Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 645
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(22): 514-516, 2024 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38843099

RESUMEN

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), caused by infection with the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis, usually manifests as meningitis or septicemia and can be severe and life-threatening (1). Six serogroups (A, B, C, W, X, and Y) account for most cases (2). N. meningitidis is transmitted person-to-person via respiratory droplets and oropharyngeal secretions. Asymptomatic persons can carry N. meningitidis and transmit the bacteria to others, potentially causing illness among susceptible persons. Outbreaks can occur in conjunction with large gatherings (3,4). Vaccines are available to prevent meningococcal disease. Antibiotic prophylaxis for close contacts of infected persons is critical to preventing secondary cases (2).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Francia/epidemiología , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Neisseria meningitidis/aislamiento & purificación , Niño , Preescolar , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lactante , Anciano , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Viaje
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e308-e318, 2023 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35675306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a highly pathogenic zoonotic betacoronavirus and a global public health concern. Better undersetting of the immune responses to MERS-CoV is needed to characterize the correlates of protection and durability of the immunity and to aid in developing preventative and therapeutic interventions. Although MERS-CoV-specific circulating antibodies could persist for several years post-recovery, their waning raises concerns about their durability and role in protection. Nonetheless, memory B and T cells could provide long-lasting protective immunity despite the serum antibodies levels. METHODS: Serological and flow cytometric analysis of MERS-CoV-specific immune responses were performed on samples collected from a cohort of recovered individuals who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission as well as hospital or home isolation several years after infection to characterize the longevity and quality of humoral and cellular immune responses. RESULTS: Our data showed that MERS-CoV infection could elicit robust long-lasting virus-specific binding and neutralizing antibodies as well as T- and B-cell responses up to 6.9 years postinfection regardless of disease severity or need for ICU admission. Apart from the persistent high antibody titers, this response was characterized by B-cell subsets with antibody-independent functions as demonstrated by their ability to produce tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, and interferon γ (IFN-γ) cytokines in response to antigen stimulation. Furthermore, virus-specific activation of memory CD8+ and CD4+ T cell subsets from MERS-recovered patients resulted in secretion of high levels of TNF-α, IL-17, and IFN-γ. CONCLUSIONS: MERS-CoV infection could elicit robust long-lasting virus-specific humoral and cellular responses.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio , Humanos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Inmunidad Celular , Interferón gamma , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos B/inmunología
3.
N Engl J Med ; 383(17): 1645-1656, 2020 10 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether combined treatment with recombinant interferon beta-1b and lopinavir-ritonavir reduces mortality among patients hospitalized with Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, adaptive, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled patients at nine sites in Saudi Arabia. Hospitalized adults with laboratory-confirmed MERS were randomly assigned to receive recombinant interferon beta-1b plus lopinavir-ritonavir (intervention) or placebo for 14 days. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality, with a one-sided P-value threshold of 0.025. Prespecified subgroup analyses and safety analyses were conducted. Because of the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019, the data and safety monitoring board requested an unplanned interim analysis and subsequently recommended the termination of enrollment and the reporting of the results. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were enrolled; 43 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 52 to the placebo group. A total of 12 patients (28%) in the intervention group and 23 (44%) in the placebo group died by day 90. The analysis of the primary outcome, with accounting for the adaptive design, yielded a risk difference of -19 percentage points (upper boundary of the 97.5% confidence interval [CI], -3; one-sided P = 0.024). In a prespecified subgroup analysis, treatment within 7 days after symptom onset led to lower 90-day mortality than use of placebo (relative risk, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.75), whereas later treatment did not. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients (9%) in the intervention group and in 10 (19%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of recombinant interferon beta-1b and lopinavir-ritonavir led to lower mortality than placebo among patients who had been hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed MERS. The effect was greatest when treatment was started within 7 days after symptom onset. (Funded by the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center; MIRACLE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02845843.).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferon beta-1b/uso terapéutico , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Interferon beta-1b/efectos adversos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Lopinavir/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ritonavir/efectos adversos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Tiempo de Tratamiento
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(5)2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33900908

RESUMEN

Understanding the immune response to Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is crucial for disease prevention and vaccine development. We studied the antibody responses in 48 human MERS-CoV infection survivors who had variable disease severity in Saudi Arabia. MERS-CoV-specific neutralizing antibodies were detected for 6 years postinfection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio , Animales , Formación de Anticuerpos , Camelus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología
5.
Lancet ; 395(10229): 1063-1077, 2020 03 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145185

RESUMEN

The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a lethal zoonotic pathogen that was first identified in humans in Saudi Arabia and Jordan in 2012. Intermittent sporadic cases, community clusters, and nosocomial outbreaks of MERS-CoV continue to occur. Between April 2012 and December 2019, 2499 laboratory-confirmed cases of MERS-CoV infection, including 858 deaths (34·3% mortality) were reported from 27 countries to WHO, the majority of which were reported by Saudi Arabia (2106 cases, 780 deaths). Large outbreaks of human-to-human transmission have occurred, the largest in Riyadh and Jeddah in 2014 and in South Korea in 2015. MERS-CoV remains a high-threat pathogen identified by WHO as a priority pathogen because it causes severe disease that has a high mortality rate, epidemic potential, and no medical countermeasures. This Seminar provides an update on the current knowledge and perspectives on MERS epidemiology, virology, mode of transmission, pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical features, management, infection control, development of new therapeutics and vaccines, and highlights unanswered questions and priorities for research, improved management, and prevention.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Epidemias , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Camelus , Niño , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Cuidados Críticos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Femenino , Salud Global , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata/fisiología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Control de Infecciones , Plasma , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Viaje , Vacunas Virales , Zoonosis/transmisión
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 59(5)2021 04 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33674285

RESUMEN

Combating the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demands accurate, rapid, and point-of-care testing with fast results to triage cases for isolation and treatment. The current testing relies on reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), which is routinely performed in well-equipped laboratories by trained professionals at specific locations. However, during busy periods, high numbers of samples queued for testing can delay the test results, impacting efforts to reduce the infection risk. Besides, the absence of well-established laboratories at remote sites and low-resourced environments can contribute to a silent spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). These reasons compel the need to accommodate point-of-care testing for COVID-19 that meets the ASSURED criteria (affordable, sensitive, specific, user-friendly, rapid and robust, equipment-free, and deliverable). This study assessed the agreement and accuracy of the portable Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 system against the gold standard tests. Nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs were used. Of the 192 samples tested using the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 system, the results from 189 samples (98.4%) were in agreement with the reference standard-of-care RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2. The portable system generated simultaneous results for nine samples in 80 min with high positive and negative percent agreements of 99.0% and 97.8%, respectively. We performed separate testing in a sealed glove box, offering complete biosafety containment. Thus, the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 system can help decentralize COVID-19 testing and offer rapid test results for patients in remote and low-resourced settings.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/instrumentación , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/instrumentación , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
Crit Care Med ; 49(3): e219-e234, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33555780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic continues to affect millions worldwide. Given the rapidly growing evidence base, we implemented a living guideline model to provide guidance on the management of patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 in the ICU. METHODS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Disease 2019 panel has expanded to include 43 experts from 14 countries; all panel members completed an electronic conflict-of-interest disclosure form. In this update, the panel addressed nine questions relevant to managing severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 in the ICU. We used the World Health Organization's definition of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019. The systematic reviews team searched the literature for relevant evidence, aiming to identify systematic reviews and clinical trials. When appropriate, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis to summarize treatment effects. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, then used the evidence-to-decision framework to generate recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Diease 2019 panel issued nine statements (three new and six updated) related to ICU patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019. For severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019, the panel strongly recommends using systemic corticosteroids and venous thromboprophylaxis but strongly recommends against using hydroxychloroquine. In addition, the panel suggests using dexamethasone (compared with other corticosteroids) and suggests against using convalescent plasma and therapeutic anticoagulation outside clinical trials. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Diease 2019 panel suggests using remdesivir in nonventilated patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 and suggests against starting remdesivir in patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019 outside clinical trials. Because of insufficient evidence, the panel did not issue a recommendation on the use of awake prone positioning. CONCLUSION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Diease 2019 panel issued several recommendations to guide healthcare professionals caring for adults with critical or severe coronavirus disease 2019 in the ICU. Based on a living guideline model the recommendations will be updated as new evidence becomes available.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina , Inmunización Pasiva , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Ventilación , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
8.
Int Immunol ; 32(12): 799-804, 2020 11 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32645711

RESUMEN

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a member of the beta-coronavirus genus of zoonotic origin that emerged in the Arabian Peninsula and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study was conducted to assess the plasma levels of cytokines to evaluate the Th1/Th2 status among 46 MERS-CoV-infected patients (19 asymptomatic and 27 symptomatic) and 52 normal healthy controls using a customized luminex kit. Comparative analysis of data between MERS-CoV-infected patients and normal healthy controls revealed that although no difference was observed between asymptomatic MERS-CoV patients and controls, the mean plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-10 (44.69 ± 40.04 pg ml-1 versus 14.84 ± 6.96 pg ml-1; P < 0.0001), IL-4 (22.46 ± 8.02 pg ml-1 versus 16.01 ± 9.97 pg ml-1; P < 0.0001), IL-5 (10.78 ± 2.86 pg ml-1 versus 8.06 ± 1.41 pg ml-1; P < 0.0001) and IL-13 (14.51 ± 3.97 pg ml-1 versus 11.53 ± 4.16 pg ml-1; P < 0.003) in MERS-CoV symptomatic patients were significantly higher than the normal controls. The mean plasma levels of interferon (IFN)-γ and IL-12 were no different among the study groups. The cytokine profile among symptomatic MERS-CoV-infected patients was skewed to a Th2 type immune response.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Citocinas/sangre , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio , Células TH1/inmunología , Células Th2/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Interacciones Microbiota-Huesped/inmunología , Humanos , Interferón gamma/sangre , Interleucina-10/sangre , Interleucina-12/sangre , Interleucina-13/sangre , Interleucina-4/sangre , Interleucina-5/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
9.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med ; 42(6): 828-838, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34918324

RESUMEN

The past two decades have witnessed the emergence of three zoonotic coronaviruses which have jumped species to cause lethal disease in humans: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2. MERS-CoV emerged in Saudi Arabia in 2012 and the origins of MERS-CoV are not fully understood. Genomic analysis indicates it originated in bats and transmitted to camels. Human-to-human transmission occurs in varying frequency, being highest in healthcare environment and to a lesser degree in the community and among family members. Several nosocomial outbreaks of human-to-human transmission have occurred, the largest in Riyadh and Jeddah in 2014 and South Korea in 2015. MERS-CoV remains a high-threat pathogen identified by World Health Organization as a priority pathogen because it causes severe disease that has a high mortality rate, epidemic potential, and no medical countermeasures. MERS-CoV has been identified in dromedaries in several countries in the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia. MERS-CoV-2 causes a wide range of clinical presentations, although the respiratory system is predominantly affected. There are no specific antiviral treatments, although recent trials indicate that combination antivirals may be useful in severely ill patients. Diagnosing MERS-CoV early and implementation infection control measures are critical to preventing hospital-associated outbreaks. Preventing MERS relies on avoiding unpasteurized or uncooked animal products, practicing safe hygiene habits in health care settings and around dromedaries, community education and awareness training for health workers, as well as implementing effective control measures. Effective vaccines for MERS-COV are urgently needed but still under development.


Asunto(s)
Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio , Animales , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Camelus/virología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/efectos de los fármacos , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/patogenicidad
10.
Artif Organs ; 45(5): E101-E112, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33190288

RESUMEN

Our aim was to investigate continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with CytoSorb cartridge for patients with life-threatening COVID-19 plus acute kidney injury (AKI), sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Of 492 COVID-19 patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU), 50 had AKI necessitating CRRT (10.16%) and were enrolled in the study. Upon ICU admission, all had AKI, ARDS, septic shock, and CRS. In addition to CRRT with CytoSorb, all received ARDS-net ventilation, prone positioning, plus empiric ribavirin, interferon beta-1b, antibiotics, hydrocortisone, and prophylactic anticoagulation. We retrospectively analyzed inflammatory biomarkers, oxygenation, organ function, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length-of-stay, and mortality on day-28 post-ICU admission. Patients were 49.64 ± 8.90 years old (78% male) with body mass index of 26.70 ± 2.76 kg/m2 . On ICU admission, mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II was 22.52 ± 1.1. Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) score was 9.36 ± 2.068 and the ratio of partial arterial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired concentration of oxygen (PaO2 /FiO2 ) was 117.46 ± 36.92. Duration of mechanical ventilation was 17.38 ± 7.39 days, ICU length-of-stay was 20.70 ± 8.83 days, and mortality 28 days post-ICU admission was 30%. Nonsurvivors had higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers, and more unresolved shock, ARDS, AKI, and pulmonary emboli (8% vs. 4%, P < .05) compared to survivors. After 2 ± 1 CRRT sessions with CytoSorb, survivors had decreased SOFA scores, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, D-dimers, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6; and increased PaO2 /FiO2 ratios, and lymphocyte counts (all P < .05). Receiver-operator-curve analysis showed that posttherapy values of interleukin-6 (cutoff point >620 pg/mL) predicted in-hospital mortality for critically ill COVID-19 patients (area-under-the-curve: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81-0.93; P = .001). No side effects of therapy were recorded. In this retrospective case-series, CRRT with the CytoSorb cartridge provided a safe rescue therapy in life-threatening COVID-19 with associated AKI, ARDS, sepsis, and hyperinflammation.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , COVID-19/terapia , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal Continuo/instrumentación , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/terapia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Sepsis/terapia , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedad Crítica , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/virología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Respiración Artificial , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sepsis/virología
11.
Am J Emerg Med ; 41: 261.e1-261.e3, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32763101

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: No guidelines exist for the management of massive pulmonary embolism (PE) in COVID-19. We present a COVID-19 patient with refractory acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS), and life-threatening PE who underwent successful thrombolysis. CASE PRESENTATION: A previously healthy 47 year old male was admitted to our hospital due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia [confirmed by Real-Time-Polymerase-Chain-Reaction (RT-PCR)]. He had rapidly evolving ARDS [partial arterial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired concentration of oxygen ratio: 175], and sepsis. Laboratory results showed lymphocytopenia, and increased D-dimer levels (7.7 µg/ml; normal: 0-0.5 µg/ml). The patient was treated in the intensive care unit. On day-1, ARDS-net/prone positioning ventilation, and empiric anti-COVID treatment integrating prophylactic anticoagulation was administered. On hospital day-2, the patient developed shock with worsening oxygenation. Point-of-care-ultrasound depicted a large thrombus migrating from the right atrium to the pulmonary circulation. Intravenous alteplase (100 mg over 2 h) was administered as rescue therapy. The patient made an uneventful recovery, and was discharged to home isolation (day-20) on oral rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: Thrombolysis may have a critical therapeutic role for massive PE in COVID-19; however the risk of potential bleeding should not be underestimated. Point-of-care ultrasound has a pivotal role in the management of refractory ARDS in COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Terapia Trombolítica , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Críticos , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , SARS-CoV-2 , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía
12.
J Ultrasound Med ; 40(3): 443-456, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32797661

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To perform a prospective longitudinal analysis of lung ultrasound findings in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Eighty-nine intensive care unit (ICU) patients with confirmed COVID-19 were prospectively enrolled and tracked. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examinations were performed with phased array, convex, and linear transducers using portable machines. The thorax was scanned in 12 lung areas: anterior, lateral, and posterior (superior/inferior) bilaterally. Lower limbs were scanned for deep venous thrombosis and chest computed tomographic angiography was performed to exclude suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Follow-up POCUS was performed weekly and before hospital discharge. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male (84.2%), with a median age of 43 years. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 17 (interquartile range, 10-22) days; the ICU length of stay was 22 (interquartile range, 20.2-25.2) days; and the 28-day mortality rate was 28.1%. On ICU admission, POCUS detected bilateral irregular pleural lines (78.6%) with accompanying confluent and separate B-lines (100%), variable consolidations (61.7%), and pleural and cardiac effusions (22.4% and 13.4%, respectively). These findings appeared to signify a late stage of COVID-19 pneumonia. Deep venous thrombosis was identified in 16.8% of patients, whereas chest computed tomographic angiography confirmed PE in 24.7% of patients. Five to six weeks after ICU admission, follow-up POCUS examinations detected significantly lower rates (P < .05) of lung abnormalities in survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care ultrasound depicted B-lines, pleural line irregularities, and variable consolidations. Lung ultrasound findings were significantly decreased by ICU discharge, suggesting persistent but slow resolution of at least some COVID-19 lung lesions. Although POCUS identified deep venous thrombosis in less than 20% of patients at the bedside, nearly one-fourth of all patients were found to have computed tomography-proven PE.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
13.
J Ultrasound Med ; 40(9): 1823-1838, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33185316

RESUMEN

Scarce data exist regarding the natural history of lung lesions detected on ultrasound in those who survive severe COVID-19 pneumonia. OBJECTIVE: We performed a prospective analysis of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) findings in critically ill COVID-19 patients during and after hospitalization. METHODS: We enrolled 171 COVID-19 intensive care unit patients. POCUS of the lungs was performed with phased array (2-4 MHz), convex (2-6 MHz) and linear (10-15 MHz) transducers, scanning 12 lung areas. Chest computed tomography angiography was performed to exclude suspected pulmonary embolism. Survivors were clinically and sonographically evaluated during a 4 month period for evidence of residual lung injury. Chest computed tomography angiography and echocardiography were used to exclude pulmonary hypertension (PH) and chest high-resolution-computed-tomography to exclude interstitial lung disease (ILD) in symptomatic survivors. RESULTS: Cox regression analysis showed that lymphocytopenia (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.88, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.68-0.96, p = .048), increased lactate (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.94-1.46, p = 0.049), and D-dimers (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.44, p = .03) were mortality predictors. Non-survivors had increased incidence of pulmonary abnormalities (B-lines, pleural line irregularities, and consolidations) compared to survivors (p < .05). During follow-up, POCUS with clinical and laboratory parameters integrated in the semi-quantitative Riyadh-Residual-Lung-Injury scale had sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76-0.89) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.94-0.95) in predicting ILD. The prevalence of PH and ILD (non-specific-interstitial-pneumonia) was 7% and 11.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: POCUS showed ability to monitor the evolution of severe COVID-19 pneumonia after hospital discharge, supporting its integration in clinical predictive models of residual lung injury.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Lesión Pulmonar , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesión Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , SARS-CoV-2 , Ultrasonografía
16.
Lancet ; 393(10185): 2073-2084, 2019 05 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31106753

RESUMEN

Mass gathering events are associated with major public health challenges. The 2014 Lancet Series on the new discipline of mass gatherings medicine was launched at the World Health Assembly of Ministers of Health in Geneva in May, 2014. The Series covered the planning and surveillance systems used to monitor public health risks, public health threats, and experiences of health-care providers from mass gathering events in 2012 and 2013. This follow-up Review focuses on the main public health issues arising from planned mass gathering events held between 2013 and 2018. We highlight public health and research data on transmission of infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria, mass casualty incidents, and non-communicable diseases, including thermal disorders. In the events discussed in this Review, the combination of a large influx of people, many from countries with outbreak-prone infectious diseases, with a high degree of crowd interactions imposed substantial burdens on host countries' health systems. The detection and transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pilgrims attending the Kumbh Mela and the Hajj raise concern of possible globalisation from mass-gathering religious events. Priorities for further investments and opportunities for research into prevention, surveillance, and management of these public health issues are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Aglomeración , Salud Global , Planificación en Salud/normas , Salud Pública/normas , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Humanos , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa/prevención & control , Religión , Medición de Riesgo , Deportes
18.
Crit Care Med ; 48(6): e440-e469, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32224769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting thousands of people around the world. Urgent guidance for clinicians caring for the sickest of these patients is needed. METHODS: We formed a panel of 36 experts from 12 countries. All panel members completed the World Health Organization conflict of interest disclosure form. The panel proposed 53 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 in the ICU. We searched the literature for direct and indirect evidence on the management of COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the ICU. We identified relevant and recent systematic reviews on most questions relating to supportive care. We assessed the certainty in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, then generated recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice recommendations. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued 54 statements, of which four are best practice statements, nine are strong recommendations, and 35 are weak recommendations. No recommendation was provided for six questions. The topics were: 1) infection control, 2) laboratory diagnosis and specimens, 3) hemodynamic support, 4) ventilatory support, and 5) COVID-19 therapy. CONCLUSION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued several recommendations to help support healthcare workers caring for critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. When available, we will provide new evidence in further releases of these guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Enfermedad Crítica , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/normas , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Pandemias , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Respiración Artificial/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Choque/terapia
19.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 26(3): 197-202, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32149751

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mass gathering events bring people from across all continents increasing the risk of spread of aerosol transmissible respiratory tract infections. Respiratory tract infections for instance in pilgrims attending the world's largest recurring annual pilgrimage, the Hajj are common. We review recent literature on viral and bacterial infectious diseases with special focus on the Hajj. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of bacterial and viral infections continue to increase, because of the acquisition of rhinovirus, coronaviruses (229E, HKU1, OC43), influenza A H1N1, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus during Hajj. Whilst MERS-CoV continues to circulate in the Middle East, no cases of MERS-CoV have yet been identified in pilgrims during Hajj. SUMMARY: Respiratory tract infections are a major cause of morbidity in pilgrims attending mass gathering events. The management of severe respiratory infections should consider investigation and empirical coverage for the most likely agents based on syndromic surveillance data from hosting country and /or other relevant exposure history during events. Pneumococcal and Pertussis vaccines should be recommended for Hajj pilgrims.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Gripe Humana/transmisión , Islamismo , Sarampión/transmisión , Neumonía Neumocócica/transmisión , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/transmisión , Viaje , Tuberculosis/transmisión , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/transmisión , Coronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/transmisión , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/transmisión , Vacunas Neumococicas/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Neumocócica/epidemiología , Neumonía Neumocócica/prevención & control , Prevalencia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Virosis/epidemiología , Virosis/transmisión , Tos Ferina/epidemiología , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Tos Ferina/transmisión
20.
Infection ; 48(1): 3-5, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31079347

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Even though prosthetic valve endocarditis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is widely documented and attracts global attention, native valve endocarditis due to CoNS has been also described lately and may warrant closer attention due to the relative increased incidence. METHODS: We describe a 35-year-old male patient who is a former resident of a long-term health-care facility with multiple co-morbidities, diagnosed with native aortic valve S. capitis endocarditis and underwent conservative antimicrobial treatment with full recovery and no recurrence after 6 months' follow-up. In addition, we reviewed the English literature on all reported cases of S. capitis endocarditis. RESULTS: Infective endocarditis due to S. capitis has thus far been described in 13 patients. All but three had involved native valves with two infected prosthetic valves and a single case of infection in an implanted transvenous pacemaker. Although the number of cases of endocarditis due to S. capitis is small, early removal of either a prosthetic valve or infected pacemaker would appear prudent, while native valve endocarditis could successfully be treated with appropriate antimicrobials alone. CONCLUSIONS: Staphylococcus capitis is classified as coagulase-negative staphylococci with the inherent ability to cause debilitating native valve endocarditis and is usually managed conservatively.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/terapia , Staphylococcus capitis/fisiología , Adulto , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA