RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The artificial intelligence (AI)-based platform ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer, OpenAI LP, San Francisco, CA, USA) has gained impressive popularity in recent months. Its performance on case vignettes of general medical (non-ophthalmological) emergencies has been assessed - with very encouraging results. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of ChatGPT on ophthalmological emergency case vignettes in terms of the main outcome measures triage accuracy, appropriateness of recommended prehospital measures, and overall potential to inflict harm to the user/patient. METHODS: We wrote ten short, fictional case vignettes describing different acute ophthalmological symptoms. Each vignette was entered into ChatGPT five times with the same wording and following a standardized interaction pathway. The answers were analyzed following a systematic approach. RESULTS: We observed a triage accuracy of 93.6%. Most answers contained only appropriate recommendations for prehospital measures. However, an overall potential to inflict harm to users/patients was present in 32% of answers. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT should presently not be used as a stand-alone primary source of information about acute ophthalmological symptoms. As AI continues to evolve, its safety and efficacy in the prehospital management of ophthalmological emergencies has to be reassessed regularly.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate of misdiagnosis of aneurysmatic pachychoroid type 1 choroidal neovascularization/polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PAT1/PCV) among cases diagnosed as non-aneurysmatic pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) and to define optical coherence tomography (OCT) features facilitating their distinction. METHODS: The database of the Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, was screened for patients diagnosed with PNV. Multimodal imaging was screened for the presence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and aneurysms/polyps. Imaging features facilitating the diagnosis of PAT1/PCV were analysed. RESULTS: In total, 49 eyes of 44 patients with a clinical PNV diagnosis were included, of which 42 (85.7%) had PNV and 7 (14.3%) represented misdiagnosed PAT1/PCV. SFCT was comparable (PNV: 377 ± 92 vs. PAT1/PCV: 400 ± 83 µm; p = 0.39). Whereas no difference was detected in total pigment epithelium detachment (PED) diameter (p = 0.46), maximum PED height was significantly higher in the PAT1/PCV group (199 ± 31 vs. 82 ± 46, p < 0.00001). In a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimum cutoff for defining "peaking PED" was 158 µm with an area under the curve of 0.969, a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% CI: 0.59-1.0), and a specificity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.84-0.99). Sub-retinal hyperreflective material (SHRM; p = 0.04), sub-retinal ring-like structures (SRRLS; p < 0.00001), and sub-RPE fluid (p = 0.04) were significantly more frequent in eyes with PAT1/PCV. CONCLUSION: A relevant percentage of eyes diagnosed with PNV might instead suffer from PAT1/PCV. The detection of a maximum PED height ("peaking PED") exceeding approximately 150 µm, SHRM, SRRLS, and sub-RPE fluid might greatly aid in the production of a more accurate diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Neovascularización Coroidal , Desprendimiento de Retina , Humanos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Vasculopatía Coroidea Polipoidea , Coroides , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos , Neovascularización Coroidal/diagnóstico , Errores Diagnósticos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To study the glistening formation in various hydrophobic-acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) models, and to evaluate the effect of glistenings on light scattering in these IOLs. DESIGN: Laboratory investigation. METHODS: The susceptibility of the hydrophobic-acrylic material to develop glistenings was evaluated in 6 IOL models. Accelerated lens aging was induced by immersing the IOLs in a solution at 45 C for 24 hours and cooled to 37 C for 2.5 hours. Light microscopy and image acquisition were performed. Glistening statistics-that is, microvacuoles' (MV) number and size-were derived from image analysis. Light scattering was measured using a clinical device featuring an adaptation for in vitro IOL assessment. RESULTS: The number of glistenings differed among the studied IOLs and ranged from 0 to 3532 MV/mm2. In 1 model, glistenings were found only at the periphery, with diffuse light scattering observed centrally despite the absence of microvacuoles. The mean size of glistenings ranged from 5.2 to 10.2 µm. The mean straylight parameter of the IOLs increased from 0.6 to 5.0 deg2/sr after accelerated aging. Straylight elevation demonstrated a proportional relationship with the glistening number. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that hydrophobic-acrylic lenses differ in their resistance to glistenings, as one group proved to be glistening-free, but the other models revealed varying grades of glistenings. Moreover, we demonstrated that the presence of glistenings results in increased straylight, and that straylight proportionally depends on the glistenings number irrespective of the IOL model. However, more research is needed to confirm that the relationship we found holds for all hydrophobic-acrylic IOLs.