Gender Differences in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Gender difference may affect lung neuroendocrine tumor (L-NET) onset, progression, and outcomes as emerged in other cancers. This study aimed to analyze gender difference in L-NET to identify potential prognostic factors, to improve patient follow-up and therapeutic strategies. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed L-NEN diagnosis referred to the ENETS CoE of the Endocrinology Unit, Federico II University of Naples, from 2013 to 2023, were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Among 48 patients with L-NEN, 38 (79.2%) with sporadic L-NET were enrolled: 22 typical (57.9%) and 16 atypical (42.1%) carcinoids, 22 (57.9%) female and 16 (42.1%) male, mean age at diagnosis 57.3 years (range 16-84). Median follow-up was 70.5 months (range 12-305). No statistical difference resulted regarding smoking habit, BMI, primary site (left/right and central/peripheral), and histological characteristics, between cohorts. Metastasis at diagnosis was found in 20 patients (52.3%), 10 female (10%) and 10 male (10%) (p: 0.20). Progressive disease (PD) was observed in 14 (36.8%) patients, and male sex developed PD more frequently 9/14 (64.3%) than female 5 (35.7%), p: 0.05. Male sex seemed to show more frequently bone metastasis without reaching statistical difference, 7 male/10 (70%), p: 0.06. Among 9 deaths (23.7%), 7 (77.8%) were men and 7 died for PD, p < 0.03. Male had a poorer prognosis than female regarding progression-free survival (PFS) (p: 0.04) and overall survival (p: 0.001), also when sub-groups of patient metastatic at diagnosis were compared (p: 0.02 and p: 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a worse prognosis in male than female with L-NET, despite similar clinical features, tumor type, stage, and treatment, with regard to PFS, OS, and metastatic spread. These findings may suggest a closer follow-up in men, with potential positive impact on outcomes.

Recent advances and future challenges in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with increasing incidence, whose diagnosis is usually delayed, negatively impacting on patients' prognosis. The latest advances in pathological classifications, biomarker identification and imaging techniques may provide early detection, leading to personalized treatment strategies. In this narrative review the recent developments in diagnosis of NEN are discussed including progresses in pathological classifications, biomarker and imaging. Furthermore, the challenges that lie ahead are investigated. By discussing the limitations of current approaches and addressing potential roadblocks, we hope to guide future research directions in this field. This article is proposed as a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers involved in the management of NEN. Update of pathological classifications and the availability of standardized templates in pathology and radiology represent a substantially improvement in diagnosis and communication among clinicians. Additional immunohistochemistry markers may now enrich pathological classifications, as well as miRNA profiling. New and multi-analytical circulating biomarkers, as liquid biopsy and NETest, are being proposed for diagnosis but their validation and availability should be improved. Radiological imaging strives for precise, non-invasive and less harmful technique to improve safety and quality of life in NEN patient. Nuclear medicine may benefit of somatostatin receptors' antagonists and membrane receptor analogues. Diagnosis in NEN still represents a challenge due to their complex biology and variable presentation. Further advancements are necessary to obtain early and minimally invasive diagnosis to improve patients' outcomes.

Dyslipidemia, lipid-lowering agents and neuroendocrine neoplasms: new horizons.

PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies originating from cells with a neuroendocrine phenotype. The complex relationship between lipid metabolism and cancer is gaining interest and a potential anti-cancer effect of lipid lowering agents is being considered. This review aims to discuss the current understanding and treatment of dyslipidaemia in NENs, focusing on the role of lipid lowering agents, including new therapeutic approaches, and future perspectives as possible tool in cancer prevention and tumor-growth control. METHODS: We performed an electronic-based search using PubMed updated until December 2023, summarizing the available evidence both in basic and clinical research about lipid lowering agents in NENs. RESULTS: Dyslipidemia is an important aspect to be considered in NENs management, although randomized studies specifically addressing this topic are lacking, unlike other cancer types. Available data mainly regard statins, and in vitro studies have demonstrated direct antitumor effects, including antiproliferative effects in some cancers, supporting possible pleiotropic effects also in NENs, but data remain conflicting. Ezetimibe, omega 3-fatty acids, fibrates and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) may enhance the regulation of lipid homeostasis, as demonstrated in other cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting dyslipidemia in NENs should be part of the multidisciplinary management and an integrated approach may be the best option for both metabolic and tumor control. Whether lipid lowering agents may directly contribute to tumor control remains to be confirmed with specific studies, focusing on association with other metabolic risk, disease stage and primary site.