Describing the Spectrum of Patient Reported Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy: Providing Information to Improve Patient Counseling and Shared Decision Making.

PURPOSE: Preoperative counseling incorporating the best case, the worst case and the most likely outcome scenarios aid patient decision making. This information is not readily available for prostate cancer counseling because most patient reported outcomes are presented as averages, which minimize individual patient experiences. Using the EPIC (Expanded Prostate Index Composite) we present data to characterize the best case and the worst case after prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EPIC bowel, urinary irritation, continence and sexual function scores were measured in 1,418 men stratified by baseline function who underwent prostatectomy. Patient level functional trajectories were modeled using a Bayesian hierarchical model. The 5-year best and worst case outcomes were defined as the upper 95th and the lower 5th percentiles, respectively. RESULTS: Five years after surgery in patients with good baseline urinary continence the best case was a score of 100.0 (95% credible interval 100.0-100.0) and the worst case was 54.4 (95% credible interval 42.2-63.7). Among men with good baseline sexual function who underwent nerve sparing surgery the best case was 83.9 points (95% credible interval 74.1-93.1) and the worst case was 17.6 (95% credible interval 7.5-26.1). The differences between best and worst case for bowel and urinary irritation were relatively small (11.4 and 13.6 points, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prostatectomy exerted a minimal negative impact on urinary irritation and bowel function with minimal variability. There was a larger range in patient experience for urinary continence and sexual function with most patients experiencing a significant functional decline. Future studies of best and worst case outcomes of multiple treatment modalities may provide valuable information for shared decision making in prostate cancer treatment.

Testicular Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Testicular cancer is relatively uncommon and accounts for <1% of all male tumors. However, it is the most common solid tumor in men between the ages of 20 and 34 years, and the global incidence has been steadily rising over the past several decades. Several risk factors for testicular cancer have been identified, including personal or family history of testicular cancer and cryptorchidism. Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise 95% of malignant tumors arising in the testes and are categorized into 2 main histologic subtypes: seminoma and nonseminoma. Although nonseminoma is the more clinically aggressive tumor subtype, 5-year survival rates exceed 70% with current treatment options, even in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the primary treatment for most patients with testicular GCTs. Postorchiectomy management is dictated by stage, histology, and risk classification; treatment options for nonseminoma include surveillance, systemic therapy, and nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Although rarely occurring, prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor, with >50% of patients dying within 1 year of diagnosis. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Testicular Cancer focuses on recommendations for the management of adult patients with nonseminomatous GCTs.

Caring for Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Are BRCA Positive.

Genomic testing may be a vital component in the medical management of patients with complex clinical phenotypes and cancer.

Long-term health effects among testicular cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Testicular cancer is diagnosed at a young age and survival rates are high; thus, the long-term effects of cancer treatment need to be assessed. Our objectives are to estimate the incidence rates and determinants of late effects in testicular cancer survivors. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of testicular cancer survivors, diagnosed 1991-2007, followed up for a median of 10 years. We identified 785 testicular cancer patients who survived ≥5 years and 3323 men free of cancer for the comparison group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to compare the hazard ratio between the cases and the comparison group and for internal analysis among case patients. RESULTS: Testicular cancer survivors experienced a 24 % increase in risk of long-term health effects >5 years after diagnosis. The overall incidence rate of late effects among testicular cancer survivors was 66.3 per 1000 person years. Higher risks were observed among testicular cancer survivors for hypercholesterolemia, infertility, and orchitis. Chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection appeared to increase the risk of late effects. Being obese prior to cancer diagnosis appeared to be the strongest factor associated with late effects. CONCLUSIONS: Testicular cancer survivors were more likely to develop chronic health conditions when compared to cancer-free men. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: While the late effects risk was increased among testicular cancer survivors, the incidence rates of late effects after cancer diagnosis was fairly low.