Evaluating and improving health equity and fairness of polygenic scores.

Polygenic scores (PGSs) are quantitative metrics for predicting phenotypic values, such as human height or disease status. Some PGS methods require only summary statistics of a relevant genome-wide association study (GWAS) for their score. One such method is Lassosum, which inherits the model selection advantages of Lasso to select a meaningful subset of the GWAS single-nucleotide polymorphisms as predictors from their association statistics. However, even efficient scores like Lassosum, when derived from European-based GWASs, are poor predictors of phenotype for subjects of non-European ancestry; that is, they have limited portability to other ancestries. To increase the portability of Lassosum, when GWAS information and estimates of linkage disequilibrium are available for both ancestries, we propose Joint-Lassosum (JLS). In the simulation settings we explore, JLS provides more accurate PGSs compared to other methods, especially when measured in terms of fairness. In analyses of UK Biobank data, JLS was computationally more efficient but slightly less accurate than a Bayesian comparator, SDPRX. Like all PGS methods, JLS requires selection of predictors, which are determined by data-driven tuning parameters. We describe a new approach to selecting tuning parameters and note its relevance for model selection for any PGS. We also draw connections to the literature on algorithmic fairness and discuss how JLS can help mitigate fairness-related harms that might result from the use of PGSs in clinical settings. While no PGS method is likely to be universally portable, due to the diversity of human populations and unequal information content of GWASs for different ancestries, JLS is an effective approach for enhancing portability and reducing predictive bias.

Genetic associations with psychosis and affective disturbance in Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) commonly experience neuropsychiatric symptoms of psychosis (AD+P) and/or affective disturbance (depression, anxiety, and/or irritability, AD+A). This study's goal was to identify the genetic architecture of AD+P and AD+A, as well as their genetically correlated phenotypes. METHODS: Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 9988 AD participants from six source studies with participants characterized for AD+P AD+A, and a joint phenotype (AD+A+P). RESULTS: AD+P and AD+A were genetically correlated. However, AD+P and AD+A diverged in their genetic correlations with psychiatric phenotypes in individuals without AD. AD+P was negatively genetically correlated with bipolar disorder and positively with depressive symptoms. AD+A was positively correlated with anxiety disorder and more strongly correlated than AD+P with depressive symptoms. AD+P and AD+A+P had significant estimated heritability, whereas AD+A did not. Examination of the loci most strongly associated with the three phenotypes revealed overlapping and unique associations. DISCUSSION: AD+P, AD+A, and AD+A+P have both shared and divergent genetic associations pointing to the importance of incorporating genetic insights into future treatment development. Highlights: It has long been known that psychotic and affective symptoms are often comorbid in individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. Here we examined for the first time the genetic architecture underlying this clinical observation, determining that psychotic and affective phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease are genetically correlated.Nevertheless, psychotic and affective phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease diverged in their genetic correlations with psychiatric phenotypes assessed in individuals without Alzheimer's disease. Psychosis in Alzheimer's disease was negatively genetically correlated with bipolar disorder and positively with depressive symptoms, whereas the affective phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease were positively correlated with anxiety disorder and more strongly correlated than psychosis with depressive symptoms.Psychosis in Alzheimer's disease, and the joint psychotic and affective phenotype, had significant estimated heritability, whereas the affective in AD did not.Examination of the loci most strongly associated with the psychotic, affective, or joint phenotypes revealed overlapping and unique associations.