Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 29(10): 1987-95, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24728472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Growth failure is common among children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We examined the relationship of growth parameters with glomerular filtration rate (GFR), CKD diagnosis, sex and laboratory results in children with CKD. METHODS: Baseline data from 799 children (median age 11.0 years, median GFR 49.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) participating in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children Study were examined. Growth was quantified by age-sex-specific height, weight, body mass index (BMI-age), and height-age-sex-specific BMI (BMI-height-age) standard deviation scores (SDS). RESULTS: Median height and weight SDS were -0.55 [interquartile range (IQR) -1.35 to 0.19] and 0.03 (IQR -0.82 to 0.97), respectively. Girls with non-glomerular CKD were the shortest (median height SDS -0.83; IQR -1.62 to -0.02). Compared to those with a serum bicarbonate (CO2) level of ≥ 22 mEq/L, children with CO2 of <18 mEq/L had a height SDS that was on average 0.67 lower [95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.31 to -1.03]. Only 23 % of children with a height SDS of ≤-1.88 were prescribed growth hormone therapy. Forty-six percent of children with glomerular CKD were overweight or obese (BMI-height-age ≥ 85th percentile). CONCLUSIONS: Growth outcomes in a contemporary cohort of children with CKD remain suboptimal. Interventions targeting metabolic acidosis and overcoming barriers to recombinant human growth hormone usage may improve growth in this population.


Asunto(s)
Estatura , Índice de Masa Corporal , Trastornos del Crecimiento/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Adolescente , Peso Corporal , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 24(5): 735-40, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22898931

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Benign joint hypermobility syndrome may be a risk factor for pelvic floor disorders. It is unknown whether hypermobility impacts the progress of childbirth, a known risk factor for pelvic floor disorders. Our objective was to investigate the association between joint hypermobility syndrome, obstetrical outcomes, and pelvic floor disorders. Our hypotheses were: (1) women with joint hypermobility are less likely to experience operative delivery and prolonged second-stage labor; and (2) pelvic floor disorders are associated with benign hypermobility syndrome, controlling for obstetrical history. METHODS: Joint hypermobility was measured in 587 parous women (participants in a longitudinal cohort study of pelvic floor disorders after childbirth). Their obstetrical histories were obtained from review of hospital records. Pelvic floor disorders were assessed using validated questionnaires and a structured examination for prolapse. Joint hypermobility and pelvic floor disorders were evaluated at enrollment (5-10 years after first delivery). We compared obstetrical outcomes and pelvic floor disorders between women with and without joint hypermobility, defined as a Beighton score ≥ 4. RESULTS: Hypermobility was diagnosed in 46 women (7.8 %) and was associated with decreased odds of cesarean after complete cervical dilation or operative vaginal delivery [odds ratio (OR)=0.51; 95 % confidence interval (CI):0.27-0.95]. Anal sphincter laceration was unlikely to occur in women with hypermobility (OR=0.19; 95 % CI 0.04-0.80). However, hypermobility was not associated with any pelvic floor disorder considered. CONCLUSIONS: Benign joint hypermobility syndrome may facilitate spontaneous vaginal birth but does not appear to be a risk factor for pelvic floor disorders in the first decade after childbirth.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/complicaciones , Trabajo de Parto/fisiología , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Maryland/epidemiología , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/epidemiología , Embarazo
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 207(5): 425.e1-6, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22831810

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term impact of anal sphincter laceration on anal incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: Five to 10 years after first delivery, anal incontinence and other bowel symptoms were measured with the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire and the short form of the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire. Obstetric exposures were assessed with review of hospital records. Symptoms and quality-of-life impact were compared among 90 women with at least 1 anal sphincter laceration, 320 women who delivered vaginally without sphincter laceration, and 527 women who delivered by cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Women who sustained an anal sphincter laceration were most likely to report anal incontinence (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.26) and reported the greatest negative impact on quality of life. Anal incontinence and quality-of-life scores were similar between women who delivered by cesarean section and those who delivered vaginally without sphincter laceration. CONCLUSION: Anal sphincter laceration is associated with anal incontinence 5-10 years after delivery.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/lesiones , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Laceraciones/complicaciones , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Incontinencia Fecal/psicología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Laceraciones/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 119(2 Pt 1): 233-9, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22227639

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether episiotomy, perineal laceration, and operative delivery are associated with pelvic floor disorders after vaginal childbirth. METHODS: This is a planned analysis of data for a cohort study of pelvic floor disorders. Participants who had experienced at least one vaginal birth were recruited 5-10 years after delivery of their first child. Obstetric exposures were classified by review of hospital records. At enrollment, pelvic floor outcomes, including stress incontinence, overactive bladder, anal incontinence, and prolapse symptoms were assessed with a validated questionnaire. Pelvic organ support was assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the relative odds of each pelvic floor disorder by obstetric history, adjusting for relevant confounders. RESULTS: Of 449 participants, 71 (16%) had stress incontinence, 45 (10%) had overactive bladder, 56 (12%) had anal incontinence, 19 (4%) had prolapse symptoms, and 64 (14%) had prolapse to or beyond the hymen on examination. Forceps delivery increased the odds of each pelvic floor disorder considered, especially overactive bladder (odds ratio [OR] 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-5.93), and prolapse (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.03-3.70). Episiotomy was not associated with any of these pelvic floor disorders. In contrast, women with a history of more than one spontaneous perineal laceration were significantly more likely to have prolapse to or beyond the hymen (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.13-4.86). Our multivariable results suggest that one additional woman would have development of prolapse for every eight women who experienced at least one forceps birth (compared with delivering all her children by spontaneous vaginal birth). CONCLUSION: Forceps deliveries and perineal lacerations, but not episiotomies, were associated with pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years after a first delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Asunto(s)
Episiotomía/efectos adversos , Extracción Obstétrica/efectos adversos , Laceraciones/complicaciones , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/etiología , Perineo/lesiones , Adulto , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/etiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 8(5): 513-9, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22934725

RESUMEN

AIM: The objective of this study was to identify maternal, obstetrical and reproductive factors associated with long-term changes in maternal weight after delivery. MATERIALS & METHODS: Participants were enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study of maternal health 5-10 years after childbirth. Data were obtained from obstetrical records and a self-administered questionnaire. Weight at the time of first delivery (5-10 years prior) was obtained retrospectively and each woman's weight at the time of her first delivery was compared with her current weight. RESULTS: Among 948 women, obesity was associated with race, parity, education, history of diabetes and history of cesarean at the time of first delivery. On average, the difference between weight at the time of first delivery and weight 5-10 years later was -11 kg (11 kg weight loss). In a multivariate model, black race and diabetes were associated with significantly less weight loss. Cesarean delivery, parity and breastfeeding were not associated with changes in maternal weight. CONCLUSION: Black women and those with a history of diabetes may be appropriate targets for interventions that promote a long-term healthy weight after childbirth.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Bienestar Materno/estadística & datos numéricos , Aumento de Peso/fisiología , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología , Adulto , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Escolaridad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Estudios Longitudinales , Maryland , Bienestar Materno/etnología , Análisis Multivariante , Obesidad/epidemiología , Paridad , Embarazo , Fumar/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Aumento de Peso/etnología , Pérdida de Peso/etnología
6.
Obstet Gynecol ; 120(5): 1021-8, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23090518

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to estimate the effect of vaginal childbirth and other obstetric exposures on pelvic muscle strength 6-11 years after delivery and to investigate the relationship between pelvic muscle strength and pelvic floor disorders. METHODS: Among 666 parous women, pelvic muscle strength was measured with a perineometer 6-11 years after delivery. Obstetric exposures were classified by review of hospital records. Pelvic floor outcomes, including stress incontinence, overactive bladder, anal incontinence, and prolapse symptoms, were assessed with a validated questionnaire. Pelvic organ support was assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to estimate the univariable associations of obstetric exposures and pelvic floor outcomes with peak muscle strength. Stepwise multivariable linear regression models were used to estimate the association between obstetric exposures and muscle strength. RESULTS: In comparison with women who delivered all of their children by cesarean, peak muscle strength and duration of contraction were reduced among women with a history of vaginal delivery (39 compared with 29 cm H2O, P<.001). Pelvic muscle strength was further reduced after history of forceps delivery (17 cm H2O, P<.001). After vaginal delivery, reduced pelvic muscle strength was associated with symptoms of anal incontinence (P=.028) and pelvic organ prolapse on examination (P=.025); these associations were not observed among those who had delivered exclusively by cesarean. CONCLUSION: Pelvic muscle strength almost a decade after childbirth is affected by vaginal delivery and by forceps delivery. Although statistically significant, some of the differences observed were small in magnitude. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Asunto(s)
Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Parto/fisiología , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/epidemiología , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo
7.
Obstet Gynecol ; 118(4): 777-84, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21897313

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate differences in pelvic floor disorders by mode of delivery. METHODS: We recruited 1,011 women for a longitudinal cohort study 5-10 years after first delivery. Using hospital records, we classified each birth as: cesarean without labor, cesarean during active labor, cesarean after complete cervical dilation, spontaneous vaginal birth, or operative vaginal birth. At enrollment, stress incontinence, overactive bladder, anal incontinence, and prolapse symptoms were assessed with a validated questionnaire. Pelvic organ support was assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the relative odds of each pelvic floor disorder by obstetric history, adjusting for relevant confounders. RESULTS: Compared with cesarean without labor, spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with a significantly greater odds of stress incontinence (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-5.5) and prolapse to or beyond the hymen (OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.2-14.7). Operative vaginal birth significantly increased the odds for all pelvic floor disorders, especially prolapse (OR 7.5, 95% CI 2.7-20.9). These results suggest that 6.8 additional operative births or 8.9 spontaneous vaginal births, relative to cesarean births, would lead to one additional case of prolapse. Among women delivering exclusively by cesarean, neither active labor nor complete cervical dilation increased the odds for any pelvic floor disorder considered, although the study had less than 80% power to detect a doubling of the odds with these exposures. CONCLUSION: Although spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly associated with stress incontinence and prolapse, the most dramatic risk was associated with operative vaginal birth. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/efectos adversos , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Parto , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiopatología , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA