Factors associated with use of dental services among HIV-infected and high-risk uninfected women.

OBJECTIVES: The authors explored the frequency of dental care utilization and identified the main barriers to access to dental care among U.S. women with HIV infection and uninfected women at high risk of becoming infected. METHODS: The authors' prospective study included HIV-infected and uninfected women enrolled in the northern California and Chicago sites of the Women's Interagency HIV Study. A trained interviewer administered a standardized questionnaire to participants by phone. The authors explored subjects' utilization of dental care in relation to predisposing, enabling and need variables using both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The 363 participants were predominantly black and unemployed and had a history of using injected drugs. Not using dental care was most prevalent among HIV-negative women, particularly in Chicago. Multivariate analyses revealed that the strongest predictors of nonuse of dental care included being of a race other than white, fear of dentists and perception of poor or fair oral health. CONCLUSION: Women not infected with HIV but at high risk of developing the infection appear to have even greater unmet dental needs than do HIV-positive women. Being of a race other than white and fear of dentists are strong predictors of not using dental care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act facilitates dental care access for people who are HIV-positive, and is the likely explanation for the higher prevalence of dental care use in this group compared with uninfected women at high risk of becoming infected. This underscores the need for Medicaid to include dental coverage for low-income populations in all states.

Oral candidiasis as a marker of HIV disease progression among Zimbabwean women.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate oral disease prevalence among Zimbabwean women by HIV serostatus and CD4 cell count and to assess accuracy of oral disease diagnoses made by nurses as compared with an oral surgeon. METHODS: Standardized oral mucosa examinations were performed by trained nurse-examiners and by an oral surgeon among women recruited in Harare, Zimbabwe. RESULTS: A total of 461 women (320 HIV-infected, 141 uninfected) were seen by nurses and an oral surgeon within a 2-week period. Oral candidiasis (OC) was the most common lesion diagnosed in nearly one quarter of HIV-infected women, whereas hairy leukoplakia and Kaposi sarcoma were found in <3%. The prevalence of OC diagnosed by nurses or the surgeon was significantly higher among women with a CD4 count <200 cells/mm than in women with a CD4 count from 200 to 499 cells/mm3 or a CD4 count >499 cells/mm3. The sensitivity of nurse examinations compared with examinations by the oral surgeon among HIV-infected women for the diagnosis of OC was 73%, the specificity was 95%, and the kappa-statistic was 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: OC was the most common lesion in HIV-infected women and was strongly associated with a low CD4 cell count. Interexaminer agreement was good for the diagnosis of OC among HIV-infected women. This study suggests that OC may play a role, in combination with other clinical indicators as a marker of disease progression in resource-poor settings.