Collaborative Antimicrobial Stewardship: Working with Information Technology.

Information technology (IT) is vitally important to making antimicrobial stewardship a scalable endeavor in modern health care systems. Without IT, many antimicrobial interventions in patient care would be missed. Clinical decision support systems and smartphone apps, either stand-alone or integrated into electronic health records, can all be effective tools to help augment the work of antimicrobial stewardship programs and support the management of infectious diseases in any health care setting.

The role of electronic health record and "add-on" clinical decision support systems to enhance antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Increasingly, demands are placed on healthcare systems to meet antimicrobial stewardship standards and reporting requirements. This trend, combined with reduced financial and personnel resources, has created a need to adopt information technology (IT) to help ease these burdens and facilitate action. The incorporation of IT into an antimicrobial stewardship program can help improve stewardship intervention efficiencies and facilitate the tracking and reporting of key metrics, including outcomes. This paper provides a review of the stewardship-related functionality within these IT systems, describes how these platforms can be used to improve antimicrobial use, and identifies how they can support current and potential future antimicrobial stewardship regulatory and accreditation standards. Finally, recommendations to help close the gaps in existing systems are provided and suggestions for future areas of development within these programs are delineated.

Association between meeting core elements for inpatient antimicrobial stewardship and antibiotic utilization.

We used multivariable analyses to assess whether meeting core elements was associated with antibiotic utilization. Compliance with 7 elements versus not doing so was associated with higher use of broad-spectrum agents for community-acquired infections [days of therapy per 1,000 patient days: 155 (39) vs 133 (29), P = .02] and anti-methicillin-resistant S. aureus agents [days of therapy per 1,000 patient days: 145 (37) vs 124 (30), P = .03].

Significant publications on infectious diseases pharmacotherapy in 2012.

PURPOSE: The most important articles pertaining to infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy published in 2012, as nominated and ranked by panels of pharmacists and physicians with ID expertise, are summarized. SUMMARY: Members of the Houston Infectious Diseases Network were asked to nominate articles on ID research published in prominent peer-reviewed journals during the period January 1-December 31, 2012, with a major impact in the field of ID pharmacotherapy. A list of 42 nominated articles on general ID-related topics and 8 articles pertaining to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) was compiled. In a survey conducted in January 2013, members of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP) were asked to select from the list 10 general ID articles and 1 HIV/AIDS-related article that they considered to be the most important. Of the 180 SIDP members surveyed, 100 (55%) and 44 (24%) participated in ranking the general ID and HIV/AIDS-related articles, respectively. Summaries of the highest-ranked articles in both categories are presented here. CONCLUSION: With the volume of published ID-related research growing each year, both ID specialists and nonspecialists are challenged to stay current with the literature. Key ID-related publications in 2012 included updated recommendations on management of diabetic foot infections, articles on promising approaches to prevention and early treatment of HIV disease, and reports on developments in research on pharmacotherapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and Klebsiella pneumoniae infections.

Antifungal susceptibility testing: a primer for clinicians.

Antifungal susceptibility testing is not as commonly performed as antibacterial susceptibility testing. The methodology for detecting antifungal resistance is newer and requires different testing supplies that may not be readily available in a clinical laboratory setting. Breakpoints for molds are lacking. Yeast breakpoints are available for most antifungals but are continually updated based on epidemiologic surveillance. Reliable and reproducible antifungal susceptibility testing methods, as well as more research on the role of susceptibility testing in patient care, are necessary in order to provide the clinician with information that can be translated into positive clinical outcomes at the bedside. There are nuances with current testing methods that, if unrecognized, could lead to misinterpretation of results and inappropriate antifungal selection. Clinicians who have an understanding of qualitative and quantitative methods, automated susceptibility testing systems, and other commercial tests can successfully engage this knowledge to improve antifungal use and patient outcomes. This primer describes the common antifungal susceptibility tests used in the clinical microbiology laboratory and reviews literature related to the impact of appropriate drug selection, timing, fungal resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics on clinical outcomes. Both conventional and modern testing methods are discussed.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a primer for clinicians.

Appropriate use of antimicrobials in health care continues to be a challenge. Reliable and reproducible antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods are necessary to provide the clinician with valuable information that can be translated into positive clinical outcomes at the bedside. However, there are nuances with these testing methods that, if unrecognized, could lead to misinterpretation of results and inappropriate antibiotic selection. This primer describes the common antimicrobial susceptibility tests used in the clinical microbiology laboratory and reviews how subtle differences in testing methods and technique can influence reported results. Clinicians who have a thorough understanding of qualitative and quantitative methods, automated susceptibility testing systems, and commonly used screening and confirmatory tests for antibiotic-resistant organisms can strengthen institutional antibiotic stewardship programs and improve patient outcomes.

Significant publications on infectious diseases pharmacotherapy in 2008.

PURPOSE: Significant publications on infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy in 2008 were compiled and summarized. SUMMARY: On December 31, 2008, the Houston Infectious Diseases Network compiled a listing of published articles identified as having a significant impact on ID pharmacotherapy. The publication period was limited to January 1 through December 31, 2008. Articles were selected based on prior presentations at ID and pharmacy meetings or were listed as major articles in prominent ID journals. Priority was given to articles that were published in peer-reviewed journals and to treatment guidelines endorsed by major medical and pharmacy organizations. A bibliography of 56 articles (40 not related to human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection and 16 related to HIV infection) was distributed to members of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP) via an Internet survey in early January 2009. Members were asked to select 10 publications not related to HIV infection and 1 HIV-related publication that they believed made the greatest contribution to the antimicrobial-related medical literature in 2008. A total of 115 SIDP members participated in the survey. Summaries of the top articles selected, along with an interpretation of their effect on clinical practice, are included. CONCLUSION: The increasing number of articles in the peer-reviewed medical literature related to the diagnosis and treatment of ID has made it challenging to maintain a contemporary knowledge base of key publications. This summary of significant ID articles published in 2008 can help to alleviate this burden.

Significant publications on infectious diseases pharmacotherapy in 2007.

PURPOSE: Significant publications on infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy in 2007 were compiled and summarized. SUMMARY: On January 2, 2008, the 21 members of the Houston Infectious Disease Network (HIDN) were asked to select an article that was published in a peer-reviewed journal between January 1 and December 31, 2007, and write a summary highlighting why the article was significant to the diagnosis or treatment of ID. Articles were selected based on prior "top 10" presentations at major ID and pharmacy meetings or were listed as major articles in prominent ID journals. Priority was given to peer-reviewed publications and nationally recognized clinical treatment guidelines. Nineteen articles and summaries were submitted by HIDN members. The publication listing was distributed to Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists members via an Internet survey in early February 2008. Members were asked to select the 10 most significant articles relating to ID pharmacotherapy from the list of 19 and were allowed to add an additional article that was not already listed. A total of 102 individuals participated in the survey. A listing of the top 10 articles published in 2007 and one honorable mention was compiled, and the significance of each article was summarized. CONCLUSION: The increased number of articles in the peer-reviewed medical literature related to the diagnosis and treatment of ID has made it challenging to maintain a contemporary knowledge base of key publications. This summary of significant ID articles published in 2007 can help to alleviate the burden of knowledge management.