Body mass index as independent predictor of overall survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma at start of systemic treatment-Analyses from the German clinical RCC-Registry.

OBJECTIVES: A high body mass index (BMI) is associated with an increased risk for developing renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a higher complication rate after surgery, and a postoperative decline in renal function after nephrectomy. In contrast, a high preoperative BMI has been associated with increased survival in patients with localized RCC. We examined the prognostic impact of the BMI in patients treated for metastatic RCC (mRCC) in daily routine practice in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ongoing prospective, multicenter German clinical cohort study on mRCC (RCC-Registry) has recruited patients from more than 110 oncology/urology outpatient centers and hospitals at initiation of systemic first-line treatment. Data on patients' demographics, treatment, and outcome in routine practice, so called "real world data", have been collected. For this analysis, 606 patients were stratified into a low (BMI < 24), medium (24 < BMI < 28), and high (BMI > 28) BMI group. The influence of the BMI on the overall survival (OS) was analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Median OS was 24.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.3-28.5), 17.9 (95% CI, 15.3-20.8) and 10.9 (95% CI, 7.3-13.4) months in the high, medium, and low BMI patient group, respectively. A significant correlation of BMI with OS, independent of other factors, was found (low vs. high BMI: hazard ratio (HR): 1.94, 95% CI, 1.48-2.54; medium vs. high BMI: HR: 1.40, 95% CI, 1.10-1.78). Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk factors were independently correlated with shorter OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed a significant and independent correlation of a high BMI with longer OS in a prospective German cohort of mRCC routine patients starting first-line systemic treatment.

Survival of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Routine Practice Differs From That in Clinical Trials-Analyses From the German Clinical RCC Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Because "real-life" patients often do not meet the strict eligibility criteria of clinical trials, we assessed the trial eligibility of patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in routine practice and compared the survival of "trial-ineligible" and potentially "trial-eligible" patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present prospective, multicenter German cohort study is recruiting patients from 110 oncology/urology outpatient centers and hospitals at initiation of systemic first-line treatment. The demographic, clinical, treatment, and survival data were collected. We defined patients as "trial-ineligible" when ≥ 1 exclusion criterion (Karnofsky performance status < 80%, hemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal, non-clear cell carcinoma histology) was documented. Otherwise, the patients were considered "trial-eligible". RESULTS: Of 732 patients included, 57% were classified as "trial-ineligible". Overall, the median first-line progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-8.9 months). The median first-line PFS of "trial-eligible" and "trial-ineligible" patients was 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.6-13.1 months) and 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.6-6.5 months), respectively. The median OS of the "trial-eligible" and "trial-ineligible" patients was 26.0 months (95% CI, 22.1-29.7 months) and 12.6 months (95% CI, 10.6-15.8 months), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that patients in routine practice differ from patients treated in clinical trials and that almost 60% of mRCC patients in German routine practice would be ineligible for participation in clinical trials. While their first-line PFS and OS were shorter than those of "trial-eligible" patients, the PFS and OS of "trial-eligible" patients were comparable with the results from clinical trials. Physicians should be aware of these differences when discussing treatment options and outcome expectations with patients.

A Cross-Sectional Investigation of Fatigue, Mucositis, Hand-Foot Syndrome and Dysgeusia in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: Final Results From the FAMOUS Study.

UNLABELLED: Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma can be associated with adverse symptoms. The perception of fatigue, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, and dysgeusia, and quality of life (QOL) was assessed in 63 oncologists and their patients receiving first-line treatment. Physicians underestimated the severity of the symptoms and the severity correlated with a lower QOL. A consistent assessment of symptoms in routine practice might improve QOL, adherence to treatment, and outcome. BACKGROUND: The management of symptoms associated with treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is crucial to ensure treatment adherence and outcome. The perception of symptoms can vary between the treating physician and patient, leading to assumptions and subsequent changes in treatment, potentially affecting treatment effectiveness. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to evaluate the perception of the common symptoms of fatigue, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, and dysgeusia in patients with mRCC receiving systemic therapies in routine practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: German patients receiving first-line systemic treatment for mRCC and their physicians were independently queried about the incidence and severity of fatigue, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, and dysgeusia. Patients also completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire to assess their quality of life (QOL). The effect of the 4 symptoms on QOL was analyzed using linear regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 63 matching questionnaires were completed by both physicians and patients with first-line treatment. The incidence and severity of symptoms differed between the patients and physicians. Patients rated the severity of symptoms significantly higher than did the physicians. A greater severity of symptoms correlated with a lower QOL. In multivariate regression analysis, fatigue adversely affected overall QOL. CONCLUSION: Physicians underestimated the severity of common symptoms in patients with mRCC. The incorporation of patient-reported outcome measures into routine practice might increase awareness of patients' overall QOL and thereby potentially improve treatment adherence. A thorough evaluation of fatigue, its potential underlying causes, and active measures to manage fatigue could potentially improve patients' QOL.