RESUMEN
The convergence of digital pathology and artificial intelligence could assist histopathology image analysis by providing tools for rapid, automated morphological analysis. This systematic review explores the use of artificial intelligence for histopathological image analysis of digitised central nervous system (CNS) tumour slides. Comprehensive searches were conducted across EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane Library up to June 2023 using relevant keywords. Sixty-eight suitable studies were identified and qualitatively analysed. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) criteria. All the studies were retrospective and preclinical. Gliomas were the most frequently analysed tumour type. The majority of studies used convolutional neural networks or support vector machines, and the most common goal of the model was for tumour classification and/or grading from haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides. The majority of studies were conducted when legacy World Health Organisation (WHO) classifications were in place, which at the time relied predominantly on histological (morphological) features but have since been superseded by molecular advances. Overall, there was a high risk of bias in all studies analysed. Persistent issues included inadequate transparency in reporting the number of patients and/or images within the model development and testing cohorts, absence of external validation, and insufficient recognition of batch effects in multi-institutional datasets. Based on these findings, we outline practical recommendations for future work including a framework for clinical implementation, in particular, better informing the artificial intelligence community of the needs of the neuropathologist.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central , Humanos , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/patología , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Informed consent is an essential process in clinical decision-making, through which healthcare providers educate patients about benefits, risks, and alternatives of a procedure. Statistical risk information is difficult to communicate and the effectiveness of aids aimed at supporting this type of communication is uncertain. This systematic review aims to study the impact of risk communication adjuncts on patients' understanding of statistical risk in surgery and interventional procedures. METHODS: A systematic search was performed across Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science until July 2021 with a repeated search in September 2022. RCTs and observational studies examining risk communication tools (e.g., information leaflets and audio-video) in adult (age >16) patients undergoing a surgical or interventional procedure were included. Primary outcomes included the objective assessment of statistical risk recall. Secondary outcomes included patient attitudes with respect to statistical information. Due to the study heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 4348 articles were identified, and following abstract and full-text screening 14 articles, including 9 RCTs, were included. The total number of adult patients was 1513. The most common risk communication tool used was written information (n = 7). Most RCTs (7/9, 77.8%) showed statistically significant improvements in patient understanding of statistical risk in the intervention group. Quality assessment found some concerns with all RCTs. CONCLUSION: Risk communication tools appear to improve recall of statistical risk. Additional prospective trials comparing various aids simultaneously are warranted to determine the most effective method of improving understanding.
Asunto(s)
Consentimiento Informado , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Medición de Riesgo , Comprensión , ComunicaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Accessible patient information sources are vital in educating patients about the benefits and risks of spinal surgery, which is crucial for obtaining informed consent. We aim to assess the effectiveness of a natural language processing (NLP) pipeline in recognizing surgical procedures from clinic letters and linking this with educational resources. METHODS: Retrospective examination of letters from patients seeking surgery for degenerative spinal disease at a single neurosurgical center. We utilized MedCAT, a named entity recognition and linking NLP, integrated into the electronic health record (EHR), which extracts concepts and links them to systematized nomenclature of medicine-clinical terms (SNOMED-CT). Investigators reviewed clinic letters, identifying words or phrases that described or identified operations and recording the SNOMED-CT terms as ground truth. This was compared to SNOMED-CT terms identified by the model, untrained on our dataset. A pipeline linking clinic letters to patient-specific educational resources was established, and precision, recall, and F1 scores were calculated. RESULTS: Across 199 letters the model identified 582 surgical procedures, and the overall pipeline after adding rules a total of 784 procedures (precision = 0.94, recall = 0.86, F1 = 0.91). Across 187 letters with identified SNOMED-CT terms the integrated pipeline linking education resources directly to the EHR was successful in 157 (78%) patients (precision = 0.99, recall = 0.87, F1 = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: NLP accurately identifies surgical procedures in pre-operative clinic letters within an untrained subspecialty. Performance varies among letter authors and depends on the language used by clinicians. The identified procedures can be linked to patient education resources, potentially improving patients' understanding of surgical procedures.
Asunto(s)
Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Systematized Nomenclature of MedicineRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative synthesis of the survival outcomes for patients with skull base chordomas, focusing on the role of 1) the extent of resection (gross-total [GTR] vs non-GTR), 2) the type of surgery (primary vs revision), 3) tumor histology, and 4) the different use of adjuvant therapies (proton beam radiotherapy [PBRT], photon radiotherapy [RT], or none). METHODS: A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies describing adult and pediatric patient cohorts harboring skull base chordomas were included. The primary outcome measures were represented by the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The main intervention effects were represented by the extent of resection (GTR vs non-GTR), type of surgical excision (primary vs revision surgeries), tumor histology, and the different use of adjuvant therapies (PBRT, RT, or none). The pooled estimates were calculated using random forest models. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case series. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-four studies were identified through a database and register search. After study selection, 51 studies and 3871 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall 5-year OS rate was 73%, which increased to 84% among patients undergoing GTR. The overall 5-year PFS rate was 52%, increasing to 74% for patients receiving GTR. The 5-year OS and PFS rates for patients undergoing PBRT were 86% and 71%, compared with 71% and 54% for patients receiving RT, and 55% and 25% when no adjuvant treatments were used. Patients undergoing their first surgery had 2.13-fold greater chances of being disease-free and 1.4-fold greater chances of being alive at 5 years follow-up compared with patients who received a revision surgery. Patients harboring chondroid chordomas had 1.13- and 1.9-fold greater chances of being alive at 5 years compared with patients with conventional and de-differentiated chordomas, respectively. The overall risk of bias was low in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this comprehensive meta-analysis highlight the tremendous impact of GTR and adjuvant PBRT on improving OS and PFS of patients harboring skull base chordomas, with better survival rates demonstrated for patients with chondroid tumors. Even in experienced hands, the rate of surgical morbidity remains high. Proper management in high-volume centers is mandatory to reach the expected resection goal at the first surgical attempt and to reduce surgical morbidity. The introduction of the endoscopic endonasal approach was related to improved surgical and functional outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Cordoma , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/radioterapia , Cordoma/cirugía , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the performance of ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM), with human neurosurgical applicants in a neurosurgical national selection interview, to assess the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and LLMs in healthcare and provide insights into their integration into the field. METHODS: In a prospective comparative study, a set of neurosurgical national selection-style interview questions were asked to eight human participants and ChatGPT in an online interview. All participants were doctors currently practicing in the UK who had applied for a neurosurgical National Training Number. Interviews were recorded, anonymised, and scored by three neurosurgical consultants with experience as interviewers for national selection. Answers provided by ChatGPT were used as a template for a virtual interview. Interview transcripts were subsequently scored by neurosurgical consultants using criteria utilised in real national selection interviews. Overall interview score and subdomain scores were compared between human participants and ChatGPT. RESULTS: For overall score, ChatGPT fell behind six human competitors and did not achieve a mean score higher than any individuals who achieved training positions. Several factors, including factual inaccuracies and deviations from expected structure and style may have contributed to ChatGPT's underperformance. CONCLUSIONS: LLMs such as ChatGPT have huge potential for integration in healthcare. However, this study emphasises the need for further development to address limitations and challenges. While LLMs have not surpassed human performance yet, collaboration between humans and AI systems holds promise for the future of healthcare.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A scoping review of the literature was conducted to identify intraoperative artificial intelligence (AI) applications for robotic surgery under development and categorize them by (1) purpose of the applications, (2) level of autonomy, (3) stage of development, and (4) type of measured outcome. BACKGROUND: In robotic surgery, AI-based applications have the potential to disrupt a field so far based on a master-slave paradigm. However, there is no available overview about this technology's current stage of development and level of autonomy. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched between January 1, 2010 and May 21, 2022. Abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers. The level of autonomy was defined according to the Yang and colleagues' classification and stage of development according to the Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment, and Long-term follow-up framework. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine studies were included in the review. Ninety-seven studies (75%) described applications providing Robot Assistance (autonomy level 1), 30 studies (23%) application enabling Task Autonomy (autonomy level 2), and 2 studies (2%) application achieving Conditional autonomy (autonomy level 3). All studies were at Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment, and Long-term follow-up stage 0 and no clinical investigations on humans were found. One hundred sixteen (90%) conducted in silico or ex vivo experiments on inorganic material, 9 (7%) ex vivo experiments on organic material, and 4 (3%) performed in vivo experiments in porcine models. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical evaluation of intraoperative AI applications for robotic surgery is still in its infancy and most applications have a low level of autonomy. With increasing levels of autonomy, the evaluation focus seems to shift from AI-specific metrics to process outcomes, although common standards are needed to allow comparison between systems.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Animales , Porcinos , Inteligencia Artificial , BenchmarkingRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma is a common neurologic disorder that is especially prevalent among older people. The effect of dexamethasone on outcomes in patients with chronic subdural hematoma has not been well studied. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial in the United Kingdom that enrolled adult patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma. The patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 2-week tapering course of oral dexamethasone, starting at 8 mg twice daily, or placebo. The decision to surgically evacuate the hematoma was made by the treating clinician. The primary outcome was a score of 0 to 3, representing a favorable outcome, on the modified Rankin scale at 6 months after randomization; scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). RESULTS: From August 2015 through November 2019, a total of 748 patients were included in the trial after randomization - 375 were assigned to the dexamethasone group and 373 to the placebo group. The mean age of the patients was 74 years, and 94% underwent surgery to evacuate their hematomas during the index admission; 60% in both groups had a score of 1 to 3 on the modified Rankin scale at admission. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis that excluded the patients who withdrew consent for participation in the trial or who were lost to follow-up, leaving a total of 680 patients, a favorable outcome was reported in 286 of 341 patients (83.9%) in the dexamethasone group and in 306 of 339 patients (90.3%) in the placebo group (difference, -6.4 percentage points [95% confidence interval, -11.4 to -1.4] in favor of the placebo group; P = 0.01). Among the patients with available data, repeat surgery for recurrence of the hematoma was performed in 6 of 349 patients (1.7%) in the dexamethasone group and in 25 of 350 patients (7.1%) in the placebo group. More adverse events occurred in the dexamethasone group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma, most of whom had undergone surgery to remove their hematomas during the index admission, treatment with dexamethasone resulted in fewer favorable outcomes and more adverse events than placebo at 6 months, but fewer repeat operations were performed in the dexamethasone group. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme; Dex-CSDH ISRCTN number, ISRCTN80782810.).
Asunto(s)
Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Hematoma Subdural Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Personas con Discapacidad , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Hematoma Subdural Crónico/complicaciones , Hematoma Subdural Crónico/mortalidad , Hematoma Subdural Crónico/cirugía , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Transsphenoidal surgery is an established treatment for pituitary adenomas. We examined outcomes and time points following transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma to identify reporting heterogeneity within the literature. METHODS: A systematic review of studies that reported outcomes for transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma 1990-2021 were examined. The protocol was registered a priori and adhered to the PRISMA statement. Studies in English with > 10 patients (prospective) or > 500 patients (retrospective) were included. RESULTS: 178 studies comprising 427,659 patients were included. 91 studies reported 2 or more adenoma pathologies within the same study; 53 studies reported a single pathology. The most common adenomas reported were growth hormone-secreting (n = 106), non-functioning (n = 101), and ACTH-secreting (n = 95); 27 studies did not state a pathology. Surgical complications were the most reported outcome (n = 116, 65%). Other domains included endocrine (n = 104, 58%), extent of resection (n = 81, 46%), ophthalmic (n = 66, 37%), recurrence (n = 49, 28%), quality of life (n = 25, 19%); and nasal (n = 18, 10%). Defined follow up time points were most reported for endocrine (n = 56, 31%), extent of resection (n = 39, 22%), and recurrence (n = 28, 17%). There was heterogeneity in the follow up reported for all outcomes at different time points: discharge (n = 9), < 30 days (n = 23), < 6 months (n = 64), < 1 year (n = 23), and > 1 year (n = 69). CONCLUSION: Outcomes and follow up reported for transsphenoidal surgical resection of pituitary adenoma are heterogenous over the last 30 years. This study highlights the necessity to develop a robust, consensus-based, minimum, core outcome set. The next step is to develop a Delphi survey of essential outcomes, followed by a consensus meeting of interdisciplinary experts. Patient representatives should also be included. An agreed core outcome set will enable homogeneous reporting and meaningful research synthesis, ultimately improving patient care.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adenoma/cirugía , Adenoma/patología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el PacienteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Heterogeneous reporting in baseline variables in patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma precludes meaningful meta-analysis. We therefore examined trends in reported baseline variables, and degree of heterogeneity of reported variables in 30 years of literature. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed and Embase was conducted on studies that reported outcomes for transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma 1990-2021. The protocol was registered a priori and adhered to the PRISMA statement. Full-text studies in English with > 10 patients (prospective), > 500 patients (retrospective), or randomised trials were included. RESULTS: 178 studies were included, comprising 427,659 patients: 52 retrospective (29%); 118 prospective (66%); 9 randomised controlled trials (5%). The majority of studies were published in the last 10 years (71%) and originated from North America (38%). Most studies described patient demographics, such as age (165 studies, 93%) and sex (164 studies, 92%). Ethnicity (24%) and co-morbidities (25%) were less frequently reported. Clinical baseline variables included endocrine (60%), ophthalmic (34%), nasal (7%), and cognitive (5%). Preoperative radiological variables were described in 132 studies (74%). MRI alone was the most utilised imaging modality (67%). Further specific radiological baseline variables included: tumour diameter (52 studies, 39%); tumour volume (28 studies, 21%); cavernous sinus invasion (53 studies, 40%); Wilson Hardy grade (25 studies, 19%); Knosp grade (36 studies, 27%). CONCLUSIONS: There is heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline variables in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. This review supports the need to develop a common data element to facilitate meaningful comparative research, trial design, and reduce research inefficiency.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Humanos , Adenoma/cirugía , Adenoma/patología , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The postoperative recurrence of cystic lesions of the sella is frequent and may require further surgery for re-drainage. OBJECTIVE: To tackle this problem, we propose to insert a small cross-shaped drain coursing from the cyst lumen to the suprasellar cistern. At this early stage of innovation, the technique is primarily intended for patients who present with a recurrence. METHODS: The cruciform drain is fashioned from the tip of a ventricular catheter and is inserted under endoscopic vision. We retrospectively reviewed the pre- and postoperative records of patients in whom this technique was implemented. RESULTS: A cruciform drain was placed in five patients since the introduction of the technique into our practice in 2018. The use of the cruciform drain did not impact upon the expected surgical workflow nor was it associated with adverse intraoperative events, but three patients did develop a postoperative CSF leak that was successfully treated in all cases. None of the patients showed re-collection of their cysts on early radiological follow-up. CONCLUSION: The cruciform drain is intended to prevent the renewed build-up of cystic fluid by allowing it to flow through and around the drain into the subarachnoid space. We have modified our repair protocol in response to the observed high CSF leak rate, as a basis for further development of the technique. Studies involving long-term follow-up will also be required to assess its efficacy in reducing cyst recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Quistes , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Endoscopía/métodos , Drenaje , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
Microsurgery serves as the foundation for numerous operative procedures. Given its highly technical nature, the assessment of surgical skill becomes an essential component of clinical practice and microsurgery education. The interaction forces between surgical tools and tissues play a pivotal role in surgical success, making them a valuable indicator of surgical skill. In this study, we employ six distinct deep learning architectures (LSTM, GRU, Bi-LSTM, CLDNN, TCN, Transformer) specifically designed for the classification of surgical skill levels. We use force data obtained from a novel sensorized surgical glove utilized during a microsurgical task. To enhance the performance of our models, we propose six data augmentation techniques. The proposed frameworks are accompanied by a comprehensive analysis, both quantitative and qualitative, including experiments conducted with two cross-validation schemes and interpretable visualizations of the network's decision-making process. Our experimental results show that CLDNN and TCN are the top-performing models, achieving impressive accuracy rates of 96.16% and 97.45%, respectively. This not only underscores the effectiveness of our proposed architectures, but also serves as compelling evidence that the force data obtained through the sensorized surgical glove contains valuable information regarding surgical skill.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Microcirugia , Microcirugia/educación , Microcirugia/métodos , Competencia Clínica , Guantes QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To extend the IDEAL framework for device innovation, IDEAL-D, to include the preclinical stage of development (stage 0). BACKGROUND: In previous work, the IDEAL collaboration has proposed frameworks for new surgical techniques and complex therapeutic technologies, the central tenet being that development and evaluation can and should proceed together in an ordered and logical manner that balances innovation and safety. METHODS: Following agreement at the IDEAL Collaboration Council, a multidisciplinary working group was formed comprising 12 representatives from healthcare, academia, industry, and a patient advocate. The group conducted a series of discussions following the principles used in the development of the original IDEAL framework. Importantly, IDEAL aims for maximal transparency, optimal validity in the evaluation of primary effects, and minimization of potential risk to patients or others. The proposals were subjected to further review and editing by members of the IDEAL Council before a final consensus version was adopted. RESULTS: In considering which studies are required before a first-in-human study, we have: (1) classified devices according to what they do and the risks they carry, (2) classified studies according to what they show about the device, and (3) made recommendations based on the principle that the more invasive and high risk a device is, the greater proof required of their safety and effectiveness before progression to clinical studies (stage 1). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed recommendations for preclinical evaluation of medical devices represent a proportionate and pragmatic approach that balances the de-risking of first-in-human translational studies against the benefits of rapid translation of new devices into clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Equipos y Suministros , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Diseño de Equipo , Seguridad de Equipos , Equipos y Suministros/clasificación , Humanos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Hyponatraemia is a common complication following transsphenoidal surgery. However, there is sparse data on its optimal management and impact on clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management and outcome of hyponatraemia following transsphenoidal surgery. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was searched over a 4-year period between January 2016 and December 2019, to identify all patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. A retrospective case-note review was performed to extract data on hyponatraemia management and outcome. RESULTS: Hyponatraemia occurred in 162 patients (162/670; 24.2%) with a median age of 56 years. Female gender and younger age were associated with hyponatraemia, with mean nadir sodium being 128.6 mmol/L on postoperative day 7. Hyponatraemic patients had longer hospital stay than normonatraemic group with nadir sodium being inversely associated with length of stay (p < 0.001). In patients with serum sodium ≤ 132 mmol/L, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) was the commonest cause (80/111; 72%). Among 76 patients treated with fluid restriction as a monotherapy, 25 patients (25/76; 32.9%) did not achieve a rise in sodium after 3 days of treatment. Readmission with hyponatraemia occurred in 11 cases (11/162; 6.8%) at a median interval of 9 days after operation. CONCLUSION: Hyponatraemia is a relatively common occurrence following transsphenoidal surgery, is associated with longer hospital stay and risk of readmission and the effectiveness of fluid restriction is limited. These findings highlight the need for further studies to better identify and treat high-risk patients, including the use of arginine vasopressin receptor antagonists.
Asunto(s)
Hiponatremia , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH , Antagonistas de los Receptores de Hormonas Antidiuréticas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Hiponatremia/epidemiología , Hiponatremia/etiología , Hiponatremia/terapia , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/complicaciones , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sodio/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Depending on severity of presentation, pituitary apoplexy can be managed with acute surgery or non-operatively. We aim to assess long-term tumour control, visual and endocrinological outcomes following pituitary apoplexy with special emphasis on patients treated non-operatively. METHODS: Multicentre retrospective cohort study. All patients with symptomatic pituitary apoplexy were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1: surgery within 7 days; group 2: surgery 7 days-3 months; group 3: non-operative. Further intervention for oncological reasons during follow-up was the primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included visual and endocrinological function at last follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were identified with mean follow-up of 48 months (n = 61 group 1; n = 34 group 2; n = 64 group 3). Factors influencing decision for surgical treatment included visual acuity loss (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.02-6.10), oculomotor nerve palsy (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.08-7.25) and compression of chiasm on imaging (OR: 9.50; 95% CI: 2.06-43.73). Treatment for tumour progression/recurrence was required in 17%, 37% and 24% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.07). Urgent surgery (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.04-0.59) and tumour regression on follow-up (OR: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.04-0.36) were independently associated with long-term tumour control. Visual and endocrinological outcomes were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Urgent surgery is an independent predictor of long-term tumour control following pituitary apoplexy. However, 76% of patients who successfully complete 3 months of non-operative treatment may not require any intervention in the long term.
Asunto(s)
Apoplejia Hipofisaria , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Apoplejia Hipofisaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Apoplejia Hipofisaria/cirugía , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background. Ultrasound has been explored as an alternative, less bulky, less time-consuming and less expensive means of intraoperative imaging in pituitary surgery. However, its use has been limited by the size of its probes relative to the transsphenoidal corridor. We developed a novel prototype that is more slender than previously reported forward-viewing probes and, in this report, we assess its feasibility and safety in an initial patient cohort. Method. The probe was integrated into the transsphenoidal approach in patients with pituitary adenoma, following a single-centre prospective proof of concept study design, as defined by the Innovation, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-Term Study (IDEAL) guidelines for assessing innovation in surgery (IDEAL stage 1 - Idea phase). Results. The probe was employed in 5 cases, and its ability to be used alongside the standard surgical equipment was demonstrated in each case. No adverse events were encountered. The average surgical time was 20 minutes longer than that of 30 contemporaneous cases operated without intraoperative ultrasound. Conclusion. We demonstrate the safety and feasibility of our novel ultrasound probe during transsphenoidal procedures to the pituitary fossa, and, as a next step, plan to integrate the device into a surgical navigation system (IDEAL Stage 2a - Development phase).
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenoma/cirugía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Microcirugia , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal management of craniopharyngiomas remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: To examine temporal trends in the management of craniopharyngioma with a focus on endocrine outcomes. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, multicentre study. Patients treated between 1951 and 2015 were identified and divided into four quartiles. Demographics, presentation, treatment and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: In total, 142 patients with childhood-onset craniopharyngioma (48/142; 34%) and adult-onset disease (94/142; 66%) were included. The median follow-up was 15 years (IQR 5-23 years). Across quartiles, there was a significant trend towards using transsphenoidal surgery (P < .0001). The overall use of radiotherapy was not different among the four quartiles (P = .33). At the latest clinical review, the incidence of GH, ACTH, gonadotrophin deficiencies and anterior panhypopituitarism fell significantly across the duration of the study. Anterior panhypopituitarism was not affected by treatment modality (surgery vs surgery and radiotherapy) (P = .23). There was no difference in the incidence of high BMI (≥25 kg/m2 ) among the four quartiles (P = .14). BMI was higher in patients who treated with surgery and radiotherapy than those treated with surgery only (P = .006). Tumour regrowth occurred in 51 patients (51/142; 36%) with no difference in regrowth among quartiles over the time course of the study (P = .15). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate a significant reduction in panhypopituitarism in craniopharyngioma patients over time, most likely because of a trend towards more transsphenoidal surgery. However, long-term endocrine sequelae remain common and lifelong follow-up is required.
Asunto(s)
Craneofaringioma , Hipopituitarismo , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Adulto , Niño , Craneofaringioma/radioterapia , Craneofaringioma/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipopituitarismo/etiología , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transsphenoidal surgery is the gold standard for pituitary adenoma resection. Although rare, a serious complication of surgery is worsened vision post-operatively. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials (VEP) is a safe, reproducible, and effective technological adjunct in predicting postoperative visual function. METHODS: The PubMed and OVID platforms were searched between January 1993 and December 2020 to identify publications that (1) featured patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, (2) used intraoperative optic nerve monitoring with VEP and (3) reported on safety or effectiveness. Reference lists were cross-checked and expert opinion sought to identify further publications. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included comprising ten case series and one prospective cohort study. All employed techniques to improve reliability. No safety issues were reported. The only comparative study included described a statistically significant improvement in post-operative visual field testing when VEP monitoring was used. The remaining case-series varied in conclusion. In nine studies, surgical manipulation was halted in the event of a VEP amplitude decrease suggesting a widespread consensus that this is a warning sign of injury to the anterior optic apparatus. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited and low-quality published evidence regarding intra-operative VEP monitoring, our review suggests that it is a safe, reproducible, and increasingly effective technique of predicting postoperative visual deficits. Further studies specific to transsphenoidal surgery are required to determine its utility in protecting visual function in the resection of complex pituitary tumours.
Asunto(s)
Potenciales Evocados Visuales , Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Visión/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is widely believed to have had a major impact on the care of patients with pituitary disease. The virus itself may directly result in death, and patients with adrenal insufficiency, often a part of hypopituitarism, are thought to represent a particularly susceptible subgroup. Moreover, even in patients that do not contract the virus, the diversion of resources by healthcare institutions to manage the virus may indirectly result in delays in their management. To this end, the aim of this study was to determine the direct and indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with pituitary disease. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was adopted, with all adult patients seen by our pituitary service in the year prior to the nationwide lockdown on March 23rd 2020 invited to participate in a telephone survey. RESULTS: In all, 412 patients (412/586; 70.3%) participated in the survey. 66 patients (66/412; 16.0%) reported having suspected COVID-19 infection. Of the 10 patients in this group tested for COVID-19 infection, three received a positive test result. No deaths due to COVID-19 were identified. 267 patients (267/412; 64.8%) experienced a delay or change in the planned care for their pituitary disease, with 100 patients (100/412; 24.3%) perceiving an impact to their care. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst only a small percentage of patients had confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection, over half were still indirectly impacted by the pandemic through a delay or change to their planned care.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud , Pandemias , Enfermedades de la Hipófisis/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distanciamiento Físico , Enfermedades de la Hipófisis/epidemiología , Cuarentena , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea (CSFR) remains a frequent complication of endonasal approaches to pituitary and skull base tumours. Watertight skull base reconstruction is important in preventing CSFR. We sought to systematically review the current literature of available skull base repair techniques. METHODS: Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for studies (2000-2020) that (a) reported on the endonasal resection of pituitary and skull base tumours, (b) focussed on skull base repair techniques and/or postoperative CSFR risk factors, and (c) included CSFR data. Roles, advantages and disadvantages of each repair method were detailed. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed where possible. RESULTS: 193 studies were included. Repair methods were categorised based on function and anatomical level. There was absolute heterogeneity in repair methods used, with no independent studies sharing the same repair protocol. Techniques most commonly used for low CSFR risk cases were fat grafts, fascia lata grafts and synthetic grafts. For cases with higher CSFR risk, multilayer regimes were utilized with vascularized flaps, gasket sealing and lumbar drains. Lumbar drain use for high CSFR risk cases was supported by a randomised study (Oxford CEBM: Grade B recommendation), but otherwise there was limited high-level evidence. Pooled CSFR incidence by approach was 3.7% (CI 3-4.5%) for transsphenoidal, 9% (CI 7.2-11.3%) for expanded endonasal, and 5.3% (CI 3.4-7%) for studies describing both. Further meaningful meta-analyses of repair methods were not performed due to significant repair protocol heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Modern reconstructive protocols are heterogeneous and there is limited evidence to suggest the optimal repair technique after pituitary and skull base tumour resection. Further studies are needed to guide practice.
Asunto(s)
Rinorrea de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/etiología , Endoscopía , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Surgical workflow analysis seeks to systematically break down operations into hierarchal components. It facilitates education, training, and understanding of surgical variations. There are known educational demands and variations in surgical practice in endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches to pituitary adenomas. Through an iterative consensus process, we generated a surgical workflow reflective of contemporary surgical practice. METHODS: A mixed-methods consensus process composed of a literature review and iterative Delphi surveys was carried out within the Pituitary Society. Each round of the survey was repeated until data saturation and > 90% consensus was reached. RESULTS: There was a 100% response rate and no attrition across both Delphi rounds. Eighteen international expert panel members participated. An extensive workflow of 4 phases (nasal, sphenoid, sellar and closure) and 40 steps, with associated technical errors and adverse events, were agreed upon by 100% of panel members across rounds. Both core and case-specific or surgeon-specific variations in operative steps were captured. CONCLUSIONS: Through an international expert panel consensus, a workflow for the performance of endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection has been generated. This workflow captures a wide range of contemporary operative practice. The agreed "core" steps will serve as a foundation for education, training, assessment and technological development (e.g. models and simulators). The "optional" steps highlight areas of heterogeneity of practice that will benefit from further research (e.g. methods of skull base repair). Further adjustments could be made to increase applicability around the world.