RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of lateral cerebellar nucleus (LCN) can enhance motor recovery and functional reorganization of perilesional cortex in rodent models of stroke or TBI. OBJECTIVE: Considering the treatment-related neuroplasticity observed at the perilesional cortex, we hypothesize that chronic LCN DBS-enhanced motor recovery observed will carry-over even after DBS has been deactivated. METHODS: Here, we directly tested the enduring effects of LCN DBS in male Long Evans rats that underwent controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury targeting sensorimotor cortex opposite their dominant forepaw followed by unilateral implantation of a macroelectrode into the LCN opposite the lesion. Animals were randomized to DBS or sham treatment for 4 weeks during which the motor performance were characterize by behavioral metrics. After 4 weeks, stimulation was turned off, with assessments continuing for an additional 2 weeks. Afterward, all animals were euthanized, and tissue was harvested for further analyses. RESULTS: Treated animals showed significantly greater motor improvement across all behavioral metrics relative to untreated animals during the 4-week treatment, with functional gains persisting across 2-week post-treatment. This motor recovery was associated with the increase in CaMKIIα and BDNF positive cell density across perilesional cortex in treated animals. CONCLUSIONS: LCN DBS enhanced post-TBI motor recovery, the effect of which was persisted up to 2 weeks beyond stimulation offset. Such evidence should be considered in relation to future translational efforts as, unlike typical DBS applications, treatment may only need to be provided until such time as a new function plateau is achieved.
RESUMEN
Despite great advances in acute care and rehabilitation, stroke remains the leading cause of motor impairment in the industrialized world. We have developed a deep brain stimulation (DBS)-based approach for post-stroke rehabilitation that has shown reproducible effects in rodent models and has been recently translated to humans. Mechanisms underlying the rehabilitative effects of this novel therapy have been largely focused on the ipsilesional cortex, including cortical reorganization, synaptogenesis, neurogenesis and greater expression of markers of long-term potentiation. The role of subcortical structures on its therapeutic benefits, particularly the striatum, remain unclear. In this study, we compared the motor rehabilitative effects of deep cerebellar stimulation in two rodent models of cerebral ischemia: a) cortical ischemia; and b) combined striatal and cortical ischemia. All animals underwent the same procedures, including implantation of the electrodes and tethered connections for stimulation. Both experimental groups received four weeks of continuous lateral cerebellar nucleus (LCN) DBS and each was paired with a no stimulation, sham, group. Fine motor function was indexed using the pasta matrix task. Brain tissue was harvested for histology and immunohistochemical analyses. In the cortical-only ischemia, the average pasta matrix performance of both sham and stimulated groups reduced from 19 to 24 pieces to 7-8 pieces following the stroke induction. At the end of the four-week treatment, the performance of stimulated group was significantly greater than that of sham group (14 pieces vs 7 pieces, p < 0.0001). Similarly, in the combined cortical and striatal ischemia, the performance of both sham and stimulated groups reduced from 29 to 30 pieces to 7-11 pieces following the stroke induction. However, at the end of the four-week treatment, the performance of stimulated group was not significantly greater than that of sham group (15 pieces vs 11 pieces, p = 0.452). In the post-mortem analysis, the number of cells expressing CaMKIIα at the perilesional cortical and striatum of the LCN DBS treated animals receiving cortical-only stroke elevated but not those receiving cortical+striatal stroke. The current findings suggested that the observed, LCN DBS-enhanced motor recovery and perilesional plasticity may involve striatal mechanisms.