ZFN-Mediated In Vivo Genome Editing Corrects Murine Hurler Syndrome.

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is a severe disease due to deficiency of the lysosomal hydrolase α-L-iduronidase (IDUA) and the subsequent accumulation of the glycosaminoglycans (GAG), leading to progressive, systemic disease and a shortened lifespan. Current treatment options consist of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which carries significant mortality and morbidity risk, and enzyme replacement therapy, which requires lifelong infusions of replacement enzyme; neither provides adequate therapy, even in combination. A novel in vivo genome-editing approach is described in the murine model of Hurler syndrome. A corrective copy of the IDUA gene is inserted at the albumin locus in hepatocytes, leading to sustained enzyme expression, secretion from the liver into circulation, and subsequent uptake systemically at levels sufficient for correction of metabolic disease (GAG substrate accumulation) and prevention of neurobehavioral deficits in MPS I mice. This study serves as a proof-of-concept for this platform-based approach that should be broadly applicable to the treatment of a wide array of monogenic diseases.

Dose-Dependent Prevention of Metabolic and Neurologic Disease in Murine MPS II by ZFN-Mediated In Vivo Genome Editing.

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II) is an X-linked recessive lysosomal disorder caused by deficiency of iduronate 2-sulfatase (IDS), leading to accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in tissues of affected individuals, progressive disease, and shortened lifespan. Currently available enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) requires lifelong infusions and does not provide neurologic benefit. We utilized a zinc finger nuclease (ZFN)-targeting system to mediate genome editing for insertion of the human IDS (hIDS) coding sequence into a "safe harbor" site, intron 1 of the albumin locus in hepatocytes of an MPS II mouse model. Three dose levels of recombinant AAV2/8 vectors encoding a pair of ZFNs and a hIDS cDNA donor were administered systemically in MPS II mice. Supraphysiological, vector dose-dependent levels of IDS enzyme were observed in the circulation and peripheral organs of ZFN+donor-treated mice. GAG contents were markedly reduced in tissues from all ZFN+donor-treated groups. Surprisingly, we also demonstrate that ZFN-mediated genome editing prevented the development of neurocognitive deficit in young MPS II mice (6-9 weeks old) treated at high vector dose levels. We conclude that this ZFN-based platform for expression of therapeutic proteins from the albumin locus is a promising approach for treatment of MPS II and other lysosomal diseases.

Regulatory Consideration for the Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Gene Therapies.

The nonclinical safety assessments for gene therapies are evolving, leveraging over 20 years of experimental and clinical experience. Despite the growing experience with these therapeutics, there are no approved harmonized global regulatory documents for developing gene therapies with only the ICH (International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use) S12 guidance on nonclinical biodistribution currently under discussion. Several health authorities have issued guidance over the last 15 years on the nonclinical safety aspects for gene therapy products, but many of the recommendations are limited to high-level concepts on nonclinical safety aspects or altogether silent on key topics. Historically, this approach was appropriately vague given our relatively small dataset of nonclinical experience, where a comprehensive and detailed regulatory guidance approach was unlikely to be appropriate to address all scenarios. However, harmonization of key considerations and assumptions can provide a consistent basis for developing the appropriate nonclinical safety development plans for individual programs, reducing uncertainty across regulatory regions and unnecessary animal use. Several key areas of nonclinical safety testing are nearing maturation for a harmonized approach, including species selection, certain aspects of study design, study duration, and unintended genomic integration risks. Furthermore, several emerging topics are unaddressed in current regulatory guidance for gene therapy products, which will become key areas of differentiation for the next generation of therapeutics. These topics include redosing, juvenile/pediatric safety, and reproductive/developmental safety testing, where relevant experience from other modalities can be applied. The rationale and potential study design considerations for these topics will be proposed, acknowledging that certain aspects of gene therapy development are not considered appropriate for harmonization. This article provides an overview of the current nonclinical safety regulatory landscape, summarizes typical nonclinical safety study designs, highlights areas of uncertainty, and discusses emerging topics that warrant consideration. Specific recommendations and perspectives are provided to inform future regulatory discussions and harmonization efforts.