Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(35): e267, 2022 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36065651

RESUMEN

The omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is known to have high infectivity and is more likely to evade vaccine immunity. However, booster vaccination is expected to strengthen cross-reactive immunity, thereby increasing the vaccine effectiveness (VE). This study aimed to evaluate the relative VE of the 3-dose (booster) vaccination compared with the 2-dose primary series vaccination in healthcare workers during omicron variant-dominant periods. During the omicron-dominant period from February 1, 2022 to February 28, 2022, a 1:1 matched case-control study was conducted. Healthcare workers with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results were classified as positive cases, whereas those with negative results served as controls. Compared with the 2-dose primary series vaccination, booster vaccination with mRNA vaccine showed moderate VE (53.1%). However, in multivariate analysis including the time elapsed after vaccination, the significant VE disappeared, reflecting the impact of recent vaccination rather than the third dose itself.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Personal de Salud , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Vacunas Sintéticas , Vacunas de ARNm
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(6): 688-695, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246494

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) face a higher risk of infection and may transmit pathogens to patients during a pandemic. This study aims to evaluate infection-control measures by analyzing the incidence and risk factors of COVID-19 and estimating vaccine effectiveness (VE) at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea. METHODS: This study included 2,516 HCWs from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022. Data were analyzed to determine the incidence density and cumulative incidence; the results were compared by the age- and gender-specific standardized incidence ratios (SIR). VE was estimated with multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models as 1-adjusted hazard ratio × 100%. RESULTS: SIR indicated a lower COVID-19 risk in the hospital population than in the general Korean population (SIR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.87). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that, compared to doctors, nonmedical service supporters and other HCWs (excluding doctors and nurses) were high-risk groups (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.72 [1.04-2.83] and 1.76 [1.20-2.58], respectively). Compared to the outpatient unit, the emergency department was a high-risk department (1.70 [1.16-2.50]). The VE of the booster dose was 55.47%, compared to no or incomplete vaccination (95% CI: 22.63-74.37). CONCLUSIONS: Besides encouraging HCWs vaccination, effective infection-control measures should target high-risk groups and departments.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunización Secundaria/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , República de Corea/epidemiología , Eficacia de las Vacunas/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA