Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Asthma ; 59(8): 1537-1547, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34288786

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We conducted surveillance for work-related asthma (WRA) in Washington State to identify the industry sectors and asthma exposures most commonly affecting injured workers and in need of prevention activities. METHODS: Using workers' compensation data as the primary data source, valid cases were classified as work-aggravated asthma (WAA) or new onset asthma that includes occupational asthma (OA) and reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS). The source of exposure that caused the worker's asthma, their industry and occupation were determined. RESULTS: There were 784 valid work-related asthma cases identified for the period 2009-2016, WAA (n = 529) was most common followed by occupational asthma (n = 127) and RADS (n = 12). The Health Care and Social Assistance industry had the highest number of cases (n = 170) with 82% classified as WAA. The highest overall proportions of new onset asthma are occurring in Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (33% of work related asthma cases), Manufacturing (31%) and Construction (30%). The leading substances associated with new onset asthma across all industries include hop plant dust, wood and cedar dust, mineral and inorganic dust, mold, and cleaning materials. We describe ten cases of cannabis-associated asthma including seven from workers in the legalized cannabis industry, four of whom had OA. CONCLUSION: State-based work-related asthma surveillance is critical in identifying the workers and exposures associated with this occupational disease, including the detection of a case-series in the cannabis industry.


Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional , Cannabis , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Asma Ocupacional/inducido químicamente , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiología , Cannabis/efectos adversos , Polvo , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Washingtón/epidemiología
2.
J Asthma ; 57(4): 421-430, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30701998

RESUMEN

Objective: Washington State's work-related asthma (WRA) surveillance program utilizes workers' compensation (WC) data as its primary data source and has spanned a 15-year time period. This study analyses trends for WRA claim incidence rates compared to all WC claim incidence rates. WRA claim incidence rates and WC costs are analyzed by industry. Methods: Potential WRA cases were identified through the WC system and through direct provider report and classified by industry, age, and year of illness onset. WRA claim rates by industry and year were calculated using total work hours reported by employers covered by the WC system. Claim costs for accepted claims were compared by industry and year. Results: WRA claim incidence rates decreased 8.9% (95% CI: -10.6, -7.2) annually for the time period 2002-2016. The decline in WRA claim incidence rate is slightly faster than the incidence rate for all WC claims which had its steepest decrease from 2007 to 2010 at an estimated annual 8.4% decrease (95% CI: -11.8, -5.0). WRA claim rates were highest for workers in Public Administration, Manufacturing, and the Agricultural, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting industries. Median claim costs for WRA did not change significantly by year (p = 0.2, range $595-$1442) and the distribution of WRA WC claim costs by industry were highest in Manufacturing (21.3%) and Construction (16.4%) industries. Conclusion: WRA claim incidence rates are declining in Washington State. The cause for the decline is unclear. Workers across all industries in Washington remain at risk for WRA.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Industrias/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Asma/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Industrias/economía , Industrias/tendencias , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/economía , Washingtón/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/economía , Indemnización para Trabajadores/tendencias
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(38): 813-818, 2019 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31557149

RESUMEN

Silicosis is an incurable occupational lung disease caused by inhaling particles of respirable crystalline silica. These particles trigger inflammation and fibrosis in the lungs, leading to progressive, irreversible, and potentially disabling disease. Silica exposure is also associated with increased risk for lung infection (notably, tuberculosis), lung cancer, emphysema, autoimmune diseases, and kidney disease (1). Because quartz, a type of crystalline silica, is commonly found in stone, workers who cut, polish, or grind stone materials can be exposed to silica dust. Recently, silicosis outbreaks have been reported in several countries among workers who cut and finish stone slabs for countertops, a process known as stone fabrication (2-5). Most worked with engineered stone, a manufactured, quartz-based composite material that can contain >90% crystalline silica (6). This report describes 18 cases of silicosis, including the first two fatalities reported in the United States, among workers in the stone fabrication industry in California, Colorado, Texas, and Washington. Several patients had severe progressive disease, and some had associated autoimmune diseases and latent tuberculosis infection. Cases were identified through independent investigations in each state and confirmed based on computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest or lung biopsy findings. Silica dust exposure reduction and effective regulatory enforcement, along with enhanced workplace medical and public health surveillance, are urgently needed to address the emerging public health threat of silicosis in the stone fabrication industry.


Asunto(s)
Materiales Manufacturados/efectos adversos , Industria Manufacturera , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Silicosis/diagnóstico , Adulto , California/epidemiología , Colorado/epidemiología , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Silicosis/epidemiología , Texas/epidemiología , Washingtón/epidemiología
4.
J Occup Environ Med ; 65(2): e51-e56, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730597

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Occupational disease presumption laws for firefighters are common, yet little is known about the workers' compensation claims filed for them. METHODS: We identified Washington State's workers' compensation claims for conditions covered by presumption among firefighters during 2000 to 2017, and described them by disease type and claim characteristics. Claim rates for specific cancers were compared with statewide incidence rates using the Washington State cancer registry. RESULTS: Firefighters filed 330 claims for conditions covered by presumption (heart problems, 43%; cancer, 35%; respiratory disease, 15%; and infectious diseases, 8%), with acceptance rates varying by disease and insurer type. Cancer claims were associated with the highest claim costs and time loss. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides necessary baseline data to understand the impact of presumption laws on workers' compensation systems, and can inform future decisions presumption law expansions for firefighters.


Asunto(s)
Bomberos , Enfermedades Profesionales , Humanos , Indemnización para Trabajadores , Washingtón/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Costos y Análisis de Costo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA