Characterisation of thymol effects on RDL receptors from the bee parasite Varroa destructor.

A major contributor to bee colony decline is infestation with its most devastating pest, the mite Varroa destructor. To control these mites, thymol is often used, although how it achieves this is not understood. One well-documented action of thymol is to modulate GABA-activated ion channels, which includes insect RDL receptors, a known insecticidal target. Here we have cloned two Varroa RDL subunits, one of which is similar to the canonical RDL subunit, while the other has some differences in M4, and, to a lesser extent, M2 and its binding site loops. Expression of this unusual RDL receptor in Xenopus oocytes reveals GABA-activated receptors, with an EC50 of 56 µM. In contrast to canonical RDL receptors, thymol does not enhance GABA-elicited responses in this receptor, and concentration response curves reveal a decrease in GABA Imax in its presence; this decrease is not seen when similar data are obtained from Apis RDL receptors. We conclude that an M2 T6'M substitution is primarily responsible for the different thymol effects, and suggest that understanding how and where thymol acts could assist in the design of novel bee-friendly miticides.

VUF10166, a novel compound with differing activities at 5-HT3A and 5-HT3AB receptors.

The actions of a novel, potent 5-HT3 receptor ligand, [2-chloro-(4-methylpiperazine-1-yl)quinoxaline (VUF10166)], were examined at heterologously expressed human 5-HT3A and 5-HT3AB receptors. VUF10166 displaced [³H]granisetron binding to 5-HT3A receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney cells with high affinity (K(i) = 0.04 nM) but was less potent at 5-HT3AB receptors (K(i) = 22 nM). Dissociation of [³H]granisetron in the presence of VUF10166 was best fit with a single time constant (t(1/2) = 53 min) at 5-HT3A receptors, but with two time constants (t(1/2) = 55 and 2.4 min) at 5-HT3AB receptors. Electrophysiological studies in oocytes revealed that VUF10166 inhibited 5-HT-induced responses at 5-HT3A receptors at nanomolar concentrations, but inhibition and recovery were too slow to determine an IC50. At 5-HT3AB receptors, inhibition and recovery were faster, yielding an IC50 of 40 nM. Cysteine substitutions in the complementary (-), but not the principal (+), face of the 5-HT3B subunit produced heteromeric receptors in which the actions of VUF10166 resembled those at homomeric receptors. At 5-HT3A receptors, VUF10166 at higher concentrations also behaved as a partial agonist (EC50 = 5.2 µM; R(max) = 0.24) but did not elicit significant responses at 5-HT3AB receptors at ≤100 µM. Thus, we propose that VUF10166 binds to the common A+A- site of both receptor types and to a second A+B- modulatory site in the heteromeric receptor. The ability of VUF10166 to distinguish between 5-HT3A and 5-HT3AB receptors could help evaluate differences between these receptor types and has potential therapeutic value.

Binding sites for bilobalide, diltiazem, ginkgolide, and picrotoxinin at the 5-HT3 receptor.

Bilobalide (BB), ginkgolide B (GB), diltiazem (DTZ), and picrotoxinin (PXN) are 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonists in which the principal sites of action are in the channel. To probe their exact binding locations, 5-HT(3) receptors with substitutions in their pore lining residues were constructed (N-4'Q, E-1'D, S2'A, T6'S, L7'T, L9'V, S12'A, I16'V, D20'E), expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and the effects of the compounds on 5-HT-induced currents were examined. EC(50) values at mutant receptors were less than 6-fold different from those of wild type, indicating that the mutations were well tolerated. BB, GB, DTZ, and PXN had pIC(50) values of 3.33, 3.14, 4.67, and 4.97, respectively. Inhibition by BB and GB was abolished in mutant receptors containing T6'S and S12'A substitutions, but their potencies were enhanced (42- and 125-fold, respectively) in S2'A mutant receptors. S2'A substitution also caused GB ligand trap. PXN potency was modestly enhanced (5-fold) in S2'A, abolished in T6'S, and reduced in L9'V (40-fold) and S12'A (7-fold) receptors. DTZ potency was reduced in L7'T and S12'A receptors (5-fold), and DTZ also displaced [(3)H]granisetron binding, indicating mixed competitive/noncompetitive inhibition. We conclude that regions close to the hydrophobic gate of M2 are important for the inhibitory effects of BB, GB, DTZ, and PXN at the 5-HT(3) receptor; for BB, GB, and PXN, the data show that the 6' channel lining residue is their major site of action, with minor roles for 2', 9', and 12' residues, whereas for DTZ, the 7' and 12' sites are important.

Cysteine modification reveals which subunits form the ligand binding site in human heteromeric 5-HT3AB receptors.

The ligand binding site of Cys-loop receptors is formed by residues on the principal (+) and complementary (-) faces of adjacent subunits, but the subunits that constitute the binding pocket in many heteromeric receptors are not yet clear. To probe the subunits involved in ligand binding in heteromeric human 5-HT(3)AB receptors, we made cysteine substitutions to the + and - faces of A and B subunits, and measured their functional consequences in receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. All A subunit mutations altered or eliminated function. The same pattern of changes was seen at homomeric and heteromeric receptors containing cysteine substitutions at A(R92) (- face), A(L126)(+), A(N128)(+), A(I139)(-), A(Q151)(-) and A(T181)(+), and these receptors displayed further changes when the sulphydryl modifying reagent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA) was applied. Modifications of A(R92C)(-)- and A(T181C)(+)-containing receptors were protected by the presence of agonist (5-HT) or antagonist (d-tubocurarine). In contrast modifications of the equivalent B subunit residues did not alter heteromeric receptor function. In addition a double mutant, A(S206C)(-)(/E229C)(+), only responded to 5-HT following DTT treatment in both homomeric and heteromeric receptors, indicating receptor function was inhibited by a disulphide bond between an A+ and an A- interface in both receptor types. Our results are consistent with binding to an A+A- interface at both homomeric and heteromeric human 5-HT(3) receptors, and explain why the competitive pharmacologies of these two receptors are identical.

Varenicline is a potent agonist of the human 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor.

Varenicline, a widely used and successful smoking cessation agent, acts as a partial agonist at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Here, we explore the effects of varenicline at human and mouse 5-Hydroxytryptamine(3) (5-HT(3)) receptors. Application of varenicline to human 5-HT(3) receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes reveal it is almost a full agonist (R(max) = 80%) with an EC(50) (5.9 µM) 3-fold higher than 5-HT. At mouse 5-HT(3) receptors varenicline is a partial agonist (R(max) = 35%) with an EC(50) (18 µM) 20-fold higher than 5-HT. Displacement of the competitive 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist [(3)H]granisetron reveals similar IC(50) values for varenicline at mouse and human receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, although studies in these cells using a membrane potential-sensitive dye show that again varenicline is a 4- or 35-fold less potent agonist than 5-HT in human and mouse receptors, respectively. Thus the data suggest that the efficacy, but not the affinity, of varenicline is greater at human 5-HT(3) receptors compared with mouse. Docking studies provide a possible explanation for this difference, because they suggest distinct orientations of the ligand in the mouse versus human 5-HT(3) agonist binding sites. Additional binding selectivity studies in a broad panel of recombinant receptors and enzymes confirmed an interaction with 5-HT(3) receptors but revealed no additional interactions of varenicline. Therefore, activation of human 5-HT(3) receptors may be responsible for some of the side effects that preclude use of higher doses during varenicline treatment.

Agonists and antagonists bind to an A-A interface in the heteromeric 5-HT3AB receptor.

The 5-HT3 receptor is a member of the Cys-loop family of transmitter receptors. It can function as a homopentamer (5-HT3A-only subunits) or as a heteropentamer. The 5-HT3AB receptor is the best characterized heteropentamer. This receptor differs from a homopentamer in its kinetics, voltage dependence, and single-channel conductance, but its pharmacology is similar. To understand the contribution of the 5-HT3B subunit to the binding site, we created homology models of 5-HT3AB receptors and docked 5-HT and granisetron into AB, BA, and BB interfaces. To test whether ligands bind in any or all of these interfaces, we mutated amino acids that are important for agonist and antagonist binding in the 5-HT3A subunit to their corresponding residues in the 5-HT3B subunit and vice versa. Changes in [3H]granisetron binding affinity (Kd) and 5-HT EC50 were determined using receptors expressed in HEK-293 cells and Xenopus oocytes, respectively. For all A-to-B mutant receptors, except T181N, antagonist binding was altered or eliminated. Functional studies revealed that either the receptors were nonfunctional or the EC50 values were increased. In B-to-A mutant receptors there were no changes in Kd, although EC50 values and Hill slopes, except for N170T mutant receptors, were similar to those for 5-HT3A receptors. Thus, the experimental data do not support a contribution of the 5-HT3B subunit to the binding pocket, and we conclude that both 5-HT and granisetron bind to an AA binding site in the heteromeric 5-HT3AB receptor.

Loop B is a major structural component of the 5-HT3 receptor.

The 5-HT(3) receptor belongs to a family of therapeutically important neurotransmitter-gated receptors whose ligand binding sites are formed by the convergence of six peptide loops (A-F). Here we have mutated 15 amino acid residues in and around loop B of the 5-HT(3) receptor (Ser-177 to Asn-191) to Ala or a residue with similar chemical properties. Changes in [3H]granisetron binding affinity (K(d)) and 5-HT EC(50) were determined using receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Substitutions at all but one residue (Thr-181) altered or eliminated binding for one or both mutants. Receptors were nonfunctional or EC(50) values were altered for all but two mutants (S182T, I190L). Homology modeling indicates that loop B contributes two residues to a hydrophobic core that faces into the beta-sandwich of the subunit, and the experimental data indicate that they are important for both the structure and the function of the receptor. The models also show that close to the apex of the loop (Ser-182 to Ile-190), loop B residues form an extensive network of hydrogen bonds, both with other loop B residues and with adjacent regions of the protein. Overall, the data suggest that loop B has a major role in maintaining the structure of the region by a series of noncovalent interactions that are easily disrupted by amino acid substitutions.

Antimalarial drugs inhibit human 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) but not GABA(C) receptors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antimalarial compounds have been previously shown to inhibit rodent nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) and 5-HT(3) receptors. Here, we extend these studies to include human 5-HT(3A), 5-HT(3AB), GABA(A) alpha1beta2, GABA(A) alpha1beta2gamma2 and GABA(C) rho1 receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We examined the effects of quinine, chloroquine and mefloquine on the electrophysiological properties of receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. KEY RESULTS: 5-HT(3A) receptor responses were inhibited by mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine with IC(50) values of 0.66, 1.06 and 24.3 microM. At 5-HT(3AB) receptors, the potencies of mefloquine (IC(50)=2.7 microM) and quinine (15.8 microM), but not chloroquine (23.6 microM), were reduced. Mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine had higher IC(50) values at GABA(A) alpha1beta2 (98.7, 0.40 and 0.46 mM, respectively) and GABA(A) alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors (0.38, 1.69 and 0.67 mM, respectively). No effect was observed at GABA(C) rho1 receptors. At all 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) receptors, chloroquine displayed competitive behaviour and mefloquine was non-competitive. Quinine was competitive at 5-HT(3A) and GABA(A) receptors, but non-competitive at 5-HT(3AB) receptors. Homology modelling in combination with automated docking suggested orientations of quinine and chloroquine at the GABA(A) receptor binding site. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The effects of mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine are distinct at GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors, whereas their effects on 5-HT(3AB) receptors are broadly similar to those at 5-HT(3A) receptors. IC(50) values for chloroquine and mefloquine at 5-HT(3) receptors are close to therapeutic blood concentrations required for malarial treatment, suggesting that their therapeutic use could be extended to include the treatment of 5-HT(3) receptor-related disorders.

The antimalarial drugs quinine, chloroquine and mefloquine are antagonists at 5-HT3 receptors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The antimalarial compounds quinine, chloroquine and mefloquine affect the electrophysiological properties of Cys-loop receptors and have structural similarities to 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists. They may therefore act at 5-HT(3) receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of quinine, chloroquine and mefloquine on electrophysiological and ligand binding properties of 5-HT(3A) receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells and Xenopus oocytes were examined. The compounds were also docked into models of the binding site. KEY RESULTS: 5-HT(3) responses were blocked with IC (50) values of 13.4 microM, 11.8 microM and 9.36 microM for quinine, chloroquine and mefloquine. Schild plots indicated quinine and chloroquine behaved competitively with pA (2) values of 4.92 (K (B)=12.0 microM) and 4.97 (K (B)=16.4 microM). Mefloquine displayed weakly voltage-dependent, non-competitive inhibition consistent with channel block. On and off rates for quinine and chloroquine indicated a simple bimolecular reaction scheme. Quinine, chloroquine and mefloquine displaced [(3)H]granisetron with K (i) values of 15.0, 24.2 and 35.7 microM. Docking of quinine into a homology model of the 5-HT(3) receptor binding site located the tertiary ammonium between W183 and Y234, and the quinoline ring towards the membrane, stabilised by a hydrogen bond with E129. For chloroquine, the quinoline ring was positioned between W183 and Y234 and the tertiary ammonium stabilised by interactions with F226. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that quinine and chloroquine competitively inhibit 5-HT(3) receptors, while mefloquine inhibits predominantly non-competitively. Both quinine and chloroquine can be docked into a receptor binding site model, consistent with their structural homology to 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists.

Discriminating between 5-HT3A and 5-HT3AB receptors.

The 5-HT3B subunit was first cloned in 1999, and co-expression with the 5-HT3A subunit results in heteromeric 5-HT3AB receptors that are functionally distinct from homomeric 5-HT3A receptors. The affinities of competitive ligands at the two receptor subtypes are usually similar, but those of non-competitive antagonists that bind in the pore often differ. A competitive ligand and allosteric modulator that distinguishes 5-HT3A from 5-HT3AB receptors has recently been described, and the number of non-competitive antagonists identified with this ability has increased in recent years. In this review, we discuss the differences between 5-HT3A and 5-HT3AB receptors and describe the possible sites of action of compounds that can distinguish between them.