RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes after bypass surgery or endovascular therapy (EVT) in average- and high-risk patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed multicenter data of patients who underwent infra-inguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2022. A high-risk patient was defined as one with estimated 30-day mortality rate ≥5% or 2-year survival rate ≤50%, as determined by the Surgical Reconstruction vs Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (SPINACH) calculator. The amputation-free survival (AFS), limb salvage (LS), wound healing, and 30-day mortality were compared separately for the average- and high-risk patients between the bypass and EVT with propensity score matching. RESULTS: We analyzed 239 and 31 propensity score-matched pairs in the average- and high-risk patients with CLTI. In the average-risk patients, the 2-year AFS and LS rates were 78.1% and 94.4% in the bypass group and 63.0% and 87.7% in the EVT group (P < .001 and P = .007), respectively. The 1-year wound healing rates were 88.6% in the bypass group and 76.8% in the EVT group, respectively (P < .001). The 30-day mortality was 0.8% in the bypass surgery and 0.8% in the EVT group (P = .996). In the high-risk patients, there was no differences in the AFS, LS, and wound healing between the groups (P = .591, P = .148, and P = .074). The 30-day mortality was 3.2% in the bypass group and 3.2% in the EVT group (P = .991). CONCLUSIONS: Bypass surgery is superior to EVT with respect to the AFS, LS, and wound healing in the average-risk patients. EVT is a feasible first-line treatment strategy for high-risk patients with CLTI undergoing revascularization, based on the lack of significant differences in the 2-year AFS rate, between the bypass surgery and EVT cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cicatrización de Heridas , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the influence of inframalleolar (IM) P0/P1 on wound healing in bypass surgery vs endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the multicenter data of patients who underwent infra-inguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2022. IM P represents target artery crossing into foot, with intact pedal arch (P0) and absent or severely diseased pedal arch (P1). The endpoints were wound healing, limb salvage (LS), and postoperative complications. RESULTS: We analyzed 66 and 189 propensity score-matched pairs in the IM P0 and IM P1 cohorts, respectively. In the IM P0 cohort, the 1-year wound healing rates were 94.5% and 85.7% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P = .092), whereas those in the IM P1 cohort were 86.2% and 66.2% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P < .001). In the IM P0 cohort, the 2-year LS rates were 96.7% and 94.1% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P = .625), and those in the IM P1 cohort were 91.8% and 81.5% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P = .004). No significant differences were observed between the bypass surgery and EVT in terms of postoperative complication rates in either the IM P0 or P1 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Bypass surgery facilitated better wound healing and LS than EVT in patients with IM P1. Conversely, no differences in wound healing or LS were observed between groups in patients with IM P0. Bypass surgery should be considered a better revascularization strategy than EVT in patients with tissue loss and IM P1 disease.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Cicatrización de Heridas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To examine the influence of liver function on patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), we classified patients with CLTI after revascularization according to their modified albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grades. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed single-center data of patients who underwent revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2020. Patients were classified with ALBI grades 1, 2a, and 2b and 3 according to the ALBI score, which was calculated, based on serum albumin and total bilirubin levels. The endpoints were the 2-year amputation-free survival (AFS) and 1-year wound healing rates. RESULTS: We included 190 limbs in 148 patients, and 50, 54, and 86 cases were assigned as grade 1, 2a, and 2b and 3, respectively. The 2-year AFS rates for the grade 1, 2a, and 2b and 3 groups were 79 ± 6%, 66% ± 7%, and 45 ± 6%, respectively (P < 0.01). One-year cumulative wound healing rates for grade 1, 2a, and 2b and 3 groups were 68 ± 7%, 69% ± 6%, and 48% ± 5%, respectively (P = 0.01). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses identified age (≥75 years), dependent ambulatory status, and modified ALBI grades 2b and 3 compared with grades 1 and 2a as significant independent predictors of AFS. The dependent ambulatory status and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification stage 4 were significant negative predictors of wound healing. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with CLTI had high modified ALBI grades, and impaired liver function classified as modified ALBI grade 2b and 3 is a robust negative predictor of AFS.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients aged ≥ 80 years and < 80 years. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed multicenter data of 789 patients who underwent infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2021. The end points were 2-year overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS), limb salvage (LS), and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients aged ≥ 80 years and 200 patients aged < 80 years underwent bypass surgery (BSX), and 205 patients aged ≥ 80 years and 294 patients aged < 80 years underwent endovascular therapy (EVT). Before the propensity score matching, multivariate analyses showed that age ≥ 80 years, lower body mass index and serum albumin levels, nonambulatory status, and end-stage renal disease were independent risk factors for 2-year mortality in the BSX and EVT groups. After propensity score matching, the 2-year OS was better in the < 80 years cohort than in the ≥ 80 years cohort in both the BSX and EVT groups (P = 0.018 and P = 0.035, respectively). There was no difference in the 2-year LS rates between the < 80 years and the ≥ 80 years cohorts in both the BSX and EVT groups (P = 0.621 and P = 0.287, respectively). According to the number of risk factors, except for age ≥ 80 years, there was no difference in the 2-year AFS rates between the < 80 years and ≥ 80 years cohorts for the BSX and EVT groups with 0-1 risk factor (P = 0.957 and P = 0.655, respectively). However, the 2-year AFS rate was poor, especially in the ≥ 80 years cohort in the BSX with 2-4 risk factors (P = 0.015). The Clavien-Dindo ≥ IV complication rates tended to be higher in the ≥ 80 years cohort than in the < 80 years cohort only in the BSX with 2-4 risk factors (P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLTI aged ≥ 80 years had poorer OS than those aged < 80 years. However, there was no difference in LS between the ≥ 80 years and < 80 years cohorts in both the BSX and EVT groups. Although age ≥ 80 years was associated with poorer OS, patients with 0-1 risk factor may benefit from revascularization, including BSX, because no difference was observed in AFS or Clavien-Dindo ≥ IV complications.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Medición de Riesgo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugía , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/terapia , Isquemia/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative lymphatic leakage is a complication of ineffective conservative treatment for retroperitoneal mass. Herein, we report a case of lymphatic leakage that arose after retroperitoneal tumor resection and that was treated with retrograde transvenous thoracic duct embolization. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old man with persistent abdominal pain was diagnosed with a large retroperitoneal metastatic tumor measuring 10 cm and a subdiaphragmatic lymph node originating from a testicular tumor. After high orchidectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the subdiaphragmatic lymph node and retroperitoneal tumor were resected together with the abdominal aorta; the latter was reconstructed using a prosthetic graft. Postoperatively, the patient developed chylothorax. No improvement was observed after conservative treatment that included fasting and somatostatin therapy. The leakage site could not be identified using antegrade lymphangiography of the bilateral inguinal lymph nodes, but was detected using retrograde transvenous lymphangiography. The leakage site was successfully embolized. CONCLUSION: This case report describes successful treatment with retrograde transvenous thoracic duct embolization for chylothorax following resection of a retroperitoneal tumor and lymph node. This approach is a less invasive and more effective mode of treatment for chylothorax and should be considered before surgical thoracic duct ligation when the leakage point cannot be identified using the antegrade approach.