RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fibula free flaps (FFF) are one of the most common bony flaps utilized. This paper describes a quality improvement project aimed at increasing early ambulation. METHODS: A review of FFF patients at an academic hospital was completed (2014-2023). In 2018, an institutional change to encourage early ambulation without placement of a boot was made. Changes in hospital disposition and physical therapy outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients underwent FFF reconstruction. There was a statistically significant lower length of stay in Group 2 (early ambulation, no boot) (8.1 vs. 9.4; p = 0.04). A higher rate of discharge to a skilled nursing facility was noted in Group 1 (delayed ambulation with boot) (21.3% vs. 11.9%; p = 0.009). A higher proportion of patients in Group 2 demonstrated independence during bed mobility, transfers, and gait (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Early ambulation without boot placement after FFF is associated with decreased length of hospital stay, improved disposition to home and physical therapy outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Tiempo de Internación , Ambulación Precoz , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) is a versatile flap with the ability to reconstruct complex defects. We detail the techniques necessary to harvest an OCRFFF, including an outline on making 90-degree osteotomies to maximize bone harvest. In this pictorial essay, we provide illustrations of the anatomy and surgical techniques necessary for OCRFFF harvest. Detailed discussion is provided on how to protect the perforators to the bone and the approach to making osteotomies in a 90-degree fashion. The approach for prophylactic plating of the radius to prevent radius fractures is outlined. A case presentation on the real-life utilization of this flap is included. The OCRFFF is an excellent head and neck reconstructive option. While there are limitations to its use for patients requiring dental rehabilitation or long/anterior mandibular defects, for the right patient and indication it has shown great success in reconstructive efforts.
Asunto(s)
Antebrazo , Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Femenino , Humanos , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Antebrazo/cirugía , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Osteotomía/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Radio (Anatomía)/cirugía , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
The osteocutaneous radial forearm (OCRFF) is a versatile free flap option for bony defects of the head and neck, given the thinness and pliability of the forearm cutaneous paddle, pedicle length, reliability, lack of atherosclerosis, and functional concerns common to other osseous donor sites. The OCRFF was once associated with a high risk of radial fracture, in addition to concerns about the quality and durability of bone stock for osseous reconstruction, particularly for the mandible. Following the introduction of prophylactic plating of the radius, the incidence of symptomatic radial fracture has drastically decreased. Furthermore, modifications of the bony osteotomies and other evolutions of this flap harvest have increased the use of the OCRFF throughout the head and neck. Despite these advantages, the OCRFF is not widely utilized by microvascular reconstructive surgeons due to perceived limitations and risks. Herein, we present a multidisciplinary, contemporary review of the harvest technique, outcomes, and perioperative management for the OCRFF.
Asunto(s)
Antebrazo , Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Humanos , Antebrazo/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Radio (Anatomía)/cirugía , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) affects approximately 0.86% of the population, with surgical resection as the treatment of choice. A 4D computed tomography (CT) is a highly effective tool in localizing parathyroid adenomas; however, there is currently no defined role for 4D CT when stratified against ultrasonography (USG) and nuclear medicine Technetium Sestamibi SPECT/CT (SES) imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Study. SETTING: University Hospital. METHODS: All patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT between 2014 and 2019 at a single institution were reviewed. Patients who had a 4D CT were included. We compared outcomes of 4D CT as a second line imaging modality to those of USG and SES as first line modalities. An imaging algorithm was proposed based on these findings. RESULTS: There were 84 patients identified who had a 4D CT after unsuccessful first line imaging. A 4D CT localized parathyroid adenoma to the correct quadrant in 64% of cases, and to the correct laterality in 75% of cases. Obese patients had significantly lower rates of adenoma localization with USG (33.4%), compared to non-obese patients (67.5%; P = .006). In determining multigland disease the sensitivity of 4D CT was 86%, while the specificity was 87%. CONCLUSIONS: A 4D CT has impressive rates of accurate localization of parathyroid adenomas; however due to the radiation exposure involved, it should remain a second line imaging modality. PHPT patients should first be evaluated with USG, with 4D CT used if this is unsuccessful and patients are greater than 40 years old, have a high BMI, or are having revision surgery.
Asunto(s)
Hiperparatiroidismo Primario , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides , Humanos , Adulto , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/cirugía , Glándulas Paratiroides , Tomografía Computarizada Cuatridimensional/métodos , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Paratiroidectomía/métodos , Radiofármacos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Large language model (LLM)-based chatbots such as ChatGPT have been publicly available and increasingly utilized by the general public since late 2022. This study sought to investigate ChatGPT responses to common patient questions regarding Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-institutional study, with data collected from high volume institutions that perform >50 transoral robotic surgery cases per year. The 100 most recent discussion threads including the term "HPV" on the American Cancer Society's Cancer Survivors Network's Head and Neck Cancer public discussion board were reviewed. The 11 most common questions were serially queried to ChatGPT 3.5; answers were recorded. A survey was distributed to fellowship trained head and neck oncologic surgeons at 3 institutions to evaluate the responses. RESULTS: A total of 8 surgeons participated in the study. For questions regarding HPV contraction and transmission, ChatGPT answers were scored as clinically accurate and aligned with consensus in the head and neck surgical oncology community 84.4% and 90.6% of the time, respectively. For questions involving treatment of HPV+ OPC, ChatGPT was clinically accurate and aligned with consensus 87.5% and 91.7% of the time, respectively. For questions regarding the HPV vaccine, ChatGPT was clinically accurate and aligned with consensus 62.5% and 75% of the time, respectively. When asked about circulating tumor DNA testing, only 12.5% of surgeons thought responses were accurate or consistent with consensus. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT 3.5 performed poorly with questions involving evolving therapies and diagnostics-thus, caution should be used when using a platform like ChatGPT 3.5 to assess use of advanced technology. Patients should be counseled on the importance of consulting their surgeons to receive accurate and up to date recommendations, and use LLM's to augment their understanding of these important health-related topics.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirugía , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Importance: As the incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) continues to rise in the US, an increasing number of patients are being treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Readmission following surgery can potentially delay initiation of adjuvant treatment and affect survival outcomes. Objective: To identify risk factors for 30-day postoperative readmission in patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study used data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2017. All patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes and included. Exclusion criteria were age younger than 18 years or incomplete information regarding index admission or readmission. The analysis was performed from April to October 2023. Exposure: TORS for OPSCC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with 30-day readmission. Covariates included demographics and medical comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, hospital characteristics, and surgical details. Trends in readmission over time, reasons for readmission, and characteristics of the readmission were also examined. Results: A weighted total of 5544 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [0.25] years; 4475 [80.7%] male) underwent TORS for OPSCC. The overall readmission rate was 17.5% (n = 971), and these rates decreased over the study period (50 of 211 patients [23.7%] in 2010 vs 58 of 633 patients [9.1%] in 2017). Risk factors associated with readmission included male sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.07-2.20) and a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (AOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.28-4.58). Factors associated with decreased rate of readmission included undergoing concurrent selective neck dissection (AOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.41). Among the 971 readmissions, the most common readmission diagnoses were bleeding (151 [15.6%]), electrolyte and digestive problems (44 [4.5%]), pneumonia (44 [4.5%]), and sepsis (26 [2.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, readmission rates following TORS for oropharynx cancer decreased over time; however, a subset of patients required readmission most commonly related to bleeding, infection, and electrolyte imbalance. Concurrent neck dissection may be protective against readmission. Elucidation of risk factors for readmission after TORS for OPSCC offers opportunities for evidence-based shared decision-making, quality improvement initiatives, and improved patient counseling.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Femenino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Readmisión del Paciente , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , ElectrólitosRESUMEN
Objective: Describe the preoperative decision-making, intraoperative electrocochleographic (ECoG) findings, and outcome of cochlear implantation (CI) in a patient with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) and normal pure-tone thresholds. Patients: A 19-year-old with a history of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and seizures was referred for hearing rehabilitation in the setting of typical hearing by pure tone audiometry but poor speech understanding. A diagnosis of ANSD was made based on acoustic brainstem response (ABR), distortion product otoacoustic emission, and acoustic reflex testing. Imaging revealed no central cause of hearing impairment. Interventions: Right-sided CI. Main Outcome Measures: Preoperative and postoperative audiometric data. Intraoperative ECoG. Results: Preoperatively the patient underwent comprehensive audiologic testing with behavioral audiometry, ABR testing, and CI candidacy evaluation. In the right ear, the pure tone average (PTA) was 15 dB and word recognition score was 36%. ABR confirmed ANSD. Preoperative CNC and AzBio in quiet were 8% and 0%, respectively. Intraoperative ECoG amplitudes and audiometry showed responses in the 100 uV range and estimated PTA of 42 dB HL. Postoperative testing at 1-month post-initial activation revealed PTA of 45 dB HL and unchanged word and sentence scores. However, the patient cites an improved ability to communicate and increased confidence and averages over 14 hours of device use daily. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of CI in an ear with normal PTA. Given that nearly all presently available ECoG data comes from patients with greater degrees of hearing loss, this unique case adds to our understanding of hearing preservation in CI.