Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Neurol ; 20(1): 140, 2020 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32299370

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Presently, for patients presenting with suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) who undergo temporary drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) there is no defined model to differentiate chance improvement form clinical significance change at the individual patient level. To address this lack of information we computed standard regression based clinical change models for the 10 Meter Walk Test, Timed Up & Go, Dual Timed Up & Go, 6-Minute Walk Test, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Symbol Digit Modalities using data from patients with suspected NPH that underwent temporary drainage of CSF. These clinically significant change modes can classify clinically significant improvement following temporary drainage of CSF at the individual patient level. This allows for physicians to differentiate a clinically significant improvement in symptoms from chance improvement. METHODS: Data was collected from 323 patients, over the age of 60, with suspected NPH that underwent temporary drainage of CSF with corresponding gait and cognitive testing. McSweeney Standardized Regression Based Clinical Change Models were computed for standard gait and cognitive measures: Timed Up & Go, Dual Timed Up & Go, 10 Meter Walk Test, MiniBESTest, 6-Minute Walk Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test. To assess the discriminate validity of the measures we used correlations, Chi2, and regression analyses. RESULTS: The clinical change models explained 69-91.8% of the variability in post-drain performance (p <  0.001). As patient scores became more impaired, the percent change required for improvement to be clinically significant increased for all measures. We found that the measures were not discriminate, the Timed Up & Go was highly related to the 10 Meter Walk Test (r = 0.85, R2 = 0.769-0.738, p <  0.001), MiniBESTest (r = - 0.67, R2 = 0.589-0.734, p <  0.001), and 6 Minute Walk Test (r = - 0.77, R2 = 0.71-0.734, p <  0.001). CONCLUSION: Standardized Regression Based Clinically Significant Change Models allow for physicians to use an evidence-based approach to differentiate clinically significant change from chance improvement at the individual patient level. The Timed Up & Go was shown to be predictive of detailed measures of gait velocity, balance, and endurance.


Asunto(s)
Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Marcha , Hidrocéfalo Normotenso/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Drenaje , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Neurosurg Pediatr ; 32(5): 553-561, 2023 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37657100

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors describe their 10-year single-institution experience with single-step complete corpus callosotomy (CCC) for seizure management in pediatric and adult patients with catastrophic, medically refractory, nonlocalizing epilepsy at Advent Health Orlando. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective observational study of patients aged 6 months to 49 years who underwent clinically indicated CCC for drug-resistant nonlocalizing epilepsy at Advent Health Orlando between July 2011 and July 2021. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 10 years. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients (57% of whom were male) who met eligibility criteria, 81 were pediatric patients and 20 were ≥ 18 years. All patients had seizures that appeared poorly lateralized on both electroencephalograms and clinical semiological studies. Of 54 patients with drop seizures before CCC, 29 (54%) achieved stable freedom from drop seizures after CCC. Of the 101 patients, 14 (13.9%) experienced stable resolution of all types of clinical seizures (International League Against Epilepsy classes 1 and 2). The most common postoperative neurological complication was a transient disconnection syndrome, observed in 50% of patients; of those patients, 73% experienced syndrome resolution within 2 months after surgery, and all resolved by the 2-year follow-up. Formal neuropsychological test results were stable in 13 patients assessed after CCC. CONCLUSIONS: CCC is an effective and well-tolerated palliative surgical technique. In this study, drop attacks were reduced after CCC but could recur for the first time as late as 44 months after surgery. Other seizure types were also reduced postoperatively but could recur for the first time as late as 28 months after surgery. Nearly 14% of patients achieved stable and complete freedom from seizures after CCC. Re-evaluation after CCC can reveal lateralized seizure onset in some patients.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria , Epilepsia , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cuerpo Calloso/cirugía , Epilepsia/cirugía , Convulsiones/etiología , Convulsiones/cirugía , Epilepsia Refractaria/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias
3.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 207: 106810, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34280677

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of the study was to assess the effect comorbid Parkinson syndromes have on results of CSF tap test (TT) and shunt outcomes for patients presenting with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH). We hypothesized that patients with possible NPH and comorbid Parkinson syndromes with Positive DaT scans will not respond to CSF TT at the same rate as patients without comorbid Parkinson syndromes. Additionally, we followed a small number of patients with positive DaT scans who were shunted to assess long term outcome of comorbid Parkinson syndromes. METHODS: Medical records and neurological exams of 251 patients were reviewed. In our analysis 101 patients with no parkinsonian symptoms and no DaT scans were included as a control group, there were 52 patients with DaT scans, 31 patients were positive (DaT-P). Gait measures were assessed before and after CSF TT using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test or paired t-tests were used. To compare the effect of DaT-P and Control, we used an ANCOVA controlling for age, sex, assistive device used, and past medical history effecting gait. RESULTS: There was not a significant difference in response between Control and DaT-P group. The Control group improved on timed up and go (TUG) by 14.82%, DualTUG 16.35%, 10-meter Walk Test (10MWT) 18.13%, MiniBEST 15.91%, and 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT) 13.96%, while the DaT-P group improved on TUG by 14.93%, DualTUG 17.24%, 10MWT 22.68%, MiniBEST 18.07%, and 6MWT 16.06%. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that patients with possible NPH and suspected comorbid movement disorder, showed similar improvement after diagnostic CSF TT compared to participants with no parkinsonian symptoms present on exam. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: Data relevant to the study will be made available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.


Asunto(s)
Hidrocéfalo Normotenso/complicaciones , Hidrocéfalo Normotenso/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Punción Espinal/métodos , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA