Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 146
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 343, 2024 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491374

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Critical care nurses (CCNs) are routinely exposed to highly stressful situations, and at high-risk of suffering from work-related stress and developing burnout. Thus, supporting CCN wellbeing is crucial. One approach for delivering this support is by preparing CCNs for situations they may encounter, drawing on evidence-based techniques to strengthen psychological coping strategies. The current study tailored a Resilience-boosting psychological coaching programme [Reboot] to CCNs. Other healthcare staff receiving Reboot have reported improvements in confidence in coping with stressful clinical events and increased psychological resilience. The current study tailored Reboot for online, remote delivery to CCNs (as it had not previously been delivered to nurses, or in remote format), to (1) assess the feasibility of delivering Reboot remotely, and to (2) provide a preliminary assessment of whether Reboot could increase resilience, confidence in coping with adverse events and burnout. METHODS: A single-arm mixed-methods (questionnaires, interviews) before-after feasibility study design was used. Feasibility was measured via demand, recruitment, and retention (recruitment goal: 80 CCNs, retention goal: 70% of recruited CCNs). Potential efficacy was measured via questionnaires at five timepoints; measures included confidence in coping with adverse events (Confidence scale), Resilience (Brief Resilience Scale), depression (PHQ-9) and burnout (Oldenburg-Burnout-Inventory). Intention to leave (current role, nursing more generally) was measured post-intervention. Interviews were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: Results suggest that delivering Reboot remotely is feasible and acceptable. Seventy-seven nurses were recruited, 81% of whom completed the 8-week intervention. Thus, the retention rate was over 10% higher than the target. Regarding preliminary efficacy, follow-up measures showed significant increases in resilience, confidence in coping with adverse events and reductions in depression, burnout, and intention to leave. Qualitative analysis suggested that CCNs found the psychological techniques helpful and particularly valued practical exercises that could be translated into everyday practice. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of remote delivery of Reboot and potential efficacy for CCNs. Results are limited due to the single-arm feasibility design; thus, a larger trial with a control group is needed.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Tutoría , Resiliencia Psicológica , Humanos , Depresión , Intención , Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Habilidades de Afrontamiento , Cuidados Críticos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 45(3): 186-195, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080712

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most hospitals outsource supply procurement to purchasing alliances, or group purchasing organizations (GPOs). Despite their early 20th century origin, we lack both national and trend data on alliance utilization, services, and performance. The topic is important as alliances help hospitals control costs, enjoy tailwinds from affiliated regional/local alliances, and face headwinds from hospital self-contracting and criticism of certain business practices. PURPOSE: We compare the utilization, services, and performance of alliances in 2004 and 2014. APPROACH: We analyze alliances using two comparable surveys of hospitals. We use significance tests to assess changes in alliance utilization, services, and performance (e.g., cost savings). We also assess the use of regional/local alliances affiliated with national GPOs. RESULTS: Purchasing through national alliances has somewhat diminished. Over 10 years, hospitals have diversified GPO memberships to include regional/local alliances (many affiliated with their national GPO) and engaged in self-contracting. At the same time, hospitals have increased purchases of many categories of supplies/services through national GPOs and endorsed their value-added functions and increasingly important role. Hospitals report greater satisfaction with several GPO functions; performance on most dimensions has not changed. CONCLUSIONS: National alliances still play important roles that hospitals find valuable. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Purchasing alliances continue to play an important role in helping hospitals with both cost savings and new services. Their growing complexity, along with growing use of self-contracting, poses managerial challenges for hospital purchasing staff that may require greater hospital investment.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/economía , Adquisición en Grupo , Servicios Externos/economía , Departamento de Compras en Hospital/tendencias , Eficiencia Organizacional , Adquisición en Grupo/economía , Adquisición en Grupo/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Departamento de Compras en Hospital/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
3.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 45(2): 173-184, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080711

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitals utilize three ideal type models for governing relationships with their physicians: the traditional medical staff, strategic alliances, and employment. Little is known about how these models impact physician alignment. PURPOSE: The study compares the level of physician-hospital alignment across the three models. APPROACH: We used survey data from 1,895 physicians in all three models across 34 hospitals in eight systems to measure several dimensions of alignment. We used logistic equations to predict survey nonresponse and differential physician selection into the alliance and employment models. Controlling for these selection effects, we then used multiple regression to estimate the effects of alliance and employment models on alignment. RESULTS: Physicians in employment models express greater alignment with their hospital on several dimensions, compared to physicians in alliances and the traditional medical staff. There were no differences in physician alignment between the latter two models. CONCLUSIONS: Employment models promote greater alignment on some (but not all) dimensions, controlling for physician selection. The impact of employment on alignment is not large, however. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospitals and accountable care organizations that rely on employment may achieve higher physician alignment compared to the other two models. It is not clear that the gain in alignment is worth the cost of employment. Given the small impact of employment on alignment, it is also clear that they are not identical. Hospitals may need to go beyond structural models of integration to achieve alignment with their physicians.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Empleo/organización & administración , Relaciones Médico-Hospital , Modelos Organizacionales , Médicos/organización & administración , Hospitales , Humanos , Estados Unidos
4.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 1099, 2019 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31409324

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour is any waking behaviour characterised by an energy expenditure of ≤1.5 metabolic equivalent of task while in a sitting or reclining posture. Prolonged bouts of sedentary behaviour have been associated with negative health outcomes in all age groups. We examined qualitative research investigating perceptions and experiences of sedentary behaviour and of participation in non-workplace interventions designed to reduce sedentary behaviour in adult populations. METHOD: A systematic search of seven databases (MEDLINE, AMED, Cochrane, PsychINFO, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and Web of Science) was conducted in September 2017. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and a thematic synthesis was conducted. Prospero database ID: CRD42017083436. RESULTS: Thirty individual studies capturing the experiences of 918 individuals were included. Eleven studies examined experiences and/or perceptions of sedentary behaviour in older adults (typically ≥60 years); ten studies focused on sedentary behaviour in people experiencing a clinical condition, four explored influences on sedentary behaviour in adults living in socio-economically disadvantaged communities, two examined university students' experiences of sedentary behaviour, two on those of working-age adults, and one focused on cultural influences on sedentary behaviour. Three analytical themes were identified: 1) the impact of different life stages on sedentary behaviour 2) lifestyle factors influencing sedentary behaviour and 3) barriers and facilitators to changing sedentary behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Sedentary behaviour is multifaceted and influenced by a complex interaction between individual, environmental and socio-cultural factors. Micro and macro pressures are experienced at different life stages and in the context of illness; these shape individuals' beliefs and behaviour related to sedentariness. Knowledge of sedentary behaviour and the associated health consequences appears limited in adult populations, therefore there is a need for provision of accessible information about ways in which sedentary behaviour reduction can be integrated in people's daily lives. Interventions targeting a reduction in sedentary behaviour need to consider the multiple influences on sedentariness when designing and implementing interventions.


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Sedentaria , Adulto , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa
5.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 44(1): 19-29, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28614165

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Magnet hospitals are recognized for nursing excellence and high-value patient outcomes, yet little is known about which and when hospitals pursue Magnet recognition. Concurrently, hospital systems are becoming a more prominent feature of the U.S. health care landscape. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to examine Magnet adoption among hospital systems over time. APPROACH: Using American Hospital Association surveys (1998-2012), we characterized the proportion of Magnet hospitals belonging to systems. We used hospital level fixed-effects regressions to capture changes in a given system hospital's Magnet status over time in relation to a variety of conditions, including prior Magnet adoption by system affiliates and nonaffiliates in local and geographically distant markets and whether these relationships varied by degree of system centralization. RESULTS: The proportion of Magnet hospitals belonging to a system is increasing. Prior Magnet adoption by a hospital within the local market was associated with an increased likelihood of a given system hospital becoming Magnet, but the effect was larger if there was prior adoption by affiliates (7.4% higher likelihood) versus nonaffiliates (2.7% higher likelihood). Prior adoption by affiliates and nonaffiliates in geographically distant markets had a lesser effect. Hospitals belonging to centralized systems were more reactive to Magnet adoption of nonaffiliate hospitals as compared with those in decentralized systems. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital systems take an organizational perspective toward Magnet adoption, whereby more system affiliates achieve Magnet recognition over time. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The findings are relevant to health care and nursing administrators and policymakers interested in the diffusion of an empirically supported organizational innovation associated with quality outcomes, particularly in a time of increasing hospital consolidation and system expansion. We identify factors associated with Magnet adoption across system hospitals and demonstrate the importance of considering diffusion of organizational innovations in relation to system centralization. We suggest that decentralized system hospitals may be missing potential benefits of such organizational innovations.


Asunto(s)
Administración de los Servicios de Salud/normas , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/normas , Innovación Organizacional , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , American Hospital Association , Humanos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/organización & administración , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
6.
Milbank Q ; 96(1): 57-109, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29504199

RESUMEN

Policy Points: Policymakers seek to transform the US health care system along two dimensions simultaneously: alternative payment models and new models of provider organization. This transformation is supposed to transfer risk to providers and make them more accountable for health care costs and quality. The transformation in payment and provider organization is neither happening quickly nor shifting risk to providers. The impact on health care cost and quality is also weak or nonexistent. In the longer run, decision makers should be prepared to accept the limits on transformation and carefully consider whether to advocate solutions not yet supported by evidence. CONTEXT: There is a widespread belief that the US health care system needs to move "from volume to value." This transformation to value (eg, quality divided by cost) is conceptualized as a two-fold movement: (1) from fee-for-service to alternative payment models; and (2) from solo practice and freestanding hospitals to medical homes, accountable care organizations, large hospital systems, and organized clinics like Kaiser Permanente. METHODS: We evaluate whether this transformation is happening quickly, shifting risk to providers, lowering costs, and improving quality. We draw on recent evidence on provider payment and organization and their effects on cost and quality. FINDINGS: Data suggest a low prevalence of provider risk payment models and slow movement toward new payment and organizational models. Evidence suggests the impact of both on cost and quality is weak. CONCLUSIONS: We need to be patient in expecting system improvements from ongoing changes in provider payment and organization. We also may need to look for improvements in other areas of the economy or to accept and accommodate prospects of modest improvements over time.


Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Sector de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/organización & administración , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Sector de Atención de Salud/economía , Sector de Atención de Salud/historia , Sector de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política de Salud , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Mecanismo de Reembolso/historia , Estados Unidos
7.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 53(6): 880-885, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28396238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The evidence base upon which current global venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention recommendations have been made is not optimal. The cost of purchasing and applying graduated compression stockings (GCS) in surgical patients is considerable and has been estimated at £63.1 million per year in England alone. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine whether low dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) alone is non-inferior to a combination of GCS and low dose LMWH for the prevention of VTE. METHODS: The randomised controlled Graduated compression as an Adjunct to Pharmacoprophylaxis in Surgery (GAPS) Trial (ISRCTN 13911492) will randomise adult elective surgical patients identified as being at moderate and high risk of VTE to receive either the current "standard" combined thromboprophylactic LMWH with GCS mechanical thromboprophylaxis, or thromboprophylactic LMWH pharmacoprophylaxis alone. To show non-inferiority (3.5% non-inferiority margin) for the primary endpoint of all VTE within 90 days, 2236 patients are required. Recruitment will be from seven UK centres. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, compliance with stockings and LMWH, overall mortality, and GCS or LMWH related complications (including bleeding). Recruitment commenced in April 2016 with the seven UK centres coming "on-line" in a staggered fashion. Recruitment will be over a total of 18 months. The GAPS trial is funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment in the UK (14/140/61).


Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/administración & dosificación , Medias de Compresión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Protocolos Clínicos , Terapia Combinada , Esquema de Medicación , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/efectos adversos , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología
8.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 41(3): 178-88, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26131607

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Kaiser Permanente model of integrated health delivery is highly regarded for high-quality and efficient health care. Efforts to reproduce Kaiser's success have mostly failed. One factor that has received little attention and that could explain Kaiser's advantage is its commitment to and investment in nursing as a key component of organizational culture and patient-centered care. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Kaiser's nursing organization in promoting quality of care. METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional analysis of linked secondary data from multiple sources, including a detailed survey of nurses, for 564 adult, general acute care hospitals from California, Florida, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey in 2006-2007. We used logistic regression models to examine whether patient (mortality and failure-to-rescue) and nurse (burnout, job satisfaction, and intent-to-leave) outcomes in Kaiser hospitals were better than in non-Kaiser hospitals. We then assessed whether differences in nursing explained outcomes differences between Kaiser and other hospitals. Finally, we examined whether Kaiser hospitals compared favorably with hospitals known for having excellent nurse work environments-Magnet hospitals. FINDINGS: Patient and nurse outcomes in Kaiser hospitals were significantly better compared with non-Magnet hospitals. Kaiser hospitals had significantly better nurse work environments, staffing levels, and more nurses with bachelor's degrees. Differences in nursing explained a significant proportion of the Kaiser outcomes advantage. Kaiser hospital outcomes were comparable with Magnet hospitals, where better outcomes have been largely explained by differences in nursing. IMPLICATIONS: An important element in Kaiser's success is its investment in professional nursing, which may not be evident to systems seeking to achieve Kaiser's advantage. Our results suggest that a possible strategy for achieving outcomes like Kaiser may be for hospitals to consider Magnet designation, a proven and cost-effective strategy to improve process of care through investments in nursing.


Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Modelos Organizacionales , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Agotamiento Profesional , Estudios Transversales , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/organización & administración , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión y Programación de Personal/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
Surgeon ; 13(5): 250-5, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24821264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Increasing resistance among post-operative Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) infections have been reported. We present our experience changing resistance patterns. METHODS: We examined microbiological results from hip and knee revisions from 2001 to 2010 and compared resistance to all Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and CNS cultured from regional pan-speciality sources, in order to examine the patterns of antibiotic resistance. MAIN FINDINGS: 72 revisions in 67 patients were included. The most common organisms were SA (36%) and CNS (35%). Resistance to methicillin was 72% for CNS versus 20% for SA and resistance to gentamicin was 40% for CNS versus 4% for SA. Among all regional (background pan-speciality) cultures SA resistance to methicillin fell from 32% to 16% from 2006 to 10 with no change in gentamicin resistance at 3%. During the same period resistance of CNS to methicillin and gentamicin increased from 63% to 70% and 32%-47% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance of CNS to both methicillin and gentamicin is higher than with SA and appears to be increasing. At least 32% of CNS and 4% of SA from infected TKRs/THRs were resistant to our current prophylaxis regime. These changing patterns of resistance may have implications for future antibiotic prophylaxis regimes.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Coagulasa/metabolismo , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Staphylococcus aureus/enzimología
10.
LDI Issue Brief ; 18(2): 1-4, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23610793

RESUMEN

Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are networks of providers that assume risk for the quality and total cost of the care they deliver. Public policymakers and private insurers hope that ACOs will achieve the elusive "triple aim" of improving quality of care, improving population health, and reducing costs. The model is still evolving, but the premise is that ACOs will accomplish these aims by coordinating care, managing chronic disease, and aligning financial incentives for hospitals and physicians. If this sounds familiar, it may be because the integrated care networks of the 1990s tried some of the same things, and mostly failed in their attempts. This Issue Brief summarizes the similarities and differences between the new ACOs and the integrated delivery networks of the 1990s, and presents the authors' analysis of the likely success of these new organizations in affecting the costs and quality of health care.


Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/tendencias , Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Enfermedad Crónica , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Predicción , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Medicare , Modelos Organizacionales , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislación & jurisprudencia , Planes de Incentivos para los Médicos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos
11.
Soc Sci Med ; 296: 114664, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35121369

RESUMEN

Healthcare policy in the United States (U.S.) has focused on promoting integrated healthcare to combat fragmentation (e.g., 1993 Health Security Act, 2010 Affordable Care Act). Researchers have responded by studying coordination and developing typologies of integration. Yet, after three decades, research evidence for the benefits of coordination and integration are lacking. We argue that research efforts need to refocus in three ways: (1) use social networks to study relational coordination and integrated healthcare, (2) analyze integrated healthcare at three levels of analysis (micro, meso, macro), and (3) focus on clinical integration as the most proximate impact on patient outcomes. We use examples to illustrate the utility of such refocusing and present avenues for future research.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Instituciones de Salud , Política de Salud , Humanos , Red Social , Estados Unidos
13.
Science ; 294(5542): 584-7, 2001 10 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11641496

RESUMEN

Tropical montane cloud forests (TMCFs) depend on predictable, frequent, and prolonged immersion in cloud. Clearing upwind lowland forest alters surface energy budgets in ways that influence dry season cloud fields and thus the TMCF environment. Landsat and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite imagery show that deforested areas of Costa Rica's Caribbean lowlands remain relatively cloud-free when forested regions have well-developed dry season cumulus cloud fields. Further, regional atmospheric simulations show that cloud base heights are higher over pasture than over tropical forest areas under reasonable dry season conditions. These results suggest that land use in tropical lowlands has serious impacts on ecosystems in adjacent mountains.


Asunto(s)
Atmósfera , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Ecosistema , Árboles , Clima Tropical , Altitud , Animales , Costa Rica , Humedad , Estaciones del Año
14.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 34(1): 2-18, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19104260

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vendors of hip and knee implants court orthopedic surgeons to adopt their products. Hospitals, which have to pay for these products, now court the same surgeons to help reduce the number of vendors and contain implant costs. PURPOSES: This study measures the surgeon's perceived alignment of interests with both vendors and hospitals and gauges surgeons' exposure and receptivity to hospital cost-containment efforts. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We surveyed all practicing orthopedists performing 12 or more implant procedures annually in Pennsylvania. The survey identified the surgeon's preferred vendor, tenure with that vendor, use of the vendor during residency training, receipt of financial payments from the vendor, alignment of interests with both vendor and hospital stakeholders, and exposure and receptivity to hospital cost-containment efforts. FINDINGS: Surgeons have long-standing relationships with implant vendors, but only a small proportion receive financial payments. Surgeons align most closely with the vendor's sales representative and least closely with the hospital's purchasing manager. Paradoxically, surgeons support hospital efforts to limit the number of vendors but report that their own choice of vendor is not constrained. The major drivers of surgeons' alignment and stance toward cost containment are their tenure with and receipt of financial payments from the vendor. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospitals face a competitive disadvantage in capturing the attention of orthopedists, compared with implant vendors. The vendors' advantage stems from historical, financial, and service benefits offered to surgeons. Hospital executives now seek to offer comparable benefits to surgeons.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Conducta de Elección , Sector de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Prótesis de Cadera/economía , Relaciones Médico-Hospital , Prótesis de la Rodilla/economía , Administración de Materiales de Hospital/economía , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/economía , Ortopedia/economía , Comercio/economía , Conflicto de Intereses , Control de Costos , Recolección de Datos , Competencia Económica , Prótesis de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Motivación , Análisis Multivariante , Ortopedia/educación , Pennsylvania , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Appl Clin Inform ; 10(1): 129-139, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30786302

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence suggesting higher quality and safer care in hospitals with comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) systems, factors related to advanced system usability remain largely unknown, particularly among nurses. Little empirical research has examined sociotechnical factors, such as the work environment, that may shape the relationship between advanced EHR adoption and quality of care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the independent and joint effects of comprehensive EHR adoption and the hospital work environment on nurse reports of EHR usability and nurse-reported quality of care and safety. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of nurse and hospital survey data. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between EHR adoption level, work environment, and a set of EHR usability and quality/safety outcomes. The sample included 12,377 nurses working in 353 hospitals. RESULTS: In fully adjusted models, comprehensive EHR adoption was associated with lower odds of nurses reporting poor usability outcomes, such as dissatisfaction with the system (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.92). The work environment was associated with all usability outcomes with nurses in better environments being less likely to report negatively. Comprehensive EHRs (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96) and better work environments (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.42-0.52) were associated with lower odds of nurses reporting fair/poor quality of care, while poor patient safety grade was associated with the work environment (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.46-0.54), but not EHR adoption level. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that adoption of a comprehensive EHR is associated with more positive usability ratings and higher quality of care. We also found that-independent of EHR adoption level-the hospital work environment plays a significant role in how nurses evaluate EHR usability and whether EHRs have their intended effects on improving quality and safety of care.


Asunto(s)
Actitud hacia los Computadores , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
16.
Br J Neurosurg ; 22(4): 529-34, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18686063

RESUMEN

A wide range of treatment modalities are employed in the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH). A rational and evidence-based treatment strategy has the potential to optimise treatment for the individual patient and save resources. The aim of this study was to survey aspects of current practice in the UK and Ireland. A 1-page postal questionnaire addressing the treatment of primary (i.e. not recurrent) CSDH was sent to consultant SBNS members in March 2006. There were 112 responses from 215 questionnaires (52%). The preferred surgical technique was burr hole drainage (92%). Most surgeons prefer not to place a drain, with 27% never using one and 58% using drain only in one-quarter of cases or less. Only 11% of surgeons always place a drain, and only 30% place one in 75% of cases or more. The closed subdural-to-external drainage was most commonly used (91%) with closed subgaleal-to-external and subdural-to-peritoneal conduit used less often (3 and 4%, respectively). Only 5% of responders claimed to know the exact recurrence rate. The average perceived recurrence rate among the surgeons that never use drains and those who always use drains, was the same (both 11%). Most operations are performed by registrars (77%). Postoperative imaging is requested routinely by 32% of respondents and 57% of surgeons prescribe bed rest. Ninety four per cent surgeons employ conservative management in less than one-quarter of cases. Forty-two per cent of surgeons never prescribe steroids, 55% prescribe them to those managed conservatively. This survey demonstrates that there are diverse practices in the management of CSDH. This may be because of sufficiently persuasive evidence either does not exist or is not always taken into account. The current literature provides Class II and III evidence and there is a need for randomized studies to address the role of external drainage, steroids and postoperative bed rest.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Craneotomía/métodos , Hematoma Subdural Crónico/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Drenaje/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hematoma Subdural Crónico/terapia , Humanos , Irlanda , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido
17.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 33(3): 203-15, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18580300

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital purchasing alliances are voluntary consortia of hospitals that aggregate their contractual purchases of supplies from manufacturers. Purchasing groups thus represent pooling alliances rather than trading alliances (e.g., joint ventures). Pooling alliances have been discussed in the health care management literature for years but have never received much empirical investigation. They represent a potentially important source of economies of scale for hospitals. PURPOSES: This study represents the first national survey of hospital purchasing alliances. The survey analyzes alliance utilization, services, and performance from the perspective of the hospital executive in charge of materials management. This study extends research on pooling alliances, develops national benchmark statistics, and answers important issues raised recently about pooling alliances. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The investigators surveyed hospital members in the seven largest purchasing alliances (that account for 93% of all hospital purchases) and individual members of the Association of Healthcare Resource & Materials Management. The concatenated database yielded an approximate population of all hospital materials managers numbering 5,014. FINDINGS: Hospital purchasing group alliances succeed in reducing health care costs by lowering product prices, particularly for commodity and pharmaceutical items. Alliances also reduce transaction costs through commonly negotiated contracts and increase hospital revenues via rebates and dividends. Thus, alliances may achieve purchasing economies of scale. Hospitals report additional value as evidenced by their long tenure and the large share of purchases routed through the alliances. Alliances appear to be less successful, however, in providing other services of importance and value to hospitals and in mediating the purchase of expensive physician preference items. There is little evidence that alliances exclude new innovative firms from the marketplace or restrict hospital access to desired products. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pooling alliances appear successful in purchasing commodity and pharmaceutical products. Pooling alliances face the same issues as trading alliances in their efforts to work with physicians and the supply items they prefer.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional , Adquisición en Grupo/estadística & datos numéricos , Recolección de Datos , Eficiencia Organizacional/economía , Adquisición en Grupo/organización & administración , Administradores de Hospital , Estados Unidos
18.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 100(5): 401-405, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29543056

RESUMEN

Background Confidential reporting systems play a key role in capturing information about adverse surgical events. However, the value of these systems is limited if the reports that are generated are not subjected to systematic analysis. The aim of this study was to provide the first systematic analysis of data from a novel surgical confidential reporting system to delineate contributory factors in surgical incidents and document lessons that can be learned. Methods One-hundred and forty-five patient safety incidents submitted to the UK Confidential Reporting System for Surgery over a 10-year period were analysed using an adapted version of the empirically-grounded Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework. Results The most common factors identified as contributing to reported surgical incidents were cognitive limitations (30.09%), communication failures (16.11%) and a lack of adherence to established policies and procedures (8.81%). The analysis also revealed that adverse events were only rarely related to an isolated, single factor (20.71%) - with the majority of cases involving multiple contributory factors (79.29% of all cases had more than one contributory factor). Examination of active failures - those closest in time and space to the adverse event - pointed to frequent coupling with latent, systems-related contributory factors. Conclusions Specific patterns of errors often underlie surgical adverse events and may therefore be amenable to targeted intervention, including particular forms of training. The findings in this paper confirm the view that surgical errors tend to be multi-factorial in nature, which also necessitates a multi-disciplinary and system-wide approach to bringing about improvements.


Asunto(s)
Confidencialidad , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Reino Unido
19.
Med Devices (Auckl) ; 11: 39-49, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29391836

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The USA devotes roughly $200 billion (6%) of annual national health expenditures to medical devices. A substantial proportion of this spending occurs during orthopedic (eg, hip and knee) arthroplasties - two high-volume hospital procedures. The implants used in these procedures are commonly known as physician preference items (PPIs), reflecting the physician's choice of implant and vendor used. The foundations for this preference are not entirely clear. This study examines what implant and vendor characteristics, as evaluated by orthopedic surgeons, are associated with their preference. It also examines other factors (eg, financial relationships and vendor tenure) that may contribute to implant preference. METHODS: We surveyed all practicing orthopedic surgeons performing 12 or more implant procedures annually in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The survey identified each surgeon's preferred hip/knee vendor as well as the factors that surgeons state they use in selecting that primary vendor. We compared the surgeons' evaluation of multiple characteristics of implants and vendors using analysis of variance techniques, controlling for surgeon characteristics, hospital characteristics, and surgeon-vendor ties that might influence these evaluations. RESULTS: Physician's preference is heavily influenced by technology/implant factors and sales/service factors. Other considerations such as vendor reputation, financial relationships with the vendor, and implant cost seem less important. These findings hold regardless of implant type (hip vs knee) and specific vendor. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that there is a great deal of consistency in the factors that surgeons state they use to evaluate PPIs such as hip and knee implants. The findings offer an empirically derived definition of PPIs that is consistent with the product and nonproduct strategies pursued by medical device companies. PPIs are products that surgeons rate favorably on the twin dimensions of technology and sales/service.

20.
Health Serv Res ; 42(1 Pt 1): 219-38, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17355590

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This paper analyzes whether the rise in managed care during the 1990s caused the increase in hospital concentration. DATA SOURCES: We assemble data from the American Hospital Association, InterStudy and government censuses from 1990 to 2000. STUDY DESIGN: We employ linear regression analyses on long differenced data to estimate the impact of managed care penetration on hospital consolidation. Instrumental variable analogs of these regressions are also analyzed to control for potential endogeneity. DATA COLLECTION: All data are from secondary sources merged at the level of the Health Care Services Area. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: In 1990, the mean population-weighted hospital Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) in a Health Services Area was .19. By 2000, the HHI had risen to .26. Most of this increase in hospital concentration is due to hospital consolidation. Over the same time frame HMO penetration increased three fold. However, our regression analysis strongly implies that the rise of managed care did not cause the hospital consolidation wave. This finding is robust to a number of different specifications.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Asociadas de Salud/organización & administración , Administración Hospitalaria , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/organización & administración , American Hospital Association , Competencia Económica , Instituciones Asociadas de Salud/economía , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/economía , Análisis de Regresión , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA