Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dis ; 213(9): 1472-5, 2016 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26690347

RESUMEN

Suspected artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum can be explored by examining polymorphisms in the Kelch (PfK13) propeller domain. Sequencing of PfK13 and other gene resistance markers was performed on 98 samples from Guyana. Five of these samples carried the C580Y allele in the PfK13 propeller domain, with flanking microsatellite profiles different from those observed in Southeast Asia. These molecular data demonstrate independent emergence of the C580Y K13 mutant allele in Guyana, where resistance alleles to previously used drugs are fixed. Therefore, in Guyana and neighboring countries, continued molecular surveillance and periodic assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Medicamentos/genética , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Antimaláricos/farmacología , Artemisininas/farmacología , ADN Protozoario/análisis , ADN Protozoario/genética , Quimioterapia Combinada , Guyana/epidemiología , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Tipificación Molecular , Mutación/genética
2.
Malar J ; 11: 347, 2012 Oct 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23083017

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Guyana, chloroquine + primaquine is used for the treatment of vivax malaria. A worldwide increase of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium vivax led to questioning of the current malaria treatment guidelines. A therapeutic efficacy study was conducted using artemether-lumefantrine + primaquine against P. vivax to evaluate a treatment alternative for chloroquine. METHODS: From 2009 to 2010, a non-controlled study in two hospitals in Guyana was conducted. A total 61 patients with P. vivax infection were treated with artemether-lumefantrine as a six-dose regimen twice a day for three days with additional 0.25 mg/kg/d primaquine at day 0 for 14 days. Clinical and parasitological parameters were followed on days 0,1,2,3,7,14 and 28 in agreement with WHO guidelines. Plasmodium vivax DNA from eight patients was analysed for pvmdr1, molecular marker of resistance. RESULTS: Artemether-lumefantrine cleared 100% of parasites on day 1, but two patients (3%) had recurrence of parasites on day 28, suggesting relapse. No pvmdr1 Y976F polymorphism was detected. The treatment regimen was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In Guyana, artemether-lumefantrine represents an adequate treatment option against P. vivax when combined with primaquine. Availability of this alternative will be of great importance in case of emerging chloroquine resistance against P. vivax.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Etanolaminas/administración & dosificación , Fluorenos/administración & dosificación , Malaria Vivax/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Combinación Arteméter y Lumefantrina , Niño , Preescolar , ADN Protozoario/genética , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Guyana , Humanos , Malaria Vivax/parasitología , Malaria Vivax/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Asociadas a Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos/genética , Mutación Missense , Plasmodium vivax/aislamiento & purificación , Primaquina/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Protozoarias/genética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Malar J ; 11: 202, 2012 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22704680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ensuring the quality of malaria medicines is crucial in working toward malaria control and eventual elimination. Unlike other validated tests that can assess all critical quality attributes, which is the standard for determining the quality of medicines, basic tests are significantly less expensive, faster, and require less skilled labour; yet, these tests provide reproducible data and information on several critical quality attributes, such as identity, purity, content, and disintegration. Visual and physical inspection also provides valuable information about the manufacturing and the labelling of medicines, and in many cases this inspection is sufficient to detect counterfeit medicines. The Promoting the Quality of Medicines (PQM) programme has provided technical assistance to Amazon Malaria Initiative (AMI) countries to implement the use of basic tests as a key screening mechanism to assess the quality of malaria medicines available to patients in decentralized regions. METHODS: Trained personnel from the National Malaria Control Programmes (NMCPs), often in collaboration with country's Official Medicine Control Laboratory (OMCL), developed country- specific protocols that encompassed sampling methods, sample analysis, and data reporting. Sampling sites were selected based on malaria burden, accessibility, and geographical location. Convenience sampling was performed and countries were recommended to store the sampled medicines under conditions that did not compromise their quality. Basic analytical tests, such as disintegration and thin layer chromatography (TLC), were performed utilizing a portable mini-laboratory. RESULTS: Results were originally presented at regional meetings in a non-standardized format that lacked relevant medicines information. However, since 2008 information has been submitted utilizing a template specifically developed by PQM for that purpose. From 2005 to 2010, the quality of 1,663 malaria medicines from seven AMI countries was evaluated, mostly collected from the public sector, 1,445/1,663 (86.9%). Results indicate that 193/1,663 (11.6%) were found not to meet quality specifications. Most failures were reported during visual and physical inspection, 142/1663 (8.5%), and most of these were due to expired medicines, 118/142 (83.1%). Samples failing TLC accounted for 27/1,663 (1.6%) and those failing disintegration accounted for 24/1,663 (1.4%). Medicines quality failures decreased significantly during the last two years. CONCLUSIONS: Basic tests revealed that the quality of medicines in the public sector improved over the years, since the implementation of this type of quality monitoring programme in 2005. However, the lack of consistent confirmatory tests in the quality control (QC) laboratory, utilizing methods that can also evaluate additional quality attributes, could still mask quality issues. In the future, AMI countries should improve coordination with their health authorities and their QC lab consistently, to provide a more complete picture of malaria medicines quality and support the implementation of corrective actions. Facilities in the private and informal sectors also should be included when these sectors constitute an important source of medicines used by malaria patients.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/farmacología , Antimaláricos/normas , Técnicas de Química Analítica , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/química , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/normas , Antimaláricos/química , Humanos , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Control de Calidad , América del Sur
4.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0126805, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25978499

RESUMEN

Guyana and Suriname have made important progress in reducing the burden of malaria. While both countries use microscopy as the primary tool for clinical diagnosis, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are useful in remote areas of the interior where laboratory support may be limited or unavailable. Recent reports indicate that histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2)-based diagnostic tests specific for detection of P. falciparum may provide false negative results in some parts of South America due to the emergence of P. falciparum parasites that lack the pfhrp2 gene, and thus produce no PfHRP2 antigen. Pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes were amplified in parasite isolates collected from Guyana and Suriname to determine if there were circulating isolates with deletions in these genes. Pfhrp3 deletions were monitored because some monoclonal antibodies utilized in PfHRP2-based RDTs cross-react with the PfHRP3 protein. We found that all 97 isolates from Guyana that met the inclusion criteria were both pfhrp2- and pfhrp3-positive. In Suriname (N = 78), 14% of the samples tested were pfhrp2-negative while 4% were pfhrp3-negative. Furthermore, analysis of the genomic region proximal to pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 revealed that genomic deletions extended to the flanking genes. We also investigated the population substructure of the isolates collected to determine if the parasites that had deletions of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 belonged to any genetic subtypes. Cluster analysis revealed that there was no predominant P. falciparum population substructure among the isolates from either country, an indication of genetic admixture among the parasite populations. Furthermore, the pfhrp2-deleted parasites from Suriname did not appear to share a single, unique genetic background.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Protozoos/genética , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Proteínas Protozoarias/genética , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Eliminación de Gen , Guyana , Humanos , Suriname
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA