Laparoscopic Portal Vein Ligation and Embolization During First-Stage Hepatectomy for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) is the only treatment for the patients with multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRMs) who are not candidates for one-step hepatectomy because of insufficient future remnant liver volume and/or impaired liver function.1-5 Although laparoscopic approaches have been introduced for TSH,6-8 the postoperative morbidity and mortality remains high because of the technical difficulties during second-stage hepatectomy.9,10 The authors present a video of laparoscopic TSH with portal vein (PV) ligation and embolization, which minimizes adhesions and PV thrombosis risk in the remnant liver, thereby facilitating second-stage hepatectomy. METHODS: Three patients with initially unresectable bilateral CRMs received a median of chemotherapy 12 cycles, followed by conversion TSH. After right PV ligation, laproscopic PV embolization was performed by injection of 100% ethanol into the hepatic side of the right PV using a 23-gauge winged needle. After PV embolization, a spray adhesion barrier (AdSpray, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan)11 was applied. RESULTS: During the first stage of hepatectomy, two patients underwent simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal resection (left hemicolectomy and high anterior resection). In the initial hepatectomy, two patients underwent two limited hepatectomies each, and one patient underwent six hepatectomies in the left lobe. After hepatectomy, all the patients underwent right PV embolization. During the second stage, two patients underwent open extended right hepatectomy (right adrenalectomy was performed because of adrenal invasion in one patient), and one patient underwent laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy. No postoperative complications occurred in the six surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TSH with PV embolization is recommended for safe completion of the second hepatectomy.

Management of potential portal vein thrombus during laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy following portal vein embolization.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein embolization (PVE) is often performed prior to right hemihepatectomy (RH) to increase the future liver remnants. However, intraoperative removal of portal vein thrombus (PVT) is occasionally required. An algorithm for treating the right branch of the PV using laparoscopic RH (LRH) after PVE is lacking and requires further investigation. METHODS: In our department, after the confirmation of a lack of extension of PVT to the main portal trunk or left branch on preoperative examination (ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography), a final evaluation was performed using intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS). Here we present the cases of eight patients who underwent LRH after PVE and examine the safety of our treatment strategies. RESULTS: IOUS revealed PVT extension into the main portal trunk in two cases. For the other six patients without PVT extension, we continued the laparoscopic procedure. In contrast, in the two cases with PVT extension, we converted to laparotomy after hepatic transection and removed the PVT. The median operation time for hepatectomy was 562 min (421-659 min), the median blood loss was 293 mL (85-1010 mL), no liver-related postoperative complications were observed, and the median length of stay was 10 days (6-34 days). CONCLUSIONS: PVT evaluation and removal are important in cases of LRH after PVE. Our strategy is safe and IOUS is particularly useful for laparoscopically evaluating PVT extension.

Patient vulnerability is associated with poor prognosis following upfront hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: With the rapid aging of populations worldwide, the number of vulnerable patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer has increased. This study aimed to examine the association between vulnerability and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). METHODS: Consecutive 101 patients undergoing upfront hepatectomy for CRLM between 2004 and 2020 were included. The preoperative vulnerability was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from one (very fit) to nine (terminally ill), and frailty was defined as a CFS score of ≥ 4. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was utilized to investigate associations of frailty with disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: Of the 101 patients, 12 (12%) had frailty. Associations between frailty and surgical outcomes, namely, the incidence of 90-day mortality and postoperative complications, were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In the multivariable analyses, after adjusting for clinical risk scores calculated using six factors (timing of liver metastasis, primary tumor lymph node status, number of liver tumors, size of the largest tumor, extrahepatic metastatic disease, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level) to predict recurrence following hepatectomy for CRLM, preoperative frailty was found to be an independent risk factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR]:2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.72, P = 0.036), OS (HR:4.17, 95% CI 1.43-10.89, P = 0.011), and CSS (HR:3.49, 95% CI 1.09-9.60, P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Preoperative frailty was associated with worse DFS, OS, and CSS after upfront hepatectomy for CRLM. Assessment and improvement of patient vulnerability may provide a favorable prognosis for patients with CRLM.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: a single-institution retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to extract prognostic factors in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for borderline resectable colorectal liver metastasis (BR-CRLM) (tumor size ≥5 cm, number of tumors ≥4, or resectable extrahepatic diseases) and assess validity of this strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 2010, patients with BR-CRLM were treated with hepatectomy after six cycles of NAC. Prognostic factors of these patients were evaluated using clinicopathological data. RESULTS: Of 650 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CRLM from 2010 to 2018, 246 BR-CRLM cases underwent hepatectomy after NAC (BR-NAC). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 16.7% and the 5-year overall survival rate (5y-OS) was 52.9%. Number of tumors ≥6, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥25 ng/mL, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and progressive disease (PD) after NAC were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for OS. Patients were divided into four groups according to the number of risk factors, and prognoses of the four groups were well stratified. CONCLUSION: In patients with BR-NAC, number of tumors ≥6, CEA ≥25 ng/mL, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and PD after NAC were independent poor prognostic factors. Patients with three or four risk factors showed poor prognosis and may need to switch chemotherapy.

Prognostic Impact of Tumor Markers (CEA and CA19-9) on Patients with Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Stratified by Tumor Number and Size: Potentially Valuable Biologic Markers for Preoperative Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CLM), a population with good prognosis, have been treated with upfront surgery, some patients have had a poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate biologic prognostic factors in patients with resectable CLMs. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for initial CLMs at the Cancer Institute Hospital between 2010 and 2020. The study defined CLMs as resectable (tumor size < 5 cm; < 4 tumors; no extrahepatic metastasis) or borderline resectable (BR). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to patients with BR CLMs. RESULTS: During the study period, 309 CLMs were classified as resectable without preoperative chemotherapy and 345 as BR with preoperative chemotherapy. For the 309 patients with resectable CLMs, the independent poor prognostic factors associated with overall survival in the multivariable analysis were high tumor marker levels (CEA ≥ 25 ng/mL and/or CA19-9 ≥ 50 U/mL; (hazard ratio [HR], 2.45; p = 0.0007), no adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 1.69; p = 0.043), and age of 75 years or older (HR, 2.09; p = 0.012). The 5-year survival rates for the patients with high tumor marker (TM) levels (CEA ≥25 ng/mL and/or CA19-9 ≥50 U/mL) were significantly worse than for those with low TM levels (CEA < 25 ng/mL and CA19-9 < 50 U/mL) (55.3% vs. 81.1%; p <0.0001) and similar to the rate for those with BR CLMs (52.1%; p = 0.864). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy had an impact on prognosis only in the high-TM group (HR, 2.65; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: High TM levels have a prognostic impact on patients with resectable CLMs stratified by tumor number and size. Perioperative chemotherapy improves long-term outcomes for patients with CLM and high TM levels.

Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine plus S-1 for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Compared with Upfront Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1 (NAC-GS) in the prognosis of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been reported. NAC-GS is now assumed to be a standard regimen for resectable PDAC in Japan. However, the reason for this improvement in prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: In 2019, we introduced NAC-GS for resectable PDAC. From 2015 to 2021, 340 patients were diagnosed with resectable PDAC (anatomical and biological [carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 < 500 U/mL]) and were divided according to the treatment period (upfront surgery [UPS] group, 2015-2019, n = 241; NAC-GS group, 2019-2021, n = 80). We used "intention-to-treat" analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of NAC-GS to those of UPS. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients with NAC-GS, 75 (93.8%) completed two cycles of NAC-GS, and the resection rate of the NAC-GS group was comparable to that of the UPS group (92.5 vs. 91.3%, P = 0.73). The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the NAC-GS group than in the UPS group (91.3 vs. 82.6%, P = 0.04), even though the surgical burden was smaller. Progression-free survival tended to be better (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70, P = 0.06), and overall survival was significantly better in the NAC-GS group than in the UPS group (HR 0.55, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: NAC-GS provided improvements in microscopic invasion leading to a high R0 rate and smooth administration and completion of adjuvant therapy, which might lead to an improved prognosis in patients with resectable PDAC.

Survival impact of immune cells infiltrating peritumoral area of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Inflammatory and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment are reported to be associated with tumor progression in several cancers. In total, 225 patients who underwent initial and curative hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from 2004 to 2013 were enrolled in this study. Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs), M2 macrophages (TAMs; tumor-associated macrophages), CD8+ T cells, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and their relationships with patient clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were evaluated. IHC was performed focusing on TANs first. We could not find a relationship between intratumoral and peritumoral TANs and clinicopathological features except for the fibrous capsule and infiltration of tumors into capsule. Next, TAMs, CD8+ cells and Tregs were evaluated by IHC. At the peritumoral area, TANs and TAMs (r = 0.36, p = 0.001) or Tregs (r = 0.16, p = 0.008) showed a positive correlation, whereas TANs and CD8+ cells showed a negative correlation (r = -0.16, p = 0.02). As for survival outcomes, at the peritumoral area, high TANs (p = 0.0398), low CD8+ cells (p = 0.0275), and high TAMs (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS). In addition, high TANs (p = 0.010), and high TAMs (p = 0.00125) were significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS). Finally, we established a risk signature model by combining the expression patterns of these cells. The high-risk signature group had significantly worse OS (p = 0.0277) and DFS (p = 0.0219) compared with those in the low-risk signature group. Our risk signature based on immune cells at the peritumoral area of the HCC can predict patient prognosis of HCC after curative hepatectomy.

Cancer-associated fibroblast senescence and its relation with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expressions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Caveolin-1 (CAV1) in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) has pro- or anti-tumourigenic effect depending on the cancer type. However, its effect in intrahepatic carcinoma (ICC) remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between CAV1 in CAFs and tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) numbers or PD-L1 levels in ICC patients. METHODS: Consecutive ICC patients (n = 158) were enrolled in this study. The levels of CAV1 in CAFs, CD8 + TILs, Foxp3+ TILs and PD-L1 in cancer cells were analysed using immunohistochemistry. Their association with the clinicopathological factors and prognosis were evaluated. The correlation between these factors was evaluated. RESULTS: CAV1 upregulation in CAFs was associated with a poor overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (P = 0.008). Clinicopathological factors were associated with high CA19-9 levels (P < 0.001), advanced tumour stage (P = 0.046) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004). CAV1 level was positively correlated with Foxp3+ TIL numbers (P = 0.01). There were no significant correlations between CAV1 levels and CD8 + TIL numbers (P = 0.80) and PD-L1 levels (P = 0.97). An increased CD8 + TIL number and decreased Foxp3+ TIL number were associated with an increased OS. In multivariate analysis, positive CAV1 expression in CAFs (P = 0.013) and decreased CD8 + TIL numbers (P = 0.021) were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Cellular senescence, represented by CAV1 levels, may be a marker of CAFs and a prognostic indicator of ICC through Foxp3+ TIL regulation. CAV1 expression in CAFs can be a therapeutic target for ICC.

Subjective Difficulty Scale in Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Observational Study.

The predictive value of a subjective difficulty scale (DS) after surgical procedures is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of a DS after liver transplantation (LT) and to identify predictors of difficulty. Surgeons prospectively evaluated the difficulty of 441 consecutive liver transplantations from donation after brain death at the end of the surgery by using a DS from 0 to 10 ("the easiest to the hardest you can imagine"). DS was associated with severe morbidity. The risk of graft loss at 1 year remained unchanged from 0 to 6 but increased beyond 6. Graft survival and patient survival of group with DS 7-10 was significantly impaired compared to groups with DS: 0-3 or DS: 4-6 but were significantly impaired for the group with DS: 7-10. Independent predictors of difficult LT (DS ≥ 7) were annular segment 1, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, retransplantation beyond 30 days, portal vein thrombosis, and ascites. Of them, ascites was a borderline non-significant covariate (p = .04). Vascular complications occurred more often after difficult LT (20.5% vs. 5.9%), whereas there was no difference in the other types of complications. DS can be used to tailor monitoring and anticipate early complications. External validation is needed.

Clinical significance of preoperative inflammation-based score for the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent hepatectomy.

PURPOSES: The present study investigated the prognostic value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent hepatectomy. METHODS: In total, 493 patients diagnosed HCC using the Milan criteria who underwent hepatic resection were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were evaluated according to several prognostic nutrition indices. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify clinicopathological variables associated with the overall survival (OS). RESULTS: According to a univariate analysis, higher values in the Glasgow Prognostic Score [GPS] (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.99, p = 0.002), modified GPS [mGPS] (HR = 2.26, p < 0.001), C-reactive protein [CRP]-to-albumin ratio [CAR] (HR = 1.86, p = 0.0012), and CONUT (HR = 1.65, p = 0.008) and a lower value of prognostic nutritional index [PNI] (HR = 2.36, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with a poor OS. A multivariate analysis showed that a CAR ≥ 0.037 (HR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.06-2.64, p = 0.03), FIB4-index > 3.25 (HR = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.14, p = 0.004) and PIVKA-II > 40 mAU/ml (HR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.14-2.61, p = 0.01) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the CAR was an independent prognostic score in patients with HCC and superior to other inflammation-based prognostic scores in terms of the prognosis.

Liver Venous Deprivation or Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy?: A Retrospective Multicentric Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 techniques of remnant liver hypertrophy in candidates for extended hepatectomy: radiological simultaneous portal vein embolization and hepatic vein embolization (HVE); namely LVD, and ALPPS. BACKGROUND: Recent advances in chemotherapy and surgical techniques have widened indications for extended hepatectomy, before which remnant liver augmentation is mandatory. ALPPS and LVD typically show higher hypertrophy rates than portal vein embolization, but their respective places in patient management remain unclear. METHODS: All consecutive ALPPS and LVD procedures performed in 8 French centers between 2011 and 2020 were included. The main endpoint was the successful resection rate (resection rate without 90-day mortality) analyzed according to an intention-to-treat principle. Secondary endpoints were hypertrophy rates, intra and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Among 209 patients, 124 had LVD 37 [13,1015] days before surgery, whereas 85 underwent ALPPS with an inter-stages period of 10 [6, 69] days. ALPPS was mostly-performed for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), LVD for CRLM and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hypertrophy was faster for ALPPS. Successful resection rates were 72.6% for LVD ± rescue ALPPS (n = 6) versus 90.6% for ALPPS (P < 0.001). Operative duration, blood losses and length-of-stay were lower for LVD, whereas 90-day major complications and mortality were comparable. Results were globally unchanged for CRLM patients, or after excluding the early 2 years of experience (learning-curve effect). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first 1 comparing LVD versus ALPPS in the largest cohort so far. Despite its retrospective design, it yields original results that may serve as the basis for a prospective study.

Is Portal Vein Embolization Followed by Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Justified in Patients with Impaired Liver Function?

BACKGROUND: Portal vein embolization (PVE) was developed for patients with insufficient future liver remnant volume and function and has gained relevant support worldwide before major hepatectomy. However, the efficacy of preoperative PVE for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with impaired liver function remains uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven HCC patients who were scheduled for PVE followed by hepatectomy were enrolled in this study. Their short- and long-term outcomes were investigated, according to the liver damage classification defined by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. RESULTS: Of 97 patients who underwent preoperative PVE, 30 (32.4%) could not undergo subsequent hepatectomy. Dropout rate from treatment strategy was significantly higher in patients with liver damage B (n = 13, 61.5%) than in those with liver damage A (n = 84, 26.2%) (P = 0.014). Among the 67 patients who underwent planned hepatectomy after PVE, 53 were categorized to liver damage A, and 14 were categorized to liver damage B at the point of hepatectomy. Although major complication and mortality rates were comparable between the two groups, the cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after hepatectomy were markedly worse in patients with liver damage B than in those with liver damage A (5-year OS rate: 23.1% vs 74.6%, P = 0.014, 5-year DFS rate: 7.8% vs 33.5%, P = 0.054, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy of PVE followed by hepatectomy might be a contraindication for HCC patients with impaired liver function categorized as liver damage B because of the higher dropout rate and poorer long-term outcomes after hepatectomy.

Early- and long-term outcomes of liver transplantation with rescue allocation grafts.

In France, liver grafts which have been refused by at least five centers are proposed as rescue allocation (RA). The aim of this study is to clarify the feasibility and safety of RA grafts in liver transplantation (LT). Short- and long-term outcomes of patients who received RA grafts (RA group) were compared with those of patients who received standard allocation (SA) grafts (SA group). From a total of 1635 patients, 102 patients received RA grafts. Before matching, the RA group was characterized primarily by less severe liver disease, but the quality of graft was worse. After matching recipients' characteristics of 102 patients who used RA grafts with 306 patients who used SA grafts, recipients' characteristics were well balanced (1:3 matching). Although the rate of primary dysfunction was significantly higher in the RA group, there is no significant difference in the occurrence of major complications, length of hospitalization, and mortality between two groups. Graft survival (GS) and overall survival (OS) in the RA group were not significantly different from the SA group (GS; HR = 1.03 P = .89, OS; HR = 1.03 P = .90). In the French allocation system, the feasibility and safety of RA grafts might be comparable to SA grafts for carefully selected patients.

Initial piggyback technique facilitates late liver retransplantation - a retrospective monocentric study.

Optimal management of inferior vena cava (IVC) is crucial to ensure safety in late liver retransplantation (ReLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate different surgical strategies with regard to IVC in late ReLT. All consecutive late ReLT (≥90 days from the previous transplant) from 2013 to 2018 in a single center was reviewed (n = 66). Of them, 46 (69.7%) were performed without venovenous bypass (VVB) including 29 with caval preservation (CP) and 17 with caval replacement (CR). The remaining 20 cases (30.3%) required the use of VVB. Among ReLT without VVB, CP was associated with a lower number of packed red blood cells (median 4 vs. 7; P = 0.016) and a lower incidence of post-transplant acute kidney injury (6.9% vs. 47.1%; P = 0.003). The feasibility of CP was 95% (14/15) in patients with previous 3-vein piggyback caval anastomosis versus 48.3% (15/31) after other techniques (P = 0.003). Indirect signs of portal hypertension (PHT) before retransplantation were predictive of VVB requirement. Early and long-term outcomes were similar across the three groups (CP without VVB, CR without VVB, and VVB). Preserving the IVC in late ReLT is associated with better postoperative renal function and is facilitated by a previous 3-vein piggyback. Routine CR is not justified in late ReLT.

The prognostic significance of serum aspartate transaminase and gamma-glutamyl transferase in liver deceased donors.

The impact of aspartate transaminases (AST) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) in serum of deceased donors on outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) is unclear. This study aimed to explore the relationship between donor highest AST value or first donor GGT value and graft survival. All consecutive patients who underwent a primary LT in a single center with available donor AST (N = 1253) and GGT value (N = 1152) were included. There was no significant association between donor AST and 90-day graft survival. We found a moderate association between GGT and 90-day graft survival. We found a significant interaction with a donor history of alcohol abuse (HAA). The risk of graft loss was associated with AST and GGT in donors with an HAA but remains unchanged in donors without HAA. There was no difference in graft survival according to donor AST or GGT with a cutoff ≥95th percentile (475 UI/l for AST and 170 UI/l for GGT). However, graft survival was significantly decreased when donors combined GGT ≥ 170 UI/l and HAA (61% at one year). Hepatic grafts from donors with high AST or high GGT but without alcohol history and no additional risk factors can be transplanted in low-risk recipient.

Variation in complications and mortality following ALPPS at early-adopting centers.

BACKGROUND: Various, often conflicting, estimates for post-operative morbidity and mortality following ALPPS have been reported in the literature, suggesting that considerable center-level variation exists. Some of this variation may be related to center volume and experience. METHODS: Using data from seventeen centers who were early adopters of the ALPPS technique, we estimated the variation, by center, in standardized 90-day mortality and comprehensive complication index (CCI) for patients treated between 2012 and 2018. RESULTS: We estimated that center-specific 90-day mortality following treatment with ALPPS varied from 4.2% (95% CI: 0.8, 9.9) to 29.1% (95% CI: 13.9, 50.9), and that center-specific CCI following treatment with ALPPS varied from 17.0 (95% CI: 7.5, 26.5) to 49.8 (95% CI: 38.1, 61.8). Declines in estimated 90-day mortality and CCI were observed over time, and almost all individual centers followed this trend. Patients treated at centers with a higher number of ALPPS cases performed over the prior year had a lower risk of post-operative mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite considerable center-level variation in ALPPS outcomes, perioperative outcomes following ALPPS have improved over time and treatment at higher volume centers results in a lower risk of 90-day mortality. Morbidity and mortality remain concerningly high at some centers.

Clinical Significance of PD-L1 Expression in Both Cancer and Stroma Cells of Cholangiocarcinoma Patients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of programmed death 1 and its ligand (PD-L1) as therapeutic targets has been reported previously. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of PD-L1 expression in cancer and stroma cells in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: The study enrolled 177 consecutive CCA patients who underwent curative resection between 2005 and 2014. Expression of PD-L1 in CCA and stroma cells was assayed by immunohistochemistry, and their relationships with patient clinicopathologic characteristics and prognoses were evaluated. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells (CD66b+ neutrophils [TANs] and CD163+ M2 macrophages [TAMs]) also were assayed by immunohistochemistry, and their relationship with PD-L1 expression in cancer and stroma cells was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 177 analyzed CCA cases, PD-L1 expression was identified in cancer cells in 54 cases (30.5%) and in stroma cells in 77 cases (43.5%). The patients with positive PD-L1 expression in cancer and stroma cells had worse overall survival rates than those negative for PD-L1 (cancer cells: hazard ratio [HR] 2.08; P = 0.0004; stroma cells: HR 1.84; P = 0.003). Moreover, the patients with PD-L1-positive cancer cells had higher rates of PD-L1 expression in stroma cells (P < 0.0001) and higher numbers of TANs (P = 0.0003) and TAMs (P = 0.004) than those with low PD-L1 expression. In the multivariate analysis, PD-L1 expression in both cancer and stroma cells (HR 2.20; P = 0.002) was an independent predictor of poor overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed PD-L1 expressed in both CCA and stromal cells and demonstrated that its expression may affect numbers of TANs and TAMs and play a pivotal role in CCA outcomes.

Endoscopic hepatic resection and endoscopic radiofrequency ablation as initial treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria.

PURPOSES: The indication of endoscopic (laparoscopic and thoracoscopic) hepatic resection (HR) has been expanded in the past decade because of its low invasiveness. However, the indications of endoscopic HR and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have not yet been determined. METHODS: Among the 906 patients hospitalized for the initial treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between 2000 and 2017, 77 underwent endoscopic partial HR (E-pHR), and 94 underwent endoscopic RFA (E-RFA). We compared the short- and long-term outcomes between the E-pHR and E-RFA groups. RESULTS: The patients in the E-RFA group were characterized primarily by an impaired liver function. Among the patients with liver damage B or C, the overall survival (OS) in the E-pHR group was significantly worse than in the E-RFA group (3-year OS: 36% vs. 82%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: E-RFA may be recommended for the initial treatment of HCC in patients with a severely impaired liver function. However, E-pHR should be avoided as the initial treatment of HCC in such patients.

Postoperative nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is correlated with malnutrition leading to an unpreferable clinical course for pancreatic cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

PURPOSES: This study aimed to clarify the impact of postoperative nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) on the clinical course of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: One hundred and eight patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with curative intent in between 2005 and 2016 were enrolled in this study. Post-PD NAFLD was assessed by computed tomography (CT), which was routinely performed at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. The clinical impact of post-PD NAFLD was examined from an oncological perspective. RESULTS: There were 50 (46.2%) post-PD NAFLD patients. The NAFLD group showed significantly lower CT values at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery than those without NAFLD. Patients with NAFLD showed significant body weight loss and a decrease in serum albumin level after surgery compared with those without NAFLD. Consequently, the 70% completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine, but not S1, was significantly lower in the NAFLD group than in the non-NAFLD group. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Post-PD NAFLD was associated with malnutrition in patients with PDAC, reducing their tolerance to gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Post-PD NAFLD needs to be emphasized and requires special nutritional intervention in patients with PDAC.

Clinical role of serum programmed death ligand 1 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Where does it come from?

PURPOSES: Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a key target for the treatment of several malignancies. The present study was conducted to clarify the role of serum PD-L1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Serum PD-L1 (sPD-L1) was examined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 153 patients with HCC who underwent curative hepatectomy at Kumamoto University in 2011-2016. The expression of PD-L1 in tissue (tPD-L1) was investigated by immunohistochemistry. The clinical roles of the PD-L1 expression in both serum and tissue were examined. RESULTS: The sPD-L1 was significantly elevated in HCC patients compared to patients without any malignant or inflammatory disease (234 vs. 93 pg/mL, p < 0.0001). The percentage of the tPD-L1-positive area (%tPD-L1) in the background liver was significantly higher than in the tumor (1.52% vs. 0.48%, p < 0.0001). The %tPD-L1 in the background liver but not in the tumor was significantly correlated with the sPD-L1 level (p = 0.0079). The sPD-L1, %tPD-L1 in the tumor, and %tPD-L1 in the background liver were not correlated with the overall survival after surgery. CONCLUSION: PD-L1-expressing cells in the background liver, but not in the tumor tissue, appeared to contribute to the sPD-L1 level. The sPD-L1 level may thus not indicate the tumor burden in patients with HCC.