RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In recent years, the approach to managing this malignancy has evolved toward embracing neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), backed by studies reporting its survival benefit. This study aimed to identify factors that contribute to disparities in NAT utilization and their impact on outcomes in patients with PDAC who underwent resection in Louisiana. METHODS: Data on diagnosed PDAC cases were obtained from the Louisiana Tumor Registry between 2000 and 2020. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounding factors in assessing the covariate relationships with NAT use. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine which factors were associated with survival. Chained multiple imputation was performed on covariates with missing data in multivariable regressions. RESULTS: The study encompassed 2121 patients who underwent resection for PDAC. Upon controlling for potential confounding variables, Black patients were on average 5.7% less likely to receive NAT than their White counterparts (ATE = 5.7, aOR= 0.56, 95% CI = 0.40-0.80, p = 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, there was a significant decrease in the risk of overall death for patients who received NAT (aHR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71-0.94, p = 0.006). There was no significant interaction between race and NAT for the risk of death. CONCLUSION: Black patients with PDAC were less likely to receive NAT before resection in Louisiana. Overall survival improved in patients who underwent NAT. These differences were independent of insurance status and poverty zip codes, and future investigations should identify modifiable barriers to access and receipt of NAT in patients with PDAC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lidocaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), but given its limited half-life, postoperative pain remains a significant concern for patients. Bupivacaine is used in various surgical subspecialty procedures and has demonstrated improved pain control compared with lidocaine. However, its role in MMS is insufficiently explored. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the current literature for reports on use of bupivacaine, traditional nonliposomal and newer liposomal formulations, for MMS. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. The MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were queried for articles presenting original data on the use of bupivacaine for MMS. RESULTS: Of 483 potentially relevant articles, 3 studies met final inclusion criteria, capturing a total of 253 patients involved in primary investigations comparing bupivacaine to traditional local anesthesia for MMS. Bupivacaine was well-tolerated and associated with comparable or modestly reduced intraoperative and postoperative pain and opioid use. CONCLUSION: Bupivacaine may have a role in prolonging intraoperative anesthesia, reducing acute postoperative pain, and reducing postoperative opioid use after MMS. However, large, prospective studies are needed to solidify the generalizability and clinical utility of these findings.