Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 90
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cell ; 157(5): 1104-16, 2014 May 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24855947

RESUMEN

Downregulation of the miR-143/145 microRNA (miRNA) cluster has been repeatedly reported in colon cancer and other epithelial tumors. In addition, overexpression of these miRNAs inhibits tumorigenesis, leading to broad consensus that they function as cell-autonomous epithelial tumor suppressors. We generated mice with deletion of miR-143/145 to investigate the functions of these miRNAs in intestinal physiology and disease in vivo. Although intestinal development proceeded normally in the absence of these miRNAs, epithelial regeneration after injury was dramatically impaired. Surprisingly, we found that miR-143/145 are expressed and function exclusively within the mesenchymal compartment of intestine. Defective epithelial regeneration in miR-143/145-deficient mice resulted from the dysfunction of smooth muscle and myofibroblasts and was associated with derepression of the miR-143 target Igfbp5, which impaired IGF signaling after epithelial injury. These results provide important insights into the regulation of epithelial wound healing and argue against a cell-autonomous tumor suppressor role for miR-143/145 in colon cancer.


Asunto(s)
Mucosa Intestinal/fisiología , MicroARNs/metabolismo , Animales , Neoplasias del Colon/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Sulfato de Dextran , Humanos , Proteína 5 de Unión a Factor de Crecimiento Similar a la Insulina/genética , Mucosa Intestinal/citología , Mesodermo/metabolismo , Ratones , MicroARNs/genética , Miofibroblastos/metabolismo , Comunicación Paracrina , Regeneración , Somatomedinas/metabolismo
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(1): 499-513, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37755565

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Performance of complex cancer surgeries at high-volume (HV) centers has been shown to reduce operative mortality. However, the case volume threshold that should be used to define HV centers is unknown. In this study, we determined thresholds to define HV pancreaticoduodenectomy, esophagectomy, and major lung resection centers based on clinical parameters. Then, we assessed the association of hospital volume with oncologic outcomes and overall survival. METHODS: We identified adult NCDB patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, esophagectomy, and major lung resections between 2004 and 2015. Multivariable models with restricted cubic splines were built to predict 5-year overall survival for each surgery group according to average yearly case volume, adjusting for demographic and clinicopathologic factors. The change point procedure was then used to identify volume cut-points for each surgery type. RESULTS: We identified the following thresholds to define HV status: 25 cases/year for pancreaticoduodenectomy; 18 cases/year for esophagectomy; and 54 cases/year for major lung resections. For all surgery types, treatment at a HV center was associated with an increased likelihood of R0 resection and adequate lymph node evaluation. HV centers had significantly decreased 30- and 90-day, postoperative mortality after adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbidities, histology, and stage. An overall survival benefit also was observed for patients undergoing resections at HV centers. CONCLUSIONS: Using novel methodology, our study identified volume thresholds for HV pancreaticoduodenectomy, esophagectomy, and major lung resection centers that were associated with improved oncologic outcomes and overall survival. These definitions of HV centers should be considered when evaluating regionalization of complex cancer care.


Asunto(s)
Esofagectomía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pulmón , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales de Alto Volumen
3.
HPB (Oxford) ; 26(2): 251-258, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37867083

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient- and hospital-level factors associated with outcomes following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) are well established. However, despite theoretical disruption in hepatopetal flow, the impact of cirrhosis on in-hospital mortality following PD is not well-studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and post-discharge disposition in patients with cirrhosis undergoing PD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (January 2002-August 2015) was conducted identifying patients undergoing PD. Using previously validated ICD-9-CM codes, patients were stratified into presence and absence of cirrhosis. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality following PD were analyzed adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors. Following PD were analyzed after adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors. RESULTS: In 16,344 patients that underwent PD, 203 (1.2 %) patients had underlying cirrhosis prior to resection. Overall in-hospital mortality following PD was significantly worse in the cirrhosis cohort (11.3 % vs. 3.6 %, p < 0.001). Patients with underlying cirrhosis were less likely to be discharged home (73.9 % vs. 83.2 %, p < 0.001) and had a longer median LOS (12.0 vs. 10.0 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of underlying cirrhosis is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, longer LOS, and decreased likelihood of home discharge following PD. Given the prohibitive risks, PD should not be performed in patients with underlying cirrhosis.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Alta del Paciente , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía
4.
HPB (Oxford) ; 26(2): 212-223, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37863740

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the association of patient-related factors such as race, socioeconomic status, and insurance on failure to rescue (FTR) after hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeries. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we analyzed 98,788 elective HPB surgeries between 2004 and 2017. Major and minor complications were identified using ICD9/10 codes. We evaluated mortality rates and FTR (inpatient mortality after major complications). We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess racial, socioeconomic, and demographic factors on FTR, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Overall, 43 % of patients (n = 42,256) had pancreatic operations, 36% (n = 35,526) had liver surgery, and 21% (n = 21,006) had biliary interventions. The overall major complication rate was 21% (n = 20,640), of which 8% (n = 1655) suffered FTR. Factors independently associated with increased risk for FTR were male sex, older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hispanic ethnicity, Asian or other race, lower income quartile, Medicare insurance, and southern region hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare insurance, male gender, Hispanic ethnicity, and lower income quartile were associated with increased risk for FTR. Efforts should be made to improve the identification and subsequent treatment of complications for those at high risk of FTR.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Demografía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria
5.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(7): 4377-4387, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36964844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) requires complex multidisciplinary care. European evidence suggests potential benefit from regionalization, however, data characterizing the ideal setting in the United States are sparse. Our study compares the significance of four hospital designations on guideline-concordant care (GCC) and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Texas Cancer Registry was queried for 17,071 patients with PDAC treated between 2004 and 2015. Clinical data were correlated with hospital designations: NCI designated (NCI), high volume (HV), safety net (SNH), and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accredited (ACS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression were used to assess associations with GCC [on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations]. Cox regression analysis assessed survival. RESULTS: Only 43% of patients received GCC. NCI had the largest associated risk reduction (HR 0.61, CI 0.58-0.65), followed by HV (HR 0.87, CI 0.83-0.90) and ACS (HR 0.91, CI 0.87-0.95). GCC was associated with a survival benefit in the full (HR 0.75, CI 0.69-0.81) and resected cohort (HR 0.74, CI 0.68-0.80). NCI (OR 1.52, CI 1.37-1.70), HV (OR 1.14, CI 1.05-1.23), and SNH (OR 0.78, CI 0.68-0.91) all correlated with receipt of GCC. For resected patients, ACS (OR 0.63, CI 0.50-0.79) and SNH (OR 0.50, CI 0.33-0.75) correlate with GCC. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 43% of patients received GCC. Treatment at NCI and HV correlated with improved GCC and survival. Including GCC as a metric in accreditation standards could impact survival for patients with PDAC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Texas/epidemiología , Hospitales , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
6.
J Transl Med ; 20(1): 116, 2022 03 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35255940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is being tested in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat advanced gastric cancer; however, little data exists regarding the efficacy of lenvatinib monotherapy. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are established by engrafting human tumors into immunodeficient mice. The generation of PDXs may be hampered by growth of lymphomas. In this study, we compared the use of mice with different degrees of immunodeficiency to establish PDXs from a diverse cohort of Western gastric cancer patients. We then tested the efficacy of lenvatinib in this system. METHODS: PDXs were established by implanting gastric cancer tissue into NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) or Foxn1nu (nude) mice. Tumors from multiple passages from each PDX line were compared histologically and transcriptomically. PDX-bearing mice were randomized to receive the drug delivery vehicle or lenvatinib. After 21 days, the percent tumor volume change (%Δvtumor) was calculated. RESULTS: 23 PDX models were established from Black, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, and Asian gastric cancer patients. The engraftment rate was 17% (23/139). Tumors implanted into NSG (16%; 18/115) and nude (21%; 5/24) mice had a similar engraftment rate. The rate of lymphoma formation in nude mice (0%; 0/24) was lower than in NSG mice (20%; 23/115; p < 0.05). PDXs derived using both strains maintained histologic and gene expression profiles across passages. Lenvatinib treatment (mean %Δvtumor: -33%) significantly reduced tumor growth as compared to vehicle treatment (mean %Δvtumor: 190%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Nude mice are a superior platform than NSG mice for generating PDXs from gastric cancer patients. Lenvatinib showed promising antitumor activity in PDXs established from a diverse Western patient population and warrants further investigation in gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Animales , Humanos , Ratones , Xenoinjertos , Ratones Endogámicos NOD , Ratones Desnudos , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
7.
Genes Dev ; 28(23): 2585-90, 2014 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25395662

RESUMEN

Down-regulation of miR-26 family members has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple malignancies. In some settings, including glioma, however, miR-26-mediated repression of PTEN promotes tumorigenesis. To investigate the contexts in which the tumor suppressor versus oncogenic activity of miR-26 predominates in vivo, we generated miR-26a transgenic mice. Despite measureable repression of Pten, elevated miR-26a levels were not associated with malignancy in transgenic animals. We documented reduced miR-26 expression in human colorectal cancer and, accordingly, showed that miR-26a expression potently suppressed intestinal adenoma formation in Apc(min/+) mice, a model known to be sensitive to Pten dosage. These studies reveal a tumor suppressor role for miR-26 in intestinal cancer that overrides putative oncogenic activity, highlighting the therapeutic potential of miR-26 delivery to this tumor type.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/fisiopatología , Carcinogénesis/genética , Neoplasias Intestinales/fisiopatología , MicroARNs/metabolismo , Adenoma/genética , Animales , Movimiento Celular , Proliferación Celular , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/citología , Mucosa Intestinal/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Intestinales/genética , Ratones , Ratones Transgénicos , MicroARNs/genética , Células Tumorales Cultivadas
8.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(5): 2831-2843, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33389294

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurate clinical staging (CS) of gastric cancer is critical for appropriate treatment selection and prognostication, but CS remains highly imprecise. Our study evaluates factors associated with inaccurate CS, the impact of inaccurate CS on outcomes, and utilization of adjuvant therapy in patients who are understaged. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of NCDB patients diagnosed with clinical early stage gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-2N0M0) between 2004 and 2016. Patients not undergoing upfront gastrectomy or with missing pathologic staging were excluded. Patients were classified as accurately staged, inaccurately staged with receipt of adjuvant therapy (IS+), and inaccurately staged with no receipt of adjuvant therapy (IS-). Logistic regression was utilized to assess the impact of factors on CS accuracy and receipt of adjuvant therapies. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of patients were inaccurately staged (IS). cT2, moderately/poorly differentiated, and site-overlapping tumors were associated with increased likelihood of being IS. Treatment at an academic facility was associated with decreased likelihood of understaging. Only 54% of patients who were IS received adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: Accurate CS of gastric cancer remains inadequate. Understaging is associated with detrimental effects on receiving guideline-concordant care and, possibly, patient outcomes. Targeted interventions reducing the proportion of understaged patients and ensuring receipt of appropriate therapy is needed to optimize outcomes. Patients with high-risk disease that are frequently understaged may benefit from selective neoadjuvant therapy. Centralization of gastric cancer care may also be a key strategy in improving receipt of guideline-concordant therapies.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
9.
J Surg Res ; 264: 481-489, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33857792

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatic angiosarcoma (AS) and hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) are rare primary hepatic vascular malignancies (PHVM) that remain poorly understood. To guide management, we sought to identify factors and trends predicting survival after surgical intervention using a national database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database patients with a diagnosis of PHVM were identified. Clinicopathologic factors were extracted and compared. Overall survival (OS) was estimated and predictors of survival were identified. RESULTS: Three hundred ninty patients with AS and 216 with HEHE were identified. Only 16% of AS and 36% of HEHE patients underwent surgery. The median OS for patients who underwent surgical intervention was 97 months, with 5-year OS of 30% for AS versus 69% for HEHE patients (P< 0.001). Tumor biology strongly impacted OS, with AS histology (Hazard Ratio [HR] of 3.61 [1.55-8.42]), moderate/poor tumor differentiation (HR = 3.86 [1.03-14.46]) and tumor size (HR = 1.01 [1.00-1.01]) conferring worse prognosis. The presence of metastatic disease in the surgically managed cohort (HR = 5.22 [2.01-13.57]) and involved surgical margins (HR = 3.87 [1.59-9.42]), were independently associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this national cohort of PHVM, tumor biology, in the form of angiosarcoma histology, tumor differentiation and tumor size, was strongly associated with worse survival after surgery. Additionally, residual tumor burden after resection, in the form of positive surgical margins or the presence of metastasis, was also negatively associated with survival. Long-term clinical outcomes remain poor for patients with the above high-risk features, emphasizing the need to develop effective forms of adjuvant systemic therapies for this group of malignancies.


Asunto(s)
Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/terapia , Hemangiopericitoma/terapia , Hemangiosarcoma/terapia , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/mortalidad , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/patología , Hemangiopericitoma/mortalidad , Hemangiopericitoma/patología , Hemangiosarcoma/mortalidad , Hemangiosarcoma/patología , Humanos , Hígado/irrigación sanguínea , Hígado/patología , Hígado/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasia Residual , Radioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
J Surg Res ; 267: 432-442, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34237628

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported healthcare disparities in the Texas-Mexico border population. Our aim was to evaluate treatment utilization and oncologic outcomes of colon cancer patients in this vulnerable population. METHODS: Patients with localized and regional colon cancer (CC) were identified in the Texas Cancer Registry (1995-2016). Clinicopathological data, hospital factors, receipt of optimal treatment, and overall survival (OS) were compared between Texas-Mexico Border (TMB) and the Non-Texas-Mexico Border (NTMB) cohorts. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with decreased survival. RESULTS: We identified 43,557 patients with localized/regional CC (9% TMB and 91% NTMB). TMB patients were more likely to be Hispanic (73% versus 13%), less likely to have private insurance (13% versus 21%), were more often treated at safety net hospitals (82% versus 22%) and less likely at ACS-CoC accredited hospitals (32% versus 57%). TMB patients were more likely to receive suboptimal treatment (21% versus 16%) and had a lower median OS for localized (8.58 versus 9.58 y) and regional colon cancer (5.75 versus 6.18 y, all P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, TMB status was not associated with worse OS. Factors associated with worse survival included receipt of suboptimal treatment, Medicare/insured status, and treatment in safety net and non-accredited ACS-CoC hospitals (all P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: While TMB CC patients had worse OS, TMB status itself was not found to be a risk factor for decreased survival. This survival disparity is likely associated with higher rate of suboptimal treatment, Medicare/Uninsured status, and decreased access to ACS-CoC accredited hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Medicare , Anciano , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , México , Texas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
11.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(8): 1365-1372, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34505295

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suffer symptoms of both end-stage liver disease and cancer. Palliative care (PC) enhances the quality of life via symptom control and even improves survival for some cancers. Our study characterized rates of PC utilization among metastatic HCC patients and determined factors associated with PC receipt. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of adult National Cancer Database patients diagnosed with metastatic HCC between 2004 and 2016. Chi-square tests were used to analyze two cohorts: those who received PC and those who did not. Logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of clinicodemographic factors on the likelihood of receiving PC. RESULTS: PC utilization was low at just 17%. Later year of diagnosis, insured status, and higher education level were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving PC. Treatment at academic centers or integrated network cancer programs increased the likelihood of receiving PC compared to treatment at a community center (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.33 and OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.07-1.45; respectively). Hispanics were significantly less likely to received PC than non-Hispanic Whites (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: PC utilization among patients with metastatic HCC remains low. Targeted efforts should be enacted to increase the delivery of PC in this group.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Calidad de Vida , Factores Socioeconómicos , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/secundario , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
12.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(7): 1051-1059, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34263460

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical presentation of gastric cancer varies between racial and ethnic groups. While historically studied as a monolithic population, the Hispanic ethnicity is comprised of heterogenous groups with considerable biologic, socioeconomic, and cultural variability; therefore, intragroup differences among Hispanic gastric cancer patients may have been overlooked in past research. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare Hispanic patients with gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015, by NCDB-reported location of patient ancestry. RESULTS: We identified a cohort of 3811 patients. There were higher proportions of females, patients with early disease onset, and stage 4 disease among patients of Mexican and South/Central American ancestry. Additionally, a significantly larger proportion of Mexican (15%) and South/Central American patients (11%) were diagnosed before age 40, in contrast to Cubans (2%), Dominicans (6%), and Puerto Ricans (3%; p < 0.0001). Mexican ancestry was independently associated with an increased rate of all-cause mortality at 5 years (hazard ratio: 1.34; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Significant clinical and epidemiological differences exist among Hispanic gastric cancer patients based on location of ancestry. Future data collection endeavors should strive to capture this granularity inherent to the Hispanic ethnicity.


Asunto(s)
Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/etnología , Adenocarcinoma/etnología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Renta , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Clase Social , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 27(6): 1997-2006, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31894482

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited research has been performed regarding pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) diagnosed in early-onset patients. This study defined early-onset disease as cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years and aimed to characterize the clinicopathologic factors associated with early- versus late-onset patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify early- and late-onset PDAC patients with cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2013. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The study enrolled 207,062 patients, including 12,137 early-onset patients (5.9%) and 194,925 late-onset patients (94.1%). The early-onset patients (stage 3 or 4 cancer) were more likely to present with a later stage of disease (62.1% vs. 55.2%; p < 0.001) and to be male (57.1% vs. 50.0%; p < 0.001) than those with late-onset PDAC. The early-onset patients also presented with a lower Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score (80.9% vs. 66.6% had a score of 0; p < 0.001) and received higher rates of treatment (22.8% vs. 40.1% received no treatment, p < 0.001) than the late-onset patients. Furthermore, early-onset PDAC was associated with improved OS among all the PDAC patients (9.2 vs. 6.0 months; p < 0.001) and among the surgically resected patients (27.3 vs. 24.3 months; p < 0.001). Early-onset PDAC also was found to be independently associated with improved OS after adjustment for other significant clinicopathologic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite features suggestive of aggressive tumor biology at presentation, early-onset PDAC was independently associated with better OS than late-onset PDAC among all patients and among curatively resected stage-matched patients.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
14.
Surg Endosc ; 34(2): 544-550, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31016458

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data-driven patient selection guidelines are not available to optimize outcomes in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD). We aimed to define risk factors associated with conversion from MIPD to open PD and to determine the impact of conversion on post-operative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of MIPD using NSQIP from 2014 to 2015. Propensity score was used to match patients who underwent completed MIPD to converted MIPD. RESULTS: 467 patients were included: 375 (80.3%) MIPD and 92 (19.7%) converted. Converted patients were more often male (64% vs. 52%, p = 0.030), had higher rates of dyspnea (10% vs. 3%, p = 0.009), underwent more vascular (44% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) or multivisceral resection (19% vs. 6%, p = 0.0005), and were more likely attempted laparoscopically compared to robotically (76% vs. 51%, p < 0.001). Robotic approach was independently associated with reduced risk of conversion (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.69), while male gender (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02-2.84), history of dyspnea (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.49-9.96), vascular resection (OR 4.32, 95% CI 2.53-7.37), and multivisceral resection (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.05-4.52) were associated with increased risk. Major complications were more common in converted patients (68% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). Converted patients had increased odds of non-home discharge (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.06-9.97) and an associated increased length of stay of 3 days (95% CI 0.1-6.7). CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of dyspnea or tumors requiring vascular or multivisceral resection were at increased risk of conversion, and the robotic platform was associated with a lower rate of conversion. Conversion was independently associated with increased overall complications, increased length of stay, and non-home discharge.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Anciano , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos
15.
Cancer ; 125(19): 3428-3436, 2019 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31299089

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fragmented cancer care (FC), or care received from multiple institutions, increases systemic health care costs and potentiates cancer care disparities. There is a paucity of data on mechanisms contributing to FC and the resulting effect on patient outcomes. This study characterized patient- and hospital-level factors associated with FC, time to treatment (TTT), and overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with HCC from 2004 to 2015 and receiving treatment were identified in the Texas Cancer Registry. Patient- and hospital-level factors were compared across 2 cohorts: an FC treatment group and a nonfragmented cancer care (NFC) treatment group. Covariate-adjusted treatment use and OS were compared between the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS: Among 4329 patients with HCC, 1185 (27.4%) received FC, and 3144 (72.6%) received NFC. Compared with NFC patients, FC patients had larger tumors (median size ≥4 cm, 52.6% vs 35.2%; P < .001), and a higher proportion had a regional/metastatic stage (35.9% vs 26.7%; P < .001). Among patients with localized disease, FC was associated with decreased odds of curative therapy (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-0.9). FC was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24) and increased TTT (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.7-0.8). In the subset of patients with localized-stage HCC who received curative therapy, FC was associated with worse OS (median survival, 67 vs 43 months; HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) and increased TTT (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.7-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: FC patients were less likely to undergo curative therapy when they were diagnosed at an early stage. After covariate adjustment, newly diagnosed patients with HCC receiving FC had worse OS and increased TTT.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Instituciones Oncológicas/economía , Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/economía , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Texas/epidemiología
17.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 26(1): 167-176, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30421058

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Two recent South Korean studies showed adjuvant therapy (AT) was not associated with improved survival in pT1N1 gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). We established the prognostic utility of lymph node status, determined the pattern of use of AT, and compared survival stratified by type of AT in pT1N1 GAC in a Western patient population. METHODS: We identified patients with pT1N0 and pT1N1 GAC using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2012. Clinicopathologic variables, treatment regimens, and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: We compared 4516 (86.6%) pT1N0 to 696 (13.4%) pT1N1 patients. pT1N1 tumors were larger (median size 2.5 vs. 1.8 cm, p < 0.001), more often poorly differentiated (56.2% vs. 39.6%, p < 0.001), and had higher median retrieved lymph nodes (RLN) (14 vs. 12, p < 0.001) compared with pT1N0. pT1N1 was associated with worse median overall survival (OS) (6.9 vs. 9.9 years for pT1N0, p < 0.001). pN1 was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84-2.56). Increased RLN was associated with improved OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.83). Among pT1N1 patients, 330 (47.4%) had observation (OBS), 77 (11.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), 68 (9.8%) received adjuvant radiation therapy (ART), and 221 (31.8%) received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (ACRT). ACT and ACRT were independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.65 and HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: pN1 was associated with worse survival and RLN ≥ 15 was associated with improved survival in pT1 GAC. ACT and ACRT were independently associated with improved survival in pT1N1 gastric cancer suggesting a valuable role in Western patients.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
J Surg Res ; 239: 253-260, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30856518

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pringle maneuver (PM) is used for inflow vascular control during hepatectomy, but its use remains controversial. We aimed to report its pattern of use and association with postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We identified hepatectomy patients using the liver-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2014-2016). Associations between PM and posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), receipt of blood transfusion, and total hospital length of stay (LOS) were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 7870 patients (74.9%) with no Pringle maneuver and 2632 (25.1%) with PM. PM patients were older (median age 61 versus 60 y, P = 0.002) and had higher ASA scores (76.1% versus 71.4% were ASA 3-4, P < 0.001). PM had more malignancy (83.0% versus 73.0%, P < 0.001), neoadjuvant therapy (37.7% versus 28.8%, P < 0.001), total lobectomy (30.6% versus 23.2%, P < 0.001), open resection (90.8% versus 74.9%, P < 0.001), and longer operations (246 min versus 212 min, P < 0.001). PM was associated with longer LOS (0.36 d, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.60) and increased risk of PHLF (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.66), although not clinically significant grade B/C PHLF (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.57-1.19), but was not associated with receipt of perioperative blood transfusions (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: PM is associated with similar clinically significant PHLF and transfusion requirements but longer LOS compared with no Pringle maneuver.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Fallo Hepático/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hepatectomía/métodos , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Hepático/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
J Surg Res ; 233: 360-367, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30502272

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Predictive models for nonhome discharge (NHD) have been proposed in major surgical specialties. The rates and risk factors associated with NHD and prolonged length of stay (PLOS) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for NHD and PLOS after CRS/HIPEC in a national cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CRS/HIPEC cases were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2011-2012 data set. Patients with an NHD or PLOS (>30 d) were compared with a group of patients discharged to home within 30 d. Univariate analysis was used to compare patient characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative complications among both groups. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of NHD and PLOS. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-six patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC were identified, of which 44 (7.9%) were not discharged to home within 30 d. The rate of NHD and PLOS in this cohort was 4.1% and 3.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age ≥65 y, pre-op albumin <3.0 g/dL, and having a multivisceral resection as independent predictors of NHD/PLOS. If all three predictors are met preoperatively, the probability of NHD/PLOS was calculated to be 30.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for NHD/PLOS after CRS/HIPEC were advanced age, hypoalbuminemia, and multivisceral resection. Adequate identification of these risk factors may facilitate preoperative discussion with patients, and improve discharge planning and resource utilization.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Peritoneo/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado de Transición/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
J Surg Oncol ; 119(3): 303-317, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30561818

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Periampullary adenocarcinoma (PAC) is stratified anatomically: ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA), distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC), duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aimed to determine differences in incidence, prognosis, and treatment in stage-matched PAC patients in a longitudinal study. METHODS: PAC patients were identified in The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2012. Clinicopathological variables were compared between subtypes. Covariate-adjusted treatment use and OS were compared. RESULTS: The 116 705 patients with PAC were identified: 1320 (9%) AA, 3732 (3%) DCC, 7142 (6%) DA, and 95 511 (82%) PDAC. DA, DCC, and PDAC were associated with worse survival compared with AA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.1-1.1; HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.4-1.6, and HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.8-1.9). Among resected patients, DA was associated with improved survival compared with AA (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67-0.75); DCC and PDAC were associated with worse survival (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.31-1.53 and HR, 2.041; 95% CI, 1.07-2.12). Resected AA, PDAC, and DA, but not DCC, demonstrated significantly improved survival over the studied period. While all patients had increased adjuvant therapy (AT) receipt over time (P < 0.001), only patients with PDAC had increased neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) receipt ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Resected PDAC, AA, and DA were associated with clinically significant improved survival over time, mirroring a concurrent associated increased receipt of AT.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Ampolla Hepatopancreática/patología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/epidemiología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Colangiocarcinoma/epidemiología , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Texas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA