Interventions, Barriers, and Proposed Solutions Associated With the Implementation of a Protocol That Uses Clinical Decision Support and a Stress Biomarker Test to Identify ICU Patients at High-Risk for Drug Associated Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Damage biomarkers are helpful in early identification of patients who are at risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). Investigations are ongoing to identify the optimal role of stress/damage biomarkers in clinical practice regarding AKI risk prediction, surveillance, diagnosis, and prognosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of utilizing a clinical decision support system (CDSS) to guide stress biomarker testing in intensive care unit (ICU) patients at risk for drug-induced acute kidney injury (D-AKI). METHODS: A protocol was designed utilizing a clinical decision support system (CDSS) alert to identify patients that were ordered 3 or more potentially nephrotoxic medications, suggesting risk for progressing to AKI from nephrotoxic burden. Once alerted to these high-risk patients, the pharmacist determined if action was needed by ordering a stress biomarker test, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2-insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (TIMP-2•IGFBP7). If the biomarker test result was elevated, the pharmacist provided nephrotoxin stewardship recommendations to the team. Pharmacists recorded the response to the clinical decision support alert, ordering, and interpreting the TIMP-2•IGFBP7, and information regarding clinical interventions. An alert in conjunction with TIMP-2•IGFBP7 as a strategy for AKI risk prediction and stimulant for patient care management was assessed. In addition, barriers and solutions to protocol implementation were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 394 total activities recorded by pharmacists for 345 unique patients. Ninety-three (93/394; 23.6%) actionable alerts resulted in a TIMP-2•IGFBP7 test being ordered. Thirty-one TIMP-2•IGFBP7 results were >0.3 (31/81; 38.3%), suggesting a high-risk of progression to AKI, which prompted 191 pharmacist/team interventions. On average, there were 1.64 interventions per patient in the low-risk patients, 3.43 in high-risk patients, and 3.75 in the highest-risk patients. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Stress biomarkers can be used in conjunction with CDSS alerts to affect therapeutic decisions in ICU patients at high-risk for D-AKI.

Forecasting imminent atrial fibrillation in long-term electrocardiogram recordings.

BACKGROUND: Despite the morbidity associated with acute atrial fibrillation (AF), no models currently exist to forecast its imminent onset. We sought to evaluate the ability of deep learning to forecast the imminent onset of AF with sufficient lead time, which has important implications for inpatient care. METHODS: We utilized the Physiobank Long-Term AF Database, which contains 24-h, labeled ECG recordings from patients with a history of AF. AF episodes were defined as ≥5 min of sustained AF. Three deep learning models incorporating convolutional and transformer layers were created for forecasting, with two models focusing on the predictive nature of sinus rhythm segments and AF epochs separately preceding an AF episode, and one model utilizing all preceding waveform as input. Cross-validated performance was evaluated using area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC(t)) at 7.5-, 15-, 30-, and 60-min lead times, precision-recall curves, and imminent AF risk trajectories. RESULTS: There were 367 AF episodes from 84 ECG recordings. All models showed average risk trajectory divergence of those with an AF episode from those without ∼15 min before the episode. Highest AUC was associated with the sinus rhythm model [AUC = 0.74; 7.5-min lead time], though the model using all preceding waveform data had similar performance and higher AUCs at longer lead times. CONCLUSIONS: In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrated the potential utility of neural networks to forecast the onset of AF in long-term ECG recordings with a clinically relevant lead time. External validation in larger cohorts is required before deploying these models clinically.

Association of Metformin Use During Hospitalization and Mortality in Critically Ill Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Sepsis.

OBJECTIVES: Whether metformin exposure is associated with improved outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients admitted to ICUs in 16 hospitals in Pennsylvania from October 2008 to December 2014. PATIENTS: Adult critical ill patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and sepsis. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare 90-day mortality in diabetic patients with sepsis with and without exposure to metformin during hospitalization. Data were obtained from the electronic health record of a large healthcare system in Pennsylvania from October 2008 to December 2014, on patients admitted to the ICU at any of the 16 hospitals within the system. The primary outcome was mortality at 90 days. The absolute and adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI were calculated in a propensity score-matched cohort. Among 14,847 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and sepsis, 682 patients (4.6%) were exposed to metformin during hospitalization and 14,165 (95.4%) were not. Within a total of 2,691 patients subjected to propensity score-matching at a 1:4 ratio, exposure to metformin (n = 599) was associated with decreased 90-day mortality (71/599, 11.9% vs 475/2,092, 22.7%; OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35-0.60), reduced severe acute kidney injury (50% vs 57%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.90), less Major Adverse Kidney Events at 1 year (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.22-0.68), and increased renal recovery (95% vs 86%; OR, 6.43; 95% CI, 3.42-12.1). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin exposure during hospitalization is associated with a decrease in 90-day mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and sepsis.

A Participant-Centered Approach to Understanding Risks and Benefits of Participation in Research Informed by the Kidney Precision Medicine Project.

An understanding of the ethical underpinnings of human subjects research that involves some risk to participants without anticipated direct clinical benefit-such as the kidney biopsy procedure as part of the Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP)-requires a critical examination of the risks as well as the diverse set of countervailing potential benefits to participants. This kind of deliberation has been foundational to the development and conduct of the KPMP. Herein, we use illustrative features of this research paradigm to develop a more comprehensive conceptualization of the types of benefits that may be important to research participants, including respecting pluralistic values, supporting the opportunity to act altruistically, and enhancing benefits to a participant's community. This approach may serve as a model to help researchers, ethicists, and regulators to identify opportunities to better respect and support participants in future research that entails some risk to these participants as well as to improve the quality of research for people with kidney disease.

Association between Net Ultrafiltration Rate and Renal Recovery among Critically Ill Adults with Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Observational Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Higher net ultrafiltration (UFNET) rates are associated with mortality among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to discover whether UFNET rates are associated with renal recovery and independence from renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using data from the Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level of Renal Replacement Therapy trial that enrolled 1,433 critically ill patients with AKI and treated with CRRT between December 2005 and November 2008 across 35 intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. We examined the association between UFNET rate and time to independence from RRT by day 90 using competing risk regression after accounting for mortality. The UFNET rate was defined as the volume of fluid removed per hour adjusted for patient body weight. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Median age was 67.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 57-76.3) years, 64.4% were male, median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-III score was 100 (IQR, 84-118), and 634 (44.2%) died by day 90. Kidney recovery occurred in 755 patients (52.7%). Using tertiles of UFNET rates, 3 groups were defined: high, >1.75; middle, 1.01-1.75; and low, <1.01 mL/kg/h. Proportion of patients alive and independent of RRT among the groups were 47.8 versus 57.2 versus 53.0%; p = 0.01. Using competing risk regression, higher UFNET rate tertile compared with middle (cause-specific hazard ratio [csHR], 0.79, 95% CI, 0.66-0.95; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.80, 95% CI, 0.67-0.97) and lower (csHR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; sHR, 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95) tertiles were associated with a longer time to independence from RRT. Every 1.0 mL/kg/h increase in rate was associated with a lower probability of kidney recovery (csHR, 0.81, 95% CI, 0.74-0.89; and sHR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.80-0.95). Using the joint model, longitudinal increases in UFNET rates were also associated with a lower renal recovery (ß = -0.29, p < 0.001). UFNET rates >1.75 mL/kg/h compared with rates 1.01-1.75 and <1.01 mL/kg/h were associated with a longer duration of dependence on RRT. Randomized clinical trials are required to confirm this UFNET rate-outcome relationship.

Early net ultrafiltration rate and mortality in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: In patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), early net ultrafiltration (NUF) rates may be associated with differential outcomes. We tested whether higher early NUF rates are associated with increased mortality in CRRT patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study of all patients treated with CRRT within 14 days of intensive care unit admission. We defined the early (first 48 h) NUF rate as the volume of fluid removed per hour adjusted for patient body weight and analysed as a categorical variable (>1.75, 1.01-1.75 and <1.01 mL/kg/h). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. To deal with competing risk, we also compared different time epochs. RESULTS: We studied 347 patients {median age 64 [interquartile range (IQR) 53-71] years and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score 73 [IQR 54-90]}. Compared with NUF rates <1.01 mL/kg/h, NUF rates >1.75 mL/kg/h were associated with greater mortality rates in each epoch: Days 0-5, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.33]; Days 6-10, aHR 1.62 (95% CI 1.55-1.68); Days 11-15, aHR 1.87 (95% CI 1.79-1.94); Days 16-26, aHR 1.92 (95% CI 1.84-2.01) and Days 27-28, aHR 4.18 (95% CI 3.98-4.40). For every 0.5 mL/kg/h NUF rate increase, mortality similarly increased during these epochs. CONCLUSION: Compared with early NUF rates <1.01 mL/kg/h, NUF rates >1.75 mL/kg/h are associated with increased mortality. These observations provide the rationale for clinical trials to confirm or refute these findings.

Heterogeneity of Effect of Net Ultrafiltration Rate among Critically Ill Adults Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: In continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)-treated patients, a net ultrafiltration (NUF) rate >1.75 mL/kg/h has been associated with increased mortality. However, there may be heterogeneity of effect of NUF rate on mortality, according to patient characteristics. METHODS: To investigate the presence and impact of heterogeneity of effect, we performed a secondary analysis of the "Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level of Renal Replacement Therapy" (RENAL) trial. Exposure was NUF rate (weight-adjusted fluid volume removed per hour) stratified into tertiles (<1.01 mL/kg/h; 1.01-1.75 mL/kg/h; or >1.75 mL/kg/h). Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Patients were clustered according to baseline characteristics. Heterogeneity of effect was assessed according to clusters and baseline edema and related to the additional impact of baseline cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We excluded patients with missing values for baseline weight and/or treatment duration. RESULTS: We identified 2 clusters. The largest (cluster 1; n = 941) included more severely ill patients, with more sepsis, more edema, and more vasopressor therapy (all p < 0.001). Compared to the middle tertile, the probability of harm was greater with the high tertile of NUF rate in patients in cluster 1 and in patients with baseline edema (probability of harm, cluster 1: 99.9%; edema: 99.1%). Moreover, higher baseline cardiovascular SOFA score also increased mortality risk with both high and low compared to middle NUF rates in cluster 1 patients and in patients with edema. CONCLUSIONS: In CRRT patients, both high and low NUF rates may be harmful, especially in those with edema, sepsis, and greater illness severity. Cardiovascular SOFA scores modulate this association. Additional studies are needed to test these hypotheses, and targeted trials of NUF rates based on risk stratification appear justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00221013.

Pannexin 1 mediates ferroptosis that contributes to renal ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Renal ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) is a significant challenge in perioperative medicine and is related to oxidative programmed cell death. However, the role of ferroptosis, a newly discovered form of oxidative cell death, has not been evaluated widely. Pannexin 1 (PANX1), an ATP-releasing pathway family protein, has pro-apoptotic effects during kidney injury. Here, we demonstrate that PANX1 deletion protects against renal IRI by regulating ferroptotic cell death. Panx1 knockout mice subjected to renal IRI had decreased plasma creatinine, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in kidney tissues, and tubular cell death (visible as decreased TUNEL-positive renal tubular cells) compared with WT mice. In cultured human kidney 2 (HK-2) cells, silenced Panx1 expression significantly attenuated ferroptotic lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation induced by the ferroptosis inducer erastin. Moreover, the Panx1 silencing significantly modulated ferroptosis-related protein expression. Furthermore, Panx1 deletion induced the expression of a cytoprotective chaperone, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and inhibited ferroptinophagy via the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. In summary, Panx1 deletion protects against renal IRI by attenuating MAPK/ERK activation in a ferroptotic pathway. Our findings provide critical insights into the role of PANX1 in ferroptotic cell death and highlight a potential therapeutic target for the management of acute kidney injury (AKI) during the perioperative period.

Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock.

BACKGROUND: Vasodilatory shock that does not respond to high-dose vasopressors is associated with high mortality. We investigated the effectiveness of angiotensin II for the treatment of patients with this condition. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with vasodilatory shock who were receiving more than 0.2 µg of norepinephrine per kilogram of body weight per minute or the equivalent dose of another vasopressor to receive infusions of either angiotensin II or placebo. The primary end point was a response with respect to mean arterial pressure at hour 3 after the start of infusion, with response defined as an increase from baseline of at least 10 mm Hg or an increase to at least 75 mm Hg, without an increase in the dose of background vasopressors. RESULTS: A total of 344 patients were assigned to one of the two regimens; 321 received a study intervention (163 received angiotensin II, and 158 received placebo) and were included in the analysis. The primary end point was reached by more patients in the angiotensin II group (114 of 163 patients, 69.9%) than in the placebo group (37 of 158 patients, 23.4%) (odds ratio, 7.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.76 to 13.3; P<0.001). At 48 hours, the mean improvement in the cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe dysfunction) was greater in the angiotensin II group than in the placebo group (-1.75 vs. -1.28, P=0.01). Serious adverse events were reported in 60.7% of the patients in the angiotensin II group and in 67.1% in the placebo group. Death by day 28 occurred in 75 of 163 patients (46%) in the angiotensin II group and in 85 of 158 patients (54%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin II effectively increased blood pressure in patients with vasodilatory shock that did not respond to high doses of conventional vasopressors. (Funded by La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company; ATHOS-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02338843 .).

Mediators of the Impact of Hourly Net Ultrafiltration Rate on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: During continuous renal replacement therapy, a high net ultrafiltration rate has been associated with increased mortality. However, it is unknown what might mediate its putative effect on mortality. In this study, we investigated whether the relationship between early (first 48 hr) net ultrafiltration and mortality is mediated by fluid balance, hemodynamic instability, or low potassium or phosphate blood levels using mediation analysis and the primary outcome was hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Mixed medical and surgical ICUs at Austin hospital, Melbourne, Australia. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy within 14 days of ICU admission who survived greater than 48 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We studied 347 patients (median [interquartile range] age: 64 yr [53-71 yr] and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score: 73 (54-90)]. After adjustment for confounders, compared with a net ultrafiltration less than 1.01 mL/kg/hr, a net ultrafiltration rate greater than 1.75 mL/kg/hr was associated with significantly greater mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.29; p = 0.011). Adjusted univariable mediation analysis found no suggestion of a causal mediation pathway for this effect by blood pressure, vasopressor therapy, or potassium levels, but identified a possible mediation effect for fluid balance (average causal mediation effect, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.89-1.00; p = 0.060) and percentage of phosphate measurements with hypophosphatemia (average causal mediation effect, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-1.00; p = 0.055). However, on multiple mediator analyses, these two variables showed no significant effect. In contrast, a high net ultrafiltration rate had an average direct effect of 1.24 (95% CI, 1.11-1.40; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An early net ultrafiltration greater than 1.75 mL/kg/hr was independently associated with increased hospital mortality. Its putative effect on mortality was direct and not mediated by a causal pathway that included fluid balance, low blood pressure, vasopressor use, hypokalemia, or hypophosphatemia.

Net Ultrafiltration Prescription and Practice Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy: A Multinational Survey of Critical Care Practitioners.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the attitudes of practitioners with respect to net ultrafiltration prescription and practice among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy. DESIGN: Multinational internet-assisted survey. SETTING: Critical care practitioners involved with 14 societies in 80 countries. SUBJECTS: Intervention: MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS:: Of 2,567 practitioners who initiated the survey, 1,569 (61.1%) completed the survey. Most practitioners were intensivists (72.7%) with a median duration of 13.2 years of practice (interquartile range, 7.2-22.0 yr). Two third of practitioners (71.0%; regional range, 55.0-95.5%) reported using continuous renal replacement therapy with a net ultrafiltration rate prescription of median 80.0 mL/hr (interquartile range, 49.0-111.0 mL/hr) for hemodynamically unstable and a maximal rate of 299.0 mL/hr (interquartile range, 200.0-365.0 mL/hr) for hemodynamically stable patients, with regional variation. Only a third of practitioners (31.5%; range, 13.7-47.8%) assessed hourly net fluid balance during continuous renal replacement therapy. Hemodynamic instability was reported in 20% (range, 20-38%) of patients and practitioners decreased the rate of fluid removal (70.3%); started or increased the dose of a vasopressor (51.5%); completely stopped fluid removal (35.8%); and administered a fluid bolus (31.6%), with significant regional variation. Compared with physicians, nurses were most likely to report patient intolerance to net ultrafiltration (73.4% vs 81.3%; p = 0.002), frequent interruptions (40.4% vs 54.5%; p < 0.001), and unavailability of trained staff (11.9% vs 15.6%; p = 0.04), whereas physicians reported unavailability of dialysis machines (14.3% vs 6.1%; p < 0.001) and costs associated with treatment as barriers (12.1% vs 3.0%; p < 0.001) with significant regional variation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides new knowledge about the presence and extent of international practice variation in net ultrafiltration. We also identified barriers and specific targets for quality improvement initiatives. Our data reflect the need for evidence-based practice guidelines for net ultrafiltration.

Net ultrafiltration prescription survey in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Fluid overload is common in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and ultrafiltration (UF) is frequently required. There is lack of guidance on optimal UF practice. We aimed to explore patterns of UF practice, barriers to achieving UF targets, and concerns related to UF practice among practitioners working in Europe. METHODS: This was a sub-study of an international open survey with focus on adult intensivists and nephrologists, advanced practice providers, and ICU and dialysis nurses working in Europe. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-five practitioners (75% intensivists) from 31 countries completed the survey. The most common criteria for UF initiation was persistent oliguria/anuria (45.6%), followed by pulmonary edema (16.7%). Continuous renal replacement therapy was the preferred initial modality (90.0%). The median initial and maximal rate of net ultrafiltration (UFNET) prescription in hemodynamically stable patients were 149 mL/hr. (IQR 100-200) and 300 mL/hr. (IQR 201-352), respectively, compared to a median UFNET rate of 98 mL/hr. (IQR 51-108) in hemodynamically unstable patients and varied significantly between countries. Two-thirds of nurses and 15.5% of physicians reported assessing fluid balance hourly. When hemodynamic instability occurred, 70.1% of practitioners reported decreasing the rate of fluid removal, followed by starting or increasing the dose of a vasopressor (51.3%). Most respondents (90.7%) believed in early fluid removal and expressed willingness to participate in a study comparing protocol-based fluid removal versus usual care. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant variation in UF practice and perception among practitioners in Europe. Future research should focus on identifying the best strategies of prescribing and managing ultrafiltration in critically ill patients.

Solute and Volume Dosing during Kidney Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.

Among critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury either continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) or intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) can be performed to provide optimal solute and volume control. The modality of KRT should be chosen based on the needs of the patient, hemodynamic status, clinician expertise, and resource available under a particular setting and consideration of costs. Evidence from high-quality randomized trials suggests that an effluent flow rate of 25 mL/kg/hour per day using CKRT and Kt/V of 1.3 per session of IHD provide optimal solute control. For volume dosing, the net ultrafiltration (UFNET) rate should be prescribed based on patient body weight in milliliters per kilogram per hour, with close monitoring of patient hemodynamics and fluid balance. Emerging evidence from observational studies suggests a "J"-shaped association between UFNET rate and outcomes with both faster and slower UFNET rates being associated with increased mortality compared with moderate UFNET rates. Thus, randomized trials are required to determine optimal UFNET rates in critically ill patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Murugan R. Solute and Volume Dosing during Kidney Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(Suppl 3):S107-S111.

Plasma Biomarkers in Predicting Renal Recovery from Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have suggested a possible role for acute kidney injury (AKI) biomarkers in predicting renal recovery both before and after renal replacement therapy (RRT). However, definitions for recovery and whether to include patients dying but free of RRT may influence results. OBJECTIVES: To validate plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (pNGAL) as a useful biomarker for predicting or improving the ability of clinical predictors alone to predict recovery following AKI, including in our model plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (pBNP) to account for cardiovascular events. METHODS: We analyzed 69 patients enrolled in the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network study. pNGAL and pBNP were measured on days 2, 7, and 14. We analyzed their predictive ability for subsequent recovery, defined as alive and independent from dialysis in 60 days. In sensitivity analyses, we explored changes in results with alternative definitions of recovery. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (42%) recovered from AKI. Neither pNGAL nor pBNP, alone or in combination, was accurate predictors of renal recovery-the best area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was for pNGAL using the largest relative change (AUC 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.74). The best clinical model achieved superior performance to biomarkers (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.81). The AUC was greatest (0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.91) when pNGAL + pBNP on day 14 were added to the clinical model but this increase did not achieve statistical significance. However, integrated discrimination improvement analysis showed that the addition of pNGAL and pBNP on day 14 to the clinical model significantly improved the prediction of renal recovery (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: pNGAL and pBNP can improve the accuracy of clinical parameters in predicting AKI recovery and a full model using biomarkers together with age achieved adequate discrimination.

Outcomes in Patients with Vasodilatory Shock and Renal Replacement Therapy Treated with Intravenous Angiotensin II.

OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy in severe vasodilatory shock is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Angiotensin II treatment may help these patients by potentially restoring renal function without decreasing intrarenal oxygenation. We analyzed the impact of angiotensin II on the outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock 3 trial. SETTING: ICUs. PATIENTS: Patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy at initiation of angiotensin II or placebo (n = 45 and n = 60, respectively). INTERVENTIONS: IV angiotensin II or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary end point: survival through day 28; secondary outcomes included renal recovery through day 7 and increase in mean arterial pressure from baseline of ≥ 10 mm Hg or increase to ≥ 75 mm Hg at hour 3. Survival rates through day 28 were 53% (95% CI, 38%-67%) and 30% (95% CI, 19%-41%) in patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.012), respectively. By day 7, 38% (95% CI, 25%-54%) of angiotensin II patients discontinued RRT versus 15% (95% CI, 8%-27%) placebo (p = 0.007). Mean arterial pressure response was achieved in 53% (95% CI, 38%-68%) and 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%) of patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at study drug initiation, 28-day survival and mean arterial pressure response were higher, and rate of renal replacement therapy liberation was greater in the angiotensin II group versus the placebo group. These findings suggest that patients with vasodilatory shock and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy may preferentially benefit from angiotensin II.

Net ultrafiltration intensity and mortality in critically ill patients with fluid overload.

BACKGROUND: Although net ultrafiltration (UFNET) is frequently used for treatment of fluid overload in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, the optimal intensity of UFNET is unclear. Among critically ill patients with fluid overload receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT), we examined the association between UFNET intensity and risk-adjusted 1-year mortality. METHODS: We selected patients with fluid overload ≥ 5% of body weight prior to initiation of RRT from a large academic medical center ICU dataset. UFNET intensity was calculated as the net volume of fluid ultrafiltered per day from initiation of either continuous or intermittent RRT until the end of ICU stay adjusted for patient hospital admission body weight. We stratified UFNET as low (≤ 20 ml/kg/day), moderate (> 20 to ≤ 25 ml/kg/day) or high (> 25 ml/kg/day) intensity. We adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, race, surgery, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, oliguria, first RRT modality, pre-RRT fluid balance, duration of RRT, time to RRT initiation from ICU admission, APACHE III score, mechanical ventilation use, suspected sepsis, mean arterial pressure on day 1 of RRT, cumulative fluid balance during RRT and cumulative vasopressor dose during RRT. We fitted logistic regression for 1-year mortality, Gray's survival model and propensity matching to account for indication bias. RESULTS: Of 1075 patients, the distribution of high, moderate and low-intensity UFNET groups was 40.4%, 15.2% and 44.2% and 1-year mortality was 59.4% vs 60.2% vs 69.7%, respectively (p = 0.003). Using logistic regression, high-intensity compared with low-intensity UFNET was associated with lower mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.93, p = 0.02). Using Gray's model, high UFNET was associated with decreased mortality up to 39 days after ICU admission (adjusted hazard ratio range 0.50-0.73). After combining low and moderate-intensity UFNET groups (n = 258) and propensity matching with the high-intensity group (n = 258), UFNET intensity > 25 ml/kg/day compared with ≤ 25 ml/kg/day was associated with lower mortality (57% vs 67.8%, p = 0.01). Findings were robust to several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill patients with ≥ 5% fluid overload and receiving RRT, UFNET intensity > 25 ml/kg/day compared with ≤ 20 ml/kg/day was associated with lower 1-year risk-adjusted mortality. Whether tolerating intensive UFNET is just a marker for recovery or a mediator requires further research.

Effect of Human Recombinant Alkaline Phosphatase on 7-Day Creatinine Clearance in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) adversely affects long-term kidney outcomes and survival. Administration of the detoxifying enzyme alkaline phosphatase may improve kidney function and survival. Objective: To determine the optimal therapeutic dose, effect on kidney function, and adverse effects of a human recombinant alkaline phosphatase in patients who are critically ill with sepsis-associated AKI. Design, Setting, and Participants: The STOP-AKI trial was an international (53 recruiting sites), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, adaptive phase 2a/2b study in 301 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of sepsis and AKI. Patients were enrolled between December 2014 and May 2017, and follow-up was conducted for 90 days. The final date of follow-up was August 14, 2017. Interventions: In the intention-to-treat analysis, in part 1 of the trial, patients were randomized to receive recombinant alkaline phosphatase in a dosage of 0.4 mg/kg (n = 31), 0.8 mg/kg (n = 32), or 1.6 mg/kg (n = 29) or placebo (n = 30), once daily for 3 days, to establish the optimal dose. The optimal dose was identified as 1.6 mg/kg based on modeling approaches and adverse events. In part 2, 1.6 mg/kg (n = 82) was compared with placebo (n = 86). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the time-corrected area under the curve of the endogenous creatinine clearance for days 1 through 7, divided by 7 to provide a mean daily creatinine clearance (AUC1-7 ECC). Incidence of fatal and nonfatal (serious) adverse events ([S]AEs) was also determined. Results: Overall, 301 patients were enrolled (men, 70.7%; median age, 67 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 59-73]). From day 1 to day 7, median ECC increased from 26.0 mL/min (IQR, 8.8 to 59.5) to 65.4 mL/min (IQR, 26.7 to 115.4) in the recombinant alkaline phosphatase 1.6-mg/kg group vs from 35.9 mL/min (IQR, 12.2 to 82.9) to 61.9 mL/min (IQR, 22.7 to 115.2) in the placebo group (absolute difference, 9.5 mL/min [95% CI, -23.9 to 25.5]; P = .47). Fatal adverse events occurred in 26.3% of patients in the 0.4-mg/kg recombinant alkaline phosphatase group; 17.1% in the 0.8-mg/kg group, 17.4% in the 1.6-mg/kg group, and 29.5% in the placebo group. Rates of nonfatal SAEs were 21.0% for the 0.4-mg/kg recombinant alkaline phosphatase group, 14.3% for the 0.8-mg/kg group, 25.7% for the 1.6-mg/kg group, and 20.5% for the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who were critically ill with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury, human recombinant alkaline phosphatase compared with placebo did not significantly improve short-term kidney function. Further research is necessary to assess other clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02182440.

Both Positive and Negative Fluid Balance May Be Associated With Reduced Long-Term Survival in the Critically Ill.

OBJECTIVES: Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, exposure to positive fluid balance, compared with negative fluid balance, has been associated with mortality and impaired renal recovery. However, it is unclear whether positive and negative fluid balances are associated with poor outcome compared to patients with even fluid balance (euvolemia). In this study, we examined the association between exposure to positive or negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, on 1-year mortality and renal recovery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight medical-surgical ICUs at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients admitted between July 2000 and October 2008. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 18,084 patients, fluid balance was categorized as negative (< 0%), even (0% to < 5%), or positive (≥ 5%). Following propensity matching, positive fluid balance, compared with even or negative fluid balance, was associated with increased mortality (30.3% vs 21.1% vs 22%, respectively; p < 0.001). Using Gray's model, negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, was associated with lower short-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio range, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) but higher long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio range, 1.16-1.22; p = 0.004). Conversely, positive fluid balance was associated with higher mortality throughout 1-year (adjusted hazard ratio range, 1.30-1.92; p < 0.001), which was attenuated in those who received renal replacement therapy (positive fluid balance × renal replacement therapy interaction (adjusted hazard ratio range, 0.43-0.89; p < 0.001). Of patients receiving renal replacement therapy, neither positive (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.68-1.4) nor negative (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43-1.55) fluid balance was associated with renal recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill patients, exposure to positive or negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, was associated with higher 1-year mortality. This mortality risk associated with positive fluid balance, however, was attenuated by use of renal replacement therapy. We found no association between fluid balance and renal recovery.

Chloride Content of Fluids Used for Large-Volume Resuscitation Is Associated With Reduced Survival.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate if the chloride content of fluids used in resuscitation was associated with short- and long-term outcomes. DESIGN: We identified patients who received large-volume fluid resuscitation, defined as greater than 60 mL/kg over a 24-hour period. Chloride load was determined for each patient based on the chloride ion concentration of the fluids they received during large-volume fluid resuscitation multiplied by the volume of fluids. We compared the development of hyperchloremic acidosis, acute kidney injury, and survival among those with higher and lower chloride loads. SETTING: University Medical Center. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to ICUs from 2000 to 2008. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 4,710 patients receiving large-volume fluid resuscitation, hyperchloremic acidosis was documented in 523 (11%). Crude rates of hyperchloremic acidosis, acute kidney injury, and hospital mortality all increased significantly as chloride load increased (p < 0.001). However, chloride load was no longer associated with hyperchloremic acidosis or acute kidney injury after controlling for total fluids, age, and baseline severity. Conversely, each 100 mEq increase in chloride load was associated with a 5.5% increase in the hazard of death even after controlling for total fluid volume, age, and severity (p = 0.0015) over 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Chloride load is associated with significant adverse effects on survival out to 1 year even after controlling for total fluid load, age, and baseline severity of illness. However, the relationship between chloride load and development of hyperchloremic acidosis or acute kidney injury is less clear, and further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the adverse effects of chloride load on survival.