RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systematic assessments of the scientific production can optimize resource allocation and increase research productivity in Brazil. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile and scientific production of researchers in the field of Cardiology who have fellowship in Medicine provided by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. METHODS: The curriculum Lattes of 33 researchers with active fellowships from 2006 to 2008 were included in the analysis. The variables of interest were: gender, affiliation, tutoring of undergraduate, masters and PhD students, and scientific production and its impact. RESULTS: : There was predominance of males (72.7%) and of fellowship level 2 (56.4%). Three states of the Federation were responsible for 94% of the researchers: SP (28; 71.8%), RS (4; 10.3%), e RJ (3; 9.1%). Four institutions are responsible for about 82% of researchers: USP (13; 39.4%), UNESP (5; 15.2%), UFRGS (4; 12.1%) e UNIFESP (3; 9.1%). During all academic careers, the researchers published 2.958 journal articles, with a mean of 89 articles per researcher. Of total, 55% and 75% were indexed at Web of Science and Scopus databases, respectively. The researchers received a total of 19648 citations at the database Web of Science, with a median of 330 citations per researcher (IQ = 198-706). The average number of citations per article was 13.5 citations (SD = 11.6). CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that researchers in the field of cardiology have a relevant scientific production. The knowledge of the profile of researchers in the field of Cardiology will probably enable effective strategies to qualitatively improve the scientific output of Brazilian researchers.
Asunto(s)
Bibliometría , Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiología/estadística & datos numéricos , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Factor de Impacto de la Revista , Masculino , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
FUNDAMENTO: Avaliações sistemáticas da pesquisa científica podem otimizar alocações de recursos financeiros e aumentar a produtividade em pesquisa no Brasil. OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o perfil e a produção científica de pesquisadores na área de Cardiologia, que possuem bolsas de produtividade científica em Medicina fornecida pelo Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. MÉTODOS: O currículo Lattes de 33 pesquisadores com bolsas ativas no triênio 2006 a 2008 foram incluídos na análise. As variáveis de interesse foram: sexo, instituição, tempo de doutoramento, orientação de alunos de graduação, mestres e doutores, artigos publicados e seu impacto. RESULTADOS: Houve uma predominância do gênero masculino (74,4 por cento) e de bolsistas na categoria 2 (57,6 por cento). Quatro instituições foram responsáveis por 70,0 por cento dos pesquisadores: USP (13; 39,4 por cento), UNESP (5; 15,2 por cento), UFRGS (4; 12,1 por cento) e UNIFESP (3; 9,1 por cento). No total da carreira acadêmica, os pesquisadores em Cardiologia publicaram 2.958 artigos em periódicos, sendo a média de 89 artigos por pesquisador. Desse total, 55,0 por cento e 75,0 por cento foram artigos indexados nas bases de dados Web of Science e Scopus, respectivamente. Os pesquisadores receberam um total de 19.648 citações na base de dados Web of Science, sendo a mediana por pesquisador de 330 citações. A média de citações por artigo foi de 13,5 citações (DP = 11,6). CONCLUSÃO: Nosso estudo mostrou que os pesquisadores na área de Cardiologia apresentam uma produção científica relevante. O conhecimento do perfil dos pesquisadores da área de Cardiologia possivelmente permitirá estratégias efetivas para incentivar a produção científica dos pesquisadores brasileiros.
BACKGROUND: Systematic assessments of the scientific production can optimize resource allocation and increase research productivity in Brazil. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile and scientific production of researchers in the field of Cardiology who have fellowship in Medicine provided by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. METHODS: The curriculum Lattes of 33 researchers with active fellowships from 2006 to 2008 were included in the analysis. The variables of interest were: gender, affiliation, tutoring of undergraduate, masters and PhD students, and scientific production and its impact. RESULTS: : There was predominance of males (72.7 percent) and of fellowship level 2 (56.4 percent). Three states of the Federation were responsible for 94 percent of the researchers: SP (28; 71.8 percent), RS (4; 10.3 percent), e RJ (3; 9.1 percent). Four institutions are responsible for about 82 percent of researchers: USP (13; 39.4 percent), UNESP (5; 15.2 percent), UFRGS (4; 12.1 percent) e UNIFESP (3; 9.1 percent). During all academic careers, the researchers published 2.958 journal articles, with a mean of 89 articles per researcher. Of total, 55 percent and 75 percent were indexed at Web of Science and Scopus databases, respectively. The researchers received a total of 19648 citations at the database Web of Science, with a median of 330 citations per researcher (IQ = 198-706). The average number of citations per article was 13.5 citations (SD = 11.6). CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that researchers in the field of cardiology have a relevant scientific production. The knowledge of the profile of researchers in the field of Cardiology will probably enable effective strategies to qualitatively improve the scientific output of Brazilian researchers.