Neuropathological and biochemical investigation of Hereditary Ferritinopathy cases with ferritin light chain mutation: Prominent protein aggregation in the absence of major mitochondrial or oxidative stress.

AIMS: Neuroferritinopathy (NF) or hereditary ferritinopathy (HF) is an autosomal dominant movement disorder due to mutation in the light chain of the iron storage protein ferritin (FTL). HF is the only late-onset neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation disorder and study of HF offers a unique opportunity to understand the role of iron in more common neurodegenerative syndromes. METHODS: We carried out pathological and biochemical studies of six individuals with the same pathogenic FTL mutation. RESULTS: CNS pathological changes were most prominent in the basal ganglia and cerebellar dentate, echoing the normal pattern of brain iron accumulation. Accumulation of ferritin and iron was conspicuous in cells with a phenotype suggesting oligodendrocytes, with accompanying neuronal pathology and neuronal loss. Neurons still survived, however, despite extensive adjacent glial iron deposition, suggesting neuronal loss is a downstream event. Typical age-related neurodegenerative pathology was not normally present. Uniquely, the extensive aggregates of ubiquitinated ferritin identified indicate that abnormal FTL can aggregate, reflecting the intrinsic ability of FTL to self-assemble. Ferritin aggregates were seen in neuronal and glial nuclei showing parallels with Huntington's disease. There was neither evidence of oxidative stress activation nor any significant mitochondrial pathology in the affected basal ganglia. CONCLUSIONS: HF shows hallmarks of a protein aggregation disorder, in addition to iron accumulation. Degeneration in HF is not accompanied by age-related neurodegenerative pathology and the lack of evidence of oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage suggests that these are not key mediators of neurodegeneration in HF, casting light on other neurodegenerative diseases characterized by iron deposition.

A systematic review and in-depth analysis of outcome reporting in early phase studies of colorectal cancer surgical innovation.

AIM: Early phase studies are essential to evaluate new technologies prior to randomized evaluation. Evaluation is limited, however, by inconsistent measurement and reporting of outcomes. This study examines outcome reporting in studies of innovative colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Systematic searches identified studies of invasive procedures treating primary colorectal adenocarcinoma. Included were a random sample of studies which authors reported as 'new' or 'modified'. Outcomes were extracted verbatim and categorized using an existing framework of 32 domains relevant to early phase studies. Outcomes were classified as 'measured' (where there was an explicit statement to that effect or evidence that data collection had occurred) or 'mentioned but not measured' (where outcomes were discussed but data collection was not evident). Patterns of identified outcomes are described. RESULTS: Of 8373 records, 816 were potentially eligible. Full-text review of a random sample of 218 studies identified 51 for inclusion of which 34 (66%) were 'new' and 17 (33%) were 'modified'. Some 2073 outcomes were identified, and all mapped to domains. 'Anticipated disadvantages' were most frequently identified [660 (32%) outcomes identified across 50 (98%) studies]. No domain was represented in all studies. Under half (944, 46%) of outcomes were 'measured'. 'Surgeon's/operator's experience of the innovation' was more frequently 'mentioned but not measured' [207 (18%) outcomes across 46 (90%) studies] than 'measured' [17 (2%) outcomes, 11 (22%) studies]. CONCLUSION: There is outcome reporting heterogeneity in studies of early phase colorectal cancer surgery. The adoption of core outcome sets may help to resolve these inconsistencies and enable efficient evaluation of surgical innovations.

Core information set for informed consent to surgery for oral or oropharyngeal cancer: A mixed-methods study.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a core information set for informed consent to surgery for oral/oropharyngeal surgery. A core information set is baseline information rated important by patients and surgeons and is intended to improve patients' understanding of the intended procedure. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study. Systematic reviews of scientific and written healthcare literature, qualitative interviews and observations, Delphi surveys, and group consensus meetings identified information domains of importance for consent. SETTING: A regional head and neck clinic in the United Kingdom. Questionnaire participants were recruited from around the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients about to undergo, or who had previously undergone, surgery for oral/oropharyngeal cancer. Healthcare professionals involved in the management of head and neck cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was a core information set. RESULTS: Systematic reviews, interviews and consultation observations yielded 887 pieces of information that were categorised into 87 information domains. Survey response rates were 67% (n = 50) and 71% (n = 52) for patient and healthcare professional groups in round one. More than 90% responded in each group in the second round. Healthcare professionals were more likely to rate information about short-term or peri-operative events as important while patients rated longer term issues about survival and quality of life. The consensus-building process resulted in an agreed core information set of 13 domains plus two procedure-specific domains about tracheostomy and free-flap surgery. CONCLUSION: This study produced a core information set for surgeons and patients to discuss before surgery for oral/oropharyngeal cancer. Future work will optimise ways to integrate core information into routine consultations.

A national patient and public colorectal research agenda: integration of consumer perspectives in bowel disease through early consultation.

AIM: There is a recognized need to include the views of patients and the public in prioritizing health research. This study aimed: (i) to explore patients' views on colorectal research; and (ii) to prioritize research topics with patients and the public. METHOD: In phase 1, 12 charitable organizations and patient groups with an interest in bowel disease were invited to attend a consultation exercise. Participants were briefed on 25 colorectal research topics prioritized by members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Focus groups were conducted and discussions were recorded with field notes. Analysis was conducted using principles of thematic analysis. In phase 2, a free public consultation was undertaken. Participants were recruited from newspaper advertisements, were briefed on the same research topics and were asked to rate the importance of each on a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to rank the topics. Univariable linear regression compared recorded demographic details with mean topic scores. RESULTS: Focus groups were attended by 12 patients who highlighted the importance of patient-centred information for trial recruitment and when selecting outcome measures. Some 360 people attended the public consultation, of whom 277 (77%) were recruited. Participants rated 'What is the best way to treat early cancer in the back passage?' highest, with 227 (85%) scoring it 4 or 5. There was no correlation between participant demographics and mean topic scores. CONCLUSION: The present study prioritized a colorectal research agenda with the input of patients and the public. Further research is required to translate this agenda into real improvements in patient care.

Core information set for oesophageal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons provide patients with information before surgery, although standards of information are lacking and practice varies. The development and use of a 'core information set' as baseline information before surgery may improve understanding. A core set is a minimum set of information to use in all consultations before a specific procedure. This study developed a core information set for oesophageal cancer surgery. METHODS: Information was identified from the literature, observations of clinical consultations and patient interviews. This was integrated to create a questionnaire survey. Stakeholders (patients and professionals) were surveyed twice to assess views on importance of information from 'not essential' to 'absolutely essential' using Delphi methods. Items not meeting predefined criteria were discarded after each survey and the final retained items were voted on, in separate patient and professional stakeholder meetings, to agree the core set. RESULTS: Some 67 information items were identified initially from multiple sources. Survey response rates were 76·5 per cent (185 of 242) and 54·8 per cent (126 of 230) for patients and professionals respectively (first round), and over 83 per cent in both groups thereafter. Health professionals rated short-term clinical outcomes most highly (technical complications), whereas patients prioritized information related to long-term benefits. The consensus meetings agreed the final set, which consisted of: in-hospital milestones to recovery, rates of open-and-close surgery, in-hospital mortality, major complications (reoperation), milestones in recovery after discharge, longer-term eating and drinking and overall quality of life, and chances of survival. CONCLUSION: This study has established a core information set for surgery for oesophageal cancer.

Synthesis and summary of patient-reported outcome measures to inform the development of a core outcome set in colorectal cancer surgery.

AIM: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) are standard measures in the assessment of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, but the range and complexity of available PROMs may be hindering the synthesis of evidence. This systematic review aimed to: (i) summarize PROMs in studies of CRC surgery and (ii) categorize PRO content to inform the future development of an agreed minimum 'core' outcome set to be measured in all trials. METHOD: All PROMs were identified from a systematic review of prospective CRC surgical studies. The type and frequency of PROMs in each study were summarized, and the number of items documented. All items were extracted and independently categorized by content by two researchers into 'health domains', and discrepancies were discussed with a patient and expert. Domain popularity and the distribution of items were summarized. RESULTS: Fifty-eight different PROMs were identified from the 104 included studies. There were 23 generic, four cancer-specific, 11 disease-specific and 16 symptom-specific questionnaires, and three ad hoc measures. The most frequently used PROM was the EORTC QLQ-C30 (50 studies), and most PROMs (n = 40, 69%) were used in only one study. Detailed examination of the 50 available measures identified 917 items, which were categorized into 51 domains. The domains comprising the most items were 'anxiety' (n = 85, 9.2%), 'fatigue' (n = 67, 7.3%) and 'physical function' (n = 63, 6.9%). No domains were included in all PROMs. CONCLUSION: There is major heterogeneity of PRO measurement and a wide variation in content assessed in the PROMs available for CRC. A core outcome set will improve PRO outcome measurement and reporting in CRC trials.

Reporting outcomes of definitive radiation-based treatment for esophageal cancer: a review of the literature.

Accurate evaluation of radical radiotherapy requires well designed research with valid and appropriate outcomes. This study reviewed standards of outcome reporting and study design in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of radiation-based therapy for esophageal cancer and made recommendations for future work. Randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes of definitive radiation-based treatment alone or in combination with chemotherapy were systematically identified and summarized. The types, frequency, and definitions of all clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reported in the methods and results sections of papers were examined. Studies providing a definition for at least one outcome and presenting all outcomes reported in the methods were classified as high quality. From 1425 abstracts, 16 RCTs including 1803 patients were identified. The primary outcome was overall survival in 13 studies, but five different definitions were reported. Outcomes for treatment failure included local, regional, and distant failures, and inconsistent definitions were applied. An observer assessment of dysphagia was reported in seven RCTs but PROs were reported in only one. Only three RCTs were at low risk of bias, with all lacking reports of sequence generation and only a minority reporting allocation concealment. The quality of outcome reporting in RCTs was inconsistent and risked bias. A core outcome set including clinical and PROs is needed to improve reporting of trials of definitive radiation-based treatment for esophageal cancer.

A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery.

AIM: Evaluation of surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is necessary to inform clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The standards of outcome reporting after CRC surgery have not previously been considered. METHOD: Systematic literature searches identified randomized and nonrandomized prospective studies reporting clinical outcomes of CRC surgery. Outcomes were listed verbatim, categorized into broad groups (outcome domains) and examined for a definition (an appropriate textual explanation or a supporting citation). Outcome reporting was considered inconsistent if results of the outcome specified in the methods were not reported. Outcome reporting was compared between randomized and nonrandomized studies. RESULTS: Of 5644 abstracts, 194 articles (34 randomized and 160 nonrandomized studies) were included reporting 766 different clinical outcomes, categorized into seven domains. A mean of 14 ± 8 individual outcomes were reported per study. 'Anastomotic leak', 'overall survival' and 'wound infection' were the three most frequently reported outcomes in 72, 60 and 44 (37.1%, 30.9% and 22.7%) studies, respectively, and no single outcome was reported in every publication. Outcome definitions were significantly more often provided in randomized studies than in nonrandomized studies (19.0% vs 14.9%, P = 0.015). One-hundred and twenty-seven (65.5%) papers reported results of all outcomes specified in the methods (randomized studies, n = 21, 61.5%; nonrandomized studies, n = 106, 66.2%; P = 0.617). CONCLUSION: Outcome reporting in CRC surgery lacks consistency and method. Improved standards of outcome measurement are recommended to permit data synthesis and transparent cross-study comparisons.

Images of the terminal ileum are more convincing than cecal images for verifying the extent of colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Independent verification of colonoscopy completion is important for quality assurance. Cecal photographs aimed at showing key landmarks, including the ileocecal valve (ICV) and appendiceal orifice are the currently recommended standard, but are often perceived as unreliable. Images of the terminal ileum demonstrating villi may provide more robust evidence of completion. We sought to prospectively evaluate the ease of routine intubation of the terminal ileum and to compare the effectiveness of terminal ileum and cecal photographs in convincing independent reviewers that total colonoscopy had been accomplished. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study evaluated 216 consecutively completed colonoscopies performed in routine clinical practice. Cecal and terminal ileum photographs were evaluated and scored by independent reviewers. Frequency of terminal ileum intubation, time required, and safety parameters were recorded. RESULTS: The terminal ileum was intubated and photographed in 188/216 (87%) of cases. Median time taken to intubate, or attempt to intubate the terminal ileum was 1 min 24 s, and was achieved without complications or requirement for additional sedation. Terminal ileum images were significantly more likely to be considered convincing than cecal images ( P<0.0001 for all reviewers). There was excellent interobserver agreement amongst the opinion of reviewers regarding terminal ileum photographs (kappa=0.91). CONCLUSION: Terminal ileum intubation is achievable rapidly and safely in the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Terminal ileum images provide more convincing evidence of complete examination of the colon than cecal images, even when attempts to capture images specifically of the ICV and appendiceal orifice are made.

Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set.

BACKGROUND: Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for the evaluation of new surgical procedures and devices is inconsistent and lacks standardization. A core outcome set may promote the safe and transparent evaluation of surgical innovations. This systematic review examined outcome selection, measurement and reporting in studies conducted within the IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term monitoring) framework to examine current practice and inform the development of a core outcome set for early-phase studies of surgical procedures/devices. METHODS: Web of Science and Scopus citation searches were performed to identify author-reported IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies for any surgical procedure/device. Outcomes were extracted verbatim, including contextual information regarding outcome selection and measurement. Outcomes were categorized to inform a conceptual framework of outcome domains relevant to evaluating innovation. RESULTS: Some 48 studies were identified. Outcome selection, measurement and reporting varied widely across studies in different IDEAL stages. From 1737 outcomes extracted, 22 domains specific to evaluating innovation were conceptualized under seven broad categories: procedure completion success/failure; modifications; unanticipated events; surgeons' experiences; patients' experiences; resource use specific to the innovative procedure/device; and other innovation-specific outcomes. Most innovation-specific outcomes were measured and reported in only a small number of studies. CONCLUSION: This review highlighted the need for guidance and standardization in outcome selection and reporting in the evaluation of new surgical procedures/devices. Novel outcome domains specific to innovation have been identified to establish a core outcome set for future evaluations of surgical innovations.

ANTECEDENTES: La selección de resultados, mediciones y redacción de los informes para la evaluación de nuevos procedimientos y dispositivos quirúrgicos es inconsistente y carece de estandarización. Determinar un conjunto de resultados básicos (core outcome set, COS) podría contribuir a la transparencia y seguridad de las evaluaciones de las innovaciones quirúrgicas. Esta revisión sistemática analizó la selección de resultados, medición de los mismos e informes de estudios efectuados en el marco metodológico IDEAL, a fin de valorar la práctica actual y presentar el desarrollo de un COS para estudios en fase inicial de procedimientos/dispositivos quirúrgicos. MÉTODOS: Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos Web of Science y Scopus para identificar estudios efectuados por los autores en el marco IDEAL/IDEAL-D referentes a cualquier procedimiento/dispositivo quirúrgico. Los resultados se extrajeron literalmente, incluida la información contextualizada referente a la selección y medición de los resultados. Los resultados se categorizaron para presentar información en un marco conceptual de dominios de resultados que fueran relevantes para poder evaluar la innovación. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 48 estudios. Los estudios mostraban una amplia variedad en la selección de resultados, mediciones e información correspondientes a diferentes estadios IDEAL. A partir de 1.737 resultados extraídos, se conceptualizaron 22 dominios específicos para evaluar la innovación agrupados en 7 amplias categorías: éxito/fracaso para completar el procedimiento; modificaciones; eventos imprevistos; experiencias de los cirujanos; experiencias de los pacientes; uso de recursos específicos del procedimiento/dispositivo innovador y otros resultados específicos de la innovación. La mayoría de los resultados específicos de la innovación se midieron y notificaron solo en un pequeño número de estudios. CONCLUSIÓN: Esta revisión ha puesto de manifiesto la necesidad de orientación y estandarización en la selección de resultados y la notificación en la evaluación de nuevos procedimientos/dispositivos quirúrgicos. Se han identificado nuevos dominios de resultados específicos de innovación para establecer un COS para futuras evaluaciones de innovaciones quirúrgicas.

The role of health-related quality of life outcomes in clinical decision making in surgery for esophageal cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy for cancer offers a chance of cure but is associated with morbidity, at least a temporary reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQL), and a 5-year survival of approximately 30%. This research evaluated how and whether HRQL outcomes contribute to surgical decision making. METHODS: A systematic review identified randomized trials and longitudinal and cross-sectional studies that assessed HRQL after esophagectomy with multidimensional validated questionnaires. Articles were independently evaluated by two reviewers, and the value of HRQL in clinical decision making was categorized in three ways: (1) the assessment of the quality of HRQL methodology according to predefined criteria; (2) the influence of HRQL outcomes on treatment recommendations and/or informed consent; and (3) the HRQL after esophagectomy for cancer in methodologically robust studies. RESULTS: Eighteen publications were identified, of which 16 (89%) were categorized as having robust HRQL design. Of these studies, 3 concluded that HRQL influenced treatment recommendations and 11 (including the former 3) informed patient consent. The remaining five papers were well designed, but the authors did not use HRQL to influence treatment recommendations or informed consent. After esophagectomy, patients report major deterioration in most aspects of HRQL with slow recovery. CONCLUSION: HRQL outcomes are relevant to surgical decision making. Methods to communicate HRQL outcomes to patients are required to inform consent and clinical practice.

Prolonged cholestasis following successful removal of common bile duct stones: beware patients on estrogen therapy.

There are various well described forms of chronic cholestatic jaundice in adults, such as autoimmune cholangitis, drug-induced cholangitis and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. We present two cases of prolonged cholestasis following removal of gallstones at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and subsequent clear cholangiography. Both patients were taking oral estrogens at the time of presentation, which were subsequently withdrawn. The first case responded rapidly to corticosteroid treatment, and the second case had a much slower resolution with ursodeoxycholic acid. Both cases highlighted the significance of estrogen-induced cholestasis in female patients with protracted jaundice following ERCP and removal of intra-ductal stones. After oral estrogens are discontinued, a short course of steroids needs to be considered.

The efficacy and safety of epidural filter catheters when used for post-operative intra-articular anaesthesia.

UNLABELLED: There are concerns about the risk of iatrogenic infection when employing local anaesthetic techniques with post-operative intra-articular infusions in total knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of intact epidural filters in preventing transit of bacteria and to develop a technique of administration which would prevent membrane rupture. Filter efficacy was assessed using a standardised test suspension of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Twenty millilitres of suspension was injected through isolated epidural filters (n=10) or filters with 40cm of catheter tubing attached (n=30). For each filter, injections were carried out at 0, 8 and 24h. Filtrates were collected, incubated, sub-cultured onto Columbia horse blood agar and examined for bacterial growth. Three delivery techniques were tested: manually controlled syringe with 5ml of water at 20ml/min, forced administration syringe with 5ml of water at >240ml/min and an automated syringe driver delivering 40ml of water at 6.7ml/min. For the two techniques using syringes, three syringe sizes, 5ml, 10ml and 20ml, were tested. Each test condition was carried out on 10 filters (total n=70). Filters were examined for rupture. Intact epidural filters prevented bacterial transit in all cases. Manual controlled and automated syringe driver administration generated no filter ruptures. Manual forced administration generated 93% filter rupture. Ruptures occurred at peak pressures of approximately 620kPa. Epidural filters can be used to prevent bacterial transit. These results suggest automated devices remove the risk of filter rupture. This study is relevant to all specialties that utilise these filters during infiltration such as epidurals or other regional anaesthetic techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study identified that filters are prone to rupture with high infusion rates and that manual techniques are particularly vulnerable. From these results, it is recommended that pumps are used to minimise risk of filter rupture.

Viral inhibition of the interferon system.

In response to interferon (IFN), cells develop an antiviral state in which the replication of a wide spectrum of RNA and DNA viruses is inhibited. Viruses have evolved a variety of mechanisms to inhibit the production and action of the interferons. Interferon action may be blocked by inhibition of the post-receptor signalling pathway, which prevents the expression of a number of proteins with antiviral properties. Other viruses prevent the action of specific, interferon-induced antiviral systems. In particular, the action of the dsRNA-dependent protein kinase (DAI) is inhibited by a variety of different viruses, indicating the fundamental importance of this enzyme to the antiviral response.

Effects of propranolol on phosphatidate phosphohydrolase and mitogen-activated protein kinase activities in A7r5 vascular smooth muscle cells.

High doses of propranolol inhibit phosphatidate phosphohydrolase (PAP) activity in intact cells, thus blocking metabolism of phosphatidic acid (PA), product of the phospholipase D (PLD) reaction. Vasopressin and phorbol ester activate PLD and ERK (extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase) mitogen-activated protein kinases in A7r5, a rat vascular smooth muscle cell line. Propranolol increased PA levels in intact A7r5 cells and inhibited cytosolic PAP and membrane calcium-independent phospholipase A2 but did not activate PLD or enhance agonist-induced PA accumulation. Incubation of cells with 200 microM propranolol for 10-45 min markedly elevated PA but caused only partial activation of ERKs. Propranolol and other lipophilic amines caused a time- and dose-dependent detachment of cells from their substrate. These results confirm that elevation of PA is not a strong signal for ERK activation and emphasize that caution should be exercised in using propranolol as a PAP inhibitor in intact cells.

Assessing the quality of written information provision for surgical procedures: a case study in oesophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the content and quality of written information provided by surgical centres for patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of the content of National Health Service (NHS) patient information leaflets (PILs) about oesophageal cancer surgery, using a modified framework approach. DATA SOURCES: Written information leaflets from 41 of 43 cancer centres undertaking surgery for oesophageal cancer in England and Wales (response rate 95.3%). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All English language versions of PILs about oesophagectomy. RESULTS: 32 different PILs were identified, of which 2 were generic tools (Macmillan 'understanding cancer of the gullet' and EIDO 'oesophagectomy'). Although most PILs focused on describing in-hospital adverse events, information varied widely and was often misleading. Just 1 leaflet described survival benefits of surgery and 2 mentioned the possibility of disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Written information provided for patients by NHS cancer centres undertaking oesophagectomy is inconsistent and incomplete. It is recommended that surgeons work together with patients to agree on standards of information provision of relevance to all stakeholders' needs.

Acute hemodynamic effects of pinacidil and hydralazine in essential hypertension.

In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study, the effects of intravenous pinacidil, 0.2 mg/kg, were compared with those of hydralazine, 0.3 mg/kg, before and after beta-adrenoceptor blockade in six subjects with hypertension. Both drugs equally reduced total peripheral resistance by about 40%. Pinacidil reduced mean blood pressure by an average of 30 mm Hg, while the reduction after hydralazine was 10 mm Hg. The difference in antihypertensive effect resulted from greater increases in heart rate, cardiac contractility (systolic time intervals), and cardiac index (thermodilution) after hydralazine. These effects after hydralazine could not be fully abolished by beta-blockade, as could the effects after pinacidil. Pinacidil decreased pulmonary blood pressure, whereas there was a slight rise in pulmonary blood pressure after hydralazine. Forearm blood flow (venous occlusion strain gauge plethysmography) increased equally after both drugs; thus pinacidil decreased forearm vascular resistance more than hydralazine did. Serum concentrations of both drugs were within the therapeutic range and correlated with the fall in mean blood pressure. Five subjects complained of side effects after hydralazine, but none were reported after pinacidil. Hydralazine increased myocardial oxygen consumption (as estimated from the rate-pressure product) by 35%; there was no change after pinacidil. It is suggested that hydralazine has direct cardiostimulatory effects that limit its antihypertensive effectiveness. These effects increase myocardial oxygen consumption and may be responsible for the common and sometimes severe cardiovascular side effects of hydralazine.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF4) binding sites in the salmon HNF1 promoter.

We report the isolation and sequencing of a 1100-bp DNA fragment containing the salmon Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1 gene (sHNF1) promoter. The sHNF1 promoter cloned upstream of the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) encoding gene is shown to be active in two cell lines of hepatic origin. DNasel footprint analysis of the proximal 400 bp reveals several protein-binding sites, including a CCAAT box, a potential site for Sp1, and three potential HNF4 binding sites. The sequence does not contain any canonical TATA box or initiator and sHNF1 transcription is initiated at four different sites spanning a region of 56 bp. Sequence comparison with the Xenopus laevis HNF1 promoter sequence did not show any significant similarity except in the region overlapping two of the potential HNF4 binding sites.

Cloning and characterisation of the gene encoding the 28-kDa glutathione S-transferase of Schistosoma mansoni.

The 28-kDa glutathione S-transferase (GST) of Schistosoma mansoni is considered a possible vaccine candidate for use against this medically important parasite. The gene encoding this molecule has been isolated from a lambda EMBL4 library by using the corresponding cDNA sequence as a probe. The gene contains four exons and is approximately 5.5 kb in length. Analysis of the 5' flanking region revealed the presence of a consensus AP-1 recognition site, 5'-TGACTCA, between nucleotides -231 and -225. Southern blot analysis suggested the presence of a single gene encoding the 28-kDa GST in the S. mansoni genome.