Whole-genome long-read sequencing to unveil Enterococcus antimicrobial resistance in dairy cattle farms exposed a widespread occurrence of Enterococcus lactis.

Enterococcus faecalis (Efs) and Enterococcus faecium (Efm) are major causes of multiresistant healthcare-associated or nosocomial infections. Efm has been traditionally divided into clades A (healthcare associated) and B (community associated) but clade B has been recently reassigned to Enterococcus lactis (Elc). However, identification techniques do not routinely differentiate Elc from Efm. As part of a longitudinal study to investigate the antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus in dairy cattle, isolates initially identified as Efm were confirmed as Elc after Oxford-Nanopore long-fragment whole-genome sequencing and genome comparisons. An Efm-specific PCR assay was developed and used to identify isolates recovered from animal feces on five farms, resulting in 44 Efs, 23 Efm, and 59 Elc. Resistance, determined by broth microdilution, was more frequent in Efs than in Efm and Elc but all isolates were susceptible to ampicillin, daptomycin, teicoplanin, tigecycline, and vancomycin. Genome sequencing analysis of 32 isolates identified 23 antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs, mostly plasmid-located) and 2 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with resistance to 10 antimicrobial classes, showing high concordance with phenotypic resistance. Notably, linezolid resistance in Efm was encoded by the optrA gene, located in plasmids downstream of the fexA gene. Although most Elc lacked virulence factors and genetic determinants of resistance, one isolate carried a plasmid with eight ARGs. This study showed that Elc is more prevalent than Efm in dairy cattle but carries fewer ARGs and virulence genes. However, Elc can carry multi-drug-resistant plasmids like those harbored by Efm and could act as a donor of ARGs for other pathogenic enterococcal species.IMPORTANCEEnterococcus species identification is crucial due to differences in pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance profiles. The failure of traditional methods or whole-genome sequencing-based taxonomic classifiers to distinguish Enterococcus lactis (Elc) from Enterococcus faecium (Efm) results in a biased interpretation of Efm epidemiology. The Efm species-specific real-time PCR assay developed here will help to properly identify Efm (only the formerly known clade A) in future studies. Here, we showed that Elc is prevalent in dairy cattle, and although this species carries fewer genetic determinants of resistance (GDRs) than Enterococcus faecalis (Efs) and Efm, it can carry multi-drug-resistant (MDR) plasmids and could act as a donor of resistance genes for other pathogenic enterococcal species. Although all isolates (Efs, Efm, and Elc) were susceptible to critically or highly important antibiotics like daptomycin, teicoplanin, tigecycline, and vancomycin, the presence of GDRs in MDR-plasmids is a concern since antimicrobials commonly used in livestock could co-select and confer resistance to critically important antimicrobials not used in food-producing animals.

Probiotic bacteria can modulate immune responses to paratuberculosis vaccination.

Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map) is the etiological agent of paratuberculosis (PTB), a chronic intestinal inflammatory disease that causes high economical losses in dairy livestock worldwide. Due to the absence of widely available preventive or therapeutical treatments, new alternative therapies are needed. In this study, the effect of a probiotic alone or in combination with a commercial vaccine has been evaluated in a rabbit model. Vaccination enhanced the humoral response, exerted a training effect of peripheral polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) against homologous and heterologous stimuli, stimulated the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) macrophages, and reduced the bacterial burden in GALT as well. However, the administration of the probiotic after vaccination did not affect the PMN activity, increased metabolic demand, and supressed pro-inflammatory cytokines, although humoral response and bacterial burden decrease in GALT was maintained similar to vaccination alone. The administration of the probiotic alone did not enhance the humoral response or PMN activity, and the bacterial burden in GALT was further increased compared to the only challenged group. In conclusion, the probiotic was able to modulate the immune response hampering the clearance of the infection and was also able to affect the response of innate immune cells after vaccination. This study shows that the administration of a probiotic can modulate the immune response pathways triggered by vaccination and/or infection and even exacerbate the outcome of the disease, bringing forward the importance of verifying treatment combinations in the context of each particular infectious agent.