Rationale and Design of the DECONGEST (Diuretic Treatment in Acute Heart Failure with Volume Overload Guided by Serial Spot Urine Sodium Assessment) Study.

AIMS: To evaluate whether early combination diuretic therapy guided by serial post-diuretic urine sodium concentration (UNa+) assessments in acute heart failure (AHF) facilitates safe and effective decongestion. METHODS: The Diuretic Treatment in Acute Heart Failure with Volume Overload Guided by Serial Spot Urine Sodium Assessment (DECONGEST) study is a pragmatic, 2-centre, randomized, parallel-arm, open-label study, aiming to enrol 104 patients with AHF and clinically evident fluid overload, requiring treatment with intravenous loop diuretics. Patients are randomized to receive standard of care or a bundled approach comprising: (1) systematic post-diuretic UNa+ assessments until successful decongestion, defined as no remaining clinical signs of fluid overload with a post-diuretic UNa+ ≤80 mmol/L; (2) thrice-daily intravenous loop diuretic bolus therapy, with dosing according to estimated glomerular filtration rate; (3) upfront use of intravenous acetazolamide (500 mg OD); and (4) full nephron blockade with high-dose oral chlorthalidone (100 mg OD) and intravenous canreonate (200 mg OD) for diuretic resistance, defined as persisting signs of fluid overload with a post-diuretic UNa+ ≤80 mmol/L. The primary endpoint of the DECONGEST study is a hierarchical composite of (1) survival at 30 days; (2) days alive and out of hospital or care facility up to 30 days; and (3) greater relative decrease in natriuretic peptide levels from baseline to day 30. CONCLUSION: The DECONGEST study aims to determine whether an intensive diuretic regimen focused on early combination therapy, guided by serial post-diuretic UNa+ assessments, safely enhances decongestion, warranting further evaluation in a larger trial powered for clinical events.

Effectiveness of the risk stratification proposed by the 2022 European Heart Rhythm Association Expert Consensus statement on arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Recently, an expert consensus statement proposed indications where implantation of a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may be reasonable in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). The objective was to evaluate the proposed risk stratification by the expert consensus statement. METHODS: Consecutive patients with MVP without alternative arrhythmic substrates with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) were included in a single-center retrospective registry. Arrhythmic MVP (AMVP) was defined as a total premature ventricular complex burden ≥5%, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), VT, or ventricular fibrillation. The end point was a composite of SCD, VT, inducible VT, and appropriate ICD shocks. RESULTS: In total, 169 patients (52.1% male, median age 51.4 years) were included and 99 (58.6%) were classified as AMVP. Multivariate logistic regression identified the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (OR 2.82, 95%CI 1.45-5.50) and mitral annular disjunction (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.02-3.86) as only predictors of AMVP. According to the EHRA risk stratification, 5 patients with AMVP (5.1%) had a secondary prevention ICD indication, while in 69 patients (69.7%) the implantation of an ICD may be reasonable. During a median follow-up of 8.0 years (IQR 5.0-15.6), the incidence rate for the composite arrhythmic end point was 0.3%/year (95%CI 0.1-0.8). CONCLUSION: More than half of MVP patients referred for CMR met the AMVP diagnostic criteria. Despite low long-term event rates, in 70% of patients with AMVP the implantation of an ICD may be reasonable. Risk stratification of SCD in MVP remains an important knowledge gap and requires urgent investigation.

Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Across Chronic Kidney Disease Stages.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data are available concerning the effect of severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) because these patients are commonly excluded from trials. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effect of CRT on renal function, reverse remodeling and outcome across all stages of CKD in a large patient population of recipients of CRT. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 798 consecutive patients with heart failure who were undergoing CRT implantation between October 2008 and September 2016. Renal function data were available at baseline and at 6 months following CRT. Remodeling based on left ventricular end diastolic volume/left ventricular ejection fraction (LVESV/LVEF) and clinical outcome was assessed using a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and hospitalization because of heart failure. RESULTS: Median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 62.8 (43.6-77.8) mL/min/1.73 m2. Of the patients, 33.6% were in CKD stage 3, 11.0% in stage 4 and 1.1% in stage 5. LVEF and LVESV improved across all CKD stages; however, patients with CKD stages 1 and 2 exhibited a greater degree of improvement in LVEF (median 15% vs 10%, P < 0.001) and LVESV (median -37.2% vs -29.9%, P < 0.001) compared to patients with CKD stages 3-5. Despite a greater degree of reverse remodeling in CKD stages 1 and 2, the most accurate cut-off of remodeling predicting good clinical outcome was lower for patients with CKD stage 3-5, respectively: 5.5% vs 9.5% (LVEF) and -6.67% vs -12.41% (LVESV). CONCLUSIONS: CRT results in reverse remodeling across all stages of CKD, although to a lesser extent in patients with renal dysfunction (CKD stage 3-5). However, patients with CKD derive benefit on outcome at a lesser degree of remodeling.

Serial Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Mitral Valve Prolapse-A Single-Center Retrospective Registry.

Background: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and mitral annular disjunction (MAD) are common valvular abnormalities that have been associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has a key role in risk stratification of VA, including assessment of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with MVP or MAD who had >1 CMR and >1 24 h Holter registration available. Data are presented in detail, including evolution of VA and presence of LGE over time. Results: A total of twelve patients had repeated CMR and Holter registrations available, of which in four (33%) patients, it was conducted before and after minimal invasive mitral valve repair (MVR). After a median of 4.7 years, four out of eight (50%) patients without surgical intervention had new areas of LGE. New LGE was observed in the papillary muscles and the mid to basal inferolateral wall. In four patients, presenting with syncope or high-risk non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), programmed ventricular stimulation was performed and in two (50%), sustained monomorphic VT was easily inducible. In two patients who underwent MVR, new LGE was observed in the basal inferolateral wall of which one presented with an increased burden of VA. Conclusions: In patients with MVP and MAD, repeat CMR may show new LGE in a small subset of patients, even shortly after MVR. A subgroup of patients who presented with an increase in VA burden showed new LGE upon repeat CMR. VA in patients with MVP and MAD are part of a heterogeneous spectrum that requires further investigation to establish risk stratification strategies.

Mortality and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: The First Decade.

Background Treatment for breast cancer (BC) frequently involves radiotherapy. Guidelines recommend screening for cardiac adverse events starting 10 years after radiotherapy. The rationale for this interval is unclear. Methods and Results We aimed to study cardiovascular event rates in the first decade following curative radiotherapy for BC. We compared mortality and cardiovascular event rates with an age- and risk factor-matched control population. We included 1095 patients with BC (mean age 56±12 years). Two hundred and eighteen (19.9%) women died. Cancer and cardiovascular mortality caused 107 (49.1%) and 22 (10.1%) deaths, respectively. A total of 904 cases were matched to female FLEMENGHO (Flemish Study on Environment, Genes and Health Outcomes) participants. Coronary artery disease incidence was similar (risk ratio [RR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.48-1.18]), yet heart failure (RR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.19-3.25]) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (RR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.07-3.08]) occurred more often in patients with BC. Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.033 [95% CI, 1.006-1.061], P=0.016), tumor grade (HR, 1.739 [95% CI, 1.166-2.591], P=0.007), and neoadjuvant treatment setting (HR, 2.782 [95% CI, 1.304-5.936], P=0.008) were risk factors for mortality. Risk factors for major adverse cardiac events were age (HR, 1.053 [95% CI, 1.013-1.093]; P=0.008), mean heart dose (HR, 1.093 [95% CI, 1.025-1.167]; P=0.007), history of cardiovascular disease (HR, 2.386 [95% CI, 1.096-6.197]; P=0.029) and Mayo Clinic Cardiotoxicity Risk Score (HR, 2.664 [95% CI, 1.625-4.367]; P<0.001). Conclusions Ten-year mortality following curative treatment for unilateral BC was mainly cancer related, but heart failure and atrial fibrillation/flutter were already common in the first decade following irradiation. Mean heart dose, pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, and Mayo Clinic Cardiotoxicity Risk Score were risk factors for cardiac adverse events. These results suggest a need for early dedicated cardio-oncological follow-up after radiotherapy.