n = 33), with no difference by energy source (1% in RF only, 1.5% in Cryo only, 1.5% in RF→Cryo, 3% in Cryo→RF; P = 0.5). Atrioventricular (AV) block requiring permanent pacemaker did not occur in any group; transient AV block occurred in 0.4% of the cohort, with no difference by group. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest pediatric study of AVNRT ablation, RF and Cryo demonstrated comparable high acute success and rare documentation of AV block that did not result in temporary or permanent pacing. Longitudinal data are important for further comparison of these modalities with regard to recurrence risk and late complications.

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement With Balloon-Expandable Valves: Utilization and Procedural Outcomes From the IMPACT Registry.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) has expanded and evolved since its initial commercial approval in the United States in 2010. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize real-world practice, including patient selection, procedural outcomes, complications, and off-label usage. METHODS: Characteristics and outcomes for patients undergoing balloon-expandable TPVR were collected from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry IMPACT (Improving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatment) Registry. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and March 2021, 4,513 TPVR procedures were performed in patients with a median age of 19 years, 57% with a Melody (Medtronic Inc) and 43% with a SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences) valve. Most implanting centers performed <10 cases annually. One-third of transcatheter pulmonary valve implants were into homograft conduits, one-third were into bioprosthetic valves (BPVs), 25% were in native or patched right ventricular outflow tracts (RVOTs), and 6% were into Contegra (Medtronic Inc) conduits. Over the course of the study period, SAPIEN valve use grew from ∼25% to 60%, in large part because of implants in patients with a native/patched RVOT. Acute success was achieved in 95% of patients (95.7% in homografts, 96.2% in BPVs, 94.2% in native RVOTs, and 95.4% in Contegra conduits). Major adverse events occurred in 2.4% of procedures, more commonly in patients with a homograft (2.9%) or native RVOT (3.4%) than a prior BPV (1.4%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes novel population data on the use and procedural outcomes of TPVR with balloon-expandable valves. Over time, there has been increasing use of TPVR to treat regurgitant native RVOT anatomy, with the SAPIEN valve more commonly used for this application.

Use of Calcium Modification During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Introduction of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy.

Background: Calcified coronary lesions are a challenge for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel calcium modification technology approved for commercial use in February 2021, but little is known about its uptake in US clinical practice. Methods: We described trends in use of calcium modification strategies, variation in use across hospitals, and predictors of calcium modification and IVL use in PCI. We included National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry patients who underwent PCI between April 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. We examined trends and hospital variation in calcium modification and IVL use. We used multivariate hierarchical logistic regression to identify predictors of calcium modification and IVL use at hospitals in 2022. Results: Of 2,733,494 PCIs across 1676 hospitals over 4.75 years, 11.4% were performed with calcium modification. Coronary IVL use increased rapidly from 0% of PCIs in Q4 2020 to 7.8% of PCIs in Q4 2022, which was accompanied by an overall increase in use of all calcium modification strategies (11.1%-16.0%) during this period with a slight corresponding decrease in coronary atherectomy use (5.4%-4.4%). In 2022, there was wide variation in IVL use across hospitals (median, 3.86%; IQR, 0%-8.19%), with IVL being the most common calcium modification strategy in 48% of hospitals. The treating hospital was the strongest predictor of calcium modification (median odds ratio [OR], 2.49; 95% CI, 2.40-2.57) and IVL use (median OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.74-3.04). Conclusions: IVL has rapidly changed the landscape of calcium modification use for PCI, although there remains wide variation across hospitals.

Treatment Variability Among Patients Hospitalized for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: An Analysis of the 2016 to 2018 US National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about treatment variability across US hospitals for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected from the 2016 to 2018 National Inpatient Sample. All patients aged ≥18 years, admitted to nonfederal US hospitals with a primary diagnosis of CLTI, were identified. Patients were classified according to their clinical presentation (rest pain, skin ulceration, or gangrene) and were further characterized according to the treatment strategy used. The primary outcome of interest was variability in CLTI treatment, as characterized by the median odds ratio. The median odds ratio is defined as the likelihood that 2 similar patients would be treated with a given modality at 1 versus another randomly selected hospital. There were 15 896 (weighted n=79 480) hospitalizations identified where CLTI was the primary diagnosis. Medical therapy alone, endovascular revascularization ± amputation, surgical revascularization ± amputation, and amputation alone were used in 4057 (25%), 5390 (34%), 3733 (24%), and 2716 (17%) patients, respectively. After adjusting for both patient- and hospital-related factors, the median odds ratio (95% CI) for medical therapy alone, endovascular revascularization ± amputation, surgical revascularization ± amputation, any revascularization, and amputation alone were 1.28 (1.19-1.38), 1.86 (1.77-1.95), 1.65 (1.55-1.74), 1.37 (1.28-1.45), and 1.42 (1.27-1.55), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability in CLTI treatment exists across US hospitals and is not fully explained by patient or hospital characteristics.

Risk Factors for Heart Failure Readmission After Cardiac Surgery.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of readmission after cardiac surgery, yet risk factors for HF readmission after cardiac surgery remain poorly characterized. Objectives: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with 30-day HF-specific readmissions after cardiac surgery using a national database. Methods: We queried the 2016 to 2018 National Readmissions Database to identify U.S. patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve repair/replacement, and/or aortic valve repair/replacement. Exclusion criteria included history of ventricular assist device or heart transplant, dialysis-dependent renal insufficiency, and death during index admission. Clinical variables were defined using International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision codes. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission for HF following discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was used to account for relevant clinical and demographic covariates and identify independent risk factors for HF readmissions following cardiac surgery. Results: Our study included 394,050 patients who underwent cardiac surgery (mean age 66 ± 12 years, 63% isolated CABG, 27% isolated valve, 11% CABG + valve). Of these patients, 7,318 were readmitted within 30 days of discharge for a principal diagnosis of HF. Independent risk factors of HF-specific readmission included older age, female sex, prolonged length of stay, comorbid congestive HF, nondialysis dependent chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, obesity, atrial fibrillation, and acute kidney injury. Prior CABG was marginally protective for HF-specific readmission. Conclusions: Using a national registry, we identified risk factors associated with HF readmission after cardiac surgery. Further analysis of these risk factors and their association with HF readmission is warranted.

In-hospital Outcomes and Cost Associated With Treatments for Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Although variation in the management of patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is well documented across US hospitals, few data exist characterizing variation in outcomes following specific management strategies. Methods: Admissions for NSTEMI to hospitals performing coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery between 2016 and 2018 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were categorized according to treatment rendered (medical therapy alone, angiography without revascularization, PCI, or CABG). The primary end point was variation in the incidence of composite in-hospital death, postprocedure myocardial infarction, or stroke, stratified by treatment rendered. Secondary outcomes included variation in length of stay (LOS), cost, and use of each treatment modality. Variation was characterized by the median odds ratio. Results: Among 140,194 hospitalizations for NSTEMI, 35,748 (25.5%) patients received medical therapy alone, 28,678 (20.5%) underwent angiography without revascularization, 58,383 (41.6%) underwent PCI, and 17,385 (12.4%) underwent CABG. Despite adjusting for patient- and hospital-related factors, 2 similar patients were 25% more likely to experience the composite primary outcome following PCI and 45% more likely following CABG at 1 randomly selected hospital than at another. Significant hospital-level variations in LOS and cost were also apparent following each treatment modality. Conclusions: In a large national analysis of hospitalizations for NSTEMI, significant variation was observed in clinical outcome, LOS, and cost associated with each treatment modality, despite adjustment for patient- and hospital-related factors.

Procedural Characteristics and Outcomes of Transcatheter Interventions for Aortic Coarctation: A Report From the IMPACT Registry.

Background: Although surgical repair was the traditional first-line treatment for native coarctation of the aorta (CoA), balloon angioplasty (BA) and stenting are now increasingly being performed. We aimed to determine the practice patterns and acute outcomes of transcatheter interventions for native coarctation in the largest multicenter registry for congenital catheterization. Methods: CoA interventions from the IMPACT (IMproving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatment) National Cardiovascular Data Registry were analyzed. The procedure choice and acute outcomes were compared among patients with no prior interventions on the aortic isthmus (native CoA). Procedural success was defined as no major adverse events (MAEs) and a final peak gradient of <20 mm Hg and optimal outcome as no MAEs and a final gradient of <10 mm Hg. Results: Over the 8-year study period, 5928 CoA procedures were performed, of which 1187 were performed in patients with native CoA. In this group, stenting was performed in more then half of children aged >1 year and >90% of those aged >8 years. Procedural success was achieved in >90% of stenting procedures but in only 69% of BAs. Stent implantation was associated with a higher likelihood of optimal gradient (<10 mm Hg) after adjustment for age and baseline characteristics. MAEs were most common in children aged <1 year (14%), occurred in 2% to 2.5% of those aged 1 to 18 years and in 6.6% of adults (P < .001), and were more likely after BA than after stenting (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.28-0.9; unadjusted P = .02). Conclusions: Catheter interventions for native coarctation are performed safely in older children and adults, with a high degree of immediate procedural success, particularly with stenting.