Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 233
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(6): 1088-1095, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781685

RESUMEN

The characteristics of severe human parainfluenza virus (HPIV)-associated pneumonia in adults have not been well evaluated. We investigated epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 143 patients with severe HPIV-associated pneumonia during 2010-2019. HPIV was the most common cause (25.2%) of severe virus-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia and the third most common cause (15.7%) of severe virus-associated community-acquired pneumonia. Hematologic malignancy (35.0%), diabetes mellitus (23.8%), and structural lung disease (21.0%) were common underlying conditions. Co-infections occurred in 54.5% of patients admitted to an intensive care unit. The 90-day mortality rate for HPIV-associated pneumonia was comparable to that for severe influenza virus-associated pneumonia (55.2% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.22). Ribavirin treatment was not associated with lower mortality rates. Fungal co-infections were associated with 82.4% of deaths. Clinicians should consider the possibility of pathogenic co-infections in patients with HPIV-associated pneumonia. Contact precautions and environmental cleaning are crucial to prevent HPIV transmission in hospital settings.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/virología , República de Corea/epidemiología , Anciano , Adulto , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Coinfección/epidemiología , Infecciones por Paramyxoviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Paramyxoviridae/mortalidad , Historia del Siglo XXI , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 109, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429645

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an argument whether the delayed intubation aggravate the respiratory failure in Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to investigate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure before mechanical ventilation on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included mechanically ventilated patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between February 2020 and December 2021 at Asan Medical Center. The patients were divided into HFNC failure (HFNC-F) and mechanical ventilation (MV) groups according to the use of HFNC before MV. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the worst values of ventilator parameters from day 1 to day 3 after mechanical ventilation between the two groups. RESULTS: Overall, 158 mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 were included in this study: 107 patients (67.7%) in the HFNC-F group and 51 (32.3%) in the MV group. The two groups had similar profiles of ventilator parameter from day 1 to day 3 after mechanical ventilation, except of dynamic compliance on day 3 (28.38 mL/cmH2O in MV vs. 30.67 mL/H2O in HFNC-F, p = 0.032). In addition, the HFNC-F group (5.6%) had a lower rate of ECMO at 28 days than the MV group (17.6%), even after adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.83; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, HFNC failure before mechanical ventilation was not associated with deterioration of respiratory failure.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Humanos , Cánula , Respiración Artificial , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia
3.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 187, 2024 05 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816883

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although several trials were conducted to optimize the oxygenation range in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, no studies have yet reached a universal recommendation on the optimal a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) range in patients with sepsis. Our aim was to evaluate whether a relatively high arterial oxygen tension is associated with longer survival in sepsis patients compared with conservative arterial oxygen tension. METHODS: From the Korean Sepsis Alliance nationwide registry, patients treated with liberal PaO2 (PaO2 ≥ 80 mm Hg) were 1:1 matched with those treated with conservative PaO2 (PaO2 < 80 mm Hg) over the first three days after ICU admission according to the propensity score. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. RESULTS: The median values of PaO2 over the first three ICU days in 1211 liberal and 1211 conservative PaO2 groups were, respectively, 107.2 (92.0-134.0) and 84.4 (71.2-112.0) in day 1110.0 (93.4-132.0) and 80.0 (71.0-100.0) in day 2, and 106.0 (91.9-127.4) and 78.0 (69.0-94.5) in day 3 (all p-values < 0.001). The liberal PaO2 group showed a lower likelihood of death at day 28 (14.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.96; p-value = 0.017). ICU (HR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.96; p-value = 0.019) and hospital mortalities (HR, 0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.97; p-value = 0.020) were lower in the liberal PaO2 group. On ICU days 2 (p-value = 0.007) and 3 (p-value < 0.001), but not ICU day 1, hyperoxia was associated with better prognosis compared with conservative oxygenation., with the lowest 28-day mortality, especially at PaO2 of around 100 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with sepsis, higher PaO2 (≥ 80 mm Hg) during the first three ICU days was associated with a lower 28-day mortality compared with conservative PaO2.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Oxígeno , Sepsis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Anciano , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/terapia , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Oxígeno/sangre , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Presión Parcial , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre/métodos , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 30, 2024 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38263076

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence on association between quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and sepsis mortality in ICU patients. The primary aim of this study was to determine the association between qSOFA and 28-day mortality in ICU patients admitted for sepsis. Association of qSOFA with early (3-day), medium (28-day), late (90-day) mortality was assessed in low and lower middle income (LLMIC), upper middle income (UMIC) and high income (HIC) countries/regions. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the MOSAICS II study, an international prospective observational study on sepsis epidemiology in Asian ICUs. Associations between qSOFA at ICU admission and mortality were separately assessed in LLMIC, UMIC and HIC countries/regions. Modified Poisson regression was used to determine the adjusted relative risk (RR) of qSOFA score on mortality at 28 days with adjustments for confounders identified in the MOSAICS II study. RESULTS: Among the MOSAICS II study cohort of 4980 patients, 4826 patients from 343 ICUs and 22 countries were included in this secondary analysis. Higher qSOFA was associated with increasing 28-day mortality, but this was only observed in LLMIC (p < 0.001) and UMIC (p < 0.001) and not HIC (p = 0.220) countries/regions. Similarly, higher 90-day mortality was associated with increased qSOFA in LLMIC (p < 0.001) and UMIC (p < 0.001) only. In contrast, higher 3-day mortality with increasing qSOFA score was observed across all income countries/regions (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that qSOFA remained associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted RR 1.09 (1.00-1.18), p = 0.038) even after adjustments for covariates including APACHE II, SOFA, income country/region and administration of antibiotics within 3 h. CONCLUSIONS: qSOFA was independently associated with 28-day mortality in ICU patients admitted for sepsis. In LLMIC and UMIC countries/regions, qSOFA was associated with early to late mortality but only early mortality in HIC countries/regions.


Asunto(s)
Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Sepsis , Humanos , APACHE , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos
5.
Nurs Crit Care ; 2024 Feb 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320812

RESUMEN

AIM: To test whether targeted SpO2 feedback (TSF), an automatic control system for fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), achieves more time in the optimal SpO2 range and/or reduces the frequency of manual adjustments to administered FiO2 compared with conventional manual titration in patients with hypoxia on high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-two patients were recruited from two hospitals. For each, two sessions of manual mode and two sessions of TSF were applied in a random order, each session lasting 2 h. The target SpO2 on TSF was 95%. Oxygen monitoring levels were classified into four SpO2 ranges: hypoxia (≤ 89%), borderline (90%-93%), optimal (94%-96%) and hyperoxia (≥ 97%). The two modes were compared based on the proportion of time spent in each SpO2 range and the number of manual FiO2 adjustments. RESULTS: The proportion of time in the optimal SpO2 range was 20.5% under manual titration mode and 65.4% under TSF (p < .01). The proportions of time in the hypoxia range were 1.1% and 0.4%, respectively (p = .31), in the borderline range 4.7% and 3.5%, respectively (p = .54), and in the hyperoxia range 73.7% and 30.7%, respectively (p < .01). There were statistical differences only in the optimal and hyperoxia SpO2 ranges. During the 8 h, the frequency of manual FiO2 adjustment was 0.7 times for the manual mode and 0.2 times for TSF, showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.076). CONCLUSION: Compared with manual titration, TSF achieved greater time of the optimal SpO2 and less time of hyperoxia during HFNC. The frequency of manual adjustments on TSF tended to be less than on manual titration mode. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Automatic closed-loop algorithm FiO2 monitoring systems can achieve better oxygen treatments than conventional monitoring and may reduce nurse workloads. In the era of pandemic respiratory diseases, this system can also facilitate contactless SpO2 monitoring during HFNC therapy.

6.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 263, 2023 07 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37408042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is etiologically and clinically a heterogeneous disease. Its diagnostic characteristics and subtype classification, and the application of these features to treatment, have been of considerable interest. Metabolomics is becoming important for identifying ARDS biology and distinguishing its subtypes. This study aimed to identify metabolites that could distinguish sepsis-induced ARDS patients from non-ARDS controls, using a targeted metabolomics approach, and to identify whether sepsis-induced direct and sepsis-induced indirect ARDS are metabolically distinct groups, and if so, confirm their metabolites and associated pathways. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 54 samples of ARDS patients from a sepsis registry that was prospectively collected from March 2011 to February 2018, along with 30 non-ARDS controls. The cohort was divided into direct and indirect ARDS. Metabolite concentrations of five analyte classes (energy metabolism, free fatty acids, amino acids, phospholipids, sphingolipids) were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry by targeted metabolomics. RESULTS: In total, 186 metabolites were detected. Among them, 102 metabolites could differentiate sepsis-induced ARDS patients from the non-ARDS controls, while 14 metabolites could discriminate sepsis-induced ARDS subphenotypes. Using partial least-squares discriminant analysis, we showed that sepsis-induced ARDS patients were metabolically distinct from the non-ARDS controls. The main distinguishing metabolites were lysophosphatidylethanolamine (lysoPE) plasmalogen, PE plasmalogens, and phosphatidylcholines (PCs). Sepsis-induced direct and indirect ARDS were also metabolically distinct subgroups, with differences in lysoPCs. Glycerophospholipid and sphingolipid metabolism were the most significant metabolic pathways involved in sepsis-induced ARDS biology and in sepsis-induced direct/indirect ARDS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated a marked difference in metabolic patterns between sepsis-induced ARDS patients and non-ARDS controls, and between sepsis-induced direct and indirect ARDS subpheonotypes. The identified metabolites and pathways can provide clues relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of individuals with ARDS.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Sepsis , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Metabolómica/métodos , Cromatografía Liquida/métodos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Sepsis/complicaciones , Biomarcadores
7.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 206(9): 1107-1116, 2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35763381

RESUMEN

Rationale: Directly comparative data on sepsis epidemiology and sepsis bundle implementation in countries of differing national wealth remain sparse. Objectives: To evaluate across countries/regions of differing income status in Asia 1) the prevalence, causes, and outcomes of sepsis as a reason for ICU admission and 2) sepsis bundle (antibiotic administration, blood culture, and lactate measurement) compliance and its association with hospital mortality. Methods: A prospective point prevalence study was conducted among 386 adult ICUs from 22 Asian countries/regions. Adult ICU participants admitted for sepsis on four separate days (representing the seasons of 2019) were recruited. Measurements and Main Results: The overall prevalence of sepsis in ICUs was 22.4% (20.9%, 24.5%, and 21.3% in low-income countries/regions [LICs]/lower middle-income countries/regions [LMICs], upper middle-income countries/regions, and high-income countries/regions [HICs], respectively; P < 0.001). Patients were younger and had lower severity of illness in LICs/LMICs. Hospital mortality was 32.6% and marginally significantly higher in LICs/LMICs than HICs on multivariable generalized mixed model analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.37; P = 0.049). Sepsis bundle compliance was 21.5% at 1 hour (26.0%, 22.1%, and 16.2% in LICs/LMICs, upper middle-income countries/regions, and HICs, respectively; P < 0.001) and 36.6% at 3 hours (39.3%, 32.8%, and 38.5%, respectively; P = 0.001). Delaying antibiotic administration beyond 3 hours was the only element independently associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-3.08; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Sepsis is a common cause of admission to Asian ICUs. Mortality remains high and is higher in LICs/LMICs after controlling for confounders. Sepsis bundle compliance remains low. Delaying antibiotic administration beyond 3 hours from diagnosis is associated with increased mortality. Clinical trial registered with www.ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2019/01/016898).


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Sepsis , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Asia , Antibacterianos
8.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(11): 2147-2154, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36287034

RESUMEN

We investigated the proportion and characteristics of severe Corynebacterium striatum pneumonia in South Korea during 2014-2019. As part of an ongoing observational study of severe pneumonia among adult patients, we identified 27 severe C. striatum pneumonia cases. Most (70.4%) cases were hospital-acquired, and 51.9% of patients were immunocompromised. C. striatum cases among patients with severe hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) increased from 1.0% (2/200) during 2014-2015 to 5.4% (10/185) during 2018-2019, but methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections among severe HAP cases decreased from 12.0% to 2.7% during the same timeframe. During 2018-2019, C. striatum was responsible for 13.3% of severe HAP cases from which bacterial pathogens were identified. The 90-day mortality rates were similarly high in the C. striatum and MRSA groups. C. striatum was a major cause of severe HAP and had high mortality rates. This pathogen is emerging as a possible cause for severe pneumonia, especially among immunocompromised patients.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Neumonía , Adulto , Humanos , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Seúl , Neumonía/etiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto
9.
Crit Care ; 26(1): 280, 2022 09 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36114545

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital-onset sepsis is associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate than community-onset sepsis. Many hospitals have implemented rapid response teams (RRTs) for early detection and timely management of at-risk hospitalized patients. However, the effectiveness of an all-day RRT over a non-all-day RRT in reducing the risk of in-hospital mortality in patient with hospital-onset sepsis is unclear. We aimed to determine the effect of the RRT's operating hours on in-hospital mortality in inpatient patients with sepsis. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study of adult patients with hospital-onset sepsis prospectively collected from the Korean Sepsis Alliance (KSA) Database from 16 tertiary referral or university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea between September of 2019 and February of 2020. RRT was implemented in 11 hospitals, of which 5 (45.5%) operated 24-h RRT (all-day RRT) and the remaining 6 (54.5%) had part-day RRT (non-all-day RRT). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 405 patients with hospital-onset sepsis, 206 (50.9%) were admitted to hospitals operating all-day RRT, whereas 199 (49.1%) were hospitalized in hospitals with non-all-day RRT. A total of 73 of the 206 patients in the all-day group (35.4%) and 85 of the 199 patients in the non-all-day group (42.7%) died in the hospital (P = 0.133). After adjustments for co-variables, the implementation of all-day RRT was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.93; P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with non-all-day RRTs, the availability of all-day RRTs was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality among patients with hospital-onset sepsis.


Asunto(s)
Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida , Sepsis , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/terapia
10.
Gerontology ; 68(3): 280-288, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34107481

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: An increase in age has been observed among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Age is a well-known risk factor for ICU readmission and mortality. However, clinical characteristics and risk factors of ICU readmission of elderly patients (≥65 years) have not been studied. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted in a total of 122-bed ICU of a tertiary care hospital in Seoul, Korea. A total of 85,413 patients were enrolled in this hospital between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017. The odds ratio of readmission and in-hospital mortality was calculated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Totally, 29,503 patients were included in the study group, of which 2,711 (9.2%) had ICU readmissions. Of the 2,711 readmitted patients, 472 patients were readmitted more than once (readmitted 2 or more times to the ICU, 17.4%). In the readmitted patient group, there were more males, higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, and hospitalized for medical reasons. Length of stay (LOS) in ICU and in-hospital were longer, and 28-day and in-hospital mortality was higher in readmitted patients than in nonreadmitted patients. Risk factors of ICU readmission included the ICU admission due to medical reason, SOFA score, presence of chronic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, transplantation, use of mechanical ventilation, and initial ICU LOS. ICU readmission and age (over 85 years) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality on multivariable analysis. The delayed ICU readmission group (>72 h) had higher in-hospital mortality than the early readmission group (≤72 h) (20.6 vs. 16.2%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: ICU readmissions occurred in 9.2% of elderly patients and were associated with poor prognosis and higher mortality.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Readmisión del Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(1): 226-228, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33350914

RESUMEN

We report a case series of severe human bocavirus-associated pneumonia in adults in Seoul, South Korea. The virus accounted for 0.5% of all severe pneumonia cases. Structural lung disease and hematologic malignancy were common underlying diseases. Overall death rate was 54.5%. Higher death rates were associated with co-infection (83.3%) and immunocompromise (80.0%).


Asunto(s)
Bocavirus Humano , Infecciones por Parvoviridae , Neumonía , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Adulto , Hospitales , Bocavirus Humano/genética , Humanos , Lactante , Infecciones por Parvoviridae/epidemiología , Derivación y Consulta , República de Corea/epidemiología , Seúl
12.
Crit Care Med ; 49(3): e219-e234, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33555780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic continues to affect millions worldwide. Given the rapidly growing evidence base, we implemented a living guideline model to provide guidance on the management of patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 in the ICU. METHODS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Disease 2019 panel has expanded to include 43 experts from 14 countries; all panel members completed an electronic conflict-of-interest disclosure form. In this update, the panel addressed nine questions relevant to managing severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 in the ICU. We used the World Health Organization's definition of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019. The systematic reviews team searched the literature for relevant evidence, aiming to identify systematic reviews and clinical trials. When appropriate, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis to summarize treatment effects. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, then used the evidence-to-decision framework to generate recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Diease 2019 panel issued nine statements (three new and six updated) related to ICU patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019. For severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019, the panel strongly recommends using systemic corticosteroids and venous thromboprophylaxis but strongly recommends against using hydroxychloroquine. In addition, the panel suggests using dexamethasone (compared with other corticosteroids) and suggests against using convalescent plasma and therapeutic anticoagulation outside clinical trials. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Diease 2019 panel suggests using remdesivir in nonventilated patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 and suggests against starting remdesivir in patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019 outside clinical trials. Because of insufficient evidence, the panel did not issue a recommendation on the use of awake prone positioning. CONCLUSION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Diease 2019 panel issued several recommendations to guide healthcare professionals caring for adults with critical or severe coronavirus disease 2019 in the ICU. Based on a living guideline model the recommendations will be updated as new evidence becomes available.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina , Inmunización Pasiva , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Ventilación , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
13.
Crit Care ; 25(1): 106, 2021 03 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33726819

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused unprecedented pressure on healthcare system globally. Lack of high-quality evidence on the respiratory management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure (C-ARF) has resulted in wide variation in clinical practice. METHODS: Using a Delphi process, an international panel of 39 experts developed clinical practice statements on the respiratory management of C-ARF in areas where evidence is absent or limited. Agreement was defined as achieved when > 70% experts voted for a given option on the Likert scale statement or > 80% voted for a particular option in multiple-choice questions. Stability was assessed between the two concluding rounds for each statement, using the non-parametric Chi-square (χ2) test (p < 0·05 was considered as unstable). RESULTS: Agreement was achieved for 27 (73%) management strategies which were then used to develop expert clinical practice statements. Experts agreed that COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is clinically similar to other forms of ARDS. The Delphi process yielded strong suggestions for use of systemic corticosteroids for critical COVID-19; awake self-proning to improve oxygenation and high flow nasal oxygen to potentially reduce tracheal intubation; non-invasive ventilation for patients with mixed hypoxemic-hypercapnic respiratory failure; tracheal intubation for poor mentation, hemodynamic instability or severe hypoxemia; closed suction systems; lung protective ventilation; prone ventilation (for 16-24 h per day) to improve oxygenation; neuromuscular blocking agents for patient-ventilator dyssynchrony; avoiding delay in extubation for the risk of reintubation; and similar timing of tracheostomy as in non-COVID-19 patients. There was no agreement on positive end expiratory pressure titration or the choice of personal protective equipment. CONCLUSION: Using a Delphi method, an agreement among experts was reached for 27 statements from which 20 expert clinical practice statements were derived on the respiratory management of C-ARF, addressing important decisions for patient management in areas where evidence is either absent or limited. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with Clinical trials.gov Identifier: NCT04534569.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/virología , Humanos
14.
Crit Care Med ; 48(6): e440-e469, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32224769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting thousands of people around the world. Urgent guidance for clinicians caring for the sickest of these patients is needed. METHODS: We formed a panel of 36 experts from 12 countries. All panel members completed the World Health Organization conflict of interest disclosure form. The panel proposed 53 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 in the ICU. We searched the literature for direct and indirect evidence on the management of COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the ICU. We identified relevant and recent systematic reviews on most questions relating to supportive care. We assessed the certainty in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, then generated recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice recommendations. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued 54 statements, of which four are best practice statements, nine are strong recommendations, and 35 are weak recommendations. No recommendation was provided for six questions. The topics were: 1) infection control, 2) laboratory diagnosis and specimens, 3) hemodynamic support, 4) ventilatory support, and 5) COVID-19 therapy. CONCLUSION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued several recommendations to help support healthcare workers caring for critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. When available, we will provide new evidence in further releases of these guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Enfermedad Crítica , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/normas , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Pandemias , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Respiración Artificial/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Choque/terapia
15.
Med Mycol ; 58(3): 275-281, 2020 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31204780

RESUMEN

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a life-threatening disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). The ICU criteria were proposed to diagnose IPA in critically ill patients. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of ICU criteria for diagnosis and treatment of IPA in nonhematologic patients in the ICU. We retrospectively reviewed 103 ICU patients with positive galactomannan test in blood and respiratory tract from January 1, 2016, to May 31, 2017. We excluded patients with hematologic malignancy. We divided the treatment and non-treatment groups according to the IPA treatment. We compared the baseline characteristics and outcomes between two groups and the agreement with ICU criteria. There were 49 patients in treatment groups and 54 patients in non-treatment groups. There were more cases of solid organ transplantation (P = .003), immunosuppressive therapy (P < .001) and bacterial viral coinfection (P = .048) in the treatment group compared to nontreatment group. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality, the use of ventilator, and septic shock between the two groups. The agreement rate between the putative group and treatment was low (59.2%). There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the putative and colonization groups according to the ICU criteria in each group. The treatment of IPA based on the symptom, radiologic finding and galactomannan test did not showed the better outcome. Also, the treatment based on the ICU criteria didn't show the difference of outcome. The new criteria for diagnosis of IPA in critically ill patients are needed.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Anciano , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/microbiología , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Galactosa/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Mananos/análisis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Órganos , Radiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
J Intensive Care Med ; 35(4): 364-370, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29343171

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The intensive care unit (ICU) admission of patients with hematologic malignancies is gradually increasing. Life-threatening events are common, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the most critical conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of ARDS in patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on all patients with ARDS with hematological malignancies in a single tertiary teaching hospital between 2008 and 2015. Data on the treatment of and the outcomes of ARDS were collected to determine the clinical characteristics associated with ICU mortality. RESULTS: During the 8-year study period, among a total of 821 patients with ARDS admitted to the ICU, all 185 patients with hematological malignancies were included in the analysis. Most of the patients (88.1%) had moderate-to-severe ARDS, and the median PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 122 (interquartile range: 88-157). The overall ICU mortality rate was 57.3% (50.0% for mild, 52.0% for moderate, and 67.7% for severe ARDS). After the univariate and the multivariate logistic regressions, the factors independently associated with a higher ICU mortality were severe ARDS (odds ratio [OR]: 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-5.25), identification of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (OR: 6.61; 95% CI: 1.31-33.41), the amount of blood product transfusion (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.13-1.38), and the progressive or refractory disease (OR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.31-6.91). Mortality was independently lower in patients who received the initial low tidal volume ventilation (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.96). CONCLUSION: The outcome of ARDS in patients with hematological malignancies is associated with the severity of the underlying diseases, the presence of multidrug-resistance pathogens, and the amount of transfusion; however, strict application of low tidal volume ventilation may improve the outcome of these patients at the time of diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Resultados de Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar
17.
J Korean Med Sci ; 35(15): e106, 2020 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32301295

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Opioid withdrawal syndrome (OWS) may occur following the reduction or discontinuation of opioid analgesics. In critically ill pediatric patients, OWS is a common and clinically significant condition. However, OWS in adult patients has not been assessed in detail. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical features of OWS in mechanically ventilated patients treated in an adult intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This study was a retrospective evaluation of data from patients treated in the medical ICU for > 3 days and who received only one type of opioid analgesic. OWS was assessed over a 24 hours period from discontinuation or reduction (by > 50%) of continuous opioid infusion. OWS was defined as the presence of ≥ 3 central nervous system or autonomic nervous system symptoms. RESULTS: In 126 patients treated with remifentanil (n = 58), fentanyl (n = 47), or morphine (n = 21), OWS was seen in 31.0%, 36.2%, and 9.5% of patients, respectively (P = 0.078). The most common symptom was a change in respiratory rate (remifentanil, 94.4%; fentanyl, 76.5%; morphine, 100%). Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards model showed that OWS was negatively associated with morphine treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.037-0.743) and duration of opioid infusion (HR, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.451-0.712). CONCLUSION: OWS is not uncommon in mechanically ventilated adult patients who received continuous infusion of opioids for > 3 days. The use of morphine may be associated with a decreased risk of OWS.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/diagnóstico , Anciano , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Remifentanilo/administración & dosificación , República de Corea/epidemiología , Frecuencia Respiratoria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Choque Séptico/complicaciones , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/complicaciones , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/epidemiología
18.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(11): 1870-1876, 2019 05 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30239615

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although aminoglycosides are recommended for cavitary Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (MAC-LD), the optimal duration of treatment is unclear. We investigated the association between duration of aminoglycoside treatment and outcomes in cavitary MAC-LD. METHODS: Among patients diagnosed with macrolide-susceptible cavitary MAC-LD between 2000 and 2013, 101 who received treatment up to August 2017 with a regimen containing aminoglycosides were enrolled at a tertiary referral center in South Korea. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. The duration of aminoglycoside treatment was at the discretion of the attending physician. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients (74.3%) were administered aminoglycosides for ≥3 months (median 164 days), whereas the remaining 26 patients (25.7%) received treatment for <3 months (median 59 days). The overall treatment success rate was 63.4% (64/101). Patients treated with aminoglycosides for ≥3 months had a significantly higher success rate than those treated for <3 months (69.3% vs 46.2%; P = .035). Multivariate analysis revealed that aminoglycoside treatment for ≥3 months was a significant factor for treatment success (adjusted odds ratio, 3.602; 95% confidence interval, 1.249-10.390; P = .018). Recurrence occurred in 8 (22.9%) of 35 patients who were followed up for at least 3 years after the end of treatment; all 8 patients received aminoglycosides for ≥3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cavitary MAC-LD treated with aminoglycosides for ≥3 months showed higher treatment success rate than those treated for <3 months. However, treatment for ≥3 months was not associated with the development of recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Aminoglicósidos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Duración de la Terapia , Enfermedades Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complejo Mycobacterium avium , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Ann Hematol ; 98(10): 2311-2318, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31432214

RESUMEN

The role of adjunctive corticosteroid in septic shock remains debatable, and its role has not been assessed in neutropenic patients. We evaluated whether hydrocortisone reduces 28-day mortality in neutropenic patients with septic shock. We conducted a retrospective cohort study between January 2012 and May 2017 at a tertiary care center in South Korea. Patients who developed septic shock treated with at least one vasopressor and whose absolute neutrophil count was < 1000 cells/µL were included. Patients were classified into a steroid and a no-steroid group. The primary outcome of the study was 28-day mortality. Propensity score matching was used to adjust baseline characteristics and disease severity between the groups. Of the 287 patients analyzed, 189 were classified in the no-steroid group and 98 in the steroid group. Fifty propensity score-matched pairs were compared for the study outcomes. We found no significant difference in 28-day mortality between patients treated with and without steroid after propensity score matching (38.0% and 42.0%, respectively; p = 0.838). Incidences of pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding were more frequent in the steroid group, but it was not statistically significant after matching. In conclusion, adjunctive hydrocortisone was not associated with reduced 28-day mortality in neutropenic patients with septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Hidrocortisona/administración & dosificación , Neutropenia , Choque Séptico , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/mortalidad , Neumonía/etiología , Neumonía/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/complicaciones , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo
20.
Respirology ; 24(2): 179-185, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30223306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate the use of the Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Prognostic Model (ProVent) score in medically ill patients with co-morbidities and to modify the score to improve the prediction power of 1-year mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who required at least 14 days of mechanical ventilation (MV) and established two groups (14-20 and ≥21 days of MV) based on the MV duration. We performed external validation of the present ProVent Model in our patients on Day 14 (or Day 21 for the ≥21-day MV group) of MV, and established the extended ProVent model, while considering the albumin and bilirubin levels and co-morbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer). RESULTS: A total of 1288 patients (666 and 622 with 14-20 and ≥21 days of MV, respectively) with at least 14 days of MV were enrolled. The 1-year mortality was 79.9% and 78.7% in the ≥21- and 14-20-day groups, respectively. Most of the observed mortality rates in all groups were within the 95% CI of predicted mortality as per the ProVent Model, except for the ProVent scores of 0 and 5. In the ProVent model, the area under the curve for the prediction of 1-year mortality was 0.69 in all patients with ≥14 days of MV, whereas in the extended ProVent model, the area under the curve was 0.89. CONCLUSION: The extended ProVent model, which considers co-morbidities and laboratory data, increases the prediction power of 1-year mortality in patients who require prolonged MV.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Respiración Artificial , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Pronóstico , República de Corea , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA