RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among people who inject drugs in the state of Manipur, India, is 43%; however, access to care is poor. We piloted a Community-led and comprehensive hepatitis care model that included same-day HCV treatment at drug treatment centres. METHODS: Screening was conducted through venipuncture samples collected by community peer PWID, using HCV antibody (HCV Ab) rapid screening and hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) rapid diagnostic tests. Reactive HCV Ab samples were tested for HCV RNA using near point-of-care Truenat® HCV on Truelab® Quattro. Eligible HCV RNA-positive participants were treated on the same day using direct-acting antivirals and followed for sustained virologic response (SVR). HBsAg-negative participants received rapid HBV vaccination regimen while those positive for HBsAg were tested for DNA and referred for treatment. RESULTS: Between November 2021 and August 2022, 643 individuals were approached and 503 consented and were screened. All screened were males with history of injection drug use, and a median age of 27 years (IQR 23-32). Of the 241 (47.9%) HCV Ab reactive all underwent RNA testing and 156 (64.7%) were RNA detectable. Of those with viraemia, 155 (99.4%) were initiated on treatment with 153 (98.1%) on same day, with 2 (1.2%) HBsAg positive and waiting for HBV DNA results. Among those 153, median time from HCV Ab screening to treatment was 6 h 38 min (IQR 5 h 42 min-8 h 23 min). In total 155 (100%) completed HCV treatment, of those 148 (95.5%) completed SVR testing and 130 (87.8%) achieved SVR12. 27 (5%) participants were HBsAg-positive, 3 (11.1%) were also living with HCV viraemia; 443 (97.6%) were eligible for vaccination and 436 (98.4%) received all 3 vaccine doses. CONCLUSION: Community-led hepatitis care incorporating same day "test and treat" for HCV was feasible and effective. HBV screening identified a large proportion who were unvaccinated. Peer support extended resulted in ensuring compliance to care and treatment cascade and completing all the three doses of HBV vaccination. As the screening, diagnostics infrastructure and vaccine are available in most countries with national viral hepatitis programs also in place, our model can be adapted or replicated to progress towards global elimination targets.
Asunto(s)
Estudios de Factibilidad , Grupo Paritario , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Humanos , Masculino , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Adulto , India/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C/sangre , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Proyectos Piloto , Respuesta Virológica SostenidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Innovation contests are a novel approach to elicit good ideas and innovative practices in various areas of public health. There remains limited published literature on approaches to deliver hepatitis testing. The purpose of this innovation contest was to identify examples of different hepatitis B and C approaches to support countries in their scale-up of hepatitis testing and to supplement development of formal recommendations on service delivery in the 2017 World Health Organization hepatitis B and C testing guidelines. METHODS: This contest involved four steps: 1) establishment of a multisectoral steering committee to coordinate a call for contest entries; 2) dissemination of the call for entries through diverse media (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, email listservs, academic journals); 3) independent ranking of submissions by a panel of judges according to pre-specified criteria (clarity of testing model, innovation, effectiveness, next steps) using a 1-10 scale; 4) recognition of highly ranked entries through presentation at international conferences, commendation certificate, and inclusion as a case study in the WHO 2017 testing guidelines. RESULTS: The innovation contest received 64 entries from 27 countries and took a total of 4 months to complete. Sixteen entries were directly included in the WHO testing guidelines. The entries covered testing in different populations, including primary care patients (n = 5), people who inject drugs (PWID) (n = 4), pregnant women (n = 4), general populations (n = 4), high-risk groups (n = 3), relatives of people living with hepatitis B and C (n = 2), migrants (n = 2), incarcerated individuals (n = 2), workers (n = 2), and emergency department patients (n = 2). A variety of different testing delivery approaches were employed, including integrated HIV-hepatitis testing (n = 12); integrated testing with harm reduction and addiction services (n = 9); use of electronic medical records to support targeted testing (n = 8); decentralization (n = 8); and task shifting (n = 7). CONCLUSION: The global innovation contest identified a range of local hepatitis testing approaches that can be used to inform the development of testing strategies in different settings and populations. Further implementation and evaluation of different testing approaches is needed.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis B/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Guías como Asunto , Hepatitis B/economía , Hepatitis C/economía , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Salud Pública/economía , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
Viral hepatitis is one of the emerging public health problems, which urgently needs special attention. The disease has a varied presentation at the time of diagnosis, and it can progress from an accidental finding to life-threatening conditions like liver cirrhosis. It belongs to the rare group of diseases that can cause chronic inflammation inside the body, and it can have a delayed presentation. It contributes substantially to the global burden on healthcare. In terms of mortality, the burden due to viral hepatitis is similar to that of HIV and tuberculosis. It is among the major global public health challenges along with other communicable diseases, such as HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis; the major difference is that there are very limited preventive models in place for viral hepatitis, especially in developing countries like India. With limited resources for diagnosis and treatment, varied levels of presentation, and a rapidly increasing burden, it can become the next silent pandemic. In the current review, the authors aimed to compile the available global strategies for combating hepatitis, protocols available for disease surveillance, and the salient points from the national program for hepatitis control in India [National Viral Hepatitis Control Program (NVHCP)], and propose some recommendations. Ensuring a health facility equipped with a rapid diagnostic kit for screening, proper lab for the confirmation, robust Health Management Information System (HMIS) portal for the data management, and organizing regular workshops for physicians and lab technicians are some of the recommendations that we put forward.
RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21907.].
RESUMEN
Data are lacking or outdated on burden of HIV, viral hepatitis infection, and sexually transmitted infections such as syphilis among people deprived of liberty in the Asia-Pacific region. We aimed to evaluate the proportion of viral hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), HIV, and syphilis infections, and factors associated with HCV, HBV, and HIV infection in a central male prison. A cross-sectional study was performed among 1,028 people deprived of liberty from a central male prison in Bangkok, Thailand. People deprived of liberty were screened for HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis infections during 2018-2019. HBV and HCV were defined as positive hepatitis B surface antigen and positive anti-HCV antibody, respectively. Proportions (95% confidence interval [CI]) of infections were calculated based on the binomial distribution. HBV proportion was reported for different age groups. Risk factors associated with HCV infections were evaluated by logistic regression model. The median age was 38 (interquartile range, 32-50) years, and 6.9% reported use of injection drugs. The proportion of HIV, HBV, anti-HCV, HCV RNA, and syphilis was 2.9% (95% CI, 1.9-4.1), 6.4% (5-8.1), 5.9% (4.6-7.6), 4.2% (3-5.6), and 4.8% (3.5-6.3), respectively. One (0.1%), 7 (0.6%), and 2 (3%) were co-infected with HIV/HBV, HIV/HCV, and HDV/HBV, respectively. HBV proportion differed across age groups: 3.7% in <30 years, 7% in 31-40 years, 9.7% in 41-50 years, and 5.5% in >50 years. Factors associated with HCV infection were older age, lower education level, previous incarceration, and injection drug use. In multivariable models, older age was associated with HBV infection, and men having sex with men was associated with HIV infection. The proportion of blood-borne infections was higher among males than among the general population. HBV vaccination, routine HCV screening, and treatment with pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals with minimal specialist requirements should be implemented in Thai prisons.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Sífilis , Adulto , Antivirales , Estudios Transversales , Libertad , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Prisiones , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/complicaciones , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Sífilis/complicaciones , Sífilis/epidemiología , Tailandia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Seven years after the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of hepatitis C, high prices remain a barrier for treatment programs worldwide. This study seeks to describe current prices for originator DAAs in 50 countries and evaluate the relationship between prices and GDP per capita. METHODS: Data on prices of sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were collected from national databases for 50 countries. Cost-based generic prices were estimated using an established algorithm, which accounts for costs of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), excipients, conversion costs of API to finished pharmaceutical product, taxes assuming manufacture in India, and a 10% profit margin. Correlation between current market prices and GDP per capita was assessed by Spearman rank-order correlation. RESULTS: Median originator prices per standard course were US$40,502 for sofosbuvir, US$26,928 for daclatasvir, US$46,812 for sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, US$34,381 for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, and US$30,710 for glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P). The estimated cost-based generic prices for a 12-week course were US$28 for sofosbuvir, US$31 for ledipasvir, US$58 for velpatasvir, US$4 for daclatasvir. For fixed-dose combinations, estimated cost-based prices were US$58 for sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, US$85 for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, and US$31 for sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (API cost data were insufficient to calculate an estimate for G/P). Cumulative originator sales of WHO-recommended DAAs reached US$82 billion by the end of 2019. Across the 50 countries, there was no correlation between GDP per capita and DAA price, nor between estimated viraemic population and DAA price. Sub-analyses within World Bank income groups found a significant negative correlation between price and GDP per capita for all DAAs within the high-income countries group. CONCLUSIONS: Prices of DAAs vary widely across countries. The lack of correlation between DAA price and GDP per capita and viraemic population suggests that prices for DAAs are not adjusted based on country income level or potential patient population. Among high-income countries, DAA prices fall as income levels rise, possibly due to greater negotiating power of wealthier countries. DAA prices in most countries remain many times higher than estimated cost-based generic prices.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With increasing availability of generic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and associated price reductions, various governments, multilateral institutions, and donors have started providing testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. More data on the quality of these generic medicines and on cost-effectiveness of their use are becoming widely available. This review seeks to describe some of the treatment programs for HCV that are evolving in Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, and Thailand. RECENT FINDINGS: The quality of multiple generic DAAs has been shown to be bioequivalent to innovator formulations, with generic versions achieving high cure rates in real-world settings. Although published materials are limited, there is expanding experience with local pilot and national treatment programs which are largely being funded by national governments and other institutions. SUMMARY: Countries and other public health stakeholders are recognizing the need to scale up HCV diagnosis and treatment programs using generic DAAs. However, local pilot or national treatment programs need to be massively expanded to eliminate HCV in high-burden areas.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Antivirales/economía , Asia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepacivirus/fisiología , Hepatitis C/economía , Hepatitis C/virología , HumanosRESUMEN
Mass production of low-cost, generic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) will be required to achieve targets of eliminating hepatitis C (HCV) by 2030. The pharmaceutical companies Gilead and Bristol-Myers Squibb have granted voluntary licences (VLs) to generic companies to mass produce the DAAs sofosbuvir and daclatasvir at low cost. However, generic manufacturers need to demonstrate bioequivalent pharmacokinetics for their DAAs, compared to the originator versions, to fulfil World Health Organization standards for prequalification. The aim of this study was to determine whether generic forms of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir had bioequivalent pharmacokinetics to the originator versions. Generic companies were contacted for results of bioequivalence studies with sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, two of the most widely used DAAs in the developing world. Data on maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) were compiled from five generic companies. Pre-specified limits for the 90% confidence intervals were 80-125% of the originator pharmacokinetic concentrations for AUC, and 69-145% for Cmax. The pharmacokinetics of generic sofosbuvir and daclatasvir were shown to be bioequivalent to the originator versions for all five generic companies. This is a crucial step towards securing prequalification of the manufacture of these drugs from these companies. WHO prequalification of bioequivalent generic DAAs could then permit their export to eligible countries for mass-treatment programmes. Mass-treatment with low-cost generic HCV DAAs is the most promising method to achieve the ambitious World Health Organization targets for HCV elimination by 2030.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High prices of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) can lead to restrictions on access to treatment in high- and middle-income countries. An increasing number of people in these countries are treating their HCV infection with generic drugs produced in India, China, Bangladesh or Egypt. This analysis assessed the efficacy of generic imported DAAs. METHODS: Patients sourced generic versions of sofosbuvir (SOF), ledipasvir (LDV) and daclatasvir (DCV) from suppliers in India, Bangladesh, China and Egypt via three buyers' clubs. The choice of DAAs and the length of treatment were determined on baseline RNA levels, HCV genotype and stage of fibrosis. Patient HCV RNA levels were evaluated pre-treatment, during treatment, at end of treatment (EOT) and then for sustained virological response (SVR) at 4, 12, and 24 weeks, normally by a treating clinician. RESULTS: Overall 616 patients submitted results: 199 from an Australian buyers' club, 205 from a South-east Asian buyers' clubs, and 212 from an Eastern European buyers' club. Of the 616 patients treated, 276 received SOF/LDV (35 with ribavirin [RBV]) and 340 received SOF/DCV (61 with RBV). At baseline, 61% were male, 52% had HCV genotype 1 and 11% had liver cirrhosis. The mean age was 44.3 years and the mean baseline HCV RNA was 6.9 log10 IU/mL. A rapid virological response (RVR) was observed in 314/375 (84%) of the patients treated. Based on currently available data, the percentage of patients with HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification (LLoQ) was 99% (234/237) at EOT, 99% (299/303) at SVR4 and 99% (247/250) at SVR12. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, treatment with imported generic DAAs achieved high rates of HCV RNA undetectability at the end of treatment, and SVR12 in 99% of patients evaluated to date. Mass treatment with generic DAAs is a feasible and economical alternative route of accessing curative DAAs, where the high prices for branded alternatives prevent access to treatment.
RESUMEN
The Asia-Pacific region bears a high burden of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections and the largest number of global deaths. Populations most at risk of infection and disease progression include people who inject drugs and those living with HIV. HCV treatment options have rapidly expanded in the past few years through the development of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medicines, which can cure HCV in over 95% of cases, but are prohibitively expensive. While price is the major barrier to treatment access, voluntary licensing has resulted in limited availability of one DAA (sofosbuvir) through generic manufacturers in India. Regulatory barriers, such as the need for domestic clinical trials, cause further delays in local medicines approvals and access. Intensive advocacy by civil society in combination with mobilisation of global resources for HIV treatment were critical to achieving price reductions in HIV medicines in the early 2000s. While the current global economic situation is less conducive to substantial funding support for HCV treatment, community advocates are building awareness of the growing opportunities for HCV cure. Key immediate steps include the inclusion of DAAs in domestic essential medicines lists, as the World Health Organization has already done for globally, and fast-tracking domestic drug approvals to facilitate government-level price negotiations with originator and generic pharmaceutical companies. Urgent action by a broad range of stakeholders is needed to facilitate access to HCV treatment in order to ensure that the millions of people living with hepatitis C in the Asia-Pacific will not miss out on these life-saving treatments.