Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
2.
Eur Respir Rev ; 33(172)2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38657997

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Six biologic agents are now approved for patients with severe asthma. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of licensed biologic agents in patients with severe asthma, including the recently approved tezepelumab. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL to identify randomised controlled trials involving licensed biologics until 31 January 2023. We used random-effects meta-analysis models for efficacy, including subgroup analyses by individual agents and markers of T2-high inflammation (blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide), and assessed safety. RESULTS: 48 studies with 16 350 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Biologics were associated with a 44% reduction in the annualised rate of asthma exacerbations (rate ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.51-0.62) and 60% reduction of hospitalisations (rate ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.60), a mean increase in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 0.11 L (95% CI 0.09-0.14), a reduction in asthma control questionnaire by 0.34 points (95% CI -0.46--0.23) and an increase in asthma quality of life questionnaire by 0.38 points (95% CI 0.26-0.49). There was heterogeneity between different classes of biologics in certain outcomes, with overall greater efficacy in patients with T2 inflammation. Overall, biologics exhibited a favourable safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive meta-analysis demonstrated that licensed asthma biologics reduce exacerbations and hospitalisations, improve lung function, asthma control and quality of life, and limit the use of systemic corticosteroids, with a favourable safety profile. These effects are more prominent in patients with evidence of T2 inflammation.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/fisiopatología , Asma/diagnóstico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Femenino , Masculino , Progresión de la Enfermedad
3.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 2024 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648113

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate if an audio-visual educational video demonstrating collapsibility of the upper airway during sleep influences initial CPAP acceptance among patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Between January 2017 and December 2018, a single-center retrospective study was conducted. We implemented an educational video demonstrating upper airway collapsibility during sleep in February 2018. We analyzed the medical records from 145 consecutive patients diagnosed with severe OSA who underwent in-lab polysomnography (PSG) both before and after implementing the educational video. Among them, 76 patients received standard care before the video's introduction (standard care group), and another 69 patients were managed after its implementation (video group). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics including age, BMI, educational level, occupation category, comorbidities, Mallampati score, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score, apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and sleep time with SpO2 below 90% (T90%) were not significantly different between the two groups. Acceptance of CPAP following in-lab overnight titration study was significantly higher in the video group (80%) compared to the standard care group (57%), P= .004.Multivariate regression analyses revealed that watching the video was a strong predictor of initial CPAP acceptance (OR 4.162, 95%, CI 1.627-10.646; P= .004). Both T90% (OR 1.020 95% CI 1.002 to 1.038; P= .029) and sleep efficiency (OR 1.052 95% CI 1.023 to 1.083; P< .001) were weak predictors for initial CPAP acceptance. At 12 months, adherence among those who accepted the CPAP treatment was similar between the two groups (78% vs 74%, P= .662). However, within the initial cohorts, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the video group (62%) were using CPAP at 12 months compared to the standard care group (42%), P= .015. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe OSA, an educational video demonstrating upper airway collapsibility during sleep improved initial CPAP acceptance rates when compared to standard care.

4.
Clin Respir J ; 18(7): e13803, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39056534

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous progressive lung condition characterized by long-term respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation. Appropriate bronchodilation is the cornerstone of COPD treatment, leading to better health status as well as benefits in prognosis and mortality. METHODS: In the current open, noninterventional, observational study, 716 patients diagnosed with COPD of variable severity were administered a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol (500 + 50 mcg) through the Elpenhaler® device. The patients' adherence to treatment (based on the MMAS-8 [8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale]) and health status (based on the CCQ [Clinical COPD Questionnaire]) were assessed at the beginning of the study and at the end of the 3-month follow-up period. RESULTS: The mean ± SD MMAS-8 score at 1 and 3 months was 6.12 ± 1.89 and 6.45 ± 1.80, respectively, indicating medium adherence overall; however, there was a statistically significant increase of 0.33 units in the MMAS-8 score at the end of the follow-up (paired t-test p < 0.0001), suggestive of an improvement in adherence throughout the study. Higher adherence was associated with better health status at baseline, which further improved by the end of the follow-up. Moreover, we observed a statistically significant decrease of 1.07 points (p < 0.0001) in the mean CCQ total score from the baseline (CCQ score = 2.2 ± 1.00) until the end of the study follow-up (CCQ score = 1.13 ± 0.67). Similar conclusions were also drawn in the mean domain scores regarding symptoms (score equal to 1.36 ± 0.72, decrease by 1.18) as well as functional and mental state (scores equal to 0.86 ± 0.73 and 1.20 ± 0.88, decrease by 1.04 and 1.00, respectively, p < 0.0001). Similarly, when patients were stratified into subgroups with and without comorbidities, the former group showed an increase of 7% in the patients with medium to high adherence during the course of the study. In the same patient subgroup, there was a notable decrease in CCQ score by 1.18 points (p < 0.0001) during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of FDC of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol, (500 + 50 mcg) via the Elpenhaler® device for COPD, resulted in a well-maintained or slight increase in treatment adherence and a subsequent benefit in health status, which further persisted after 3 months of treatment.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol , Estado de Salud , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Administración por Inhalación , Albuterol/análogos & derivados , Albuterol/administración & dosificación , Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol/administración & dosificación , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Eur Respir Rev ; 33(171)2024 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38508668

RESUMEN

This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids for COPD exacerbations.Following a pre-registered protocol, we appraised eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) according to Cochrane methodology, performed random-effects meta-analyses for all outcomes prioritised in the European Respiratory Society COPD core outcome set and rated the certainty of evidence as per Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.We included 20 RCTs totalling 2140 participants with moderate or severe exacerbations. All trials were at high risk of methodological bias. Low-certainty evidence did not reveal significant differences between inhaled and systemic corticosteroids for treatment failure rate (relative risk 1.75, 95% CI 0.76-4.02, n=569 participants); breathlessness (mean change: standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.11, 95% CI -0.36-0.15, n=239; post-treatment scores: SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.41-0.05, n=293); serious adverse events (relative risk 1.47, 95% CI 0.56-3.88, n=246); or any other efficacy outcomes. Moderate-certainty evidence implied a tendency for fewer adverse events with inhaled compared to systemic corticosteroids (relative risk 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.0, n=480). Hyperglycaemia and oral fungal infections were observed more frequently with systemic and inhaled corticosteroids, respectively.Limited available evidence suggests potential noninferiority of inhaled to systemic corticosteroids in COPD exacerbations. Appropriately designed and powered RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1361891, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711495

RESUMEN

Background: To date, studies investigating the association between pre-biologic biomarker levels and post-biologic outcomes have been limited to single biomarkers and assessment of biologic efficacy from structured clinical trials. Aim: To elucidate the associations of pre-biologic individual biomarker levels or their combinations with pre-to-post biologic changes in asthma outcomes in real-life. Methods: This was a registry-based, cohort study using data from 23 countries, which shared data with the International Severe Asthma Registry (May 2017-February 2023). The investigated biomarkers (highest pre-biologic levels) were immunoglobulin E (IgE), blood eosinophil count (BEC) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Pre- to approximately 12-month post-biologic change for each of three asthma outcome domains (i.e. exacerbation rate, symptom control and lung function), and the association of this change with pre-biologic biomarkers was investigated for individual and combined biomarkers. Results: Overall, 3751 patients initiated biologics and were included in the analysis. No association was found between pre-biologic BEC and pre-to-post biologic change in exacerbation rate for any biologic class. However, higher pre-biologic BEC and FeNO were both associated with greater post-biologic improvement in FEV1 for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R, with a trend for anti-IL4Rα. Mean FEV1 improved by 27-178 mL post-anti-IgE as pre-biologic BEC increased (250 to 1000 cells/µL), and by 43-216 mL and 129-250 mL post-anti-IL5/5R and -anti-IL4Rα, respectively along the same BEC gradient. Corresponding improvements along a FeNO gradient (25-100 ppb) were 41-274 mL, 69-207 mL and 148-224 mL for anti-IgE, anti-IL5/5R, and anti-IL4Rα, respectively. Higher baseline BEC was also associated with lower probability of uncontrolled asthma (OR 0.392; p=0.001) post-biologic for anti-IL5/5R. Pre-biologic IgE was a poor predictor of subsequent pre-to-post-biologic change for all outcomes assessed for all biologics. The combination of BEC + FeNO marginally improved the prediction of post-biologic FEV1 increase (adjusted R2: 0.751), compared to BEC (adjusted R2: 0.747) or FeNO alone (adjusted R2: 0.743) (p=0.005 and <0.001, respectively); however, this prediction was not improved by the addition of IgE. Conclusions: The ability of higher baseline BEC, FeNO and their combination to predict biologic-associated lung function improvement may encourage earlier intervention in patients with impaired lung function or at risk of accelerated lung function decline.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Productos Biológicos , Biomarcadores , Eosinófilos , Inmunoglobulina E , Humanos , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Adulto , Eosinófilos/inmunología , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Recuento de Leucocitos , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA