Current UK practice of pre-operative risk assessment prior to neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Intra-cranial and spinal surgery is associated with significant morbidity (23.6% and 11.2%) (5) . Fully informed consent, shared decision-making and optimal peri-operative care are essential to ensure excellent surgical outcome. There is evidence to support the use of formal pre-operative risk assessment to facilitate this in non-cardiac surgery but little is published on best practice for neurosurgery. Our aim was to establish current practice in pre-operative risk assessment at UK Neurosciences centres. METHODS: A national peer-reviewed electronic structured survey on current practice of pre-operative risk assessment was conducted through the Neuroanaesthesia Society of Great Britain and Ireland or NASGBI in 2014. RESULTS: We received a response from every UK neurosciences centre. 85% of neurosurgical units offer pre-operative assessment or PAC for elective admissions with 32% of respondents performing formal risk assessment. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and its Portsmouth (P-POSSUM) modification were used most frequently. Although formal multi-disciplinary team discussions were conducted rarely following risk assessment, the results guided post-operative care and were used for consent. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey is the first of its kind in the UK for neurosciences. As expected, formal risk assessment and multi-disciplinary team discussion is not routine. Neurosurgery has a high risk of morbidity and mortality, and pre-operative risk assessment should therefore be considered in line with national recommendations. Further work is required to establish best practice in neurosurgery to ensure that patients are appropriately consented, and to improve standards of care and support surgical outcome data.

Value-based Care and Quality Improvement in Perioperative Neuroscience.

Value-based care and quality improvement are related concepts used to measure and improve clinical care. Value-based care represents the relationship between the incremental gain in outcome for patients and cost efficiency. It is achieved by identifying outcomes that are important to patients, codesigning solutions using multidisciplinary teams, measuring both outcomes and costs to drive further improvements, and developing partnerships across the health system. Quality improvement is focused on process improvement and compliance with best practice, and often uses "Plan-Do-Study-Act" cycles to identify, test, and implement change. Validated, standardized core outcome sets for perioperative neuroscience are currently lacking, but neuroanesthesiologists can consider using traditional clinical indicators, patient-reported outcomes measures, and perioperative core outcome measures. Several examples of bundled care solutions have been successfully implemented in perioperative neuroscience to increase value; for example, enhanced recovery for spine surgery, delirium reduction pathways, and same-day discharge craniotomy. This review proposes potential individual- and system-based solutions to address barriers to value-based care and quality improvement in perioperative neuroscience.

The Need for Head Protection Protocols for Craniectomy Patients during Rest, Transfers and Turning.

After craniectomy, patients are generally advised to wear a helmet when mobilising to protect the unshielded brain from damage. However, there exists limited guidance regarding head protection for patients at rest and when being transferred or turned. Here, we emphasise the need for such protocols and utilise evidence from several sources to affirm our viewpoint. A literature search was first performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE, looking for published material relating to head protection for patients post-craniectomy during rest, transfer or turning. No articles were identified using a wide-ranging search strategy. Next, we surveyed and interviewed staff and patients from our neurosurgical centre to ascertain how often their craniectomy site was exposed to external pressure and the precautions taken to prevent this. 59% of patients admitted resting in contact with the craniectomy site, in agreement with the observations of 67% of staff. In 63% of these patients, this occurred on a daily basis and for some, was associated with symptoms suggestive of raised intracranial pressure. 44% of staff did not use a method to prevent craniectomy site contact while 65% utilised no additional precautions during transfer or turning. 63% of patients received no information about avoiding craniectomy site contact upon discharge, and almost all surveyed wished for resting head protection if it were available. We argue that pragmatic guidelines are needed and that our results support this perspective. As such, we offer a simple, practical protocol which can be adopted and iteratively improved as further evidence becomes available in this area.

Using the Postoperative Morbidity Survey to Measure Morbidity After Cranial Neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of morbidity after cranial neurosurgery is significant, reported in up to a quarter of patients depending on methodology used. The Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) is a reliable method for identifying clinically relevant postsurgical morbidity using 9 organ system domains. The primary aim of this study was to quantify early morbidity after cranial neurosurgery using POMS. The secondary aims were to identify non-POMS-defined morbidity and association of POMS with postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective electronic health care record review was conducted for all patients who underwent elective or expedited major cranial surgery over a 3-month period. Postsurgical morbidity was quantified on postoperative days (D) 1, 3, 5, 8, and 15 using POMS. A Poisson regression model was used to test the correlation between LOS and total POMS scores on D1, 3 and 5. A further regression model was used to test the association of LOS with specific POMS domains. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included. POMS-defined morbidity was 40%, 30%, and 33% on D1, D3, and D8, respectively. The presence of POMS morbidity on these days was associated with longer median (range) LOS: D1 6 (1 to 49) versus 4 (2 to 45) days; D3 8 (4 to 89) versus 6 (4 to 35) days; D5 14 (5 to 49) versus 8.5 (6 to 32) days; D8 18 (9 to 49) versus 12.5 (9 to 32) days (P<0.05). Total POMS score correlated with overall LOS on D1 (P<0.001), D3 (P<0.001), and D5 (P<0.001). A positive response to the "infectious" (D1, 3), "pulmonary" (D1), and "renal" POMS items (D1) were associated with longer LOS. CONCLUSION: Although our data suggests that POMS is a useful tool for measuring morbidity after cranial neurosurgery, some important morbidity items that impact on LOS are missed. A neurosurgery specific tool would be of value.

Wellbeing of Frontline Health Care Workers After the First SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Surge at a Neuroscience Centre: A Cross-sectional Survey.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected people of all ages, races, and socioeconomic groups, and placed extraordinary stress on health care workers (HCWs). We measured the prevalence of burnout and assessed wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) in HCWs at a single UK neuroscience center after the first pandemic surge. METHODS: A 38-item electronic questionnaire was disseminated through local team email lists between May 22 and June 7, 2020, to HCWs in a university neurosciences center. Burnout was measured using the single-item Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalization scales, and wellbeing and QoL assessed using the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment Scale and the EuroQol-5 Dimension instrument. RESULTS: The response rate was 57.4% (n=234); 58.2% of respondents were nurses, 69.4% were women and 40.1% were aged 25 to 34 years. Overall, 21.4% of respondents reported burnout assessed by the Emotional Exhaustion scale; burnout was higher for nurses (23.5%) and allied health care professionals (22.5%) compared with doctors (16.4%). HCWs from ethnic minority groups reported a higher rate of burnout (24.5%) compared with white HCWs (15.0%). There were no differences in reported wellbeing or QoL between professional groups, or HCW age, sex, or race. Nurses (36.8%) and staff from ethnic minority groups (34.6%) were more fearful for their health than others. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the prevalence of HCW burnout after the first surge of the pandemic, with an increased risk of burnout among nurses and staff from ethnic minority groups. Both nursing and staff from ethnic minority groups were also more fearful for their health. With ongoing pandemic surges, the impact on HCW wellbeing should be continuously assessed to ensure that local strategies to support staff wellbeing are diverse and inclusive.

Repurposing a Neurocritical Care Unit for the Management of Severely Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation declared a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on March 11, 2020. Following activation of the UK pandemic response, our institution began planning for admission of COVID-19 patients to the neurointensive care unit (neuro-ICU) to support the local critical care network which risked being rapidly overwhelmed by the high number of cases. This report will detail our experience of repurposing a neuro-ICU for the management of severely ill patients with COVID-19 while retaining capacity for urgent neurosurgical and neurology admissions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective process analysis of the repurposing of a quaternary level neuro-ICU during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. We retrieved demographic data, diagnosis, and outcomes from the electronic health care records of all patients admitted to the ICU between March 1, 2020 and April 30, 2020. Processes for increase in surge capacity, reduction in ICU demand, and staff redeployment and rapid training are reported. RESULTS: Over a 10-day period, total ICU capacity was increased by 21.7% (from 23 to 28 beds) while the capacity to provide mechanical ventilation was increased by 77% (from 13 to 23 beds). There were 30 ICU admissions of 29 COVID-19 patients between March 1 and April 30, 2020; median (range) length of ICU stay was 9.9 (1.3 to 32) days, duration of mechanical ventilation 11 (1 to 27) days, and ICU mortality rate 41.4%. There was a 44% reduction in urgent neurosurgical and neurology admissions compared with the same period in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to repurpose a dedicated neuro-ICU for the management of critically ill non-neurological patients during a pandemic response, while maintaining access for urgent neuroscience referrals.

Early Postoperative Outcomes of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Results of a Service Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) are often elderly, frail and affected by multimorbidity. Treatment is surgical with cerebrospinal diversion shunts. The selection of patients that are of an acceptable level of risk to be treated surgically has been a matter of debate for years and has deprived some patients of life-changing surgery. The aim of this service evaluation was to investigate the preoperative risk factors and early postoperative morbidity of patients with NPH using a standardized postoperative survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive NPH patients admitted for neurosurgical management of NPH between May 2017 and May 2018 were included in this prospective service evaluation. In addition to the collection of traditional outcome measures, the cardiac version of the Postoperative Morbidity Survey (C-POMS) was conducted on postoperative days 4, 7, and 10 to identify postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (63 males, age mean±SD, 75±7 y) underwent 106 surgical procedures (61 lumbar drains, 45 ventriculoperitoneal shunts). There was no 30-day mortality and no unexpected return to the operating room or admission to intensive care unit. There was 1 conservatively managed surgical complication. On postoperative day 4, the C-POMS identified no postoperative morbidity in 72% of the patients, and mild morbidity (postoperative nausea and mobility issues) in 28%. There was a delay in discharge in 50% of the patients with no postoperative morbidity on day 4, highlighting areas of our service requiring improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative outcomes of NPH patients are good after both ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion and lumbar drainage. This evaluation provides initial evidence on the utility of the C-POMS as a service evaluation tool in the standardized assessment postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery patients.