RESUMEN
Ipilimumab was the first treatment that improved survival in advanced melanoma. Efficacy and toxicity in a real-world setting may differ from clinical trials, due to more liberal eligibility criteria and less intensive monitoring. Moreover, high costs and lack of biomarkers have raised cost-benefit concerns about ipilimumab in national healthcare systems and limited its use. Here, we report the prospective, interventional study, Ipi4 (NCT02068196), which aimed to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of ipilimumab in a real-world population with advanced melanoma. This national, multicentre, phase IV trial included 151 patients. Patients received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenously and were followed for at least 5 years or until death. Treatment interruption or cessation occurred in 38%, most frequently due to disease progression (19%). Treatment-associated grade 3 to 4 toxicity was observed in 28% of patients, and immune-related toxicity in 56%. The overall response rate was 9%. Median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% CI: 8.3-15.9); and progression-free survival 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.6-2.8). After 5 years, 20% of patients were alive. In a landmark analysis from 6 months, improved survival was associated with objective response (HR 0.16, P = .001) and stable disease (HR 0.49, P = .005) compared to progressive disease. Poor performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein were identified as biomarkers. This prospective trial represents the longest reported follow-up of a real-world melanoma population treated with ipilimumab. Results indicate safety and efficacy comparable to phase III trials and suggest that the use of ipilimumab can be based on current cost-benefit estimates.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/secundario , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and risk of recurrence (ROR) score in patients with early breast cancer and long-term follow-up. A special focus was placed on hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) pN0 patients not treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer (n = 653) enrolled in the observational Oslo1 study (1995-1998) were followed for distant recurrence and breast cancer death. Clinicopathological parameters were collected from hospital records. The primary tumors were analyzed using the Prosigna® PAM50 assay to determine the prognostic value of the intrinsic subtypes and ROR score in comparison with pathological characteristics. The primary endpoints were distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS: Of 653 tumors, 52.2% were classified as luminal A, 26.5% as luminal B, 10.6% as HER2-enriched, and 10.7% as basal-like. Among the HR+/HER2- patients (n = 476), 37.8% were categorized as low risk by ROR score, 22.7% as intermediate risk, and 39.5% as high risk. Median follow-up durations for BCSS and DDFS were 16.6 and 7.1 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that intrinsic subtypes (all patients) and ROR risk classification (HR+/HER2- patients) yielded strong prognostic information. Among the HR+/HER2- pN0 patients with no adjuvant treatment (n = 231), 53.7% of patients had a low ROR, and their prognosis at 15 years was excellent (15-year BCSS 96.3%). Patients with intermediate risk had reduced survival compared with those with low risk (p = 0.005). In contrast, no difference in survival between the low- and intermediate-risk groups was seen for HR+/HER2- pN0 patients who received tamoxifen only. Ki-67 protein, grade, and ROR score were analyzed in the unselected, untreated pT1pN0 HR+/HER2- population (n = 171). In multivariate analysis, ROR score outperformed both Ki-67 and grade. Furthermore, 55% of patients who according to the PREDICT tool ( http://www.predict.nhs.uk/ ) would be considered chemotherapy candidates were ROR low risk (33%) or luminal A ROR intermediate risk (22%). CONCLUSIONS: The PAM50 intrinsic subtype classification and ROR score improve classification of patients with breast cancer into prognostic groups, allowing for a more precise identification of future recurrence risk and providing an improved basis for adjuvant treatment decisions. Node-negative patients with low ROR scores had an excellent outcome at 15 years even in the absence of adjuvant therapy.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Pronóstico , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Most cancer vaccines to date have made use of common tumor antigens or allogenic cancer cell lines. The majority of tumor antigens may, however, be unique patient-specific antigens. Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells known. The present report is a full-scale preclinical evaluation of autologous DCs transfected with autologous tumor-mRNA (tDCs) for vaccination in malignant melanoma. By using autologous tumor-mRNA, we intend to make the DCs present a broad spectrum of tumor-associated antigens relevant to each individual patient. Previously, we have described effective methods for mRNA-transfection into DCs by square-wave electroporation and for generating large numbers of DCs. Here, we demonstrate the ability of tDCs, made under full-scale vaccine conditions, to generate in vitro T-cell responses specific for antigens encoded by the transfected tumor-mRNA. T-cell proliferation assays demonstrated tDC-specific responses for all six patients tested. Responses were further studied by IFNgamma ELISPOT and Bioplex cytokine assays (two patients) and by experiments on isolated CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, including HLA-blockage (one patient). Moreover, we describe the results of extensive tumor-RNA analysis using Agilent Bioanalyser, a method that we have implemented in the clinical protocol. Based on this preclinical evaluation, a vaccine trial has been started.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Melanoma/inmunología , ARN Mensajero/genética , ARN Neoplásico/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/genética , Humanos , Interferón gamma/metabolismo , Masculino , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , TransfecciónRESUMEN
We have developed immuno-gene therapy for malignant melanoma and prostate cancer. The therapy is based on monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) that are transfected with autologous melanoma-mRNA or mRNA from three prostate cancer cell lines (DU-145, LN-CaP and PC-3). A broad spectrum of tumour-associated antigens will be included in both DC-vaccines. The use of autologous melanoma-mRNA moreover allows targeting of individual tumour antigens that are specific to each patient. Effective protocols have been established for mRNA-transfection by square wave electroporation and for the generation of clinical grade DCs. A full scale preclinical evaluation demonstrated in vitro T cell responses in 6/6 advanced melanoma patients. The responses were specific to antigens encoded by the transfected tumour-mRNA. Recently, we have conducted two phase I/II trials, in advanced malignant melanoma and androgen-resistant prostate cancer. Successful vaccine preparations were obtained for all 41 patients elected. No serious adverse effects were observed. Specific T cell responses (T cell proliferation and/or IFNgamma ELISPOT) were demonstrated in 9/19 evaluable melanoma patients and in 12/19 prostate cancer patients. The response rates were higher for patients receiving intradermal vaccination, compared to intranodal injection. Thirteen prostate cancer patients developed a decrease in log-slope PSA. The PSA-response was significantly related to the T cell response (P=0.002). We conclude that the DC-vaccine is feasible and safe, and that T cell responses are elicited in about 50% of patients.