Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
CMAJ ; 196(23): E779-E788, 2024 Jun 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885975

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The response of Canada's research community to the COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine the country's clinical health research ecosystem. We sought to describe patterns of enrolment across Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)-funded studies on COVID-19. METHODS: We identified COVID-19 studies funded by the CIHR and that enrolled participants from Canadian acute care hospitals between January 2020 and April 2023. We collected information on study-and site-level variables from study leads, site investigators, and public domain sources. We described and evaluated factors associated with cumulative enrolment. RESULTS: We obtained information for 23 out of 26 (88%) eligible CIHR-funded studies (16 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 7 cohort studies). The 23 studies were managed by 12 Canadian and 3 international coordinating centres. Of 419 Canadian hospitals, 97 (23%) enrolled a total of 28 973 participants - 3876 in RCTs across 78 hospitals (median cumulative enrolment per hospital 30, interquartile range [IQR] 10-61), and 25 097 in cohort studies across 62 hospitals (median cumulative enrolment per hospital 158, IQR 6-348). Of 78 hospitals recruiting participants in RCTs, 13 (17%) enrolled 50% of all RCT participants, whereas 6 of 62 hospitals (9.7%) recruited 54% of participants in cohort studies. INTERPRETATION: A minority of Canadian hospitals enrolled the majority of participants in CIHR-funded studies on COVID-19. This analysis sheds light on the Canadian health research ecosystem and provides information for multiple key partners to consider ways to realize the full research potential of Canada's health systems.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , COVID-19 , Humanos , Canadá/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Can Vet J ; 65(7): 692-697, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952758

RESUMEN

Objective: To determine if short-duration peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) cause a hypercoagulable state in healthy dogs, based on point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation monitor (VCM). Animals: Ten beagle dogs were randomly and equally allocated into control and PICC groups. Procedure: Control dogs had VCM analysis on whole blood following direct venipuncture before sedation (T0) and 2 h after sedation (T2). In the experimental group, a PICC was placed (medial saphenous or femoral vein) under sedation and removed after 4 h, with measurements before placement (T0) and 2 and 6 h after placement (T2 and T6, respectively). Parametric data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA with Holm-Sídák test for multiple comparisons and paired or unpaired Student's t-test. Nonparametric data were analyzed using Friedman test with Dunn multiple comparison test for Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test for PICC group, control group, and to compare PICC versus control groups, respectively. Results: Clot formation time was longer at T2 versus T6 (P = 0.0342, but not clinically relevant) in the PICC group, with no significant differences between the PICC and control groups. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Short-term placement of a PICC line did not alter viscoelastic endpoints in healthy beagles.


L'utilisation de courte durée d'un cathéter central inséré par voie périphérique n'affecte pas les paramètres viscoélastiques chez les chiens sains. Objectif: Déterminer si les cathéters centraux insérés par voie périphérique (CCIP) pour une courte durée provoque un état d'hypercoagulabilité chez des chiens en bonne santé sur la base des mesures du Viscoelastic Coagulation Monitor (VCM) au point de soins. Animaux: Dix chiens sains de race beagle ont été choisis et répartis de façon égale et aléatoire dans un groupe témoin et un groupe de CCIP. Procédure: Les chiens témoins ont eu une prise de sang et analyse par VCM avant sédation (T0) et 2 heures après la sédation (T2). Dans le groupe expérimental, un CCIP a été mis en place (veines saphènes ou fémorales médiales) sous sédation et retiré après 4 heures. Les mesures viscoélastiques sur le sang frais ont été effectuées avant la pose du CCIP (T0), 2 heures après la pose (T2) et 2 heures après le retrait/6 heures après la pose du cathéter (T6). L'analyse statistique des données paramétriques a été faite par le test ANOVA à un facteur avec un test de comparaisons multiples de Holm-Sídák pour le groupe CCIP, un test t de Student apparié pour le groupe témoin, et un test t de Student non apparié pour comparer les groupes CCIP et témoin. Les données non paramétriques ont été analysées à l'aide du test de Friedman avec un test de comparaison multiple de Dunn pour le groupe CCIP, du test de rang signé de Wilcoxon pour le groupe témoin et du test de Mann-Whitney U pour comparer les groupes CCIP et témoin. Résultats: Pour le groupe CCIP, le temps de formation du caillot à T2 était plus long mais non cliniquement pertinent. comparativement à T6 (P = 0,0342) et il n'y avait aucune différence significative entre les groupes CCIP et témoin. Conclusion et pertinence clinique: La pose d'un CCIP pour une courte durée n'a pas modifié les variables viscoélastiques chez les chiens beagle en bonne santé.(Traduit par les auteurs).


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Animales , Perros , Masculino , Femenino , Cateterismo Periférico/veterinaria , Cateterismo Venoso Central/veterinaria , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38351524

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the definitions of sepsis in human and veterinary medicine. DESIGN: International, multicenter position statement on the need for consensus definitions of sepsis in veterinary medicine. SETTING: Veterinary private practice and university teaching hospitals. ANIMALS: Dogs and cats. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition associated with the body's response to an infection. In human medicine, sepsis has been defined by consensus on 3 occasions, most recently in 2016. In veterinary medicine, there is little uniformity in how sepsis is defined and no consensus on how to identify it clinically. Most publications rely on modified criteria derived from the 1991 and 2001 human consensus definitions. There is a divergence between the human and veterinary descriptions of sepsis and no consensus on how to diagnose the syndrome. This impedes research, hampers the translation of pathophysiology insights to the clinic, and limits our abilities to optimize patient care. It may be time to formally define sepsis in veterinary medicine to help the field move forward. In this narrative review, we present a synopsis of prior attempts to define sepsis in human and veterinary medicine, discuss developments in our understanding, and highlight some criticisms and shortcomings of existing schemes. CONCLUSIONS: This review is intended to serve as the foundation of current efforts to establish a consensus definition for sepsis in small animals and ultimately generate evidence-based criteria for its recognition in veterinary clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos , Enfermedades de los Perros , Sepsis , Animales , Gatos , Perros , Enfermedades de los Gatos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/veterinaria , Sepsis/complicaciones
4.
Anim Microbiome ; 5(1): 64, 2023 Dec 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104116

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The gastrointestinal microbiome and metabolome vary greatly throughout the different segments of the gastrointestinal tract, however current knowledge of gastrointestinal microbiome and metabolome in health and disease is limited to fecal samples due to ease of sampling. The engineered Small Intestinal MicroBiome Aspiration (SIMBA™) capsule allows specific sampling of the small intestine in humans. We aimed to determine whether administration of SIMBA™ capsules to healthy beagle dogs could reliably and safely sample the small intestinal microbiome and metabolome when compared to their fecal microbiome and metabolome. RESULTS: Eleven beagle dogs were used for the study. Median transit time of capsules was 29.93 h (range: 23.83-77.88). Alpha diversity, as measured by the Simpson diversity, was significantly different (P = 0.048). Shannon diversity was not different (P = 0.114). Beta diversity results showed a significant difference between capsule and fecal samples regarding Bray-Curtis, weighted and unweighted unifrac (P = 0.002) and ANOSIM distance metric s (R = 0.59, P = 0.002). In addition to observing a statistically significant difference in the microbial composition of capsules and feces, distinct variation in the metabolite profiles was seen between the sample types. Heat map analysis showed 16 compounds that were significantly different between the 2 sampling modes (adj-P value ranged between 0.004 and 0.036) with 10 metabolites more abundant in the capsule than in the feces and 6 metabolites more abundant in the feces compared to the capsules. CONCLUSIONS: The engineered Small Intestinal MicroBiome Aspiration (SIMBA™) capsule was easy and safe to administer to dogs. Microbiome and metabolome analysis from the capsule samples were significantly different than that of the fecal samples and were like previously published small intestinal microbiome and metabolome composition.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA