Anti-factor Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time strategies for unfractionated heparin dosing after HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: No clear guidelines exist for perioperative anticoagulation management after durable left ventricular assist device insertion. In this study, we sought to compare outcomes between anti-factor Xa (FXa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in monitoring unfractionated heparin (UFH) dosing after HeartMate 3 (HM3) insertion. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review of patients who received UFH after HM3 insertion between 01/2020-12/2022. Post-operative UFH dose was titrated by aPTT goal 45-60 sec (n = 53) or FXa goal 0.1-0.2 U/mL (n = 59). Baseline differences between cohorts were balanced by inverse probability treatment weighting. RESULTS: At baseline, unadjusted FXa patients were more likely to be white (47.5% vs. 35.8%, p < 0.001), INTERMACS 1-2 (69.5% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.013), have history of coronary artery disease (66.1% vs. 43.4%, p = 0.026), and lower eGFR (54.1 vs. 63.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.029) compared to the aPTT group. After adjusting for several bleeding/thrombosis risk factors, 97.5% of FXa and 91.0% of aPTT patients reached therapeutic levels with comparable UFH duration and maximum dose. Moreover, in-hospital mortality (2.5% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.842), major bleeding events (4.2% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.360), and thromboembolic events (21.8% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.151) remained without significant differences between FXa and aPTT cohorts. There was a high degree of variability in FXa (r2 = 0.20) and aPTT (r2 = 0.22) values for any given UFH dose. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in frequency of bleeding or thromboembolic events were observed in this study between FXa versus aPTT cohorts after HM3 implantation. More longitudinal studies are warranted to determine whether or not one assay is superior to the other.

Unplanned hospital readmissions following HeartMate 3 implantation: Readmission rates, causes, and impact on survival.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remain a frequent comorbidity, associated with decreased quality of life and increased resources utilization. This study sought to determine causes, predictors, and impact on survival of hospitalizations during HeartMate 3 (HM3) support. METHODS: All patients implanted with HM3 between November 2014 to December 2019 at Columbia University Irving Medical Center were consecutively enrolled in the study. Demographics and clinical characteristics from the index admission and the first outpatient visit were collected and used to estimate 1-year and 900-day readmission-free survival and overall survival. Multivariable analysis was performed for subsequent readmissions. RESULTS: Of 182 patients who received a HM3 LVAD, 167 (92%) were discharged after index admission and experienced 407 unplanned readmissions over the median follow up of 727 (interquartile range (IQR): 410.5, 1124.5) days. One-year and 900-day mean cumulative number of all-cause unplanned readmissions was 0.43 (95%CI, 0.36, 0.51) and 1.13 (95%CI, 0.99, 1.29). The most frequent causes of rehospitalizations included major infections (29.3%), bleeding (13.2%), device-related (12.5%), volume overload (7.1%), and other (28%). One-year and 900-day survival free from all-cause readmission was 38% (95%CI, 31-46%) and 16.6% (95%CI, 10.3-24.4%). One-year and 900-day freedom from 2, 3, and ≥4 readmissions were 60.7%, 74%, 74.5% and 26.2%, 33.3%, 41.3%. One-year and 900-day survival were unaffected by the number of readmissions and remained >90%. Male sex, ischemic etiology, diabetes, lower serum creatinine, longer duration of index hospitalization, and a history of readmission between discharge and the first outpatient visit were associated with subsequent readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned hospital readmissions after HM3 are common, with infections and bleeding accounting for the majority of readmissions. Irrespective of the number of readmissions, one-year survival remained unaffected.

2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The executive summary of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions coronary artery revascularization guideline provides the top 10 items readers should know about the guideline. In the full guideline, the recommendations replace the 2011 coronary artery bypass graft surgery guideline and the 2011 and 2015 percutaneous coronary intervention guidelines. This summary offers a patient-centric approach to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization, as well as the supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2019 to September 2019, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, CINHL Complete, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2021, were also considered. Structure: Recommendations from the earlier percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery guidelines have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians in caring for patients undergoing coronary revascularization. This summary includes recommendations, tables, and figures from the full guideline that relate to the top 10 take-home messages. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, supportive text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in the development of this guideline.

Long-Term Survival Benefits of Porcine versus Pericardial Bioprostheses in Elderly Patients Undergoing Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement: A 32-Year Study.

BACKGROUND: The elderly population is growing at an unprecedented rate. Aortic valve disease increases with age. Bioprostheses are the valves of choice for older patients; however, the optimal tissue valve remains undetermined. The purpose of this investigation was to perform a life-of-patient survival comparison of the prototypical porcine and pericardial prostheses in elderly patients. METHODS: The study population (N = 1480) consisted of patients 65 years of age and older who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement from 1990 through 2005 with a Carpentier-Edwards Porcine (n = 650) or Pericardial (n = 830) bioprosthesis. Propensity score-matched groups were created. RESULTS: Valve selection was not associated with operative mortality. Survival estimates at 10 years were better for Pericardial (41.8%; 95% CI: 37.9 to 45.7) than Porcine (32.6%; 95% CI: 28.8 to 36.3); and 5.2% (95% CI: 3.2 to 7.1) versus 2.0%; (95% CI: 0.8 to 3.2) at 20 years (p < 0.001). E-value analysis found minimal influence of unknown study confounders. Factors associated with long-term mortality were porcine valve (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), preop renal insufficiency (p < 0.001), peripheral artery disease (p = 0.011), congestive heart failure (p = 0.003), New York Heart Association Class III or IV (p = 0.004), surgical history-reoperation (p = 0.012), transient ischemic attack (p = 0.009), prolonged ventilation (p = 0.010), postop renal insufficiency (p < 0.001), and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.009). The indexed Effective Orifice Area (EOAi) was assessed and did not influence observed long-term survival differences. CONCLUSIONS: This unusual lifetime study provided substantial evidence for the superiority of the pericardial over the porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position in elderly patients. It demonstrated enhanced long-term survival benefits for elderly patients without any increase in perioperative mortality. It is intended to inform future investigation into aortic valve design.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of an Anorectal Surgery Multimodal Enhanced Recovery Program on Opioid Use.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal cases may be a common gateway to the opioid epidemic. Opioid reduction is inherent in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, but little work has evaluated ERAS in these cases. OBJECTIVE: To determine if ERAS could reduce postoperative opioid utilization in ambulatory anorectal surgery without sacrificing patient pain or satisfaction. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial assigned ambulatory anorectal patients to ERAS (experimental) or routine care (surgeon's choice) for pain management (control) over 30-days postoperatively. Primary outcome was overall days of opioid use. Secondary outcomes included pain and satisfaction scores over multiple time points and new persistent opioid use. The Visual Analog Scale, Functional Pain Scale, and EQ-5D-3L measured patient-reported pain and satisfaction. Univariate analysis compared outcomes overall and at individual time points. Two-way mixed ANOVA evaluated pain and satisfaction measures between groups and over time. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were randomized into each arm (64 total). The control group consumed significantly more opioids after discharge (median 121.3MME vs 23.5MME, P < 0.001). Significantly more control patients requested additional narcotics (P  =  0.004), made unplanned calls (P = 0.009), and had unplanned clinic visits (P = 0.003). The control group had significantly more days on opioids (mean 14.4 vs 2.2, P < 0.001). Three control patients (9.4%) versus no experimental patients had new persistent opioid use. The mean global health, EQ5D-3L, Visual Analog Scale, and Functional Pain scores were comparable between groups over time. CONCLUSIONS: An ERAS protocol in ambulatory anorectal surgery is feasible, and resulted in reduced opioid use, and healthcare utilization, with no difference in pain or patient satisfaction. This challenges the paradigm that extended opioids are needed for effective postoperative pain management.

Predictors of 1-year outcome after cardiac re-transplantation: Machine learning analysis.

BACKGROUND: As cardiac re-transplantation is associated with inferior outcomes compared with primary transplantation, allocating scarce resources to appropriate re-transplant candidates is important. The aim of this study is to elucidate the factors associated with 1-year mortality in cardiac re-transplantation using the random forests algorithm for survival analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry and identified all adult (> 17 years old) recipients who underwent cardiac re-transplantation between January 2000 and March 2020. The random forest algorithm on Cox modeling was used to calculate the variable importance (VIMP) of independent variables for contributing to 1-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1294 patients underwent cardiac re-transplantation. Of these, 137 patients were re-transplanted within 1 year of their first transplant, while 1157 patients were re-transplanted more than 1 year after their first transplant. One-year mortality was significantly higher for patients receiving early transplantation compared with those receiving late transplantation (Early 40.6% vs. Late 13.6%, log-rank P < .001). Machine learning analysis showed that total bilirubin (> 2 mg/dl) (VIMP, 2.99%) was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality after early re-transplant. High BMI (> 30.0 kg/m2 ) (VIMP, 1.43%) and ventilator dependence (VIMP, 1.47%) were independent predictors of 1-year mortality for the late re-transplantation group. CONCLUSION: Machine learning showed that optimal 1-year survival following cardiac re-transplantation was significantly related to liver function in early re-transplantation, and to obesity and preoperative ventilator dependence in late re-transplantation.

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is an important and serious postoperative complication after heart transplantation. We sought to characterize in-hospital VTE after heart transplantation and its association with clinical outcomes. METHOD: Adult (≧18 years) patients undergoing heart transplantation from 2015 to 2019 at our center were retrospectively reviewed. Post-transplant VTE was defined as newly diagnosed venous system thrombus by imaging studies. RESULTS: There were 254 patients. The cohort's median age was 55 years. A total of 61 patients were diagnosed with VTE, including one with right atrial thrombus, 54 with upper extremity DVT in which one patient subsequently developed PE, four with lower extremity DVT, and two with upper and lower extremity DVT. The cumulative incidence of VTE was 42% at 60-days of post heart transplant. Patients with VTE had longer hospital stay (P < .001), higher in-hospital mortality (P = .010), and worse 5-year survival (P = .009). On the multivariable Cox analysis, history of DVT/PE and intubation for more than 3 days were associated with an increased risk of in hospital VTE. CONCLUSION: The incidence of VTE in heart transplant recipients is high. Post-transplant surveillance, and appropriate preventive measures and treatment strategies after diagnosis are warranted.

Stroke patterns and cannulation strategy during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane support.

Stroke has potentially devastating consequences for patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane support (VA-ECMO). Arterial cannulation sites for VA-ECMO include the ascending aorta, axillary artery, and femoral artery. However, the influence of cannulation site on stroke risk has not been well described. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between occurrence and patterns of stroke with ECMO arterial cannulation sites. We retrospectively reviewed 414 consecutive patients who received VA-ECMO support for cardiogenic shock between March 2007 and May 2018. Patients were categorized by cannulation strategy. The rates, subtype and location of strokes as assessed by neuroimaging during and after VA-ECMO support were analyzed. Median age was 61 years (IQR 50-69); 67% were men. 77 patients were cannulated via the ascending aorta (17%), 31 via the axillary artery (7%), and 306 (69%) via the femoral artery. In total, 26 patients (6.3%) developed 30 stroke lesions at a median of 6.0 (IQR 3.1-8.7) days after ECMO cannulation. Ischemic stroke was the most common subtype (64%), followed by hemorrhagic transformation (20%) and hemorrhagic stroke (16%). Location by CT was right hemispheric in 38%, left hemispheric in 24%, bilateral in 21%, and vertebrobasilar in 17%. The incidence of stroke was similar across cannulation strategies: aorta (n = 5, 6.5%), axillary artery (n = 2, 6.5%), and femoral artery (n = 19, 6.2%), (p = 0.99). Incidence of stroke does not appear to differ among patients cannulated via the ascending aorta, axillary artery, or femoral artery. Ischemic stroke was the most common subtype of stroke.

Changes in waitlist and posttransplant outcomes in patients with adult congenital heart disease after the new heart transplant allocation system.

OBJECTIVE: In 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) introduced new criteria for heart allocation. This study sought to assess the impact of this change on waitlist and posttransplant outcomes in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) recipients. METHODS: Between January 2010 and March 2020, we extracted first heart transplant ACHD patients listed from the UNOS database. We compared waitlist and post-transplant outcomes before and after the policy change. RESULTS: A total of 1206 patients were listed, 951 under the old policy and 255 under the new policy. Prior to transplant, recipients under the new policy era were more likely to be treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P = .018), and have intra-aortic balloon pumps (P < .001), and less likely to have left ventricular assist devices (P = .027).Compared to patients waitlisted in the pre-policy change era, those waitlisted in the post policy change era were more likely to receive transplants (P = .001) with no significant difference in waiting list mortality (P = .267) or delisting (P = .915). There was no difference in 1-year survival post-transplant between the groups (P = .791). CONCLUSION: The new policy altered the heart transplant cohort in the ACHD group, allowing them to receive transplants earlier with no changes in early outcomes after heart transplantation.

Cardiac transplantation in adult congenital heart disease with prior sternotomy.

BACKGROUND: Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients who require orthotopic heart transplantation are surgically complex due to anatomical abnormalities and multiple prior surgeries. In this study, we investigated these patients' outcomes using our institutional database. METHODS: ACHD patients who had prior intracardiac repair and subsequent heart transplant were included (2008-2018). Adult patients without ACHD were extracted as a control. A comparison of patients with functional single ventricular (SV) and biventricular (BV) hearts was performed. RESULTS: There were 9 SV and 24 BV patients. The SV group had higher central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (P = .028), hemoglobin concentration (P = .010), alkaline phosphatase (P = .022), and were more likely to have liver congestion (P = .006). Major complications included infection in 16 (48.5%), temporary dialysis in 12 (36.4%), and graft dysfunction requiring perioperative mechanical support in 7 (21.2%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 15.2%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a higher, but not statistically significant, survival after 10 years between the ACHD and control groups (ACHD 84.9% vs. control 67.5%, P = .429). There was no significant difference in 10-year survival between SV and BV groups (78% vs. 88%, P = .467). CONCLUSIONS: Complex ACHD cardiac transplant recipients have a high incidence of early morbidities after transplantation. However, long-term outcomes were acceptable.

Cardiovascular outcomes among elderly patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease and without atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease accelerates heart failure progression, leading to poor prognosis and a substantial increase in morbidity and mortality. This study was aimed to assess the impact of coronary artery disease on all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic stroke (IS) among hospitalized newly-diagnosed heart failure (HF) patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included Medicare patients (aged ≥65 years) with ≥1 inpatient heart failure claim (index date = discharge date) during 01JAN2007-31DEC2013. Patients were required to have continuous enrollment for ≥1-year pre-index date (baseline: 1-year pre-index period) without a prior heart failure claim (in the 1 year pre-index prior to the index hospital admission); follow-up ran from the index date to death, disenrollment from the health plan, or the end of the study period, whichever occurred first. HF with LVSD patients, identified with diagnosis codes of systolic dysfunction (excluding baseline atrial fibrillation), were stratified based on prevalent coronary artery disease at baseline into coronary artery disease and non-coronary artery disease cohorts. Main outcomes were occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance patient characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves of ACM and cumulative incidence distribution of MI/IS were presented. RESULTS: Of 22,230 HF with LVSD patients, 15,827 (71.2%) had coronary artery disease and were overall more likely to be younger (79.8 vs 80.9 years), male (49.6% vs. 35.6%), white (86.2% vs 81.4%), with more prevalent comorbidities including hypertension (80.7% vs 74.3%), hyperlipidemia (67.7% vs 46.7%), and diabetes (46.3% vs 35.8%) (all p < 0.0001). After propensity score matching, cohorts included 5792 patients each. The coronary artery disease cohort had significantly higher cumulative incidence of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke at the end of 7-year follow-up vs non-coronary artery disease (myocardial infarction = 50.0% vs 18.0%; ischemic stroke = 23.3% vs 18.7%; all p < 0.0001). Follow-up all-cause mortality rates were similar between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: HF with LVSD patients with coronary artery disease had significantly higher incidence of ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction, but similar all-cause mortality compared to those without coronary artery disease.

Double mattress suture lines for valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

Valve sparing aortic root replacement remains a complex procedure despite various improvements that have been made to this operation. Specifically, a hemostatic proximal anastomosis is one of the most important factors for successful completion of the operation without complication. Here we describe a double mattress suture line technique, which facilitates a secure and hemostatic proximal suture line.

Bridge to simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation via extracorporeal life support: National outcomes in the new heart allocation policy era.

BACKGROUND: Since United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) revised their heart allocation policy in 2018, usage of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) has dramatically increased as a bridge to transplant. This study investigated outcomes of VA-ECLS patients bridged to simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHK) in the new policy era. METHODS: This study included 774 adult patients from the UNOS database who received SHK between 10/18/18 and 12/31/21 and compared patients bridged to transplant on VA-ECLS (n = 50) with those not bridged (n = 724). RESULTS: At baseline, SHK recipients bridged from VA-ECLS were younger (50.5 vs 58.0 years, p = 0.007), had higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at time of transplant (47.6 vs 30.1, p < 0.001), and spent fewer days on the waitlist (7.0 vs 33.5 days, p < 0.001). In the perioperative period, VA-ECLS was associated with higher rates of temporary dialysis (56.0% vs 28.0%, p < 0.001) but similar 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic dialysis (7.5% vs 5.4%, p = 0.800) and renal allograft failure (12.0% vs 8.1%, p = 0.500) compared to non-ECLS cohort. However, VA-ECLS patients had decreased survival to discharge (76.0% vs 92.7%, p < 0.001) and 2-year post-transplant survival (71.7% vs 83.0%, p = 0.004), as well as greater 2-year cumulative incidence of cardiac allograft failure (10.0% vs 2.7%, p = 0.002). Multivariable analyses found VA-ECLS at time of transplant to be independently associated with 2-year post-transplant mortality (HR [95% CI]: 3.40 [1.66-6.96], p = 0.001) and cardiac allograft failure (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] [95% CI]: 8.51 [2.77-26.09], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Under the new allocation policy, patients bridged to SHK from VA-ECLS displayed greater early mortality and cardiac allograft failure but similar renal outcomes compared to non-ECLS counterparts.

Feasibility of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support in awake patients with cardiogenic shock.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to demonstrate outcomes of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) in non-intubated ('awake') patients with cardiogenic shock, as very few studies have investigated safety and feasibility in this population. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 394 consecutive VA-ECLS patients at our institution from 2017 to 2021. We excluded patients cannulated for indications definitively associated with intubation. Patients were stratified by intubation status at time of cannulation and baseline differences were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality while secondary outcomes included adverse events during ECLS and destination at discharge. RESULTS: Out of 135 patients in the final cohort, 79 were intubated and 56 were awake at time of cannulation. All awake patients underwent percutaneous femoral cannulation with technical success of 100% without intubation. Indications for VA-ECLS in awake patients included acute decompensated heart failure (64.3%), pulmonary hypertension or massive pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocarditis (8.9%) and acute myocardial infarction (5.4%). After adjustment, awake and intubated patients had similar ECLS duration (7 vs 6 days, P = 0.19), in-hospital mortality (39.6% vs 51.7%, P = 0.28), and rates of various adverse events. Intubation status was not a significant risk factor for 90-day mortality (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.26 [0.64, 2.45], P = 0.51) in multivariable analysis. Heart transplantation (15.1% vs 4.9%) and ventricular assist device (17.4% vs 2.2%) were more common destinations at discharge in awake patients than intubated patients (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Awake VA-ECLS is safe and feasible with comparable outcomes as intubated counterparts in select cardiogenic shock patients.

Early outcomes in heart transplantation using donation after circulatory death donors in patients bridged with durable left ventricular assist devices.

OBJECTIVE: Donation after circulatory death heart transplantation potentially increases donor allografts, especially for patients with lower listing status. We assessed the outcomes of donation after circulatory death heart transplantation in patients bridged with durable left ventricular assist devices. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adult heart transplants using donation after circulatory death donors from 2019 to 2022. Patients were stratified between those with durable left ventricular assist devices and those with intra-aortic balloon pump, inotropic, or no bridging support (control group). Primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Secondary end points were hospital length of stay, stroke, pacemaker implantation, dialysis, and acute rejection before discharge. RESULTS: A total of 160 left ventricular assist device recipients and 311 control recipients met study inclusion criteria. Recipients bridged with left ventricular assist devices were younger (55 vs 58 years, P < .001) with lower body mass index (28.3 vs 30.3, P < .001), longer waitlist times (112 vs 34 days, P < .001), longer out of body times (5.7 vs 4.6 hours, P < .001), and less frequent normothermic regional perfusion (31% vs 40%, P = .049). Patients with left ventricular assist devices commonly underwent transplantation at United Network for Organ Sharing status 3 and 4 (92%), whereas control patients underwent transplantation at status 2 (27%), status 3 (10%), status 4 (30%), or status 6 (30%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in 1-year mortality between groups (P = .34). However, acute rejection was higher in the unadjusted left ventricular assist device cohort (26% vs 13%, P < .001). On multivariable logistic regression, left ventricular assist device was an independent predictor of acute rejection (odds ratio, 2.21, 95% CI, 1.32-3.69, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Durable left ventricular assist devices may be associated with a higher risk of developing an early inflammatory response in donation after circulatory death heart transplantation; however, 1-year survival was similar between groups.

Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting enhances survival in diabetic patients: a 30-year follow-up of propensity score-matched cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing at an unprecedented rate, affecting nearly 8% of the population. Previous studies have demonstrated a potential benefit for surgical over interventional revascularization in this group of patients. Similarly, studies have shown the superiority of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting over single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting in select populations. However, concerns about sternal wound infection have discouraged the use of BIMA grafting in diabetics. Therefore, we studied the long-term results of BIMA versus SIMA grafting in a large population of diabetic patients in whom BIMA grafting was broadly applied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between February 1972 and May 1994, 1107 consecutive diabetic patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with either SIMA (n=646) or BIMA (n=461) grafting. Optimal matching with the propensity score was used to create matched SIMA (n=414) and BIMA (n=414) cohorts. Cross-sectional follow-up (6 weeks to 30.1 years; mean, 8.9 years) determined long-term survival. There was no difference in operative mortality, sternal wound infection, or total complications between matched SIMA and BIMA groups (operative mortality, 10 of 414 [2.4%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P=0.279; sternal wound infection, 7 of 414 [1.7%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P=0.179); total complications, 71 of 414 [17.1%] versus 71 of 414 [17.1%]; P=1.000). Late survival was significantly enhanced with the use of BIMA grafting (median survival: SIMA, 9.8 years versus BIMA, 13.1 years; P=0.001). Use of BIMA was found to be associated with late survival on Cox regression (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Compared with SIMA grafting, BIMA grafting in propensity score-matched patients provides diabetics with enhanced survival without any increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality.

Mitral Repair vs Replacement for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation in Patients Aged ≥65 Years.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of mitral valve repair vs replacement are well documented. However, survival benefits in the elderly population are more controversial. In this novel lifetime analysis, we hypothesize that survival benefits for valve repair vs replacement in the elderly are sustained throughout the patient's lifetime. METHODS: From January 1985 through December 2005, 663 patients, aged ≥65 years with myxomatous degenerative mitral valve disease underwent primary isolated mitral valve repair (n = 434) or replacement (n = 229). Propensity score matching was used to balance variables potentially related to outcome. RESULTS: Follow-up was complete in 99.1% of mitral repair and 99.6% of mitral replacement patients. In matched patients, perioperative mortality was 3.9% (9 of 229) for repair and 10.9% (25 of 229) for replacement (P = .004). Survival estimates (95% confidence limits) from 29-year follow-up for matched patients were 54.6% (48.0%, 61.1%) and 11.0% (6.8%, 15.2%) at 10 years and 20 years for repair patients, and 34.2% (27.7%, 40.7%) and 3.7% (1%, 6.4%) for replacement patients, respectively. Median survival (95% confidence limits) was 11.3 years (9.6, 12.2 years) for repair patients compared with 6.9 years (6.3, 8.0 years) for replacement patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that although the elderly population is prone to multiple comorbidities, survival benefits of isolated mitral valve repair vs replacement are sustained throughout the patient's lifetime.

Correlating state-specific and national trends in breast reconstruction after Medicaid expansion: A decade-long update on the Affordable Care Act's impact.

While disparities in access to reconstruction persist, a comprehensive analysis comparing state-based outcomes and national patterns in breast reconstruction as a result of Medicaid expansion has never been examined. In this study, we investigated how breast reconstruction rates changed as a result of Medicaid expansion and compared these state-based findings to national counterparts. Patient data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project among states that chose to expand Medicaid were compared with those from states that did not expand. The difference-in-differences estimate of expansion to nonexpansion states was 7.05 (p = 0.10) for implant-based reconstruction, -11.56 (p = 0.01) for autologous reconstruction, and -7.08 (p = 0.18) for overall reconstruction. Comparing rates of nonexpansion states to national trends yielded estimates of -0.06 (p = 0.04), 0.06 (p = 0.01), and 0.004 (p = 0.90) for implant-based, autologous, and overall breast reconstruction, respectively. Similarly, comparing rates of expansion states to national trends yielded estimates of 0.02 (p = 0.38), -0.05 (p = 0.03), and -0.02 (p = 0.44) for implant-based, autologous, and overall breast reconstruction, respectively. In this study on national health policy, Medicaid expansion was associated with a significant increase in autologous rates while state-specific trends alone did not appear to predict the national outcomes of sweeping legislative changes that were differentially applied among states.

Do age and functional dependence affect outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation?

Objective: This study assessed characteristics and outcomes of younger (18-65) versus older (>65) recipients of simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplantation with varying functional dependence. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 1398 patients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database who received SHK between 2010 and 2021. Patients who were <18 year old, underwent transplant of additional organs simultaneously, or had previous heart transplant were excluded. The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and secondary end points included adverse events and cause of death. Outcomes were also evaluated by propensity score-matched comparison. Results: The number of annual SHK transplantation in the United States has significantly increased among both age groups over the past 2 decades (P < .0001). After propensity score matching of recipients aged 18 to 65 years (n = 1162) versus age >65 years (n = 236), baseline characteristics were similar and well-balanced between the 2 cohorts. Between matched cohorts, older recipients did not have increased posttransplant mortality compared with younger recipients (90-day survival, P = .85; 7-year survival, P = .61). Multivariable Cox regression analysis found that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.039 [0.975-1.106], P = .2415) and pretransplant functional status with interaction term for age (some assistance, HR, 0.965 [0.902-1.033], P = .3079; total assistance, HR, 0.976 [0.914-1.041], P = .4610) were not significant risk factors for 7-year post-SHK transplantation mortality. Conclusions: Older and more functionally dependent recipients in this study did not have increased post-SHK transplantation mortality. These findings have important implications for organ allocation among elderly patients, as they support the need for thorough assessment of SHK candidates in terms of comorbidities, rather than exclusion solely based on age and functional dependence.