Current Trends in Invasive Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Very Low Birth Weight Infants in United States Children's Hospitals, 2016-2021.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current practices in invasive patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure (surgical ligation or transcatheter occlusion) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants and changes in patient characteristics and outcomes from 2016 to 2021 among US children's hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated a retrospective cohort of VLBW infants (birth weight 400-1499 g and gestational age 22-31 weeks) who had invasive PDA closure within 6 months of age from 2016 to 2021 in children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System. Changes in patient characteristics and outcomes over time were evaluated using generalized linear models and generalized linear mixed models. RESULTS: 2418 VLBW infants (1182 surgical ligation; 1236 transcatheter occlusion) from 42 hospitals were included. The proportion of infants receiving transcatheter occlusion increased from 17.2% in 2016 to 84.4% in 2021 (P < .001). In 2021, 28/42 (67%) hospitals had performed transcatheter occlusion in > 80% of their VLBW infants needing invasive PDA closure, compared with only 2/42 (5%) in 2016. Although median postmenstrual age (PMA) at PDA closure did not change for the overall cohort, PMA at transcatheter occlusion decreased from 38 weeks in 2016 to 31 weeks by 2020, P < .001. Among those infants not intubated prior to PDA closure, extubation within 3 days postprocedure increased over time (yearly adjusted odds ratios of 1.26 [1.08-1.48]). Length of stay and mortality did not change over time. CONCLUSION: We report rapid adoption of transcatheter occlusion for PDA among VLBW infants in US children's hospitals over time. Transcatheter occlusions were performed at younger PMA over time.

Ventilatory Strategies in Infants with Established Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Multicenter Point Prevalence Study.

We performed a point prevalence study on infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), collecting data on type and settings of ventilatory support; 187 infants, 51% of whom were on invasive positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV), from 15 centers were included. We found a significant center-specific variation in ventilator modes.

Correction: Genetic variation in CRHR1 is associated with short-term respiratory response to corticosteroids in preterm infants at risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

In the original version of this article, the Supplementary Information file contained incorrect reference numbers. 'Supplemental Table S1' has now been replaced with the corrected version, in which the correct reference numbers are cited. The authors would like to apologise for this error.

Genetic variation in CRHR1 is associated with short-term respiratory response to corticosteroids in preterm infants at risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is an orphan disease and advances in prevention and treatment are lacking. The clinical efficacy of systemic corticosteroid therapy to reduce the severity of lung disease and BPD is highly variable. Our objective was to assess whether candidate SNPs in corticosteroid metabolism and response genes are associated with short-term phenotypic response to systemic corticosteroids in infants at high risk for BPD. METHODS: Pharmacogenetic analysis of data from a large randomized controlled trial (TOLSURF) in infants treated with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone using multivariate linear regression. The primary outcome was a change in respiratory severity score (RSS, mean airway pressure x FiO2) at day 7 of corticosteroid treatment. RESULTS: rs7225082 in the intron of CRHR1 is significantly associated with the magnitude of decrease in RSS 7 days after starting treatment with systemic corticosteroid (meta-analysis P = 2.8 × 10-4). Each T allele at rs7225082 is associated with a smaller absolute change in RSS at day 7, i.e., less response to systemic corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variability is associated with corticosteroid responsiveness with regard to respiratory status in preterm infants. Identification of genetic markers of corticosteroid responsiveness may allow for therapeutic individualization, with the goal of optimizing the risk-to-benefit ratio for an individual child.

Ursodeoxycholic acid versus phenobarbital for cholestasis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Although neonates and young infants with cholestasis are commonly treated with either phenobarbital or ursodeoxycholic acid (ursodiol), there is no evidence that phenobarbital is effective for this indication. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of ursodiol and phenobarbital for the treatment of cholestasis in a diverse NICU population. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including infants with cholestasis who were admitted to a Level IV NICU between January 2010 and December 2015. Drug courses of phenobarbital and ursodiol were identified within the medical record, and medical, demographic, and drug information were extracted. The primary outcome was reduction in direct bilirubin. RESULTS: Sixty-eight infants provided a total of 112 courses of drug therapy for comparison. Diverse medical diagnoses were captured in the patient cohort. Ursodiol was significantly more effective in reducing direct bilirubin than was phenobarbital (- 1.89 vs + 0.76 mg/dL; - 33.33 vs + 13.0 umol/L, p-value 0.03), even after controlling for baseline cholestasis severity, intrauterine growth restriction status, and lipid lowering therapy (- 2.16 vs + 0.27 mg/dl; - 36.94 vs + 4.62 umol/L, p-value 0.03). There was no improvement in direct bilirubin in the majority of infants treated with phenobarbital. CONCLUSIONS: Phenobarbital, as compared to ursodiol, has limited efficacy for the reduction of direct bilirubin in neonates and young infants with cholestasis. Given new data regarding the potential neurotoxicity of phenobarbital in the developing brain, providers may choose to avoid phenobarbital in the treatment of cholestasis in infants.

A call for increased inclusivity and global representation in pharmacogenetic testing.

Commercial pharmacogenetic testing panels capture a fraction of the genetic variation underlying medication metabolism and predisposition to adverse reactions. In this study we compared variation in six pharmacogenes detected by whole genome sequencing (WGS) to a targeted commercial panel in a cohort of 308 individuals with family history of pediatric heart disease. In 1% of the cohort, WGS identified rare variants that altered the interpretation of metabolizer status and would thus prevent potential errors in gene-based dosing.

Commentary: The Injustice of Paediatric Drug Labelling in Canada - A Call to Action.

Building upon the article by Moore Hepburn et al. (2023), this rejoinder acts to reinforce the inadequacy of current drug labelling laws and the urgency of the need for improved paediatric drug regulation in Canada. To facilitate a path forward, specific examples of success in other trusted foreign jurisdictions are provided. A call to educate parents and the public about the current lack of paediatric drug labelling and the ways that multi-stakeholder groups can work together to ensure safe and effective pharmacotherapy for Canadian children are highlighted.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics Modeling in the Neonatal Population-Current Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is an approach to predicting drug pharmacokinetics, using knowledge of the human physiology involved and drug physiochemical properties. This approach is useful when predicting drug pharmacokinetics in under-studied populations, such as pediatrics. PBPK modeling is a particularly important tool for dose optimization for the neonatal population, given that clinical trials rarely include this patient population. However, important knowledge gaps exist for neonates, resulting in uncertainty with the model predictions. This review aims to outline the sources of variability that should be considered with developing a neonatal PBPK model, the data that are currently available for the neonatal ontogeny, and lastly to highlight the data gaps where further research would be needed.

Advancing Precision Medicine in Paediatrics: Past, present and future.

Precision Medicine is an approach to disease treatment and prevention taking into account individual genetic, environmental, therapeutic and lifestyle variability for each person. This holistic approach to therapeutics is intended to enhance drug efficacy and safety not only across healthcare systems but for individual patients. While weight and to some extent gestational age have been considered in determining drug dosing in children, historically other factors including genetic variability have not been factored into therapeutic decision making. As our knowledge of the role of ontogeny and genetics in determining drug efficacy and safety has expanded, these insights have provided new opportunities to apply principles of Precision Medicine to the care of infants, children and youth. These opportunities are most likely to be achieved first in select sub-groups of children. While there are many challenges to the successful implementation of Precision Medicine in children including the need to ensure that Precision Medicine enhances rather than reduces equity in children's health care rather, there are many more opportunities. Research, advocacy, planning and teamwork are required to move Precision Medicine forward in children in pursuit of the common goal of safe and effective drug therapy.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles: unique considerations for optimal design of neonatal clinical trials.

Core clinical pharmacology principles must be considered when designing and executing neonatal clinical trials. In this review, the authors discuss important aspects of drug dose selection, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics and pharmacodynamics that stakeholders may consider when undertaking a neonatal or infant clinical trial.

Developmental pharmacokinetics of indomethacin in preterm neonates: Severely decreased drug clearance in the first week of life.

Indomethacin is used commonly in preterm neonates for the prevention of intracranial hemorrhage and closure of an abnormally open cardiac vessel. Due to biomedical advances, the infants who receive this drug in the neonatal intensive care unit setting have become younger, smaller, and less mature (more preterm) at the time of treatment. To develop a pharmacokinetics (PK) model to aid future dosing, we designed a prospective cohort study to characterize indomethacin PK in a dynamically changing patient population. A population PK base model was created using NONMEM, and a covariate model was developed in a primary development cohort and subsequently was tested for accuracy in a validation cohort. Postnatal age was a significant covariate for hepatic clearance (CLH ) and renal clearance (CLR ). The typical value of the total clearance (CL, the sum of CLR and CLH ) was 3.09 ml/h and expressed as CL/WTmedian  = 3.96 ml/h/kg, where WTmedian is the median body weight. The intersubject variability of CLR and CLH were 61% and 207%, respectively. The typical value of the volume of distribution Vp  = 366 ml (Vp /WTmedian  = 470 ml/kg), and its intersubject variability was 38.8%. Half-life was 82.1 h. Compared with more mature and older preterm populations studied previously, indomethacin CL is considerably lower in this contemporary population. Model-informed precision dosing incorporating important covariates other than weight alone offers an opportunity to individualize dosing in a susceptible patient undergoing rapid change.

Improving Racial and Ethnic Equity in Clinical Trials Enrolling Pregnant and Lactating Individuals.

Racial and ethnic marginalized populations have historically been poorly represented, underrecruited, and underprioritized across clinical trials enrolling pregnant and lactating individuals. The objectives of this review are to describe the current state of racial and ethnic representation in clinical trials enrolling pregnant and lactating individuals and to propose evidence-based tangible solutions to achieving equity in these clinical trials. Despite efforts from federal and local organizations, only marginal progress has been made toward achieving equity in clinical research. This continued limited inclusion and transparency in pregnancy trials exacerbates health disparities, limits the generalizability of research findings, and may heighten the maternal child health crisis in the United States. Racial and ethnic underrepresented communities are willing to participate in research; however, they face unique barriers to access and participation. Multifaceted approaches are required to facilitate the participation of marginalized individuals in clinical trials including partnering with the local community to understand their priorities, needs, and assets; establishing accessible recruitment strategies; creating flexible protocols; supporting participants for their time; and increasing culturally congruent and/or culturally sensitive research staff. This article also highlights exemplars in pregnancy research.

The neonatal adverse event severity scale: current status, a stakeholders' assessment, and future perspectives.

To support informed decisions on drug registration and prescription, clinical trials need tools to assess the efficacy and safety signals related to a given therapeutic intervention. Standardized assessment facilitates reproducibility of results. Furthermore, it enables weighted comparison between different interventions, instrumental to facilitate shared decisions. When focused on adverse events in clinical trials, tools are needed to assess seriousness, causality and severity. As part of such a toolbox, the international Neonatal Consortium (INC) developed a first version of the neonatal adverse event severity scale (NAESS). This version underwent subsequent validation in retro-and prospective trials to assess its applicability and impact on the inter-observer variability. Regulators, sponsors and academic researchers also reported on the use of the NAESS in regulatory documents, trial protocols and study reports. In this paper, we aim to report on the trajectory, current status and impact of the NAESS score, on how stakeholders within INC assess its relevance, and on perspectives to further develop this tool.

The cellular and immunological dynamics of early and transitional human milk.

Human milk is essential for infant nutrition and immunity, providing protection against infections and other immune-mediated diseases during the lactation period and beyond in later childhood. Milk contains a broad range of bioactive factors such as nutrients, hormones, enzymes, immunoglobulins, growth factors, cytokines, and antimicrobial factors, as well as heterogeneous populations of maternal cells. The soluble and cellular components of milk are dynamic over time to meet the needs of the growing infant. In this study, we utilize systems-approaches to define and characterize 62 analytes of the soluble component, including immunoglobulin isotypes, as well as the cellular component of human milk during the first two weeks postpartum from 36 mothers. We identify soluble immune and growth factors that are dynamic over time and could be utilized to classify milk into different phenotypic groups. We identify 24 distinct populations of both epithelial and immune cells by single-cell transcriptome analysis of 128,016 human milk cells. We found that macrophage populations have shifting inflammatory profiles during the first two weeks of lactation. This analysis provides key insights into the soluble and cellular components of human milk and serves as a substantial resource for future studies of human milk.

Prospective assessment of inter-rater reliability of a neonatal adverse event severity scale.

Introduction: To ensure the quality of clinical trial safety data, universal data standards are required. In 2019 the International Neonatal Consortium (INC) published a neonatal adverse event severity scale (NAESS) to standardize the reporting of adverse event (AE) severity. In this study the reliability of AE severity grading with INC NAESS was prospectively assessed in a real-world setting. Methods: Severity of AEs was assessed by two independent observers at each of four centers across the world. In each center two series of 30 neonatal adverse events were assessed by both observers: in a first phase with a generic (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE) severity scale not specific to neonates, and in a second phase with INC NAESS (after a structured training). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to express inter-rater agreement in both phases, and bootstrap sampling was used to compare them. Results: 120 AEs were included in each of both phases. The ICC with the use of INC NAESS in phase 2 was 0.69. This represents a significant but modest improvement in comparison to the initial ICC of 0.66 in phase 1 (confidence interval of ratio of ICC in phase 2 to phase 1 = 1.005-1.146; excludes 1). The ICC was higher for those AEs for which a diagnosis specific AE severity table was available in INC NAESS (ICC 0.80). Discussion: Good inter-rater reliability of the INC NAESS was demonstrated in four neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across the globe. The ICC is comparable to what is reported for scales with similar purposes in different populations. There is a modest, but significant, improvement in inter-rater agreement in comparison to the naïve phase without INC NAESS. The better performance when reviewers use AE-specific NAESS tables highlights the need to expand the number of AEs that are covered by specific criteria in the current version of INC NAESS.