Debate: Should dialysis at home be mandatory for all suitable ESRD patients?: patients should not be forced onto home dialysis.

Outcomes are similar between hospital-based hemodialysis and less expensive home-based therapies, especially home peritoneal dialysis. Because of this, some have argued that all suitable patients should be forced to these less expensive modalities. However, such an approach would violate the ethical principles of autonomy and maleficence, and would run counter to the movement toward patient-centered care. Therefore, from a North American perspective, home dialysis should be actively promoted for suitable patients, but should not be mandatory. Extending these arguments into newer paradigms of home- and community-based dialysis, with paid assistance, will be a challenge as traditional cost effectiveness arguments may not be definitive and effective. Nephrology will need to embrace new methods for evaluation of therapies and to develop and endorse sophisticated principles of advocacy to influence health care policy and funding decision makers to maximize nonhospital-based, patient-centered care and improve outcomes in the future.

Effect of calcium-based versus non-calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Phosphate binders (calcium-based and calcium-free) are recommended to lower serum phosphate and prevent hyperphosphataemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, but their effects on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes are unknown. We aimed to update our meta-analysis on the effect of calcium-based versus non-calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. METHODS: We did a systematic review of articles published in any language after Aug 1, 2008, up until Oct 22, 2012, by searching Medline, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. We included all randomised and non-randomised trials that compared outcomes between patients with chronic kidney disease taking calcium-based phosphate binders with those taking non-calcium-based binders. Eligible studies, determined by consensus with predefined criteria, were reviewed, and data were extracted onto a standard form. We combined data from randomised trials to assess the primary outcome of all-cause mortality using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. FINDINGS: Our search identified 847 reports, of which eight new studies (five randomised trials) met our inclusion criteria and were added to the ten (nine randomised trials) included in our previous meta-analysis. Analysis of the 11 randomised trials (4622 patients) that reported an outcome of mortality showed that patients assigned to non-calcium-based binders had a 22% reduction in all-cause mortality compared with those assigned to calcium-based phosphate binders (risk ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·61-0·98). INTERPRETATION: Non-calcium-based phosphate binders are associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality compared with calcium-based phosphate binders in patients with chronic kidney disease. Further studies are needed to identify causes of mortality and to assess whether mortality differs by type of non-calcium-based phosphate binder. FUNDING: None.

Major bleeding events and risk stratification of antithrombotic agents in hemodialysis: results from the DOPPS.

Benefits and risks of antithrombotic agents remain unclear in the hemodialysis population. To help clarify this we determined variation in antithrombotic agent use, rates of major bleeding events, and factors predictive of stroke and bleeding in 48,144 patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) phases I-IV. Antithrombotic agents including oral anticoagulants (OACs), aspirin (ASA), and anti-platelet agents (APAs) were recorded along with comorbidities at study entry, and clinical events including hospitalization due to bleeding were then collected every 4 months. There was wide variation in OAC (0.3-18%), APA (3-25%), and ASA use (8-36%), and major bleeding rates (0.05-0.22 events/year) among countries. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and bleeding events requiring hospitalization were elevated in patients prescribed OACs across adjusted models. The CHADS2 score predicted the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients. Gastrointestinal bleeding in the past 12 months was highly predictive of major bleeding events; for patients with previous gastrointestinal bleeding, the rate of bleeding exceeded the rate of stroke by at least twofold across all categories of CHADS2 score, including patients at high stroke risk. Appropriate risk stratification and a cautious approach should be considered before OAC use in the dialysis population.

Factors associated with suboptimal initiation of dialysis despite early nephrologist referral.

BACKGROUND: STARRT recently demonstrated that many patients experience suboptimal dialysis starts (defined as initiation as an inpatient and/or with a central venous catheter), even when followed by a nephrologist for >12 months (NDT 2011). However, STARRT did not identify the factors associated with suboptimal initiation of dialysis. The objectives of this study were to extend the results of STARRT by ascertaining the factors leading to suboptimal initiation of dialysis in patients who were referred at least 12 months prior to commencement of dialysis. METHODS: At each of the three Toronto centers, charts of consecutive incident RRT patients were identified from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2010, with predetermined data extracted. RESULTS: A total of 436 incident RRT patients were studied; 52.4% were followed by a nephrologist for >12 months prior to the initiation of dialysis. Suboptimal starts occurred in 56.4% of these patients. No attempt at arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) prior to initiation was made in 65% of these starts. Factors contributing to suboptimal starts despite early referral included patient-related delays (31.25%), acute-on-chronic kidney disease (31.25%), surgical delays (16.41%), late decision-making (8.59%) and others (12.50%). The percentage of optimal starts with early referral among 14 nephrologists ranged from 33 to 72%. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients started dialysis in a suboptimal manner, despite an extended period of pre-dialysis care. Nephrologists should take responsibility for suboptimal initiation of dialysis despite early referral and test methods that attempt to prevent this.

A proposal for improving evidence generation in nephrology.

The existing framework for the evaluation and reimbursement of new drugs and other treatments in nephrology does not appear to be providing the optimal incentives to advance science and improve outcomes for patients with end-stage renal disease. This article examines reasons for this malalignment and how the field of nephrology is affected, then proceeds to show that alternative evaluation paradigms are being developed by the health technology assessment community. These alternative evaluative frameworks are complementary to traditional evidence-based medicine and comparative evaluative research and may be worthy of adaptation by those interested in seeing more pivotal kidney research (both quantity and quality) and more efficient evaluation of new therapies for patients with chronic kidney failure treated using long-term dialysis therapy.

Suboptimal initiation of dialysis with and without early referral to a nephrologist.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to examine patients who initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT) at 10 representative Canadian centers, characterize their initiation as inpatient or outpatient and describe their initial type of dialysis access, duration of pre-dialysis care and clinical status at the time of dialysis initiation. We also examined the impact of an optimal dialysis start (i.e. initiated as an outpatient with an arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft or peritoneal dialysis catheter) on subsequent health outcomes. METHODS: Charts of consecutive incident RRT patients were identified from 1 July to 31 December 2006. Information was collected until 6 months after the initiation or until death, transplant or transfer. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-nine incident RRT patients were studied: 39.6% initiated as an inpatient; 54% started hemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter; 15.3% had <1 month predialysis care, while 64.6% had >1 year. Optimal starts occurred in 39.5% of patients. For HD patients, optimal starts occurred in 19.8%. Suboptimal starts were noted in patients referred <12 months prior to end-stage renal disease (44%) and in patients referred earlier (56%). The composite end point of death, transfusion or subsequent hospitalization was significantly reduced with an optimal start [hazard ratio 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.32-0.68), P = 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal initiation of dialysis is common in patients referred early or late. The benefits of early referral are lost if dialysis is initiated suboptimally. There is a need to identify factors that lead to suboptimal initiation despite early referral.

Interprovincial differences in the achievement of K/DOQI targets of mineral metabolism in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in mineral metabolism in chronic kidney disease are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) clinical practice guidelines were established in 2003 to address issues in the management of mineral and bone metabolism. The goal of this study was to compare (i) mineral metabolism control among Canadian haemodialysis (HD) patients with K/DOQI-defined targets and Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study II (DOPPS II) data and (ii) the effect of different treatment strategies. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 2215 HD patients was conducted. Phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and calcium-phosphate product (CaXP) were analysed. In addition, management was compared between provinces with more or less restricted access to the phosphate binder sevelamer. RESULTS: K/DOQI targets for P, Ca, iPTH and CaXP K/DOQI targets were met by 59.7%, 58.6%, 29.7% and 83.3%, respectively. A greater proportion of patients were within target compared with those in DOPPS II (2002-2004). Targets were more likely to be reached by patients residing in provinces with formularies allowing less restricted access to sevelamer: P: 61.8% vs 55.7% (P = 0.01); CaXP: 85.5% vs 79.1% (P = 0.0006). As expected, patients in provinces with more restrictive formularies were more often receiving doses of elemental calcium > 1.5 g/day than those with more open listings (62.1% vs 14.0%, P < 0.0001) and were less likely to receive sevelamer (14.1% vs 42.4%, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Mineral metabolism parameters were more frequently within the target range amongst (i) patients in the current study compared with those in the DOPPS II era and (ii) patients in provinces with less restricted access to sevelamer.

Conditionally funded field evaluations--a solution to the economic barriers limiting evidence generation in dialysis?

Evaluation of new therapies after licensing is usually a binary decision by payers; to fund or not to fund. In the real world, many therapies fall into a gray zone of incomplete evaluation. Many clinical and economic issues in nephrology have combined to create a long list of such promising but incompletely evaluated therapies. This article focuses on the economic challenges that limit evidence generation in nephrology. Conditionally funded field evaluations such as coverage with evidence development can allow both earlier access to new treatments and rigorous evaluation. The authors propose that field evaluations will stimulate an environment that promotes pivotal renal care advances. Certainly, the evidence challenge faced by nephrology requires urgent discussions on creating conditions that catalyze and accelerate innovation, and improve patient outcomes.

A three-step approach to conversion of prevalent catheter-dependent hemodialysis patients to arteriovenous access.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prevalent central venous catheter (CVC) rates among hemodialysis (HD) patients in Canada remain high. In October 2006, we implemented a three-step multidisciplinary quality improvement project in our in-centre HD unit. The primary objective was to convert 50% of suitable patients to arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENT: We undertook a case-crossover evaluation of the efficacy of a three-step conversion strategy. In step one, all medically suitable in-centre HD patients were assessed for arteriovenous (AV) access creation. In step two, patients were scheduled for preoperative vascular mapping and referred to the vascular surgeon. In step three, patients who refused conversion were asked to sign a waiver indicating that their decision to continue with a CVC was against medical advice. RESULTS: At the start of the project in October 2006, there were a total of 284 patients on HD in our in-centre unit and 108 patients were catheter-dependent (38%). Of these, 53 patients were deemed suitable for conversion from a CVC to AVF or AVG; 26/53 (49%) patients agreed to conversion and 27/53 (51%) refused conversion. For the patients in the conversion group, 63% had been followed in chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinic and 37% initiated dialysis acutely; compared to 57% and 43% respectively in the refusal group. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.62 by Chi-square test), suggesting that there may be other factors affecting a patient's decision other than predialysis nephrology care. Of interest, 19/27 (70%) of patients who refused conversion signed the waiver and 8/27 (30%) refused to sign the waiver. None of the patients, when confronted with the waiver, agreed to conversion. Based on analysis of the main findings from our study, patients were most concerned about insertion of needles, pain and the appearance of their AV accesses. While 22 patients have successfully converted, resulting in a conversion rate of 41.5%, the percentage of catheter-dependent patients increased from 38% to 46% during the project period. Factors that likely contribute to the increase in point-prevalence CVC rates during the project period include a high rate of patient refusal, a high rate of patients deemed to be medically unsuitable, AV access failure during the project period, and most common was a failure to create AV access among incident HD patients who were followed in our centre through the late stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Successful conversion was defined as removal of CVC and use ofAVaccess for HD at the end of the study period (December, 2010). CONCLUSION: Long-term CVC use in Canada and the unwillingness of medically suitable patients to convert to more optimal forms of vascular access are linked problems with potentially grave consequences. We need to develop a better understanding of the patients' perspective and possible psychological factors affecting patients' decisions if we are to have an impact on the high CVC use of Canadian prevalent HD patients.

Dialysis delivery in Canada and the United States: a view from the trenches.

Although the general framework for health care delivery is vastly different in Canada and the United States, the framework for dialysis delivery is less divergent. However, the 2 systems have evolved very differently. Examined during the past 20 years, it is apparent that the dialysis system in the United States has undergone profound change, whereas the system in Canada is relatively stagnant. Most of the change in the United States has been positive, and this evolutionary change is expected to continue. In Canada, a system that historically has worked reasonably well is now showing severe signs of suboptimal performance that would be expected to get worse if no effort is made to improve it. This article, written from the perspective of 2 academic clinicians, tries to describe similarities and differences, identify strengths and weaknesses, and serve as a catalyst for discussions about improving both systems. Just as no dialysis treatment modality is perfect, the same can be said for dialysis delivery systems. Empirical methods to objectively evaluate the impact of change must be included in the design and implementation of new initiatives in the United States and Canada.

The effects of calcium-based versus non-calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effects of calcium compared with non-calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality, cardiovascular events and vascular calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are unknown. METHODS: To address this question, we conducted a systematic review. We electronically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and CINAHL. We identified 160 potential studies and included 8 randomized trials. Eligible studies, determined by consensus using predefined criteria, were reviewed, and data were extracted onto a standard from. RESULTS: There was a trend towards a decrease in all-cause mortality among non-calcium-based versus calcium-based phosphate binders [relative risk (RR) 0.68; 95% CI 0.41-1.11] based upon eight randomized controlled trials and 2873 subjects. Two trials reported on cardiovascular events with a RR of 0.85 (95% CI 0.35-2.03) in patients receiving calcium-based versus non-calcium-based binders. Coronary artery calcification was reported in five trials involving 469 patients; the difference in the change in the calcium score from baseline to follow-up among subjects taking non-calcium-based binders versus calcium-based binders was -76.35 (95% CI -158.25-5.55). CONCLUSION: Despite the trends observed, we did not find a statistically significant difference in cardiovascular mortality and coronary artery calcification in patients receiving calcium-based phosphate binders compared to non-calcium-based phosphate binders. However, the data are limited by the small number of studies and the confidence intervals do not exclude a potentially important beneficial effect. Therefore, further randomized trials are required.

A prospective evaluation of renal replacement therapy modality eligibility.

BACKGROUND: Patient eligibility for renal replacement therapy (RRT) modalities is frequently debated, but little prospective data are available from large patient cohorts. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated medical and psychosocial eligibility for the three RRT modalities in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages III-V who were enrolled in an ongoing prospective cohort study conducted at seven North American nephrology practices. RESULTS: Ninety-eight percent of patients were considered medically eligible for haemodialysis (HD), 87% of patients were assessed as medically eligible for peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 54% of patients were judged medically eligible for transplant. Age was the leading cause of non-eligibility for both PD and transplant. Anatomical concerns (adhesions, hernias) were the second most frequent concern for PD eligibility followed by weight. Weight was also a concern for transplant eligibility. The proportion of patients medically eligible for RRT did not vary by CKD stage. There was, however, significant inter-centre variation in the proportion of patients medically eligible for PD and transplant. Ninety-five percent of patients were considered psychosocially eligible for HD, 83% of patients were assessed as psychosocially eligible for PD and 71% of patients were judged psychosocially eligible for transplant. The percentage of patients who were assessed as having neither medical nor psychosocial contraindications for RRT was 95% for HD, 78% for PD and 53% for transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Most CKD patients are considered by their medical care providers to be suitable for PD. Enhanced patient education, promotion of home dialysis for suitable patients and empowerment of patient choice are expected to augment growth of home dialysis modalities.

An integrated review of "unplanned" dialysis initiation: reframing the terminology to "suboptimal" initiation.

BACKGROUND: Ideally, care prior to the initiation of dialysis should increase the likelihood that patients start electively outside of the hospital setting with a mature arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter. However, unplanned dialysis continues to occur in patients both known and unknown to nephrology services, and in both late and early referrals. The objective of this article is to review the clinical and socioeconomic outcomes of unplanned dialysis initiation. The secondary objective is to explore the potential cost implications of reducing the rate of unplanned first dialysis in Canada. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to 2008 were used to identify studies examining the clinical, economic or quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients with an unplanned versus planned first dialysis. Data were described in a qualitative manner. RESULTS: Eight European studies (5,805 patients) were reviewed. Duration of hospitalization and mortality was higher for the unplanned versus planned population. Patients undergoing a first unplanned dialysis had significantly worse laboratory parameters and QoL. Rates of unplanned dialysis ranged from 2449%. The total annual burden to the Canadian healthcare system of unplanned dialysis in 2005 was estimated at $33 million in direct hospital costs alone. Reducing the rate of unplanned dialysis by one-half yielded savings ranging from $13.3 to $16.1 million. CONCLUSION: The clinical and socioeconomic impact of unplanned dialysis is significant. To more consistently characterize the unplanned population, the term suboptimal initiation is proposed to include dialysis initiation in hospital and/or with a central venous catheter and/or with a patient not starting on their chronic modality of choice. Further research and implementation of initiatives to reduce the rate of suboptimal initiation of dialysis in Canada are needed.

Vascular access use and outcomes: an international perspective from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

BACKGROUND: A well-functioning vascular access (VA) is essential to efficient dialysis therapy. Guidelines have been implemented improving care, yet access use varies widely across countries and VA complications remain a problem. This study took advantage of the unique opportunity to utilize data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) to examine international trends in VA use and trends in patient characteristics and practices associated with VA use from 1996 to 2007. DOPPS is a prospective, observational study of haemodialysis (HD) practices and patient outcomes at >300 HD units from 12 countries and has collected data thus far from >35,000 randomly selected patients. METHODS: VA data were collected for each patient at study entry (1996-2007). Practice pattern data from the facility medical director, nurse manager and VA surgeon were also analysed. RESULTS: Since 2005, a native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) was used by 67-91% of prevalent patients in Japan, Italy, Germany, France, Spain, the UK, Australia and New Zealand, and 50-59% in Belgium, Sweden and Canada. From 1996 to 2007, AVF use rose from 24% to 47% in the USA but declined in Italy, Germany and Spain. Moreover, graft use fell by 50% in the USA from 58% use in 1996 to 28% by 2007. Across three phases of data collection, patients consistently were less likely to use an AVF versus other VA types if female, of older age, having greater body mass index, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease or recurrent cellulitis/gangrene. In addition, countries with a greater prevalence of diabetes in HD patients had a significantly lower percentage of patients using an AVF. Despite poorer outcomes for central vein catheters, catheter use rose 1.5- to 3-fold among prevalent patients in many countries from 1996 to 2007, even among non-diabetic patients 18-70 years old. Furthermore, 58-73% of patients new to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) used a catheter for the initiation of HD in five countries despite 60-79% of patients having been seen by a nephrologist >4 months prior to ESRD. Patients were significantly (P < 0.05) less likely to start dialysis with a permanent VA if treated in a faciity that (1) had a longer time from referral to access surgery evaluation or from evaluation to access creation and (2) had longer time from access creation until first AVF cannulation. The median time from referral until access creation varied from 5-6 days in Italy, Japan and Germany to 40-43 days in the UK and Canada. Compared to patients using an AVF, patients with a catheter displayed significantly lower mean Kt/V levels. CONCLUSIONS: Most countries meet the contemporary National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative goal for AVF use; however, there is still a wide variation in VA preference. Delays between the creation and cannulation must be improved to enhance the chances of a future permanent VA. Native arteriovenous fistula is the VA of choice ensuring dialysis adequacy and better patient outcomes. Graft is, however, a better alternative than catheter for patients where the creation of an attempted AVF failed or could not be created for different reasons.

A practice-related risk score (PRS): a DOPPS-derived aggregate quality index for haemodialysis facilities.

BACKGROUND: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) database was used to develop and validate a practice-related risk score (PRS) based on modifiable practices to help facilities assess potential areas for improving patient care. METHODS: Relative risks (RRs) from a multivariable Cox mortality model, based on observational haemodialysis (HD) patient data from DOPPS I (1996-2001, seven countries), were used. The four practices were the percent of patients with Kt/V > or =1.2, haemoglobin > or =11 g/dl (110 g/l), albumin > or =4.0 g/dl (40g/l) and catheter use, and were significantly related to mortality when modelled together. DOPPS II data (2002-2004, 12 countries) were used to evaluate the relationship between PRS and mortality risk using Cox regression. RESULTS: For facilities in DOPPS I and II, changes in PRS over time were significantly correlated with changes in the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The PRS ranged from 1.0 to 2.1. Overall, the adjusted RR of death was 1.05 per 0.1 points higher PRS (P < 0.0001). For facilities in both DOPPS I and II (N = 119), a 0.2 decrease in PRS was associated with a 0.19 decrease in SMR (P = 0.005). On average, facilities that improved PRS practices showed significantly reduced mortality over the same time frame. CONCLUSIONS: The PRS assesses modifiable HD practices that are linked to improved patient survival. Further refinements might lead to improvements in the PRS and will address regional variations in the PRS/mortality relationship.

Experience and evidence: is there enough to support funding daily in-center dialysis?

The dialysis community has increasingly shown the health benefits of short daily hemodialysis (sDHD) at home. While this appears mainly suitable for younger and more independent patients, it seems likely that older and frailer patients would benefit from short daily dialysis as well. Humber River Regional Hospital has an in-center daily dialysis program in Canada, offering services to 31 patients. The experiences of patients, challenges for the health care team, and funding issues are discussed and point toward a promising future for in-center daily dialysis. However, a need for studies of greater quality and quantity is outlined as a major obstacle in gaining widespread support for in-center daily dialysis from the funders of dialysis care.

DOPPS estimate of patient life years attributable to modifiable hemodialysis practices in Canada.

We examined data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry, and from a special substudy of CORR, to determine whether changes have occurred in practice patterns before and after the 1999 Canadian Society of Nephrology guidelines were published. Second, we used data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study to calculate the impact of observed deviations from guideline targets and estimated potential gains in life years that might accrue if guideline targets were achieved in all Canadian hemodialysis patients. For dialysis dose and hemoglobin targets, there was a significant improvement in Canadian facility performance over time. On the other hand, vascular access care showed a worse pattern with increased catheter use. A calculation of attributable risk, which assumes causality, suggests that 49 percent of deaths could be averted if all patients currently outside the guidelines achieved them over the next five years. When expressed as an annual death rate per hundred patient years, this corresponds to a decrease from 18 to 10.1 deaths per 100 patient years. We conclude that promoting a facility-based culture of quality improvement based on achievement of guideline targets is supported by international and Canadian observational data from the DOPPS. In the future, the impact of such an approach should be assessed empirically by correlating changes in practice over time with changes in outcomes.

Optimizing hemodialysis practices in Canada could improve patient survival.

Data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry (CORR) and the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) were used to determine whether practice patterns have changed in Canada since the introduction of the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) Guidelines in 1999. DOPPS data were then used to calculate the impact of not meeting the proposed guideline targets and to estimate the potential life years gained if all Canadian hemodialysis patients achieved guideline targets. For dialysis dose and hemoglobin targets, Canadian facility performance has significantly improved over time. The vascular access use patterns show trends toward a worse pattern with increased catheter use. A calculation of the percentage of attributable risk suggests that 49% of deaths could possibly be averted if all patients currently outside the guidelines achieved them over the next five years. This corresponds to a decrease in the annual death rate from 18 to 10.1 per hundred patient years. These data support the need for improved adherence to guidelines. If Canadian caregivers were to optimize practice patterns, patient outcomes could be improved.

Attitudes and Opinions of Canadian Nephrologists Toward Continuous Quality Improvement Options.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A shift to holding individual physicians accountable for patient outcomes, rather than facilities, is intuitively attractive to policy makers and to the public. We were interested in nephrologists' attitudes to, and awareness of, quality metrics and how nephrologists would view a potential switch from the current model of facility-based quality measurement and reporting to publically available reports at the individual physician level. DESIGN SETTING PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: The study was conducted using a web-based survey instrument (Online Appendix 1). The survey was initially pilot tested on a group of 8 nephrologists from across Canada. The survey was then finalized and e-mailed to 330 nephrologists through the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) e-mail distribution list. The 127 respondents were 80% university based, and 33% were medical/dialysis directors. RESULTS: The response rate was 43%. Results demonstrate that 89% of Canadian nephrologists are engaged in efforts to improve the quality of patient care. A minority of those surveyed (29%) had training in quality improvement. They feel accountable for this and would welcome the inclusion of patient-centered metrics of care quality. Support for public reporting as an effective strategy on an individual nephrologist level was 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Support for public reporting of individual nephrologist performance was low. The care of nephrology patients will be best served by the continued development of a critical mass of physicians trained in patient safety and quality improvement, by focusing on patient-centered metrics of care delivery, and by validating that all proposed new methods are shown to improve patient care and outcomes.

CONTEXTE ET OBJECTIFS DE L'ÉTUDE: Une transition vers l'attribution de la responsabilité des résultats des patients au médecin traitant plutôt qu'à l'établissement de soins de santé est un concept attrayant pour les décideurs et le grand public. Notre objectif d'étude était bipartite: d'abord, nous voulions explorer la perception et la connaissance qu'ont les néphrologues des indicateurs de la qualité des soins; ensuite, nous souhaitions prendre connaissance de l'avis des néphrologues sur un éventuel changement de modèle, lequel évalue actuellement la qualité des soins de manière globale plutôt que pour chaque médecin et enfin, sur l'idée que de tels rapports individuels soient accessibles au public. CONCEPTION ET CADRE DE L'ÉTUDE PARTICIPANTS ET MÉTHODOLOGIE: L'étude a été réalisée à l'aide d'un sondage Web (voir l'annexe 1). Une version provisoire du sondage a d'abord été testée auprès de huit néphrologues de partout au Canada. La version définitive du sondage a été envoyée par courriel à 330 néphrologues figurant sur la liste d'envoi de la Société canadienne de néphrologie (SCN). Le taux de réponse global a été de 43%. Des 127 répondants, la grande majorité (80%) travaillait en milieu universitaire et 33% occupait un poste de directeur médical ou de directeur d'unité de dialyse. RÉSULTATS: Les résultats ont démontré que 89% des néphrologues canadiens s'efforcent déjà d'améliorer les soins prodigués aux patients, et qu'une minorité d'entre eux (29%) ont reçu une formation pertinente. De manière générale, ils se sentent responsables de la qualité des soins et sont réceptifs à l'idée d'inclure des critères d'évaluation plus axés sur les patients. Le taux d'approbation en regard de l'accès libre aux rapports individuels comme une stratégie efficace au plan individuel était de 30%. CONCLUSION: Un faible pourcentage des néphrologues s'est prononcé en faveur de la divulgation publique de rapport faisant état de leur performance individuelle. Les soins prodigués aux patients suivis en néphrologie seront perfectionnés en continuant d'augmenter le nombre de médecins formés en matière d'amélioration de la qualité des soins aux patients et de sécurité, en promouvant des indicateurs de qualité centrés sur les patients, et en vérifiant que toute nouvelle méthode proposée vise foncièrement à améliorer les soins ou les résultats des patients.