Development and evaluation of virtual simulation games to increase the confidence and self-efficacy of healthcare learners in vaccine communication, advocacy, and promotion.

BACKGROUND: Although healthcare providers (HCPs) are the most trusted source of vaccine information, there is a paucity of easily accessible, multidisciplinary educational tools on vaccine communication for them. Virtual simulation games (VSGs) are innovative yet accessible and effective tools in healthcare education. The objectives of our study were to develop VSGs to increase HCP confidence and self-efficacy in vaccine communication, advocacy, and promotion, and evaluate the VSGs' effectiveness using a pre-post self-assessment pilot study. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of experts in medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and simulation development created three VSGs for HCP learners focused on addressing conversations with vaccine hesitant individuals. We evaluated the VSGs with 24 nursing students, 30 pharmacy students, and 18 medical residents who completed surveys and 6-point Likert scale pre-post self-assessments to measure changes in their confidence and self-efficacy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline confidence and self-efficacy across the three HCP disciplines, despite varied levels of education. Post-VSG confidence and self-efficacy (median: 5) were significantly higher than pre-VSG (median: 4-5) for all three HCP disciplines (P ≤ 0.0005), highlighting the effectiveness of the VSGs. Medical residents reported significantly lower post-VSG confidence and self-efficacy than nursing and pharmacy learners despite completing the most significant amount of education. CONCLUSIONS: Following the completion of the VSGs, learners in medicine, nursing, and pharmacy showed significant improvement in their self-assessed confidence and self-efficacy in holding vaccine conversations. The VSGs as an educational tool, in combination with existing clinical immunization training, can be used to increase HCP confidence and engagement in vaccine discussions with patients, which may ultimately lead to increased vaccine confidence among patients.

Using simulation to enhance primary care sexual health services for breast cancer survivors: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a virtual simulation game (VSG) to improve primary care sexual health services for breast cancer survivors. METHODS: We developed a VSG to help primary care providers (PCPs) address sexual health disturbances among breast cancer survivors. We used a pretest-posttest design with a series of validated tools to assess the feasibility and perceived impact of the  VGS, including an open-ended question about participants' perceptions. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics and qualitative data through an inductive content analysis approach. RESULTS: Of the 60 participants, the majority were nurse practitioner students (n = 26; 43.3%), female (n = 48; 80%), and worked full-time (n = 35; 58.3%). Participants perceived the VSG as feasible and potentially effective. The intervention elicited an improvement in PCPs' perception of knowledge between pretest and posttest surveys (z = - 1.998, p = 0.046). Professional background and previous exposure to sexual health training were predictors of knowledge perception. Participants described the intervention as an engaging educational strategy where they felt safe to make mistakes and learn from that. CONCLUSIONS: VSGs can be a potentially effective educational approach for PCPs. Our findings indicate that despite being an engaging interactive strategy, VSG interventions should be tailored for each professional group. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This intervention has potential to improve the knowledge and practice of PCPs related to breast cancer follow-up care to support comprehensive care for survivors, resulting in a better quality of life and patient outcomes.

Identifying the Professional Development Needs Among Early Career Doctorally Prepared Oncology Professionals.

This study aimed to identify the professional development needs of early career doctorally prepared professionals in psychosocial oncology. We used a cross-sectional descriptive survey design to assess professionally related skills deemed most important to participants' academic excellence and promotion, skills they felt most and least confident to engage in, and those they were most interested to learn more about. Seventeen participants completed the survey and were, on average, 39.3 years of age (range 29-55 years) and had completed doctoral or post-doctoral training 3.1 years previously (range 0-5 years). Participants identified seeking external funding as not only the most important skill to achieve their academic excellence and promotion, but also as the skill they felt least confident to engage in. They felt most confident to engage in career planning and getting published and were most interested to learn more about how to negotiate a career/position. Participants also expressed interest in having access to a forum wherein they could collaborate with others and receive mentorship from expert oncology professionals with doctoral degrees. The findings from this study point to the need for professional development opportunities for oncology professionals before and after they complete their doctoral or post-doctoral training. Study participants' perspectives offer insights about topics that may be enhanced in doctoral and post-doctoral mentorship programs.

Developing simulation games to advance public health nursing competence in baccalaureate education.

We describe the development of an innovative baccalaureate nursing education strategy for public health nursing. Virtual simulation pedagogy is known to be effective for acute care nursing practice while less known for public health nursing. Three Canadian nursing schools, the Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing (CASN), and the Canadian Alliance of Nurse Educators using Simulation (CAN-Sim) partnered to develop three public health nursing virtual simulation games. Learners work through unfolding population health scenarios, simulating public health nursing practice focused on entry level public health nursing competencies. Each game fosters clinical reasoning and collaborative, community decision-making to respond to population health issues during community assessment, evidence-informed health promotion planning, and evaluation processes. A companion guide was developed to support best practices in implementing virtual simulation and promote optimum student learning using the public health nursing games.

"How to start that conversation?": Experiences of developing a virtual simulation about sexual health care for breast cancer survivors.

Virtual simulation (VS) is an innovative and engaging knowledge translation strategy that can improve healthcare providers' knowledge and skills. However, there is no known literature published related to the use of simulation to improve cancer survivorship care. In this paper, we describe our experience of developing a VS to educate primary healthcare professionals about sexual health disturbances among breast cancer survivors. Based on literature in other contexts, this VS may help increase health professionals' knowledge and skills needed to assist breast cancer survivors with sexual health concerns. Our VS development experience can be used to encourage and guide other researchers planning to develop similar interventions in the future.

The use of clinical simulation in wound care education for nurses: a scoping review protocol.

Many nurse educators consider simulation a valuable tool to supplement and augment learning due to current shortages of clinical placements. Wound care is integral to nursing practice yet many students and practicing nurses experience difficulties in securing sufficient learning opportunities or experience at the undergraduate level to feel competent in providing it. Emerging evidence supports simulation as a promising intervention to facilitate student learning in wound care, building nurses' confidence and competence in providing evidence-based wound care. OBJECTIVE: To understand how clinical simulation is being used to educate nurses about wound assessment and management, and to explore the impact of clinical simulation on learning outcomes, including knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and skills related to wound care. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria include studies of nursing students and nurses, simulation educational interventions, and learning outcomes related to wound care evaluated by any measures. Any studies that do not fit these criteria will be excluded. METHODS: Databases to be searched include PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, SciELO up to February 2022. Studies in English with a date limit of 2012 to 2022 will be included. Search results will be imported into Covidence and screened by two independent reviewers, first based on the title and abstract and then full text. Data will be extracted with a novel extraction tool developed by the reviewers and then synthesised and presented in narrative, tabular, and/or graphical forms. DISSEMINATION: The finished scoping review will be published in a scientific journal once analysis is completed.

Exploring the effect of neurofeedback on postcancer cognitive impairment and fatigue: A pilot feasibility study.

Purpose: Postcancer cognitive impairment (PCCI) and fatigue are adverse effects that often persist following cancer treatment, and impact quality of life. The study purpose was to evaluate feasibility and effect of neurofeedback on cognitive functioning and fatigue in cancer survivors. Specifically, we aimed to test feasibility of recruitment strategies and our study protocol including outcome measures. Design: This pilot feasibility study used a 10-week wait-list design. Participants served as their own controls and received neurofeedback training twice a week for 10 weeks. Participants: The sample consisted of breast cancer survivors from Kingston, Ontario (n = 16). Methods: Outcomes were assessed using validated, self-report scales and neuropsychological tests before, during, and after neurofeedback. Findings: The neurofeedback protocol was feasible and resulted in significant decreases in perceived cognitive deficits, fatigue, sleep, and psychological symptoms. Implications for psychosocial providers: Neurofeedback may be an effective, non-invasive complementary therapy for PCCI in breast cancer survivors.

Healthcare Simulation Use to Support Guidelines Implementation: An Integrative Review.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based education is a useful teaching and learning strategy that can help to implement guidelines into healthcare settings. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to collate, synthesize, and analyze the literature focusing on the use of simulation as an educational strategy to support guidelines implementation among healthcare providers (HCPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Integrative literature review using the methodology proposed by Ganong. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Twenty-three articles were selected, the majority (n=19, 82%) used simulation in practice settings and pre- and post-test measurement (n=16, 69%). All studies that assessed simulation effects highlighted that the use of simulation improved the measured outcomes related to guideline implementation. Simulation-based education can be an effective strategy to support guidelines implementation among HCPs, but aspects such as cost involved, time constraints, training of educators, and the HCPs' learning needs can affect its applicability. Future research should focus on more transparent reports related to the guidelines for simulation content, virtual learning, costs of simulation, and measurement of the long-term effects of simulation-based education.

Using Simulation to Enhance Education Regarding Epidural Analgesia for Registered Nurses.

BACKGROUND: Registered nurses (RNs) receive didactic training regarding caring for patients receiving epidural analgesia. Although RNs are tested on their knowledge after this training, their ability to critically think through adverse events has not been assessed at our institution. AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of simulation education for RNs regarding the assessment and management of patients receiving epidural analgesia. METHOD: The study included an education intervention, which consisted of a 4-hour workshop. After obtaining informed consent, RNs completed a preworkshop evaluation of skill performance where they completed an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in which they demonstrated an epidural assessment of a standardized patient. RNs then completed a demographic and knowledge questionnaire followed by a lecture regarding care, management, and assessment of patients who are receiving epidural analgesia. After the lecture, RNs practiced epidural assessments within small groups. A postworkshop OSCE, questionnaire, and debriefing were completed before the end of the workshop. RESULTS: Thirty-seven RNs completed the workshop. The mean age of participants was 43 years. For the pre- and postworkshop knowledge questionnaire, there was significant improvement in answers related to epidural pharmacology and assessment of blockade questions. For the pre- and postworkshop OSCE, there was a significant increase in the number of correct procedures performed in all categories, with the exception of assessment of equipment. There was also a significant change in the proportion of RNs who stated that they felt confident in their assessment of a patient receiving epidural analgesia.

A comprehensive framework and key guideline recommendations for the provision of evidence-based breast cancer survivorship care within the primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer survivors continue to experience physical and psychosocial health care needs post-treatment. Primary care involvement is increasing as cancer centres move forward with earlier discharge of stable breast cancer survivors to primary care follow-up. Research suggests primary care providers (PCPs) are willing to provide survivorship care but many lack knowledge and confidence to provide evidence-based care. Although clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) exist for follow-up surveillance and certain aspects of survivorship care, no single comprehensive guideline addresses all significant breast cancer survivorship issues encountered in primary care. PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to create a comprehensive clinical practice framework to guide the provision of breast cancer survivorship care in primary care settings. METHODS: This study consisted of an extensive search, appraisal and synthesis of CPGs for post-treatment breast cancer care using a modified Delphi method. Breast cancer survivorship issues and relevant CPGs were mapped to four essential components of survivorship care to create a comprehensive clinical practice framework to guide provision of breast cancer survivorship care. RESULTS: The completed framework consists of a one-page checklist outlining breast cancer survivorship issues relevant to primary care, a three-page summary of key recommendations and a one-page list of guideline sources. The framework and key guideline recommendations were verified by a panel of experts for comprehensiveness, importance and relevance to primary care. CONCLUSIONS: This framework may serve as a tool to remind PCPs about issues impacting breast cancer survivors, as well as the evidence-based recommendations and resources to provide the associated care.

Are primary care providers implementing evidence-based care for breast cancer survivors?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of key best practice guideline recommendations for posttreatment breast cancer survivorship care by primary care providers (PCPs). DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Southeastern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two PCPs: 62 family physicians (FPs) and 20 primary health care nurse practitioners (PHCNPs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Twenty-one "need-to-know" breast cancer survivorship care guideline recommendations rated by participants as "implemented routinely," "aware of guideline recommendation but not implemented routinely," or "not aware of guideline recommendation." RESULTS: Overall, FPs and PHCNPs in our sample reported similar practice patterns in terms of implementation of breast cancer survivorship guideline recommendations. The PCPs reported routinely implementing approximately half (46.4%, 9.7 of 21) of the key guideline recommendations with breast cancer survivors in their practices. Implementation rates were higher for recommendations related to prevention and surveillance aspects of survivorship care, such as mammography and weight management. Knowledge and practice gaps were highest for recommendations related to screening for and management of long-term effects such as fatigue and distress. There were only a few minor differences reported between FPs and PHCNPs. CONCLUSION: There are knowledge and practice gaps related to implementation of the key guideline recommendations for breast cancer survivorship care in the primary care setting that could be targeted for improvement through educational or other interventions.

Shaping Social Justice Values Through Inclusive Assessment and Debriefing of eLearning Modules.

BACKGROUND: Nurses need to recognize how intersectionality shapes the experiences of individuals and families navigating complex health systems. Guided reflection on complex social justice issues serves as an approach to move beyond simply understanding social determinants of health toward shaping core professional values of developing nurses to promote lasting change. METHOD: Third-year Canadian undergraduate prelicensure nursing students co-created assignment expectations, completed online modules, and submitted initial reflections before class in a mandatory social justice course. In-class debriefing was based on students' reflections and cofacilitated by subject matter experts. Students completed a final reflection that focused on advocating for social change. RESULTS: Student feedback, reflections, and grades as well as faculty observations support the success of this interactive student-centered approach. CONCLUSION: A flexible approach to debriefing modular content informed by universal design for learning and simulation theory enables nurse educators to promote in-depth, meaningful, and lasting student learning. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(1):48-52.].

Healthcare Students' Experiences of Learner-Educator Cocreation of Virtual Simulations: A Phenomenographic Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cocreating virtual simulations with learners during a course is an innovative approach to improving student preparation for real-world practice while helping simulationists meet learner needs, support authentic assessment, and maximize the impact of simulation-based learning. This study explores differences in healthcare students' experiences of learner-educator cocreation of virtual simulations (LECoVSs) using phenomenographic methods. Identifying differences in perceptions of LECoVSs enables educators to make evidence-informed decisions about engaging in simulation cocreation as a tool to maximize learning. METHODS: Phenomenography focuses on identifying different ways that participants can experience the same phenomenon, in this case, LECoVSs. The setting was a collaborative interprofessional simulation assignment between navigation and nursing students. Participants completed a demographic survey then submitted reflective journals completed during the course and/or an open-ended survey. Data analysis occurred in iterative stages, from familiarization with the data to grouping and interpreting themes. RESULTS: Nineteen open-ended surveys and 13 reflective journals from navigation and nursing students who completed the simulation assignment between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. Students experienced LECoVSs in 4 increasingly complex ways: (1) supporting consistent student progress, (2) amending course expectations, (3) sharing decision-making, and (4) fostering mutual growth. CONCLUSIONS: Simulationists may leverage cocreation to improve student learning, access, empowerment, and professional growth. However, for students to achieve higher learning outcomes, educators need to clearly communicate the full potential of cocreation, how it can occur, and why it can support learning. This study's findings may be used as a framework for explaining simulation cocreation to students to maximize their learning.

PROTOCOL: Learner-educator co-creation of student assessment in health professional education courses: A scoping review protocol.

This is a protocol for a Campbell Review following JBI scoping review methodology. The objectives are to answer the following questions: What has been reported in the literature about collaborative learner-educator design, implementation, or evaluation of learner assessment in health professional education? (1) Where is learner-educator co-creation of assessment occurring? (i.e., which disciplines, course types, level of learner, year of study). (2) What course assessment decisions are influenced or being made together? (i.e., assessment instructions and/or grades). (3) How much influence do learners have on decision-making? (i.e., where does it fall on Bovill and Bulley's ladder of participation). (4) How do learners and educators go about making decisions together? (i.e., discussion or voting, with a whole class or portion of the class). (5) What are the perceived benefits, disadvantages, barriers, and/or facilitators reported by the authors?

Virtual clinical simulation to teach mental health concepts: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to determine the extent of the literature on the use of virtual clinical simulation to teach health professional students about mental health. INTRODUCTION: Graduates of health professional programs need to be prepared to provide safe and effective care for persons with a mental illness in every practice context. Clinical placements in specialty areas are difficult to obtain and cannot ensure students will have opportunities to practice specific skills. Virtual simulation is a flexible and innovative tool that can be used in pre-registration health care education to effectively develop cognitive, communication, and psychomotor skills. Given the recent focus on virtual simulation usage, the literature will be mapped to determine what evidence exists regarding virtual clinical simulation to teach mental health concepts. INCLUSION CRITERIA: We will include reports that focus on pre-registration health professional students and use virtual simulation to teach mental health concepts. Reports that focus on health care workers, graduate students, patient viewpoints, or other uses will be excluded. METHOD: Four databases will be searched including MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Reports with a focus on mental health virtual clinical simulation for health professional students will be mapped. Independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, then review the full texts of articles. Data from studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be presented in figures and tables, and described narratively. REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/r8tqh.

Quality improvement tools to manage deceased organ donation processes: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To collate and summarise the literature on the quality improvement tools that have been developed for deceased organ donation processes after circulatory determination of death and neurological determination of death. DESIGN: Scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. DATA SOURCES: We searched for published (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science) and unpublished literature (organ donation organisation websites worldwide). The search was initially conducted on 17 July 2021 and updated on 1 June 2022. Included articles discussed the creation and/or use of quality improvement tools to manage deceased organ donation processes. Two independent reviewers screened the references, extracted and analysed the data. RESULTS: 40 references were included in this review, and most records were written in English (n=38), originated in Canada (n=21), published between 2016 and 2022 (n=22), and were specific for donation after neurological determination of death (n=20). The tools identified included checklists, algorithms, flow charts, charts, pathways, decision tree maps and mobile apps. These tools were applied in the following phases of the organ donation process: (1) potential donor identification, (2) donor referral, (3) donor assessment and risk, (4) donor management, (5) withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, (6) death determination, (7) organ retrieval and (8) overall organ donation process. CONCLUSIONS: We conducted a thorough investigation of the available quality improvement tools for deceased organ donation processes. The existing evidence lacks details in the report of methods used for development, testing and impact of these tools, and we could not locate tools specific for some phases of the organ donation process. Lastly, by mapping existing tools, we aim to facilitate both clinician choices among available tools, as well as research work building on existing knowledge.

Wolfgang's Story: A Virtual Simulation Supporting Effective and Supportive Communication With an Older Gay Adult.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and Two-Spirit (LGBTQI2S) older adults face barriers to quality health care, often because practitioners misunderstand the unique health needs of this population. Education is essential to support nurses in maintaining culturally safe practice. Wolfgang's Story, a virtual simulation developed as an educational resource to address this need, focuses on an interaction between an older gay adult and a nurse during a health-care encounter, exploring the use of appropriate terminology, personal assumptions, biases, and key concepts related to heterosexism and to grief. The aim of the article is to report on the development, implementation, and evaluation of this project.