Small RNA teg49 Is Derived from a sarA Transcript and Regulates Virulence Genes Independent of SarA in Staphylococcus aureus.

Expression of virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus is regulated by a wide range of transcriptional regulators, including proteins and small RNAs (sRNAs), at the level of transcription and/or translation. The sarA locus consists of three overlapping transcripts generated from three distinct promoters, all containing the sarA open reading frame (ORF). The 5' untranslated regions (UTRs) of these transcripts contain three separate regions ∼711, 409, and 146 nucleotides (nt) upstream of the sarA translation start, the functions of which remain unknown. Recent transcriptome-sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis and subsequent characterization indicated that two sRNAs, teg49 and teg48, are processed and likely produced from the sarA P3 and sarA P1 transcripts of the sarA locus, respectively. In this report, we utilized a variety of sarA promoter mutants and cshA and rnc mutants to ascertain the contributions of these factors to the generation of teg49. We also defined the transcriptional regulon of teg49, including virulence genes not regulated by SarA. Phenotypically, teg49 did not impact biofilm formation or affect overall SarA expression significantly. Comparative analyses of RNA-Seq data between the wild-type, teg49 mutant, and sarA mutant strains indicated that ∼133 genes are significantly upregulated while 97 are downregulated in a teg49 deletion mutant in a sarA-independent manner. An abscess model of skin infection indicated that the teg49 mutant exhibited a reduced bacterial load compared to the wild-type S. aureus Overall, these results suggest that teg49 sRNA has a regulatory role in target gene regulation independent of SarA. The exact mechanism of this regulation is yet to be dissected.

Characterization of RNA Helicase CshA and Its Role in Protecting mRNAs and Small RNAs of Staphylococcus aureus Strain Newman.

The toxin MazFsa in Staphylococcus aureus is a sequence-specific endoribonuclease that cleaves the majority of the mRNAs in vivo but spares many essential mRNAs (e.g., secY mRNA) and, surprisingly, an mRNA encoding a regulatory protein (i.e., sarA mRNA). We hypothesize that some mRNAs may be protected by RNA-binding protein(s) from degradation by MazFsa. Using heparin-Sepharose-enriched fractions that hybridized to sarA mRNA on Northwestern blots, we identified among multiple proteins the DEAD box RNA helicase CshA (NWMN_1985 or SA1885) by mass spectroscopy. Purified CshA exhibits typical RNA helicase activities, as exemplified by RNA-dependent ATPase activity and unwinding of the DNA-RNA duplex. A severe growth defect was observed in the cshA mutant compared with the parent when grown at 25°C but not at 37°C. Activation of MazFsa in the cshA mutant resulted in lower CFU per milliliter accompanied by a precipitous drop in viability (∼40%) compared to those of the parent and complemented strains. NanoString analysis reveals diminished expression of a small number of mRNAs and 22 small RNAs (sRNAs) in the cshA mutant versus the parent upon MazFsa induction, thus implying protection of these RNAs by CshA. In the case of the sRNA teg049 within the sarA locus, we showed that the protective effect was likely due to transcript stability as revealed by reduced half-life in the cshA mutant versus the parent. Accordingly, CshA likely stabilizes selective mRNAs and sRNAs in vivo and as a result enhances S. aureus survival upon MazFsa induction during stress.

Contribution of teg49 small RNA in the 5' upstream transcriptional region of sarA to virulence in Staphylococcus aureus.

High-throughput RNA sequencing technology has found the 5' untranslated region of sarA to contain two putative small RNAs (sRNAs), designated teg49 and teg48. Northern blot analysis disclosed that teg49 and teg48 were detectable within the P3-P1 and P1 sarA promoter regions, respectively. Focusing on teg49, we found that this sRNA, consisting of 196 nucleotides, is transcribed in the same direction as the sarA P3 transcript. The expression of both P3 and teg49 transcripts is dependent on sigB and cshA, which encodes a DEAD box RNA helicase. Within the sRNA teg49, there are two putative hairpin-loop structures, HP1 and HP2. Transversion mutation of the HP1 loop produced a smaller amount of sarA P3 and P2 transcripts and SarA protein than the corresponding HP1 stem and the HP2 stem and loop mutations, leading to lower RNAII transcription and derepression of aur transcription. The HP1 loop mutant also exhibited less biofilm formation than the parental and complemented strains. Complementation with shuttle plasmid pEPSA5 carrying teg49 was able to reestablish sarA P3 and P2 transcription and augment RNAII expression in the HP1 loop mutant. We thus conclude that teg49, embedded within the extended promoter regions of sarA, is modulated by sigB and cshA and plays an important trans-acting role in modulating the transcription and ensuing expression of sarA.

Release of transcriptional repression through the HCR promoter region confers uniform expression of HWP1 on surfaces of Candida albicans germ tubes.

The mechanisms that fungi use to co-regulate subsets of genes specifically associated with morphogenic states represent a basic unsolved problem in fungal biology. Candida albicans is an important model of fungal differentiation both for rapid interconversion between yeast and hyphal growth forms and for white/opaque switching mechanisms. The Sundstrom lab is interested in mechanisms regulating hypha-specific expression of adhesin genes that are critical for C. albicans hyphal growth phenotypes and pathogenicity. Early studies on hypha-specific genes such as HWP1 and ALS3 reported 5' intergenic regions that are larger than those typically found in an average promoter and are associated with hypha-specific expression. In the case of HWP1, activation and repression involves a 368 bp region, denoted the HWP1 control region (HCR), located 1410 bp upstream of its transcription start site. In previous work we showed that HCR confers developmental regulation to a heterologous ENO1 promoter, indicating that HCR by itself contains sufficient information to couple gene expression to morphology. Here we show that the activation and repression mediated by HCR are localized to distinct HCR regions that are targeted by the transcription factors Nrg1p and Efg1p. The finding that Efg1p mediates both repression via HCR under yeast morphological conditions and activation conditions positions Efg1p as playing a central role in coupling HWP1 expression to morphogenesis through the HCR region. These localization studies revealed that the 120 terminal base pairs of HCR confer Efg1p-dependent repressive activity in addition to the Nrg1p repressive activity mediated by DNA upstream of this subregion. The 120 terminal base pair subregion of HCR also contained an initiation site for an HWP1 transcript that is specific to yeast growth conditions (HCR-Y) and may function in the repression of downstream DNA. The detection of an HWP1 mRNA isoform specific to hyphal growth conditions (HWP1-H) showed that morphology-specific mRNA isoforms occur under both yeast and hyphal growth conditions. Similar results were found at the ALS3 locus. Taken together, these results, suggest that the long 5' intergenic regions upstream of hypha-specific genes function in generating mRNA isoforms that are important for morphology-specific gene expression. Additional complexity in the HWP1 promoter involving HCR-independent activation was discovered by creating a strain lacking HCR that exhibited variable HWP1 expression during hyphal growth conditions. These results show that while HCR is important for ensuring uniform HWP1 expression in cell populations, HCR independent expression also exists. Overall, these results elucidate HCR-dependent mechanisms for coupling HWP1-dependent gene expression to morphology uniformly in cell populations and prompt the hypothesis that mRNA isoforms may play a role in coupling gene expression to morphology in C. albicans.

Mechanism of repression by Bacillus subtilis CcpC, a LysR family regulator.

Bacillus subtilis CcpC is a LysR family transcriptional regulatory protein that negatively regulates genes encoding enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid branch of the Krebs cycle. In the present work, the promoter region of the aconitase (citB) gene was used to investigate the mechanism of repression by CcpC. The binding of CcpC to the citB promoter region was shown to depend on DNA elements located near positions -66 and -27. Binding to these elements induced a bend in the DNA at position -41. Introduction of mutations in the -27 region and the presence of citrate, the inducer, had similar effects. In either case, citB expression was derepressed in vivo, the affinity of CcpC binding was reduced in vitro, the angle of the bend was relaxed, and RNA polymerase gained greater access to the -35 region of the promoter.

A 368-base-pair cis-acting HWP1 promoter region, HCR, of Candida albicans confers hypha-specific gene regulation and binds architectural transcription factors Nhp6 and Gcf1p.

To elucidate the molecular mechanisms controlling the expression of the hypha-specific adhesin gene HWP1 of Candida albicans, its promoter was dissected and analyzed using a green fluorescent protein reporter gene. A 368-bp region, the HWP1 control region (HCR), was critical for activation under hypha-inducing conditions and conferred developmental regulation to a heterologous ENO1 promoter. A more distal region of the promoter served to amplify the level of promoter activation. Using gel mobility shift assays, a 249-bp subregion of HCR, HCRa, was found to bind at least four proteins from crude extracts of yeasts and hyphae with differing binding patterns dependent on cell morphology. Four proteins with DNA binding activities were identified by using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis after separation by anion-exchange and heparin-Sepharose chromatography. One protein with high similarity to Nhp6, an HMG1 family member in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and another with weak similarity to an HMG-like condensation factor from Physarum polycephalum implicated changes in chromatin structure as a critical process in hypha-specific gene regulation. Proteins with strong homology to histones were also found. These studies are the first to identify proteins that bind to a DNA segment that confers developmental gene regulation in C. albicans and suggest a new model for hypha-specific gene regulation.

Regulation of the bacillus subtilis ccpC gene by ccpA and ccpC.

Bacillus subtilis CcpC, a LysR-type transcriptional regulator, represses the transcription of genes for citrate synthase (citZ) and aconitase (citB) in response to citrate availability. Transcription of ccpC was shown to initiate at two promoters, P1, located just upstream of the ccpC gene, and P2, located within or upstream of the neighbouring ykuL gene. Expression from the ccpC-specific promoter (P1) was negatively regulated by CcpC but independent of the carbon source in the medium. Gel shift and DNase I footprinting experiments revealed that CcpC binds to an interrupted dyad sequence that surrounds the ccpC transcriptional start point. Transcription of ccpC from the upstream promoter (P2) was repressed by glucose in a CcpA-dependent manner. A putative CcpA binding site (cre) was identified upstream of the -35 region of the P1 promoter. Transcriptional fusion studies demonstrated that glucose repression of ccpC expression from the P2 promoter depends on this cre site. In addition, DNase I footprinting experiments showed that CcpA specifically binds to this cre site and that the introduction of mutations (cre*) into this site abolished the binding. These results suggest that CcpA may control CcpC synthesis by acting as a road-block to readthrough transcription from the P2 promoter.

Complex regulation of the Bacillus subtilis aconitase gene.

The roles of the CcpC, CodY, and AbrB proteins in regulation of the Bacillus subtilis aconitase (citB) gene were found to be distinct and to vary with the conditions and phase of growth. CcpC, a citrate-inhibited repressor that is the primary factor regulating citB expression in minimal-glucose-glutamine medium, also contributed to repression of citB during exponential-phase growth in broth medium. A null mutation in codY had no effect on citB expression during growth in minimal medium even when combined with ccpC and abrB mutations. However, a codY mutation slightly relieved repression during exponential growth in broth medium and completely derepressed citB expression when combined with a ccpC mutation. An abrB mutation led to decreased expression of citB during stationary phase in both broth and minimal medium. All three proteins bound in vitro to specific and partially overlapping sites within the citB regulatory region. Interaction of CcpC and CodY with the citB promoter region was partially competitive.